For your newsgroups file:
alt.sci.selassociation Community newsgroup for SEL Association member >discussions and public participation.
CHARTER:
Discussions for SEL Association projects and plans.
JUSTIFICATION:
SEL Association is a new Italian association supporting science
projects such as:
- Propulsion Physics
- Computer Science
- Structural Engineering
- Operative research
- Robotics engineering
- Energy Research
sel@selroc.systems wrote:
For your newsgroups file:
alt.sci.selassociation Community newsgroup for SEL Association member >>discussions and public participation.
You cannot have a line break. This has to be 79 characters or less. Drop
all the trite words that aren't keywords.
No one expects Italian language newsgroups to be in alt. But there are a
few under alt.it.*
You should really propose it in it.*
An institutional newsgroup like this isn't really appropriate for
Usenet. Can you show that the institution itself, as a topic, is widely >discussed on Usenet? Is there a reason the institution's associates are
going to communicate by Usenet and not a mailing list or something else?
CHARTER:
Discussions for SEL Association projects and plans.
JUSTIFICATION:
That's not justification.
In justification, you count the number of articles in which SEL is
discussed over a recent 90 day period. If there aren't a minimum of 10 >articles a day, the group will end up a barely used spamtrap.
It's the job of you, the proponent, to promote the newsgroup to other
Usenet users discussing the topic. Performing the justification informs
you where and who these users are. Your job isn't finished till
discussion in the newsgroup is at sustainable levels, a minimum of 10 >articles a day of discussion, not just announcements and press releases. >Crossposts don't count either.
SEL Association is a new Italian association supporting science
projects such as:
- Propulsion Physics
- Computer Science
- Structural Engineering
- Operative research
- Robotics engineering
- Energy Research
I can't believe all these topics would be discussed in one newsgroup
versus newsgroups that already exist to discuss specific science and >engineering topics.
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:22:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
sel@selroc.systems wrote:
For your newsgroups file:
alt.sci.selassociation Community newsgroup for SEL Association member >>>discussions and public participation.
You cannot have a line break. This has to be 79 characters or less. Drop >>all the trite words that aren't keywords.
No one expects Italian language newsgroups to be in alt. But there are a >>few under alt.it.*
You should really propose it in it.*
An institutional newsgroup like this isn't really appropriate for
Usenet. Can you show that the institution itself, as a topic, is widely >>discussed on Usenet? Is there a reason the institution's associates are >>going to communicate by Usenet and not a mailing list or something else?
CHARTER:
Discussions for SEL Association projects and plans.
JUSTIFICATION:
That's not justification.
In justification, you count the number of articles in which SEL is >>discussed over a recent 90 day period. If there aren't a minimum of 10 >>articles a day, the group will end up a barely used spamtrap.
It's the job of you, the proponent, to promote the newsgroup to other >>Usenet users discussing the topic. Performing the justification informs
you where and who these users are. Your job isn't finished till
discussion in the newsgroup is at sustainable levels, a minimum of 10 >>articles a day of discussion, not just announcements and press releases. >>Crossposts don't count either.
SEL Association is a new Italian association supporting science
projects such as:
- Propulsion Physics
- Computer Science
- Structural Engineering
- Operative research
- Robotics engineering
- Energy Research
I can't believe all these topics would be discussed in one newsgroup
versus newsgroups that already exist to discuss specific science and >>engineering topics.
Thank you for reaching out.
I had anticipated that it would be difficult to get a usenet news
group for the association, as such I have resorted to creating a
public IRC channel, which is not so difficult to obtain.
Regards.
Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:22:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
sel@selroc.systems wrote:
For your newsgroups file:
alt.sci.selassociation Community newsgroup for SEL Association member >>>>discussions and public participation.
You cannot have a line break. This has to be 79 characters or less. Drop >>>all the trite words that aren't keywords.
No one expects Italian language newsgroups to be in alt. But there are a >>>few under alt.it.*
You should really propose it in it.*
An institutional newsgroup like this isn't really appropriate for
Usenet. Can you show that the institution itself, as a topic, is widely >>>discussed on Usenet? Is there a reason the institution's associates are >>>going to communicate by Usenet and not a mailing list or something else?
CHARTER:
Discussions for SEL Association projects and plans.
JUSTIFICATION:
That's not justification.
In justification, you count the number of articles in which SEL is >>>discussed over a recent 90 day period. If there aren't a minimum of 10 >>>articles a day, the group will end up a barely used spamtrap.
It's the job of you, the proponent, to promote the newsgroup to other >>>Usenet users discussing the topic. Performing the justification informs >>>you where and who these users are. Your job isn't finished till >>>discussion in the newsgroup is at sustainable levels, a minimum of 10 >>>articles a day of discussion, not just announcements and press releases. >>>Crossposts don't count either.
SEL Association is a new Italian association supporting science >>>>projects such as:
- Propulsion Physics
- Computer Science
- Structural Engineering
- Operative research
- Robotics engineering
- Energy Research
I can't believe all these topics would be discussed in one newsgroup >>>versus newsgroups that already exist to discuss specific science and >>>engineering topics.
Thank you for reaching out.
I had anticipated that it would be difficult to get a usenet news
group for the association, as such I have resorted to creating a
public IRC channel, which is not so difficult to obtain.
Regards.
You morphed to a yads-like identity within the same thread? You can't be
a good proponent if you're not known for discussing the topic.
Quite frankly, as you had no interest in doing the hard work to get this >group going, then yes, you're better off withdrawing the proposal. No one
in alt.config can get you a newsgroup. We're not the proponent. You are.
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:35:14 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:22:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
sel@selroc.systems wrote:
For your newsgroups file:
alt.sci.selassociation Community newsgroup for SEL Association member >>>>discussions and public participation.
You cannot have a line break. This has to be 79 characters or less. Drop >>>all the trite words that aren't keywords.
No one expects Italian language newsgroups to be in alt. But there are a >>>few under alt.it.*
You should really propose it in it.*
An institutional newsgroup like this isn't really appropriate for >>>Usenet. Can you show that the institution itself, as a topic, is widely >>>discussed on Usenet? Is there a reason the institution's associates are >>>going to communicate by Usenet and not a mailing list or something else? >>>
CHARTER:
Discussions for SEL Association projects and plans.
JUSTIFICATION:
That's not justification.
In justification, you count the number of articles in which SEL is >>>discussed over a recent 90 day period. If there aren't a minimum of 10 >>>articles a day, the group will end up a barely used spamtrap.
It's the job of you, the proponent, to promote the newsgroup to other >>>Usenet users discussing the topic. Performing the justification informs >>>you where and who these users are. Your job isn't finished till >>>discussion in the newsgroup is at sustainable levels, a minimum of 10 >>>articles a day of discussion, not just announcements and press releases. >>>Crossposts don't count either.
SEL Association is a new Italian association supporting science >>>>projects such as:
- Propulsion Physics
- Computer Science
- Structural Engineering
- Operative research
- Robotics engineering
- Energy Research
I can't believe all these topics would be discussed in one newsgroup >>>versus newsgroups that already exist to discuss specific science and >>>engineering topics.
Thank you for reaching out.
I had anticipated that it would be difficult to get a usenet news
group for the association, as such I have resorted to creating a
public IRC channel, which is not so difficult to obtain.
Regards.
You morphed to a yads-like identity within the same thread? You can't be
a good proponent if you're not known for discussing the topic.
Quite frankly, as you had no interest in doing the hard work to get this >group going, then yes, you're better off withdrawing the proposal. No one >in alt.config can get you a newsgroup. We're not the proponent. You are.
I'm sorry for the change of identity, that is my default persona,
it should be clear from my reply that I have already renounced to
continue with this endeavour.
But if you need a formal withdrawal there it is: I withdraw the
request. The motivation is that I objectively have no time to spend in
an activity that can take months.
Regards.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 02:07:31 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,321 |