• UL reference?

    From Mark Shaw@mshaw@panix.com to alt.folklore.urban on Mon Mar 28 23:41:53 2022
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
    to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
    useful.

    Thanks-
    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm ========================================================================
    "All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From cbusylol@shinnokxz@gmail.com to alt.folklore.urban on Sun Apr 3 23:31:53 2022
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:41:54 PM UTC-6, Mark Shaw wrote:
    What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
    to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
    useful.

    Thanks-

    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm ======================================================================== "All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks

    There probably aren't a lot now that social media is a loudspeaker

    And social media networks aren't exactly designed or have instruments
    to find or archive much of anything that is posted- it's all now now now.

    All you need is one situation / video and 200 people retweeting out of
    context and bam, you have yourself a modern urban legend.

    This will likely never change since the majority of those that listen don't bother to do any sort of research, which all ULs tend to have in common
    and propagate through.

    Word of mouth spread is a lot less though (read: not through the keyboard)
    and there's all sorts of factors into that.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ray Depew@bishopdepew@gmail.com to alt.folklore.urban on Fri Jan 20 15:02:12 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:41:54 PM UTC-6, Mark Shaw wrote:
    What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
    to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
    useful.

    Thanks-

    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm ======================================================================== "All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks

    Wow, they're all gone.

    I just had a look at/for all of the old goto sites.

    * snopes.com, as you observed, is nothing like what it used to be.
    * Likewise, truthorfiction.com, while it's still there, hasn't been updated lately.
    * urbanlegends.about.com no longer exists, and typing in the URL takes you to a fluff page.
    * The grand old tafkac.org ("The Archive Formerly Known as Cathouse") is no more. The URL has been taken over by what looks like a business operating under the dot-org rubric instead of dot-com.
    * urbanlegends.com is a page selling stuff.
    * urbanlegends.org takes you to Arthur Goldstuck's UL blog, and it hasn't been updated since 2012.

    All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.

    --
    Regards
    Ray
    "It does not do to
    leave a live dragon out of
    your calculations."
    -- haiku by J. R. R. Tolkien
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From danny burstein@dannyb@panix.com to alt.folklore.urban on Fri Jan 20 23:28:54 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    In <66dc740d-bc0d-4f2a-bcdf-d9fcd9664534n@googlegroups.com> Ray Depew <bishopdepew@gmail.com> writes:

    On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:41:54 PM UTC-6, Mark Shaw wrote:
    What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
    to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
    useful.
    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
    ========================================================================

    Wow, they're all gone.

    I just had a look at/for all of the old goto sites.

    * snopes.com, as you observed, is nothing like what it used to be.

    [tales of woe snipped]

    All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.

    Not bad. Mr. Mark's query is March, 2022. I guess we'll hear
    from Ed Rice in another year or two...

    His doppleganger, an author based in California (I think...)
    has a bunch of books that might qualify. Or might be a
    good source of laughs, depending on your point of view.

    https://markshawbooks.com
    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Freeman@Don@cosmoslair.com to alt.folklore.urban on Wed Jan 25 12:40:35 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On 1/20/2023 4:02 PM, Ray Depew wrote:
    On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 5:41:54 PM UTC-6, Mark Shaw wrote:
    What's the go-to resource for debunking ULs these days? Snopes seems
    to have evolved into pure fact-checking, and I've found nothing else
    useful.

    Thanks-

    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
    ========================================================================
    "All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks

    Wow, they're all gone.

    I just had a look at/for all of the old goto sites.

    * snopes.com, as you observed, is nothing like what it used to be.
    * Likewise, truthorfiction.com, while it's still there, hasn't been updated lately.
    * urbanlegends.about.com no longer exists, and typing in the URL takes you to a fluff page.
    * The grand old tafkac.org ("The Archive Formerly Known as Cathouse") is no more. The URL has been taken over by what looks like a business operating under the dot-org rubric instead of dot-com.
    * urbanlegends.com is a page selling stuff.
    * urbanlegends.org takes you to Arthur Goldstuck's UL blog, and it hasn't been updated since 2012.

    All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.


    There the subreddit r/UrbanMyths though it does seem to be mainly
    recounting ghost stories.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Freeman@Don@cosmoslair.com to alt.folklore.urban on Wed Jan 25 12:46:23 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On 1/25/2023 12:40 PM, Don Freeman wrote:


    There the subreddit r/UrbanMyths though it does seem to be mainly
    recounting ghost stories.


    There is also r/UrbanLegends but it is the same as the one above.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ptomblin+netnews@ptomblin+netnews@xcski.com (Paul Tomblin) to alt.folklore.urban on Tue Jan 31 18:20:51 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    In a previous article, Ray Depew <bishopdepew@gmail.com> said:
    All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.

    As are those of us who created them.
    --
    Paul Tomblin <ptomblin@xcski.com> http://blog.xcski.com/
    God is real, unless declared as an integer.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lee Rudolph@lrudolph381@gmail.com to alt.folklore.urban on Sun Feb 19 18:16:47 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 1:20:53 PM UTC-5, Paul Tomblin wrote:
    In a previous article, Ray Depew <bisho...@gmail.com> said:
    All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.
    As are those of us who created them.

    Speak for yourself. I am crumbling to ashes.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From tmcd@tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) to alt.folklore.urban on Sun Feb 26 21:34:31 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    In article <33517428-54e5-49b9-8c03-1df97ddbec41n@googlegroups.com>,
    Lee Rudolph <lrudolph381@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 1:20:53 PM UTC-5, Paul Tomblin wrote:
    In a previous article, Ray Depew <bisho...@gmail.com> said:
    All the sparkling edifices of the 1990s and 2000s are crumbling to dust.
    As are those of us who created them.

    Speak for yourself. I am crumbling to ashes.

    Power Off options: please choose one.

    [ ] Ashes to ashes
    [ ] Funk to funky
    [ ] Dust to dust
    [ ] All flesh is grass
    [ ] A spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire
    [ ] Other (please detail in 16 characters or fewer)
    --
    Tim McDaniel, tmcd@panix.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2