• Re: Plagiarism

    From Lafe@lafe@lafes.newlafe.net to alt.folklore.urban on Sat Aug 21 04:42:38 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On 2021-08-14, Jay Furr <jfurr@furrs.org> wrote:
    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said, is
    anyone out there?

    I got emails today from the staff at snopes.com informing me that
    snopes himself has gotten in major hot water for plagiarizing lots and
    lots of news stories and not giving credit, and that he's been
    suspended from all creative access to the site.

    I'm surprised and disappointed. I was wondering if others had any
    more profound or interesting reactions.

    I'm here, and I'm even new. I used to lurk here long ago, and decided to
    see how NNTP was doing again.

    I'm afraid I don't have anything else to offer as far as a reaction to
    the news.

    Lafe

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lee Rudolph@lrudolph381@gmail.com to alt.folklore.urban on Sat Aug 21 05:30:41 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 9:11:01 PM UTC-4, Jay Furr wrote:
    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said, is anyone out there?

    I'm out here. I may or may not be essentially dead. And I too would be interested in profound or interesting reactions...

    Lee "NMI" Rudolph
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From drew@drew@furrfu.invalid (Drew Lawson) to alt.folklore.urban on Sat Aug 21 16:18:11 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    In article <slrnsi111u.h5o.lafe@lafelet.lafes.net>
    Lafe <lafe@lafes.newlafe.net> writes:
    On 2021-08-14, Jay Furr <jfurr@furrs.org> wrote:
    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said, is
    anyone out there?

    I got emails today from the staff at snopes.com informing me that
    snopes himself has gotten in major hot water for plagiarizing lots and
    lots of news stories and not giving credit, and that he's been
    suspended from all creative access to the site.

    I'm surprised and disappointed. I was wondering if others had any
    more profound or interesting reactions.

    I'm here, and I'm even new. I used to lurk here long ago, and decided to
    see how NNTP was doing again.

    NNTP is going gangbusters these days.

    Unfortunately, and appropriate to this thread, that is mostly
    copyright violations in alt.binaries.*.

    I'm afraid I don't have anything else to offer as far as a reaction to
    the news.

    Lafe

    --
    |Drew Lawson | Mrs. Tweedy! |
    | | The chickens are revolting! |
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hastings@hastings@yahoo.com to alt.folklore.urban,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate on Sun Nov 21 06:15:37 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On 13 Aug 2021, Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> posted some news:sf7eql$5gr$1@reader1.panix.com:

    Jay Furr <jfurr@furrs.org> wrote:

    [reformatted for linefeeds]

    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said,
    is anyone out there?

    Yep, a few of us.

    I got emails today from the staff at snopes.com informing me that
    snopes himself has gotten in major hot water for plagiarizing lots
    and lots of news stories and not giving credit, and that he's been
    suspended from all creative access to the site.

    I'm surprised and disappointed. I was wondering if others had any
    more profound or interesting reactions.

    It's been in the news. I'm also a bit surprised, but it is what it
    is.

    The downside is that, despite the (somewhat deserved) popular
    perception of bias on the part of snopes.com, they've been pretty
    well consistently a gold-plated source for details one can cite to
    combat {d|m}isinformation. This event will damage their credibility
    in the eyes of many. This is a pretty bad thing, in that it will
    introduce even more friction in the machinery of internet discourse.

    Indeed it has.

    From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
    Message-ID: <sn9jg3$njg$16@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 01:37:08 -0000 (UTC)

    "I searched Snopes high and low for any reference to this and found
    nothing."

    That isn't proof, kook.

    From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
    Message-ID: <snbk6h$cmu$8@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:01:22 -0000 (UTC)

    SMH... snopes is run by former usenet trolls.

    Proof, kook?

    Rookie troll Nadegda's lack of Usenet historical knowledge and inability
    to use Bing or google noted and recorded.

    In 1994 David and Barbara Mikkelson created Urban Legends Reference Pages,
    an urban folklore website that was later renamed Snopes.com.

    David Mikkelson had originally adopted the username "Snopes" (the name of
    a family of often unpleasant people in the works of William Faulkner) as a username in the Usenet newsgroup alt.folklore.urban.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kyle Rittenhouse - NOT GUILTY!@thewitcher@outlook.com to alt.folklore.urban,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate on Sun Nov 21 23:14:32 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    In article <XnsADE8E272CEEBC2021@0.0.0.0>
    Hastings <hastings@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 13 Aug 2021, Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> posted some news:sf7eql$5gr$1@reader1.panix.com:

    Jay Furr <jfurr@furrs.org> wrote:

    [reformatted for linefeeds]

    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said,
    is anyone out there?

    Yep, a few of us.

    I got emails today from the staff at snopes.com informing me that
    snopes himself has gotten in major hot water for plagiarizing lots
    and lots of news stories and not giving credit, and that he's been
    suspended from all creative access to the site.

    I'm surprised and disappointed. I was wondering if others had any
    more profound or interesting reactions.

    It's been in the news. I'm also a bit surprised, but it is what it
    is.

    The downside is that, despite the (somewhat deserved) popular
    perception of bias on the part of snopes.com, they've been pretty
    well consistently a gold-plated source for details one can cite to
    combat {d|m}isinformation. This event will damage their credibility
    in the eyes of many. This is a pretty bad thing, in that it will
    introduce even more friction in the machinery of internet discourse.

    Indeed it has.

    From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
    Message-ID: <sn9jg3$njg$16@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 01:37:08 -0000 (UTC)

    "I searched Snopes high and low for any reference to this and found
    nothing."

    That isn't proof, kook.

    From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
    Message-ID: <snbk6h$cmu$8@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:01:22 -0000 (UTC)

    SMH... snopes is run by former usenet trolls.

    Proof, kook?

    Rookie troll Nadegda's lack of Usenet historical knowledge and inability
    to use Bing or google noted and recorded.

    In 1994 David and Barbara Mikkelson created Urban Legends Reference Pages,
    an urban folklore website that was later renamed Snopes.com.

    David Mikkelson had originally adopted the username "Snopes" (the name of
    a family of often unpleasant people in the works of William Faulkner) as a username in the Usenet newsgroup alt.folklore.urban.

    Lol!

    _____
    / ___|
    \ `--.
    `--. \
    /\__/ /
    \____/


    ______
    | ___ \
    | |_/ /
    | __/
    | |
    \_|


    ___
    / _ \
    / /_\ \
    | _ |
    | | | |
    \_| |_/


    _ _
    | \ | |
    | \| |
    | . ` |
    | |\ |
    \_| \_/


    _ __
    | | / /
    | |/ /
    | \
    | |\ \
    \_| \_/


    _
    | |
    | |
    | |
    |_|
    (_)

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From briang@briang@panix.com (Brian Gordon) to alt.folklore.urban,talk.politics.guns,alt.checkmate on Sun Nov 21 23:25:01 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    I lost faith in Snopes a few years back. The Democrat National Convention had no US flags on stage on day 1. I watched part of it live and there were no flags visible. When Snopes was asked why they were missing, the answer was that they were NOT missing and an image was shown as proof. The image, however,
    was of the stage on day 2 - I watched that, too. Months later, that had still not been retracted or corrected, and I had to downgrade my opinion of Snopes. -- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ | Brian Gordon -->briang@panix.com<-- brian dot gordon at cox dot net | + bgordon@aol.com Bass: NSC Frank Thorne + ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Shaw@mshaw@panix.com to alt.folklore.urban on Mon Nov 22 16:07:51 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    In alt.folklore.urban Brian Gordon <briang@panix.com> wrote:

    [Non-AFU groups blasted; I mean, c'mon]

    I lost faith in Snopes a few years back. The Democrat National Convention had
    no US flags on stage on day 1. I watched part of it live and there were no flags visible. When Snopes was asked why they were missing, the answer was that they were NOT missing and an image was shown as proof. The image, however,
    was of the stage on day 2 - I watched that, too. Months later, that had still
    not been retracted or corrected, and I had to downgrade my opinion of Snopes.

    The bias is there, certainly. For example, if you check Snopes for "Rittenhouse" today (topicality alert) you'll find a bunch of news
    stories (why Snopes feels it's necessary for them to report the
    news and not stick to ULs is beyond me) and some debunking of minor
    claims, but nothing at all about the lies that were reported and
    repeated about Rittenhouse himself or his motives.

    This is a shame, because there are some questions outstanding. I
    originally went there not so I could make a point here, but rather
    to check on something I'd seen on social media: that the property
    he went to Kenosha to protect was owned by his grandparents. I
    still don't know if that's a credible claim or not.

    What it means in the larger equation is that Snopes is not the
    one-stop shopping it once was. However incomplete their offering
    is, however, they still do good work and I'll still check them
    first for most questionable claims I see out in the wild.
    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm ========================================================================
    "All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lee Ayrton@layrton455@gmail.com to alt.folklore.urban on Sun Dec 19 15:45:26 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On Saturday, August 21, 2021 at 8:30:42 AM UTC-4, Lee Rudolph wrote:
    On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 9:11:01 PM UTC-4, Jay Furr wrote:
    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said, is anyone out there?
    I'm out here. I may or may not be essentially dead. And I too would be interested in profound or interesting reactions...

    Lee "NMI" Rudolph


    I too seem to be not yet dead. I may even start reading here semi-regularly. --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas Prufer@prufer.public@mnet-online.de.invalid to alt.folklore.urban on Mon Dec 20 09:27:51 2021
    From Newsgroup: alt.folklore.urban

    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:45:26 -0800 (PST), Lee Ayrton <layrton455@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, August 21, 2021 at 8:30:42 AM UTC-4, Lee Rudolph wrote:
    On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 9:11:01 PM UTC-4, Jay Furr wrote:
    I know that alt.folklore.urban is essentially dead, but that said, is anyone out there?
    I'm out here. I may or may not be essentially dead. And I too would be interested in profound or interesting reactions...

    Lee "NMI" Rudolph


    I too seem to be not yet dead. I may even start reading here semi-regularly.

    I'll post the AFU eggnog recipe. Or is that reference enough already?


    Thomas "internym" Prufer
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2