• How to revert to a previous version of Firefox?

    From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 14:26:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 15:53:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Miller@miller@posteo.ee to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 23:39:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Here you go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JJ@jj4public@gmail.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 04:57:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:26:35 -0400, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Depending on how much the browser version difference is, downgrading the browser while preserving browser settings/data may not be possible or may
    lead to data loss, due to difference in browser setting/data format changes which are not backward compatible.

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.

    There's browser policy settings for that.

    https://firefox-admin-docs.mozilla.org/guides/getting-started/
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan K.@alan@invalid.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 18:24:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/3/26 3:53 PM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by
    side? I can make the two windows split simply by grabbing the title bar of each and
    swinging to one side then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute little
    tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head around why developer time was
    taken to do this rather than fix something else. It's just one more new item now to break.
    --
    Linux Mint 22.3, Mozilla Thunderbird 140.9.0esr, Mozilla Firefox 149.0
    Alan K.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan K.@alan@invalid.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 18:27:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/3/26 5:57 PM, JJ wrote:
    On Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:26:35 -0400, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Depending on how much the browser version difference is, downgrading the browser while preserving browser settings/data may not be possible or may lead to data loss, due to difference in browser setting/data format changes which are not backward compatible.

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.

    There's browser policy settings for that.

    https://firefox-admin-docs.mozilla.org/guides/getting-started/
    I've always used the policies.json file.
    You'd be wise to start making backups of firefox and/or thunderbird since obviously you
    think mozilla will muck with things. (I know... TB is not mozilla).
    --
    Linux Mint 22.3, Mozilla Thunderbird 140.9.0esr, Mozilla Firefox 149.0
    Alan K.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nil@rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 19:29:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 03 Apr 2026, "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> wrote in alt.comp.software.firefox:

    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2
    screen windows side by side? I can make the two windows split
    simply by grabbing the title bar of each and swinging to one side
    then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute
    little tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do
    it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head
    around why developer time was taken to do this rather than fix
    something else. It's just one more new item now to break.

    Split Screen is easier, faster, less fiddly, self-contained so you can
    move the whole thing around as one, etc. I'm going to have to train
    myself to use the feature, but I can see it being quite useful to me.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 17:12:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 18:24:10 -0400, "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> wrote:
    On 4/3/26 3:53 PM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by
    side? I can make the two windows split simply by grabbing the title bar of each and
    swinging to one side then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute little
    tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do it).
    Yeah... called Snap... but as Nil suggests in their response, Ffox
    149's Split View isn't as fiddly as the likes of Win 11's Snap tool.
    Right click on a tab... select... and Bingo!
    It's really just a variation on 'new tab' to my mind.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 17:12:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 18:24:10 -0400, "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> wrote:
    On 4/3/26 3:53 PM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by
    side? I can make the two windows split simply by grabbing the title bar of each and
    swinging to one side then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute little
    tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head around why developer time was
    taken to do this rather than fix something else. It's just one more new item now to break.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Fri Apr 3 17:16:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Fri, 03 Apr 2026 17:12:04 -0700, Nobody <jock@soccer.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 18:24:10 -0400, "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 4/3/26 3:53 PM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said >>>> Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by
    side? I can make the two windows split simply by grabbing the title bar of each and
    swinging to one side then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute little
    tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head around why developer time was
    taken to do this rather than fix something else. It's just one more new item now to break.
    Uh-oh. The vasectomy finally worked... <g>
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From R Daneel Olivaw@Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 11:05:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    Alan K. wrote:
    On 4/3/26 5:57 PM, JJ wrote:
    On Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:26:35 -0400, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old.-a Has anything relevant changed?

    Depending on how much the browser version difference is, downgrading the
    browser while preserving browser settings/data may not be possible or may
    lead to data loss, due to difference in browser setting/data format
    changes
    which are not backward compatible.

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again.-a In the past it asked me, but >>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to.-a Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.

    There's browser policy settings for that.

    https://firefox-admin-docs.mozilla.org/guides/getting-started/
    I've always used the policies.json file.
    You'd be wise to start making backups of firefox and/or thunderbird
    since obviously you think mozilla will muck with things.-a (I know... TB
    is not mozilla).


    I do it that way as well, and having the file in /etc/firefox/policies
    makes far more sense to me than having it in the FF installed file which
    is where it is under Windows.
    I still apply updates (to the esr versions) but that is handled by the
    Linux repositories rather than Firefox itself.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 10:22:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    "Alan K." wrote:

    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by side?

    Yes, you can position two firefox windows, with the required pages in
    each one, the advantage of viewing two tabs in split view is that you
    only get a single set of "chrome" eating into screen area (menus,
    address bars, toolbars etc).
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lisa@not.in.use@home.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 13:45:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:26:35 -0400, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
    wrote:

    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    use the portable version.
    If you are happy with the settings and add-ons clone the directory and
    rename the old directory with the version number. It's up to you how
    much versions you want to keep.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 10:42:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/3/2026 6:24 PM, Alan K. wrote:
    On 4/3/26 3:53 PM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by
    side? I can make the two windows split simply by grabbing the title bar of each and
    swinging to one side then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute little
    tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head around why developer time was
    taken to do this rather than fix something else. It's just one more new item now to break.


    You must be super excellent with resizing windows. If I have two full
    screen displays and put them side to side, I need to spend more than
    just a second to tweak the sizing edges of each and the scroll bars of
    each to see the sections of each screen that are relevant to what I'm
    doing. And, often, I find that if I move the mouse from one to the
    other tab's display, the first one automatically minimizes. For me, the
    new feature is extremely welcome and useful.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 15:56:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    Retirednoguilt wrote:

    You must be super excellent with resizing windows. If I have two full
    screen displays and put them side to side, I need to spend more than
    just a second to tweak the sizing edges of each and the scroll bars of
    each
    For anyone using Win11, it happens to be straightforward - you drag one
    window to the top edge of the screen, a pop-up will display various
    "snap layouts", you choose one with two windows side-by-side, and they
    will be snapped into position.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 11:49:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/4/2026 10:56 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Retirednoguilt wrote:

    You must be super excellent with resizing windows. If I have two full
    screen displays and put them side to side, I need to spend more than
    just a second to tweak the sizing edges of each and the scroll bars of
    each
    For anyone using Win11, it happens to be straightforward - you drag one window to the top edge of the screen, a pop-up will display various
    "snap layouts", you choose one with two windows side-by-side, and they
    will be snapped into position.


    Andy, I don't follow. I am using Win 11. In FF, if I have a full
    screen tab open it can't be dragged anywhere. (I normally work in full
    screen view.) However, If I put the cursor on any tab of a minimized
    window or on the tab of the open window, and right click on any tab, I
    get drop down choices that include the choice "add split view (new)"
    [with new in a green oval]. Then I click on the tab I want to view side
    by side with the already opened window, mission accomplished. No
    dragging possible or needed.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 09:14:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Sat, 4 Apr 2026 11:49:34 -0400, Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:
    On 4/4/2026 10:56 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Retirednoguilt wrote:

    You must be super excellent with resizing windows. If I have two full
    screen displays and put them side to side, I need to spend more than
    just a second to tweak the sizing edges of each and the scroll bars of
    each
    For anyone using Win11, it happens to be straightforward - you drag one
    window to the top edge of the screen, a pop-up will display various
    "snap layouts", you choose one with two windows side-by-side, and they
    will be snapped into position.


    Andy, I don't follow. I am using Win 11. In FF, if I have a full
    screen tab open it can't be dragged anywhere.
    You need to engage the Snap tool:
    (Right click) Start > Settings > System> Multi-tasking... and slide
    the (first entry) Snap windows' radio button to ON.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 17:17:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    Retirednoguilt wrote:

    I don't follow. I am using Win 11. In FF, if I have a full
    screen tab open it can't be dragged anywhere. (I normally work in full
    screen view.) However, If I put the cursor on any tab of a minimized
    window or on the tab of the open window, and right click on any tab, I
    get drop down choices that include the choice "add split view (new)"
    [with new in a green oval]. Then I click on the tab I want to view side
    by side with the already opened window, mission accomplished. No
    dragging possible or needed.

    It's not about dragging tabs, you need to drag the firefox window by the titlebar to the top edge [alternatively Win+Z] even if it's maximised
    you can still do that by nudging it down and up again, if it's actually full-screen by F11 rather than just maximised, you'll have to exit full-screen.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 17:23:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    Nobody wrote:

    You need to engage the Snap tool:

    (Right click) Start > Settings > System> Multi-tasking... and slide
    the (first entry) Snap windows' radio button to ON.

    Yes, but it's enabled by default.


    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 13:51:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/4/2026 12:23 PM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Nobody wrote:

    You need to engage the Snap tool:

    (Right click) Start > Settings > System> Multi-tasking... and slide
    the (first entry) Snap windows' radio button to ON.

    Yes, but it's enabled by default.


    I don't remember turning off multi-tasking, but when I checked, it was
    off. I'll turn in on and as long as it doesn't create problems, I'll
    leave it on. I just did that and now I have a second way to get side by
    side windows. One strictly for seeing two different FF tabs, and one
    that enables side by side positioning of screens from different
    programs. Neat! Learned something new today. Thanks guys for sticking
    with me.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nobody@jock@soccer.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 4 11:01:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Sat, 4 Apr 2026 17:23:22 +0100, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
    wrote:
    Nobody wrote:

    You need to engage the Snap tool:

    (Right click) Start > Settings > System> Multi-tasking... and slide
    the (first entry) Snap windows' radio button to ON.

    Yes, but it's enabled by default.

    Hmm, I don't recall killing it whenever... but it was only with a
    recent query elsewhere that I enabled it for testing.
    And Retirednoguilt seems to confirm my experience.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sun Apr 5 04:30:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 18:27:26 -0400, Alan K. wrote:

    (I know... TB is not mozilla).

    Actually, it is.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Mon Apr 6 01:33:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On Sat, 4 Apr 2026 10:22:57 +0100, Andy Burns wrote:

    ... the advantage of viewing two tabs in split view is that you only
    get a single set of "chrome" eating into screen area (menus, address
    bars, toolbars etc).

    F11 gives you a full-screen view, with no chrome at all.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sun Apr 5 22:40:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:53:56 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's

    Yes, I saw that feature. Haven't used it yet, but still hate to give it
    up. But I would have if need be to solve my proglem in the previous
    Firefox thread.

    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?

    Not updates in general, just loss of the efficient alternate search box.
    But Nobody solve my searchbox problem.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sun Apr 5 22:41:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 23:39:48 +0200, Frank
    Miller <miller@posteo.ee> wrote:

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Here you go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    Thanks, jackass.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sun Apr 5 22:45:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Sat, 4 Apr 2026 10:42:52 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/3/2026 6:24 PM, Alan K. wrote:
    On 4/3/26 3:53 PM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said >>>> Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?
    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2 screen windows side by
    side? I can make the two windows split simply by grabbing the title bar of each and
    swinging to one side then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute little
    tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head around why developer time was
    taken to do this rather than fix something else. It's just one more new item now to break.


    You must be super excellent with resizing windows. If I have two full
    screen displays and put them side to side, I need to spend more than
    just a second to tweak the sizing edges of each and the scroll bars of
    each to see the sections of each screen that are relevant to what I'm
    doing. And, often, I find that if I move the mouse from one to the
    other tab's display, the first one automatically minimizes.

    I too certainly have a problem with this,. When I have to drag a file to another copy of a file manager, I still don't know whhich window can be
    bigger and which should be smalller.

    For me, the
    new feature is extremely welcome and useful.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Mon Apr 6 01:06:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Sat, 4 Apr 2026 04:57:48 +0700, JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:26:35 -0400, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Depending on how much the browser version difference is, downgrading the >browser while preserving browser settings/data may not be possible or may >lead to data loss, due to difference in browser setting/data format changes >which are not backward compatible.

    Well, I only want to go back to V148 from 149 and stay there. So that's probably okay, right? I thought I'd been given a fix for the terible
    change to the alternate search box, but they are talking about
    eliminating the fix.
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2012951


    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.

    There's browser policy settings for that.

    https://firefox-admin-docs.mozilla.org/guides/getting-started/
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nick@nick@koohii.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Mon Apr 6 07:18:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 04.04.2026 01:29, Nil wrote:
    On 03 Apr 2026, "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> wrote in alt.comp.software.firefox:

    What's the diff between split screen and putting 2 firefox 1/2
    screen windows side by side? I can make the two windows split
    simply by grabbing the title bar of each and swinging to one side
    then the other. Two quick mouse drags. And there's some cute
    little tool in Windows11 to do that too (not that I know how to do
    it).

    Not bitching, I just saw this feature and can't wrap my head
    around why developer time was taken to do this rather than fix
    something else. It's just one more new item now to break.

    Split Screen is easier, faster, less fiddly, self-contained so you can
    move the whole thing around as one, etc. I'm going to have to train
    myself to use the feature, but I can see it being quite useful to me.

    IIRC, it's something Vivaldi implemented first. And yeah, it's much
    easier if you need to swap between the two tabs and a terminal window or something similar since the two tabs act as a single window. I used to
    use it so much at my last job, so much so that I missed it when I had to switch to another browser after I quit and started working at a
    different company.

    I don't use it as much these days, not to mention that the flow of using
    it seems a bit off. Can't put my finger on why though.

    -Nick

    ---
    Take care, it's a desert out there
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Mon Apr 6 08:46:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/5/2026 10:41 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 23:39:48 +0200, Frank
    Miller <miller@posteo.ee> wrote:

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Here you go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    Thanks, jackass.

    I've been confused every time by TB's system of color lines to designate attributions. As I read this I'm being accused of sending the "Here you
    go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/" message. I
    most emphatically didn't send that. I detest ad hominem attacks. Not my
    style.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Mon Apr 6 09:00:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/5/2026 10:40 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:53:56 -0400, Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's

    Yes, I saw that feature. Haven't used it yet, but still hate to give it
    up. But I would have if need be to solve my proglem in the previous
    Firefox thread.

    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?

    Not updates in general, just loss of the efficient alternate search box.
    But Nobody solve my searchbox problem.

    Don't know either. I've always updated to the most recent 64 bit
    version available, and never lost the capacity to have and use search shortcuts. The little down arrow toward the left side of the search box
    data entry space is not gone. Perhaps you didn't check "search" tab of
    the FF settings menu in the update(s). There's an entire section called "Search Shortcuts" which enables the user to select almost any number of
    search engines to appear in a list. If that list is empty, there won't
    be a drop down menu because you didn't provide any choices to your
    default search engine selection.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From R Daneel Olivaw@Danni@hyperspace.vogon.gov.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Mon Apr 6 15:37:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/5/2026 10:41 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 23:39:48 +0200, Frank
    Miller <miller@posteo.ee> wrote:

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Here you go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    Thanks, jackass.

    I've been confused every time by TB's system of color lines to designate attributions. As I read this I'm being accused of sending the "Here you
    go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/" message. I
    most emphatically didn't send that. I detest ad hominem attacks. Not my style.


    I don't see why anyone would think that you sent that post, certainly
    not "micky".
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Tue Apr 7 00:11:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Mon, 6 Apr 2026 08:46:18 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/5/2026 10:41 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 23:39:48 +0200, Frank
    Miller <miller@posteo.ee> wrote:

    This, which now has 2 >'s, had none 2 posts ago, because he was the
    author of the post to which I replied.

    Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    Here you go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    And this which now has 3 >'s, had one two posts ago, and was written by
    the aforementioned person.

    Thanks, jackass.

    I've been confused every time by TB's system of color lines to designate >attributions. As I read this I'm being accused of sending the "Here you
    go idiot: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/" message. I
    most emphatically didn't send that. I detest ad hominem attacks. Not my >style.

    I never thought you did. I'm sorry to have alarmed you. I've only used
    Forte Agent in all these years (plus google's archive once in a great
    while) and it has no colors, just >>>>, although users can choose their
    own symbol if they don't want > and they can also make a list of all the
    other symbols other people use. Sadly, as the number of people on Usenet
    has declined, there isn't as much diversity. Everyone I see uses >.

    Reddit looked okay at first but not only does it suffer from having a
    diffeent tab for every question, and that you basically have to wait for
    an email to see if someone replied, that you can't scan 50 threads in
    one minute looking for updates, even when google finds you a thread on
    the topic you're asking about, if a thread has replies more than 2 or
    maybe 3 deep, you have to click on + and then click on Back or its
    keyboard equivalent once for every level it goes back. It's so sad that
    the best forum (even allowing for occasinoal confusino with colors) is
    no longer in much use.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Tue Apr 7 00:21:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Mon, 6 Apr 2026 09:00:57 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/5/2026 10:40 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:53:56 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said >>>> Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's

    Yes, I saw that feature. Haven't used it yet, but still hate to give it
    up. But I would have if need be to solve my proglem in the previous
    Firefox thread.

    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?

    Not updates in general, just loss of the efficient alternate search box.
    But Nobody solve my searchbox problem.

    Don't know either. I've always updated to the most recent 64 bit
    version available, and never lost the capacity to have and use search >shortcuts. The little down arrow toward the left side of the search box
    data entry space is not gone. Perhaps you didn't check "search" tab of
    the FF settings menu in the update(s). There's an entire section called >"Search Shortcuts" which enables the user to select almost any number of >search engines to appear in a list. If that list is empty, there won't
    be a drop down menu because you didn't provide any choices to your
    default search engine selection.

    First, I'm talking about the secondary search box that one only gets by
    using Customize Tool Bar. I'm not 100% sure you're not talking about
    the main search box, which has features I never use.

    I don't think it has a drop down these days, but the dropdown in the
    secondary search box is what I'm trying to avoid. I want it the way it
    was up to version 148, which I got less than a week ago, a drop-down
    array, maybe 5 icons wide and enough rows to hold all one's choices, so
    that I can continue to use the tab key to go from one to another.

    I describe my complaint in more detail in the previous thread,
    Subject: Re: Did Firefox screw up the alternate search box?
    in my 3rd post in that thread,
    Message-ID: <t410tkhps7e257g7ijvpi47c2bn3l4fr99@4ax.com>

    But like I say, Nobody has fixed it.

    (If Nobody fixed it, is it fixed?)

    And will the developers take away Nobody's fix, as one or more of them
    have threatened to do. In which case I will go back to version 148 or
    even use, horrors, one of the other browsers.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Tue Apr 7 10:34:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/7/2026 12:21 AM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Mon, 6 Apr 2026 09:00:57 -0400, Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/5/2026 10:40 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:53:56 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>>>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said >>>>> Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and >>>> ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open >>>> tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's

    Yes, I saw that feature. Haven't used it yet, but still hate to give it >>> up. But I would have if need be to solve my proglem in the previous
    Firefox thread.

    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?

    Not updates in general, just loss of the efficient alternate search box. >>> But Nobody solve my searchbox problem.

    Don't know either. I've always updated to the most recent 64 bit
    version available, and never lost the capacity to have and use search
    shortcuts. The little down arrow toward the left side of the search box
    data entry space is not gone. Perhaps you didn't check "search" tab of
    the FF settings menu in the update(s). There's an entire section called
    "Search Shortcuts" which enables the user to select almost any number of
    search engines to appear in a list. If that list is empty, there won't
    be a drop down menu because you didn't provide any choices to your
    default search engine selection.

    First, I'm talking about the secondary search box that one only gets by
    using Customize Tool Bar. I'm not 100% sure you're not talking about
    the main search box, which has features I never use.


    I am talking about what you are referring to as the secondary search
    box. The other box is more properly referred to, I believe, as the
    address box even though most browsers today, including FF, will do
    searches as well from the address box.

    I don't think it has a drop down these days,

    If you populate the "Search Shortcuts" section of the "Search" tab in
    settings with at least one search engine other than your designated
    default, it does have a drop down arrow.

    but the dropdown in the
    secondary search box is what I'm trying to avoid. I want it the way it
    was up to version 148, which I got less than a week ago, a drop-down
    array, maybe 5 icons wide and enough rows to hold all one's choices, so
    that I can continue to use the tab key to go from one to another.

    My drop down selection area has enough width to accommodate an icon
    followed by the name of the search engine. It has has many rows as the
    number of optional search engines you've entered in the "Search
    Shortcuts" area of settings. If I hit the tab key, it doesn't drop down
    into those choices. However, the down arrow key does that. So you can continue to use the keyboard to make your choice of search engine. Just
    to clarify, My current frame of reference is: windows 11 64 bit home
    version, with all recommended updates installed and FF version 149 (64-bit).

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Tue Apr 7 23:25:59 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Tue, 7 Apr 2026 10:34:38 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/7/2026 12:21 AM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Mon, 6 Apr 2026 09:00:57 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/5/2026 10:40 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Fri, 3 Apr 2026 15:53:56 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages >>>>>> I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but >>>>>> too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said >>>>>> Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and >>>>> ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update >>>>> enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open >>>>> tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're >>>>> doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's

    Yes, I saw that feature. Haven't used it yet, but still hate to give it >>>> up. But I would have if need be to solve my proglem in the previous
    Firefox thread.

    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?

    Not updates in general, just loss of the efficient alternate search box. >>>> But Nobody solve my searchbox problem.

    Don't know either. I've always updated to the most recent 64 bit
    version available, and never lost the capacity to have and use search
    shortcuts. The little down arrow toward the left side of the search box >>> data entry space is not gone. Perhaps you didn't check "search" tab of
    the FF settings menu in the update(s). There's an entire section called >>> "Search Shortcuts" which enables the user to select almost any number of >>> search engines to appear in a list. If that list is empty, there won't
    be a drop down menu because you didn't provide any choices to your
    default search engine selection.

    First, I'm talking about the secondary search box that one only gets by
    using Customize Tool Bar. I'm not 100% sure you're not talking about
    the main search box, which has features I never use.


    I am talking about what you are referring to as the secondary search
    box. The other box is more properly referred to, I believe, as the
    address box even though most browsers today, including FF, will do
    searches as well from the address box.

    I don't think it has a drop down these days,

    If you populate the "Search Shortcuts" section of the "Search" tab in >settings with at least one search engine other than your designated
    default, it does have a drop down arrow.

    but the dropdown in the
    secondary search box is what I'm trying to avoid. I want it the way it
    was up to version 148, which I got less than a week ago, a drop-down
    array, maybe 5 icons wide and enough rows to hold all one's choices, so
    that I can continue to use the tab key to go from one to another.

    My drop down selection area has enough width to accommodate an icon
    followed by the name of the search engine. It has has many rows as the >number of optional search engines you've entered in the "Search
    Shortcuts" area of settings. If I hit the tab key, it doesn't drop down
    into those choices. However, the down arrow key does that. So you can >continue to use the keyboard to make your choice of search engine. Just
    to clarify, My current frame of reference is: windows 11 64 bit home
    version, with all recommended updates installed and FF version 149 (64-bit).

    Okay, good. We are talking about the same thing. I can't retest it
    because I applied he fix, but I'm pretty sure i want to use the tab and
    not the Down arrow.

    The new method also has the problems that it remains set to whatever
    engine you set it to, except if you edit or delete and reenter the text,
    it reverts to the default even on those occasions when you don't want it
    to. The prior system had no flaws afaic.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Retirednoguilt@HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid to alt.comp.software.firefox on Wed Apr 8 11:04:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/7/2026 11:25 PM, micky wrote:
    FF version 149 (64-bit).

    Okay, good. We are talking about the same thing. I can't retest it
    because I applied he fix, but I'm pretty sure i want to use the tab and
    not the Down arrow.

    The new method also has the problems that it remains set to whatever
    engine you set it to, except if you edit or delete and reenter the text,
    it reverts to the default even on those occasions when you don't want it
    to. The prior system had no flaws afaic.

    Current configuration for my frame of reference remains as I provided in
    my previous comment in this thread. In the address box, using the drop
    down arrow and selecting a search engine different than the default will
    not continue to use that other search engine with subsequent data
    entries. It will return to the default.

    However, that's not the case with what you call the secondary search
    area. An alternate choice chosen from the drop down choices is "sticky"
    when you enter a new search term regardless of how you enter that new
    search term(by editing previous search term, using the "x" at the right
    side of the box to delete the search term, etc.). Your choice of
    alternate browser will also remain if/when you open or close tabs.
    Obviously, if you completely close FF and re-open it, that secondary
    search box search engine choice will revert to the default.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Thu Apr 9 07:52:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    In alt.comp.software.firefox, on Wed, 8 Apr 2026 11:04:24 -0400,
    Retirednoguilt <HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.invalid> wrote:

    On 4/7/2026 11:25 PM, micky wrote:
    FF version 149 (64-bit).

    Okay, good. We are talking about the same thing. I can't retest it
    because I applied he fix, but I'm pretty sure i want to use the tab and
    not the Down arrow.

    The new method also has the problems that it remains set to whatever
    engine you set it to, except if you edit or delete and reenter the text,
    it reverts to the default even on those occasions when you don't want it
    to. The prior system had no flaws afaic.

    Current configuration for my frame of reference remains as I provided in
    my previous comment in this thread. In the address box, using the drop
    down arrow and selecting a search engine different than the default will
    not continue to use that other search engine with subsequent data
    entries. It will return to the default.

    However, that's not the case with what you call the secondary search
    area. An alternate choice chosen from the drop down choices is "sticky"
    when you enter a new search term regardless of how you enter that new
    search term(by editing previous search term, using the "x" at the right
    side of the box to delete the search term, etc.). Your choice of
    alternate browser will also remain if/when you open or close tabs.

    So it works almos like the address box except that it is sticky. Exactly
    why this is not an improvement afaic since the prior system worked
    better afaic.

    YMMV.

    Obviously, if you completely close FF and re-open it, that secondary
    search box search engine choice will revert to the default.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Real Bev@bashley101@gmail.com to alt.comp.software.firefox on Sat Apr 25 08:33:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.software.seamonk

    On 4/3/26 12:53, Retirednoguilt wrote:
    On 4/3/2026 2:26 PM, micky wrote:
    How does one revert to a previous version of Firefox. The only webpages
    I found are 5 years old. Has anything relevant changed?

    How do I keep Firefox from updating again. In the past it asked me, but
    too often in situations like this, I've accidentally, reflexively said
    Yes when I didn't want to. Is there a way to keep it from even
    suggesting an update.
    If for no other reason than the security patches, I accept updates and
    ignore the added features that I don't choose to use. Current update
    enables split screen viewing just by right clicking on each of two open
    tabs and selecting the split screen option. Very useful when you're
    doing something but continually need to refer to something on a
    different tab. Much easier than trying to manually resize two tab's
    displays to fit the screen. Why are you so opposed to updates?

    Because some major updates eliminated features and options that were
    important to me.

    I just got updated from 149 to 150. I have the policies.json file.
    Somehow it got overriden. Not happy.
    --
    Cheers, Bev
    "Faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death."
    -- Hunter S. Thompson
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2