rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-its-bases-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local
power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now. The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho.
1.2 MW each. Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck. Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
Uses
5% U-235. I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and >installation.
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-its-bases-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local
power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now. The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho.
Highly unlikely to happen by 2028, probably not until much later,
if at all.
"Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor
Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department
of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army. Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
"While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'"
"This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost,
and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat edge,
Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/microreactor-pilot-reaches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each. Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck. Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy. It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses. He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are-worrying-the-world
Uses
5% U-235. I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and
installation.
10 times that is more likely. Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about. While LEU doesn't have the proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-its-bases-b
y-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local
power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now. The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho.
1.2 MW each. Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck. Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
Uses
5% U-235. I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and installation.
Of course, these are Shipstones. Heinlein fans will recognize the term.
I wonder if these will be downsized enough so that I can buy a 20 kW
unit for $100,000 for my home.
Hat tip to:
https://thelibertydaily.com/
Lynn
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-its-bases
-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now. The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho.
Highly unlikely to happen by 2028, probably not until much later,
if at all.
"Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department
of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army. Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
"While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'"
"This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost,
and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat edge,
Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/microreactor-pilot-rea
ches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each. Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck. Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy. It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses.
He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are-worrying-
the-world
Uses
5% U-235. I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and installation.
10 times that is more likely. Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about.
While LEU doesn't have the
proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
On 10/24/2025 4:32 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-its-base
s-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now. The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho.
Highly unlikely to happen by 2028, probably not until much later,
if at all.
"Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department
of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army. Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
"While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'"
"This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost,
and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat edge, Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/microreactor-pilot-r
eaches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each. Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck. Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy. It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses. He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are-worryin
g-the-world
Uses
5% U-235. I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and installation.
10 times that is more likely. Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about. While LEU doesn't have the proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
Your TDS is showing.
Helium is not in short supply.
I can buy cans of it at many stores for
blowing up balloons.
Lynn
On 10/24/2025 4:32 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCYHighly unlikely to happen by 2028,-a probably not until much later,
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-
its-bases-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local
power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now.-a The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho. >>
if at all.
-a-a "Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
-a-a-a Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor
-a-a-a Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department
-a-a-a of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
-a-a-a nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
-a-a-a than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army.-a Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
-a-a "While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
-a-a-a do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'"
-a-a "This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost, >> -a-a-a and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat edge, >> -a-a-a Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
-a-a https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/
microreactor-pilot-reaches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each.-a Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck.-a Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy.-a It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses.-a He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are-
worrying-the-world
Uses
5% U-235.-a I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and
installation.
10 times that is more likely.-a Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about.-a While LEU doesn't have the
proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
Your TDS is showing.
Helium is not in short supply.-a I can buy cans of it at many stores for blowing up balloons.
On 10/24/2025 6:00 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 10/24/2025 4:32 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-
its-bases-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local >>>> power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now.-a The demo unit comes online in 2026 in
Idaho.
Highly unlikely to happen by 2028,-a probably not until much later,
if at all.
-a-a "Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
-a-a-a Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor >>> -a-a-a Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department >>> -a-a-a of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
-a-a-a nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
-a-a-a than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army.-a Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
-a-a "While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
-a-a-a do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'" >>>
-a-a "This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost, >>> -a-a-a and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat
edge,
-a-a-a Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
-a-a https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/
microreactor-pilot-reaches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each.-a Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck.-a Uses >>>> helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy.-a It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses.-a He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are-
worrying-the-world
Uses
5% U-235.-a I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and >>>> installation.
10 times that is more likely.-a Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about.-a While LEU doesn't have the
proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
Your TDS is showing.
Helium is not in short supply.-a I can buy cans of it at many stores
for blowing up balloons.
The price has tripled since 2018.
pt
I wonder if these will be downsized enough so that I can buy a 20 kW
unit for $100,000 for my home.
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
A nucleus consisting of two protons an two neutrons, passing through
a blood stream at high energy. Generally not considered healthy.
On Oct 25, 2025, Thomas Koenig wrote
(in article <10dhvus$35i3g$3@dont-email.me>):
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
A nucleus consisting of two protons an two neutrons, passing through
a blood stream at high energy. Generally not considered healthy.
Also known as He-4 nucleus. Alphas are the most common form of radioactivity.
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
On Oct 25, 2025, Thomas Koenig wrote
(in article <10dhvus$35i3g$3@dont-email.me>):
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
A nucleus consisting of two protons an two neutrons, passing through
a blood stream at high energy. Generally not considered healthy.
Also known as He-4 nucleus. Alphas are the most common form of radioactivity.
Why does it have to be bloody, though?
On 10/24/2025 10:06 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
On 10/24/2025 6:00 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
1.2 MW each.-a Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck.-a Uses >>>>> helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy.-a It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses.-a He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are- >>>> worrying-the-world
Uses
5% U-235.-a I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and >>>>> installation.
10 times that is more likely.-a Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about.-a While LEU doesn't have the
proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
Your TDS is showing.
Helium is not in short supply.-a I can buy cans of it at many stores
for blowing up balloons.
The price has tripled since 2018.
pt
Everything in the USA has doubled or tripled since 2018.
On 10/25/2025 4:48 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
On Oct 25, 2025, Thomas Koenig wrote
(in article <10dhvus$35i3g$3@dont-email.me>):
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
A nucleus consisting of two protons an two neutrons, passing through
a blood stream at high energy. Generally not considered healthy.
Also known as He-4 nucleus. Alphas are the most common form of
radioactivity.
Why does it have to be bloody, though?
Because it makes you bleed internally?
On 10/24/2025 10:06 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote:No.
On 10/24/2025 6:00 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 10/24/2025 4:32 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
oArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028o
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to- >>>>> its-bases-by-2028
oThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local >>>>> power grids to energize its most critical installations.o
Um, that is Real Soon Now.a The demo unit comes online in 2026 in
Idaho.
Highly unlikely to happen by 2028,a probably not until much later,
if at all.
aa "Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
aaa Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor
aaa Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department
aaa of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
aaa nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
aaa than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army.a Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
aa "While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
aaa do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'" >>>>
aa "This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost, >>>> aaa and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat
edge,
aaa Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
aa https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/
microreactor-pilot-reaches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each.a Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck.a Uses >>>>> helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy.a It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses.a He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250331-why-helium-shortages-are- >>>> worrying-the-world
Uses
5% U-235.a I am guessing a cost of $25 million each plus delivery and >>>>> installation.
10 times that is more likely.a Then there are waste storage and
disposal issues to be concerned about.a While LEU doesn't have the
proliferation dangers that HEU does, the waste is still deadly.
Your TDS is showing.
Helium is not in short supply.a I can buy cans of it at many stores
for blowing up balloons.
The price has tripled since 2018.
pt
Everything in the USA has doubled or tripled since 2018.
On Oct 25, 2025, Thomas Koenig wroteimmediately what you were asking.
(in article <10dhvus$35i3g$3@dont-email.me>):
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
A nucleus consisting of two protons an two neutrons, passing through
a blood stream at high energy. Generally not considered healthy.
Also known as He-4 nucleus. Alphas are the most common form of radioactivity. You know, when your post above finally appeared in Agent, I knew
On Oct 24, 2025, Scott Lurndal wrote
(in article <sfSKQ.1200021$Jgh9.154348@fx15.iad>):
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
rCLArmy To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028rCY
https://www.twz.com/nuclear/army-to-bring-nuclear-microreactors-to-its-bases
-by-2028
rCLThe Army is highly concerned about its near total reliance on local
power grids to energize its most critical installations.rCY
Um, that is Real Soon Now. The demo unit comes online in 2026 in Idaho.
Highly unlikely to happen by 2028, probably not until much later,
if at all.
"Janus is the Army's plan to realize President Orange Clown's
Executive Order 14299, titled 'Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactor
Technologies for National Security,' which directs the Department
of War[sic. Defense] to commence operation of an Army-regulated
nuclear reactor at a domestic military installation no later
than September 30, 2028."
All they need to do to satisfy this requirement is to transfer
control of one of the test reactors in Utah to the Army. Indeed,
the plan you are touting is for reactors at domestic bases only.
"While Pele is developmentally interesting, Waksman said, 'We
do not at this time see nuclear power as a tactical application.'"
"This is largely because tactical reactor development drives up cost,
and there is currently no need for megawatt power at the combat edge,
Waksman explained."
The air force has been working on a micro reactor at Eilson AFB since
2021, but haven't yet issued a contract to actually build it.
https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Display/Article/4213214/microreactor-pilot-rea
ches-major-project-milestone/
1.2 MW each. Can be delivered on a skid by airplane or truck. Uses
helium for the primary coolant which does not become radioactive.
The He needs to be cooled, which costs energy. It also requires
specialized (read expensive) piping to prevent losses.
this is a MAJOR problem.
He is
actually rather scarce at the moment.
Helium is not in short supply. I can buy cans of it at many stores for >blowing up balloons.
On 10/25/25 08:31, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 10/25/2025 4:48 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
On Oct 25, 2025, Thomas Koenig wrote
(in article <10dhvus$35i3g$3@dont-email.me>):
WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> schrieb:
I wonder what a bloody alpha particle is...
A nucleus consisting of two protons an two neutrons, passing through >>>>> a blood stream at high energy. Generally not considered healthy.
Also known as He-4 nucleus. Alphas are the most common form of
radioactivity.
Why does it have to be bloody, though?
Because it makes you bleed internally?
Only if you ingest it.
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Helium is not in short supply. I can buy cans of it at many stores for >>blowing up balloons.
Although the shortage is not as bad as it was five or six years ago
before the US started selling off the helium reserves, the prices are
still high and most companies will sell only a limited amount at a time. Really annoying for people who do weather balloons.
BUT... there is a solution, and it's nuclear power since it's a decay
product of uranium and thorium.
the no-nuke-kooks vastly exaggerate this. The main danger from reactor-grade uranium/plutonium is that theyrCOre heavy metals and therefore extremely toxic, and they also burn real good once you ignite them. Reactor-grade kicks mostly alphas. Alphas get stopped by a sheet of cardboard. You do want to keep heavy metals away from ground water.
On 10/24/2025 6:34 PM, WolfFan wrote:
the no-nuke-kooks vastly exaggerate this. The main danger from reactor-grade >> uranium/plutonium is that theyrCOre heavy metals and therefore extremely
toxic, and they also burn real good once you ignite them. Reactor-grade kicks
mostly alphas. Alphas get stopped by a sheet of cardboard. You do want to
keep heavy metals away from ground water.
That's a dangerous simplification.
In 1962, the United States successfully detonated a low yield (< 20kt)
nuke built with reactor grade plutonium.
Production of helium is around 30000 tons a year. The amount you could
get from nuclear power is _far_ less. Do the math (and don't forget to
put in the molar mass of He and U, respectively). Hint: It's not
enough.
It would also be an interesting problem to retrofit nuclear power plants
for He collection...
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> schrieb:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Helium is not in short supply. I can buy cans of it at many stores for
blowing up balloons.
Although the shortage is not as bad as it was five or six years ago
before the US started selling off the helium reserves, the prices are
still high and most companies will sell only a limited amount at a time.
Really annoying for people who do weather balloons.
BUT... there is a solution, and it's nuclear power since it's a decay
product of uranium and thorium.
Production of helium is around 30000 tons a year. The amount you could
get from nuclear power is _far_ less. Do the math (and don't forget to
put in the molar mass of He and U, respectively). Hint: It's not
enough.
It would also be an interesting problem to retrofit nuclear power plants
for He collection...
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
Production of helium is around 30000 tons a year. The amount you could
get from nuclear power is _far_ less. Do the math (and don't forget to
put in the molar mass of He and U, respectively). Hint: It's not
enough.
Yes, given cureent use.
It would also be an interesting problem to retrofit nuclear power plants
for He collection...
THAT is where it would start to get interesting, yes. Use every part of
the pig!
--scott
Michael Benveniste <mhb@murkyether.com> schrieb:
On 10/24/2025 6:34 PM, WolfFan wrote:
the no-nuke-kooks vastly exaggerate this. The main danger from reactor-grade
uranium/plutonium is that theyrCOre heavy metals and therefore extremely >>> toxic, and they also burn real good once you ignite them. Reactor-grade kicks
mostly alphas. Alphas get stopped by a sheet of cardboard. You do want to >>> keep heavy metals away from ground water.
That's a dangerous simplification.
In 1962, the United States successfully detonated a low yield (< 20kt)
nuke built with reactor grade plutonium.
Source?
On 10/26/2025 10:25 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Michael Benveniste <mhb@murkyether.com> schrieb:
On 10/24/2025 6:34 PM, WolfFan wrote:
the no-nuke-kooks vastly exaggerate this. The main danger from reactor-grade
uranium/plutonium is that theyrCOre heavy metals and therefore extremely >>>> toxic, and they also burn real good once you ignite them. Reactor-grade kicks
mostly alphas. Alphas get stopped by a sheet of cardboard. You do want to >>>> keep heavy metals away from ground water.
That's a dangerous simplification.
In 1962, the United States successfully detonated a low yield (< 20kt)
nuke built with reactor grade plutonium.
Source?
https://www.osti.gov/opennet/forms?formurl=document/press/pc29.html
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:45:34 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
6 files (8,794K bytes) |
| Messages: | 184,914 |
| Posted today: | 1 |