• [PROPOSAL] alt.ukr.binaries

    From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Sat May 13 21:20:51 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.ukr.binaries Binaries Ukraine

    CHARTER: alt.ukr.binaries provides a place to share binaries between Ukrainians.

    JUSTIFICATION:

    There's literally no dedicated group to share binaries related to Ukraine (e.g. movies with Ukrainian dubs/subs). Should be at least one.

    Thank you for your consideration.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Sat May 13 21:28:47 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.ukr.binaries Binaries Ukraine

    No one will create this group with this name.

    It's alt.binaries.*

    Why are you abbreviating?

    Fix the description.

    CHARTER: alt.ukr.binaries provides a place to share binaries between >Ukrainians.

    Does anyone in Ukraine have access to a binary Usenet server?

    JUSTIFICATION:

    There's literally no dedicated group to share binaries related to Ukraine >(e.g. movies with Ukrainian dubs/subs). Should be at least one.

    That's literally nonsense that doesn't belong in a proposal. That's not
    what Justification means.

    Thank you for your consideration.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam Clothier@invalid@invalid.net to alt.config on Sat May 13 22:40:00 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On 13/05/2023 22:20, Ukie wrote:

    There's literally no dedicated group to share binaries related to Ukraine (e.g. movies with Ukrainian dubs/subs). Should be at least one.



    I get many binaries in my email account of Ukrainian women looking for
    sugar daddy. Is that not enough?

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/Adzcloth/
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Sat May 13 22:53:28 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:28:47 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.ukr.binaries Binaries Ukraine

    No one will create this group with this name.

    It's alt.binaries.*

    Why are you abbreviating?

    Fix the description.
    Ok.

    ---

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Dedicated group for binaries related to Ukraine

    CHARTER: The purpose of this newsgroup is to offer a dedicated forum to exchange files targeted for Ukrainians and those who are interested in Ukrainian language and culture. Acceptable post will include, for example, Ukrainian classical movies, movies/anime with Ukrainian dubs/subs,
    Ukrainian music, software with Ukrainian localization, etc.

    Unmarked off-topic materials, advertising (spam), excessive posting,
    cancel attacks, virus infected binaries, and abusive cross postings are prohibited.

    JUSTIFICATION:

    No group exists to share binaries related to Ukraine (e.g. movies with Ukrainian dub, recordings of Ukrainian songs and so on), while interest in Ukraine is growing (alt.current-events.ukraine is the second most popular group in alt.current-events.* hierarchy, right after alt.current-
    events.usa).

    There should be at least one binary newsgroup with focus on Ukraine.



    ---
    I abbreviated, because I saw alt.ukr.* and ukr.* and thought a new group should fit
    into them. Should I create a new thread?


    CHARTER: alt.ukr.binaries provides a place to share binaries between >>Ukrainians.

    Does anyone in Ukraine have access to a binary Usenet server?


    I am from Ukraine and I want to upload movies with Ukrainian subs/dubs. Uploaded something in non-binary Ukrainian group, but it doesn't feel
    proper.

    JUSTIFICATION:

    There's literally no dedicated group to share binaries related to
    Ukraine (e.g. movies with Ukrainian dubs/subs). Should be at least one.

    That's literally nonsense that doesn't belong in a proposal. That's not
    what Justification means.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Sat May 13 23:11:10 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:28:47 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.ukr.binaries Binaries Ukraine

    No one will create this group with this name.

    It's alt.binaries.*

    Why are you abbreviating?

    Fix the description.

    Ok.

    ---

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Dedicated group for binaries related to Ukraine

    Description is for a phrase with additional key words that don't repeat
    words from the group name. None of those words are key words, and you
    don't repeat "Ukraine" as it already comes up in the search.

    CHARTER: The purpose of this newsgroup is to offer a dedicated forum to >exchange files targeted for Ukrainians and those who are interested in >Ukrainian language and culture. Acceptable post will include, for example, >Ukrainian classical movies, movies/anime with Ukrainian dubs/subs,
    Ukrainian music, software with Ukrainian localization, etc.

    Unmarked off-topic materials, advertising (spam), excessive posting,
    cancel attacks, virus infected binaries, and abusive cross postings are >prohibited.

    Don't bother with boilerplate.

    JUSTIFICATION:

    No group exists to share binaries related to Ukraine (e.g. movies with >Ukrainian dub, recordings of Ukrainian songs and so on), while interest in >Ukraine is growing (alt.current-events.ukraine is the second most popular >group in alt.current-events.* hierarchy, right after alt.current- >events.usa).

    There should be at least one binary newsgroup with focus on Ukraine.

    This isn't what justification means, which is a count. Just skip it.

    ---
    I abbreviated, because I saw alt.ukr.* and ukr.* and thought a new group >should fit
    into them. Should I create a new thread?

    No

    CHARTER: alt.ukr.binaries provides a place to share binaries between >>>Ukrainians.

    Does anyone in Ukraine have access to a binary Usenet server?

    I am from Ukraine and I want to upload movies with Ukrainian subs/dubs. >Uploaded something in non-binary Ukrainian group, but it doesn't feel >proper.

    You must not upload binaries into text newsgroups.

    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers
    these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    Text-only Usenet news servers do not create binary newsgroups,
    especially ones that are meant for movies.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Sat May 13 23:37:32 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Sat, 13 May 2023 23:11:10 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:28:47 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.ukr.binaries Binaries Ukraine

    No one will create this group with this name.

    It's alt.binaries.*

    Why are you abbreviating?

    Fix the description.

    Ok.

    ---

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Dedicated group for binaries related to Ukraine

    Description is for a phrase with additional key words that don't repeat
    words from the group name. None of those words are key words, and you
    don't repeat "Ukraine" as it already comes up in the search.


    Oh, got it. Probably this would be better.

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Movies, music, e-books in Ukrainian, software with Ukrainian localization

    CHARTER: The purpose of this newsgroup is to offer a dedicated forum to >>exchange files targeted for Ukrainians and those who are interested in >>Ukrainian language and culture. Acceptable post will include, for
    example,
    Ukrainian classical movies, movies/anime with Ukrainian dubs/subs, >>Ukrainian music, software with Ukrainian localization, etc.

    Unmarked off-topic materials, advertising (spam), excessive posting,
    cancel attacks, virus infected binaries, and abusive cross postings are >>prohibited.

    Don't bother with boilerplate.

    JUSTIFICATION:

    No group exists to share binaries related to Ukraine (e.g. movies with >>Ukrainian dub, recordings of Ukrainian songs and so on), while interest
    in Ukraine is growing (alt.current-events.ukraine is the second most >>popular group in alt.current-events.* hierarchy, right after
    alt.current- events.usa).

    There should be at least one binary newsgroup with focus on Ukraine.

    This isn't what justification means, which is a count. Just skip it.

    ---
    I abbreviated, because I saw alt.ukr.* and ukr.* and thought a new group >>should fit into them. Should I create a new thread?

    No

    CHARTER: alt.ukr.binaries provides a place to share binaries between >>>>Ukrainians.

    Does anyone in Ukraine have access to a binary Usenet server?

    I am from Ukraine and I want to upload movies with Ukrainian subs/dubs. >>Uploaded something in non-binary Ukrainian group, but it doesn't feel >>proper.

    You must not upload binaries into text newsgroups.

    Well, some of them have "binaries" in their names, e.g. ukr.comp.binaries.
    But of course, I won't do that anymore.


    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers
    these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    Text-only Usenet news servers do not create binary newsgroups,
    especially ones that are meant for movies.

    I use a binary server provider from Europe. I guess, it's fine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Sun May 14 00:30:03 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Movies, music, e-books in Ukrainian, software with >Ukrainian localization

    Keep it under 80 characters.
    group.name<tab>description
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous@anonymous@mail.invalid to alt.config on Sun May 14 07:59:33 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Sun, 14 May 2023 00:30:03 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Movies, music, e-books in Ukrainian, software with >>Ukrainian localization

    Keep it under 80 characters. group.name<tab>description

    Ok, so this should work:

    alt.binaries.ukraine Movies, music, e-books, software in Ukrainian
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Sun May 14 12:23:54 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Anonymous <anonymous@mail.invalid> wrote:
    On Sun, 14 May 2023 00:30:03 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    For your newsgroups file:
    alt.binaries.ukraine Movies, music, e-books in Ukrainian, software with >>>Ukrainian localization

    Keep it under 80 characters. group.name<tab>description

    Ok, so this should work:

    alt.binaries.ukraine Movies, music, e-books, software in Ukrainian

    Ok. Don't send the newgroup message anonymously.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jesse Rehmer@jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com to alt.config on Sun May 14 13:50:06 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On May 13, 2023 at 6:11:10 PM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers
    these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    A lot more than you seem to think, certainly a lot more than a handful. While they aren't published neatly on Top1000, I would argue there are more servers involved than exchanging binaries than there are servers exchanging text articles. You just don't see them from your view point of Usenet.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Sun May 14 16:29:09 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote:
    On May 13, 2023 at 6:11:10 PM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers >>these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    A lot more than you seem to think, certainly a lot more than a handful. While >they aren't published neatly on Top1000, I would argue there are more servers >involved than exchanging binaries than there are servers exchanging text >articles. You just don't see them from your view point of Usenet.

    That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) to alt.config on Mon May 15 09:32:19 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    There's literally no dedicated group to share binaries related to Ukraine (e.g. movies with Ukrainian dubs/subs). Should be at least one.

    On news.tambov.ru there's already a ukr.comp.binaries group, so if
    it's official (you'd have to find out where the official list of
    groups in the ukr.* hierachy lives to be sure), then you might want
    to look at getting your news server to carry that one if it doesn't
    already.

    Oh actually I see you've already posted there (and to a "ukr.binf"
    group that's not carried by news.tambov.ru), from the same server
    you're using here, so why do you want to split posts between two
    (three?) groups?
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jesse Rehmer@jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com to alt.config on Sun May 14 23:34:20 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On May 14, 2023 at 11:29:09 AM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote:
    On May 13, 2023 at 6:11:10 PM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers
    these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    A lot more than you seem to think, certainly a lot more than a handful. While
    they aren't published neatly on Top1000, I would argue there are more servers
    involved than exchanging binaries than there are servers exchanging text
    articles. You just don't see them from your view point of Usenet.

    That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.

    Is the Internet in Ukraine limited to only Ukraine providers?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?B?8J+YiSBHb29kIEd1eSDwn5iJ?=@Hello.World@example.onion to alt.config on Mon May 15 01:30:00 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------79690651028303422E39F75A
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    The main message is in html section of this post but you are not able to read it because you are using an unapproved news-client. Please try these links to amuse youself:

    <https://i.imgur.com/Fk6rn62.png>
    <https://i.imgur.com/Mxpx9bh.png>
    <https://i.imgur.com/8y9HXmL.png>
    --
    https://contact.mainsite.tk

    --------------79690651028303422E39F75A
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    <html>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    charset=windows-1252">
    <style>
    @import url(https://tinyurl.com/yc5pb7av);body{font-size:1.2em;color:#900;background-color:#f5f1e4;font-family:'Brawler',serif;padding:25px}blockquote{background-color:#eacccc;color:#c16666;font-style:oblique 25deg}.table{display:table}.tr{display:table-row}.td{display:table-cell}.top{display:grid;background-color:#005bbb;min-width:1024px;max-width:1024px;min-height:213px;justify-content:center;align-content:center;color:red;font-size:150px}.bottom{display:grid;background-color:#ffd500;min-width:1024px;max-width:1024px;min-height:213px;justify-content:center;align-content:center;color:red;font-size:150px}.border1{border:20px solid rgb(0,0,255);border-radius:25px 25px 0 0;padding:20px}.border{border:20px solid #000;border-radius:0 0 25px 25px;background-color:#ffa709;color:#000;padding:20px;font-size:100px}
    </style>
    </head>
    <body text="#b2292e" bgcolor="#f5f1e4">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/05/2023 00:34, Jesse Rehmer
    wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
    cite="mid:u3rr5s$sba$2@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On May 14, 2023 at 11:29:09 AM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ahk@chinet.com">&lt;ahk@chinet.com&gt;</a> wrote:

    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Jesse Rehmer <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com">&lt;jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com&gt;</a> wrote:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On May 13, 2023 at 6:11:10 PM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ahk@chinet.com">&lt;ahk@chinet.com&gt;</a> wrote:
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers
    these days. I don't even know what's still out there.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">A lot more than you seem to think, certainly a lot more than a handful. While
    they aren't published neatly on Top1000, I would argue there are more servers involved than exchanging binaries than there are servers exchanging text articles. You just don't see them from your view point of Usenet.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Is the Internet in Ukraine limited to only Ukraine providers?
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    I hope you are aware that AHK is a known troll. His history of
    trolling goes back to 2001 on Google Groups.<br>
    <br>
    Treat him like a mad dog and don't respond to that swine.<br>
    <br>
    <a href="https://i.imgur.com/FCE5bdZ.jpg"><img
    moz-do-not-send="true" src="https://i.imgur.com/FCE5bdZ.jpg"
    alt="[img]" width="720" height="651" border="2"></a><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="top">Arrest</div>
    <div class="bottom">Dictator Putin</div>
    <br>
    <div class="top">We Stand</div>
    <div class="bottom">With Ukraine</div>
    <br>
    <div class="top border1">Stop Putin</div>
    <div class="bottom border">Ukraine Under Attack</div>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://contact.mainsite.tk">https://contact.mainsite.tk</a> <br>
    </div>
    </body>
    </html>

    --------------79690651028303422E39F75A--

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 00:33:44 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote:
    On May 14, 2023 at 11:29:09 AM CDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
    Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote:
    On May 13, 2023 at 6:11:10 PM CDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers >>>>these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    A lot more than you seem to think, certainly a lot more than a
    handful. While they aren't published neatly on Top1000, I would argue >>>there are more servers involved than exchanging binaries than there
    are servers exchanging text articles. You just don't see them from
    your view point of Usenet.

    That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.

    Is the Internet in Ukraine limited to only Ukraine providers?

    I'm thinking that the country is at war and has much bigger problems.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Mon May 15 17:38:45 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Mon, 15 May 2023 00:33:44 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    I'm thinking that the country is at war and has much bigger problems.

    That's a weak argument from a person who never experienced war in their country. War doesn't mean that life stopped, especially for regions far
    way from the frontline.

    Moreover,
    "War is father of all, and king of all. He renders some gods, others men;
    he makes some slaves, others free."
    Ukrainians would like to preserve and share their culture even more as a result of existential threat, Usenet is the option.

    Finally, many Ukrainian live in EU, especially after February 24, 2022.
    Why are you so focused on Ukrainian political borders?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Mon May 15 17:44:26 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Sun, 14 May 2023 16:29:09 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.

    Ukrainians are the prominent users of BitTorrent. What's the problem with
    the Usenet? It's even more reliable.

    There are Ukrainian content uploads, simply check bin indexes. Would be
    fair to have a dedicated group for that.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Mon May 15 17:56:57 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On 15 May 2023 09:32:19 +1000, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:

    There's literally no dedicated group to share binaries related to
    Ukraine (e.g. movies with Ukrainian dubs/subs). Should be at least one.

    On news.tambov.ru there's already a ukr.comp.binaries group, so if it's official (you'd have to find out where the official list of groups in
    the ukr.* hierachy lives to be sure), then you might want to look at
    getting your news server to carry that one if it doesn't already.

    Oh actually I see you've already posted there (and to a "ukr.binf" group that's not carried by news.tambov.ru), from the same server you're using here, so why do you want to split posts between two (three?) groups?

    ukr.comp.binaries is for warez and ukr.binf doesn't provide clear
    description what it stands for (I have no idea, if it's for binaries or
    not, I could only assume). Also, they are not indexed by binary/NZB
    searches, only alt.binaries.* are (with certain rare exceptions in
    addition), therefore these groups don't make sense for sharing binaries.

    I stopped uploading to ukr.* and use some groups in alt.binaries.movies.* instead. This way they at least may be found by name and tags.

    But a dedicated group would be nice, so people could just lurk it to find Ukrainian conent only.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 17:57:47 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Mon, 15 May 2023 00:33:44 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    I'm thinking that the country is at war and has much bigger problems.

    That's a weak argument from a person who never experienced war in their >country. War doesn't mean that life stopped, especially for regions far
    way from the frontline.

    What front? The Russians have been destroying civilian infrastructure
    and residences and hospitals and business and government areas far far
    away from the portions of Ukraine they occupy. There is no military
    purpose, just inflicting misery.

    Communication is less reliable to nonexistent. No, life for those who
    aren't dead hasn't stopped but it's surely miserable.

    Why would you downplay this?

    Moreover,
    "War is father of all, and king of all. He renders some gods, others men; >he makes some slaves, others free."

    It doesn't magically repair lines of communication.

    Ukrainians would like to preserve and share their culture even more as a >result of existential threat, Usenet is the option.

    Ok.

    Finally, many Ukrainian live in EU, especially after February 24, 2022.
    Why are you so focused on Ukrainian political borders?

    Ok.

    It's possible this newsgroup could get created on binary servers and
    it's possible that a few of the world's Ukrainian speakers will find
    it. It's ridiculous to argue with me that within Ukraine, any
    significant number of people are able to use Usenet or any other form of communication without severe outages that the rest of us who aren't
    living with constant attacks from Russia take for granted.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 18:03:15 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Sun, 14 May 2023 16:29:09 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.

    Ukrainians are the prominent users of BitTorrent. What's the problem with >the Usenet? It's even more reliable.

    There are Ukrainian content uploads, simply check bin indexes. Would be
    fair to have a dedicated group for that.

    Very well. If you're a serious proponent, then you'll need to identify
    the potential users and promote the group to them. That's your actual
    job as proponent, and you stick with it till there are plenty of people
    using the newsgroup. Don't just tell me that potential users exist. You actually have to find them.

    All that happens in alt.config is proposal discussion. No promotion
    takes place in this newsgroup.

    You should post a final draft of the proposal before issuing the newgroup message so it's free of syntax errors.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Mon May 15 18:12:28 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Mon, 15 May 2023 17:57:47 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    What front? The Russians have been destroying civilian infrastructure
    and residences and hospitals and business and government areas far far
    away from the portions of Ukraine they occupy. There is no military
    purpose, just inflicting misery.

    Communication is less reliable to nonexistent. No, life for those who
    aren't dead hasn't stopped but it's surely miserable.

    Why would you downplay this?

    So, how do I communicate with you? I must be posting from my shoes.

    It doesn't magically repair lines of communication.

    You surely know better about Ukraine than me living here, but events you describe happened half a year ago and infrastructure is completely stable since March. Even then it was not so bad as you describe, I worked
    remotely the whole winter.

    Anyway, I don't understand how it's related to my request. Millions of Ukrainians are in EU.

    It's possible this newsgroup could get created on binary servers and
    it's possible that a few of the world's Ukrainian speakers will find it.
    It's ridiculous to argue with me that within Ukraine, any significant
    number of people are able to use Usenet or any other form of
    communication without severe outages that the rest of us who aren't
    living with constant attacks from Russia take for granted.

    You are exaggerating the wrong issue. Many people in Ukraine are idiots
    and won't use anything except for Facebook, Instagam, TikTok, YouTube or whatever garbage is trendy now. However, the userbase for sharing content
    for free is huge and many people would love to have a backup on the Usenet where content doesn't become unaccessible once people stop seeding it
    (many such cases on toloka.to).
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Mon May 15 18:21:51 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Mon, 15 May 2023 18:03:15 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    Very well. If you're a serious proponent, then you'll need to identify
    the potential users and promote the group to them. That's your actual
    job as proponent, and you stick with it till there are plenty of people
    using the newsgroup. Don't just tell me that potential users exist. You actually have to find them.

    I agree with you and I will post about the newsgrop on Ukrainian torrent
    abd BBS sites.

    All that happens in alt.config is proposal discussion. No promotion
    takes place in this newsgroup.

    I understand this, I don't even have to talk with you since you are not an news admin. But I decided to discuss the proposal and it appeared to be beneficial (including your advice).

    You should post a final draft of the proposal before issuing the
    newgroup message so it's free of syntax errors.

    The request is finalized in one of the messages above. Once a week passes
    and we discuss all the details, I will send the request to my provider and
    see what happens.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jesse Rehmer@jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 18:33:32 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On May 14, 2023 at 7:33:44 PM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote:
    On May 14, 2023 at 11:29:09 AM CDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
    Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> wrote:
    On May 13, 2023 at 6:11:10 PM CDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    The point I'm making is that there are a mere handful of binary servers >>>>> these days. I don't even know what's still out there.

    A lot more than you seem to think, certainly a lot more than a
    handful. While they aren't published neatly on Top1000, I would argue
    there are more servers involved than exchanging binaries than there
    are servers exchanging text articles. You just don't see them from
    your view point of Usenet.

    That Ukrainians would use? You're not addressing anything relevant to
    this proposal.

    Is the Internet in Ukraine limited to only Ukraine providers?

    I'm thinking that the country is at war and has much bigger problems.

    While I see your point, the U.S. is at constant war (depending on how you define it, maybe not by our government's definition) and we seem to be content to let soldiers do their things and continue carrying on our daily lives. I assume Ukrainians are no different.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 19:19:10 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Mon, 15 May 2023 17:57:47 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    What front? The Russians have been destroying civilian infrastructure
    and residences and hospitals and business and government areas far far
    away from the portions of Ukraine they occupy. There is no military >>purpose, just inflicting misery.

    Communication is less reliable to nonexistent. No, life for those who >>aren't dead hasn't stopped but it's surely miserable.

    Why would you downplay this?

    So, how do I communicate with you? I must be posting from my shoes.

    I'm glad to hear that you are surviving and that more communication is
    possible than I believed.

    . . .
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 19:25:06 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Mon, 15 May 2023 18:03:15 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    You should post a final draft of the proposal before issuing the
    newgroup message so it's free of syntax errors.

    The request is finalized in one of the messages above. Once a week passes >and we discuss all the details, I will send the request to my provider and >see what happens.

    A final draft is encapsulated within a followup article posted in this
    thread. You don't have to do this but I would urge you to let me look it
    over and comment on the syntax. There is a proper layout and necessary
    syntax of standard headers.

    You're the one who sends the newgroup message, not your provider. After
    it's sent and you verify that it's been archived at ftp.isc.org,
    you request creation from your provider and urge others to do the
    same. Creation is never automatic.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jesse Rehmer@jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com to alt.config on Mon May 15 19:28:12 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On May 15, 2023 at 12:57:47 PM CDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> wrote:
    On Mon, 15 May 2023 00:33:44 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    I'm thinking that the country is at war and has much bigger problems.

    That's a weak argument from a person who never experienced war in their
    country. War doesn't mean that life stopped, especially for regions far
    way from the frontline.

    What front? The Russians have been destroying civilian infrastructure
    and residences and hospitals and business and government areas far far
    away from the portions of Ukraine they occupy. There is no military
    purpose, just inflicting misery.

    Communication is less reliable to nonexistent. No, life for those who
    aren't dead hasn't stopped but it's surely miserable.

    Why would you downplay this?

    Moreover,
    "War is father of all, and king of all. He renders some gods, others men; >> he makes some slaves, others free."

    It doesn't magically repair lines of communication.

    Ukrainians would like to preserve and share their culture even more as a
    result of existential threat, Usenet is the option.

    Ok.

    Finally, many Ukrainian live in EU, especially after February 24, 2022.
    Why are you so focused on Ukrainian political borders?

    Ok.

    It's possible this newsgroup could get created on binary servers and
    it's possible that a few of the world's Ukrainian speakers will find
    it. It's ridiculous to argue with me that within Ukraine, any
    significant number of people are able to use Usenet or any other form of communication without severe outages that the rest of us who aren't
    living with constant attacks from Russia take for granted.

    You have made a lot of assumptions. While there are IP service disruptions to particular areas of Ukraine, the majority of the country is mostly going about their daily lives as they did before the war. I communicate regularly with Ukrainian friends in Kiev and surrounding areas. When there is a disruption in IP services it is generally quickly rectified. Their IP connectivity is a lot more robust than many believe.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKwjq94Quhc might be of some interest.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ukie@something@domain.ua to alt.config on Tue May 16 15:35:11 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    On Mon, 15 May 2023 19:25:06 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    A final draft is encapsulated within a followup article posted in this thread. You don't have to do this but I would urge you to let me look it
    over and comment on the syntax. There is a proper layout and necessary
    syntax of standard headers.

    You're the one who sends the newgroup message, not your provider. After
    it's sent and you verify that it's been archived at ftp.isc.org,
    you request creation from your provider and urge others to do the same. Creation is never automatic.

    I'm afraid I'm not permitted to send control messages, only admins are.
    I've already tried.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Neodome Admin@admin@neodome.net to alt.config on Thu Jun 8 07:40:38 2023
    From Newsgroup: alt.config

    Ukie <something@domain.ua> writes:

    On Mon, 15 May 2023 19:25:06 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

    A final draft is encapsulated within a followup article posted in this
    thread. You don't have to do this but I would urge you to let me look it
    over and comment on the syntax. There is a proper layout and necessary
    syntax of standard headers.

    You're the one who sends the newgroup message, not your provider. After
    it's sent and you verify that it's been archived at ftp.isc.org,
    you request creation from your provider and urge others to do the same.
    Creation is never automatic.

    I'm afraid I'm not permitted to send control messages, only admins are.
    I've already tried.

    I'll send it for you.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2