From Newsgroup: alt.fan.usenet

On 6/14/25 02:05, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@panix.com> wrote:

"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that
many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users
largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."

https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false

Ironically, Paul has posted something he didn't write.

Ironically, we replied.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.fan.usenet

On 9/26/25 2:42 PM, sjoz wrote:

On 6/14/25 02:05, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@panix.com> wrote:

"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that >>> many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users
largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."

https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false

Ironically, Paul has posted something he didn't write.

Ironically, we replied.

I think I feel called out. I love science.

--
Pranav
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.fan.usenet

"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that
many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users
largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."

https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false

--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.fan.usenet

Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@panix.com> wrote:

"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that
many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users
largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."

https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false

Ironically, Paul has posted something he didn't write.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.fan.usenet

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@panix.com> wrote:

"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that >many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users >largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."

https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false

Ironically, Paul has posted something he didn't write.

heh.
--
^-^. Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS My pet rock Gordon just is.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2