From Newsgroup: alt.config

So Sven Petersen <svenpetersen@REMOVEprotonmail.com> sez to me they
sez:

It is inhumane rCo and profoundly irresponsible rCo to pretend
FettermanrCOs reliance on cognitive assistance software does not affect
his candidacy for the Senate.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/19/is-cyborg-john-fetterman-really-fit >-for-the-senate/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=is-cyborg-jo >hn-fetterman-really-fit-for-the-senate

"Let not your heart be troubled."

-- Sven Petersen

The Federalist seems to be a far-right biased publication using alt.hackers.malicious alum locogh0st's 'sven' RSS-feed-to-usenet sporging bot software. (https://web.archive.org/web/20211209181517/https://github.com/locogh0st/sven)

https://adfontesmedia.com/federalist-bias-and-reliability/
Ad Fontes Media rates The Federalist in the Hyper-Partisan Right category of bias and as Unreliable, Problematic in terms of reliability. The Federalist is a conservative online magazine and podcast that focuses on politics, culture, national security and crime. Founded in 2013, it reaches its readers through its website and an emailed newsletter. The Federalist website records 8 million visits per month.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://www.thefactual.com/blog/is-the-federalist-a-reliable-news-source/
How Factual Is The Federalist?
The Federalist scored an average Factual Grade of 56.0%, placing the site in the 19th percentile of our dataset. Several factors contribute to these low overall scores. First, articles rarely include links to supporting evidence, and when such links do appear, they often direct readers to other content from The Federalist. Second, articles from the site generally produce low scores for author expertise, suggesting that authors rarely cover a topic consistently or have only published other low-scoring articles on the same subject. Finally, most articles are very or moderately opinionated, rather than neutral in tone.

Like any news source, scores for articles from The Federalist varied widely based on factors like author expertise and cited evidence. For example, some scored above 80%, while others scored well below 50%.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/google-bans-two-websites-its-ad-platform-over-protest-articles-n1231176
Google also issued a warning on Tuesday to The Federalist over comments on articles related to recent protests.

A Google spokesperson said in an email on Monday that it demonetized the websites after determining they violated its policies on content related to race.

rCLWe have strict publisher policies that govern the content ads can run on and explicitly prohibit derogatory content that promotes hatred, intolerance, violence or discrimination based on race from monetizing," the spokesperson wrote. "When a page or site violates our policies, we take action. In this case, werCOve removed both sitesrCO ability to monetize with Google.rCY

After publication of this story, Google backtracked Tuesday, clarifying that The Federalist had been warned about policy violations but still had time to address them. It now has three days to remove the violations before a ban goes into effect.

On Wednesday morning, Google said The Federalist had removed the comments that violated its policies and that it would take no further action.

--
rO- MAX POWER rO-
rO- HE'S THE MAN WHOSE NAME rO-
rO- YOU'D LOVE TO TOUCH rO-
rO- BUT YOU MUSTN'T TOUCH rO-
rO- HIS NAME SOUNDS GOOD IN YOUR EAR rO-
rO- BUT WHEN YOU SAY IT, YOU MUSTN'T FEAR rO-
rO- 'CAUSE HIS NAME CAN BE SAID rO-
rO- BY ANYONE... rO-
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2