From Newsgroup: alt.english.usage
yoylelandGuy to Anton Shepelev:
IMHO, `newby' in the sense of `newbie' is simply wrong,
because this noun-forming suffix is strictly -ie, eg.
Ah, that makes sense. It must be a rare form of the term
since I've only seen one occurrence of that spelling before.
Beare that often rare occurences are vulgar distortions that
have failed supplant correct forms. For example, the abominable
"different than/to" dates back the 17th century, but has always
remaned a rarity. It is easy understand why it is wrong. One
need only consider its origin from the verb /to differ/. To
quote my own e-mail a week ago:
to differ from -- different from
to diverge from -- divergent from
to depend (up)on -- dependent (up)on
to attend (up)on -- attendant (up)on
to coincide with -- coincident with
&c.
`different to' is obviously a vulgar error due rather to
ignorance of the language, than love for it. It is not a
genuine improvement or even a neutral change. In
biological terms, it is a bad mutation.
The word `Newby' looks like a toponym to me, similar to
(A stop at) Willoughby.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2