America's Newspaper of Record:
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record low amounts
of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some specific
location. They completely ignore previous years with record low
amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional climate change denier!
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciation for evidence so why bother?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some specific >location. They completely ignore previous years with record low amounts
of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf--
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some specific
location. They completely ignore previous years with record low
amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional
climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received >publication yet. So, we'll see.
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
--we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciation forSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
evidence so why bother?
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional
climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received publication yet. So, we'll see.
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciation forSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
evidence so why bother?
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional
climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received
publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional boomer shit >posters
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciation forSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
evidence so why bother?
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:20:37 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some specific
location. They completely ignore previous years with record low amounts
of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
That is real fucking smart.
Get your science from hot air. They know all kinds of stuff, theyIt kind of goes without saying, that nobody can compare to your learned
might even know how to chew gum.>
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received
publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional boomer shit posters
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciationSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
for evidence so why bother?
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional
climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received publication yet. So, we'll see.
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received
publication yet. So, we'll see.
I'm sure Nick will have a well researched piece out shortly.
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
--https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional
climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received
publication yet. So, we'll see.
I'm sure Nick will have a well researched piece out shortly.
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received
publication yet. So, we'll see.
I'm sure Nick will have a well researched piece out shortly.
On 8/10/2026 9:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:"Wen you get cold put on a coat. When you get hot take it off." - Ma
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at
a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
You came here. For what? Mental health?
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional boomer
shit posters
The truth is, you created everything - it's all in your mind. Your mind
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciationSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
for evidence so why bother?
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
is too full with bad thoughts. Just realax. Have a cigar.
In reality, there's nothing you can do or say as an individual to change
or alter the weather.
At this point, all we can do is ask you why you did it? Why are you polluting the planet, Nick?
Take some responsibility. Admit that you are using up more energy every
day than 7/8 of the total human population living in nation states!
You and your tech brothers in Silicon Valley caused global warming and drought and as a result there are wildfires all over Canada today and
you're doing nothing about it.
Nothing. Don't deny it!
On 8/11/26 9:33 AM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 9:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:"Wen you get cold put on a coat. When you get hot take it off." - Ma
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And
Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere,
some specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at >>>>> a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
You came here. For what? Mental health?
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional boomer
shit posters
The truth is, you created everything - it's all in your mind. Your
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciationSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
for evidence so why bother?
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
mind is too full with bad thoughts. Just realax. Have a cigar.
In reality, there's nothing you can do or say as an individual to
change or alter the weather.
At this point, all we can do is ask you why you did it? Why are you
polluting the planet, Nick?
Take some responsibility. Admit that you are using up more energy
every day than 7/8 of the total human population living in nation states!
You and your tech brothers in Silicon Valley caused global warming and
drought and as a result there are wildfires all over Canada today and
you're doing nothing about it.
Nothing. Don't deny it!
this is me trying to do something about it: generating arguments
you're doing worse: you're actually the bumblefuck denier arguing
against doing anything about it
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:31:37 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media >>>>> love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record >>>>> low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Who suggested there would be? Climate change says that some dry areas
will get wetter and some wet areas will get drier. And the global
average temperature will continue to rise towards 2 degrees C if not
there already. If so, then on to 2.5.
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questionsthat require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at a
l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a professional >>>> climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not received
publication yet. So, we'll see.
I'm sure Nick will have a well researched piece out shortly.
On 8/11/2026 3:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 9:33 AM, Dude wrote:You came here to warn us about the weather?
On 8/10/2026 9:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:"Wen you get cold put on a coat. When you get hot take it off." - Ma
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And
Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere,
some specific location. They completely ignore previous years
with record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works
at a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
You came here. For what? Mental health?
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional boomer
shit posters
The truth is, you created everything - it's all in your mind. Your
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have much appreciation >>>>>> for evidence so why bother?Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
mind is too full with bad thoughts. Just realax. Have a cigar.
In reality, there's nothing you can do or say as an individual to
change or alter the weather.
At this point, all we can do is ask you why you did it? Why are you
polluting the planet, Nick?
Take some responsibility. Admit that you are using up more energy
every day than 7/8 of the total human population living in nation
states!
You and your tech brothers in Silicon Valley caused global warming
and drought and as a result there are wildfires all over Canada today
and you're doing nothing about it.
Nothing. Don't deny it!
this is me trying to do something about it: generating arguments
you're doing worse: you're actually the bumblefuck denier arguing
against doing anything about it
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at
a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
I'm sure Nick will have a well researched piece out shortly.
On 8/11/26 4:12 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/11/2026 3:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 9:33 AM, Dude wrote:You came here to warn us about the weather?
On 8/10/2026 9:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:"Wen you get cold put on a coat. When you get hot take it off." - Ma
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, >>>>>>>> some specific location. They completely ignore previous years >>>>>>>> with record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And >>>>>>>>> Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional >>>>>> petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works >>>>>>> at a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
You came here. For what? Mental health?
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional boomer >>>>> shit posters
The truth is, you created everything - it's all in your mind. Your
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have muchSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
appreciation for evidence so why bother?
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
mind is too full with bad thoughts. Just realax. Have a cigar.
In reality, there's nothing you can do or say as an individual to
change or alter the weather.
At this point, all we can do is ask you why you did it? Why are you
polluting the planet, Nick?
Take some responsibility. Admit that you are using up more energy
every day than 7/8 of the total human population living in nation
states!
You and your tech brothers in Silicon Valley caused global warming
and drought and as a result there are wildfires all over Canada
today and you're doing nothing about it.
Nothing. Don't deny it!
this is me trying to do something about it: generating arguments
you're doing worse: you're actually the bumblefuck denier arguing
against doing anything about it
thanks for admitting ur in the wrong
now if you could actually start acting like it, that would be great
On 8/11/2026 4:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 4:12 PM, Dude wrote:For God's sake Nick, you could at least turn off that AC causing all the problems. Over 99.9% of people on the entire planet full of nation
On 8/11/2026 3:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 9:33 AM, Dude wrote:You came here to warn us about the weather?
On 8/10/2026 9:52 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 5:32 PM, Dude wrote:"Wen you get cold put on a coat. When you get hot take it off." - Ma >>>>> -a>
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, >>>>>>>>> some specific location. They completely ignore previous years >>>>>>>>> with record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And >>>>>>>>>> Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
u don't even understand the question dud
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional >>>>>>> petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works >>>>>>>> at a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a >>>>>>>> professional climate change denier!
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
u again, have no idea what constitutes evidence
You came here. For what? Mental health?
tbh, can't believe wilson gives that to us for free!You came here to get free enlightenment.
there is no enlightenment is this rag tag band of delusional
boomer shit posters
The truth is, you created everything - it's all in your mind. Your
we could go thru her claims, but cons don't have muchSome people just feel better when they have someone to talk to.
appreciation for evidence so why bother?
some people just feel better when they deny the truth
mind is too full with bad thoughts. Just realax. Have a cigar.
In reality, there's nothing you can do or say as an individual to
change or alter the weather.
At this point, all we can do is ask you why you did it? Why are you >>>>> polluting the planet, Nick?
Take some responsibility. Admit that you are using up more energy
every day than 7/8 of the total human population living in nation
states!
You and your tech brothers in Silicon Valley caused global warming
and drought and as a result there are wildfires all over Canada
today and you're doing nothing about it.
Nothing. Don't deny it!
this is me trying to do something about it: generating arguments
you're doing worse: you're actually the bumblefuck denier arguing
against doing anything about it
thanks for admitting ur in the wrong
now if you could actually start acting like it, that would be great
states can't afford central air and heat from a heat pump running on electricity 24 x 7.
On 8/11/2026 1:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:Listen up, Cracker!
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And
Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere,
some specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also
does not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one, and they have increased in places where it matter
substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does
not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
The Old FarmerrCOs Almanac was first published in 1792 by founder and
editor Robert B. Thomas. Released during George Washington's first term
as president, it is the oldest continuously published periodical in
North America.
Yo, Sucker!
When you start acting like it's a crises, maybe then I will start to
believe that there's a crises. YMMV.
https://heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken/It should go without saying that no analysis, by any professional
lol a sorority bitch studied petroleum engineering and now works at >>>>> a l0lbertarian think tank ... and it basically paid to be a
professional climate change denier!
petroleum engineer, can compare to your report, which has not
received publication yet. So, we'll see.
I'm sure Nick will have a well researched piece out shortly.
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:31:37 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>What happened to all those articles about widespread desertification due
wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media >>>>> love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record >>>>> low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Who suggested there would be? Climate change says that some dry areas
will get wetter and some wet areas will get drier. And the global
average temperature will continue to rise towards 2 degrees C if not
there already. If so, then on to 2.5.
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And
Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere,
some specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also
does not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one, and they have increased in places where it matter
substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does
not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And
Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere,
some specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also
does not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one, and they have increased in places where it matter
substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does
not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
On 8/12/26 9:29 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And
Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere,
some specific location. They completely ignore previous years
with record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question
are beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also
does not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one, and they have increased in places where it matter
substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does
not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
says that guy that cherry picks when he believes paleoclimactic reconstruction based on how convenient it is for his argument...
that shit is appalling, i'm not sure i'm ever going to respect the basis
for your opinion wilson
On 8/12/2026 1:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/12/26 9:29 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, >>>>>>>> some specific location. They completely ignore previous years >>>>>>>> with record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And >>>>>>>>> Giant Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking
questions that require answers when the post you're responding to
is simply an attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts
in question are beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also
does not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one, and they have increased in places where it matter
substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does
not change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you
are engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
says that guy that cherry picks when he believes paleoclimactic
reconstruction based on how convenient it is for his argument...
that shit is appalling, i'm not sure i'm ever going to respect the
basis for your opinion wilson
Oh no!
On 8/11/2026 4:34 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:31:37 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>What happened to all those articles about widespread desertification due
wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media >>>>>> love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record >>>>>> low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Who suggested there would be? Climate change says that some dry areas
will get wetter and some wet areas will get drier. And the global
average temperature will continue to rise towards 2 degrees C if not
there already. If so, then on to 2.5.
to AGW?
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one, >>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
On 8/12/2026 2:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>> beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does >>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global
one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not >>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.-a Love
was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
The question is...
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one, >>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>> beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does >>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one, >>>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not >>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the
time comes.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>>> beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does >>>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one, >>>>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not >>>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
On 8/13/26 12:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/12/2026 2:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>The question is...
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, >>>>>>>>> some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And >>>>>>>>>> Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>>> beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also
does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global >>>>> one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does >>>>> not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.-a Love
was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
why are u such a fucking willful moron?
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>>> beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does >>>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one, >>>>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not >>>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:20:53 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:34 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:31:37 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>What happened to all those articles about widespread desertification due
wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media >>>>>>> love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record >>>>>>> low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
Who suggested there would be? Climate change says that some dry areas
will get wetter and some wet areas will get drier. And the global
average temperature will continue to rise towards 2 degrees C if not
there already. If so, then on to 2.5.
to AGW?
Anthropogenic global warming or simply global warming. From the
beginning I have not heard about widespread desertification. I did
hear when it became clear that the phrase "global warming" was giving
the people the wrong impression. That would have been maybe 10 years
ago or so. So, it was decided to call it climate change which is more accurate predicting wetter dry places and drier wet places among
various other effects. That has been the story for a long time. If
your guys want to switch back to the wrong impression, that is to be
expected of them, and that you would believe it also expected.
On 8/13/2026 1:43 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 12:15 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, why did you do it?
On 8/12/2026 2:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>The question is...
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question >>>>>>> are
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, >>>>>>>>>> some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And >>>>>>>>>>> Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also >>>>>> does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally
does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.-a Love >>>> was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
Why did you pollute the USA and then run off to pollute the Philiines?
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
On 8/11/26 5:42 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
For God's sake Nick, you could at least turn off that AC causing all
the problems. Over 99.9% of people on the entire planet full of nation
states can't afford central air and heat from a heat pump running on
electricity 24 x 7.
what a fucking boomer meme: eAt YoUr fOoD cAuSe ChIlDrEn In aFrICa aRe SaRvInG...
that isn't caused by me using AC dud, that's caused by us collectively
using an inefficient, market driven economic system that is simply
incapable of producing the general social trust required to deploy
global nuclear
i'm a raging idiot
On 8/13/26 4:57 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/13/2026 1:43 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 12:15 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, why did you do it?
On 8/12/2026 2:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>The question is...
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And >>>>>>>>>>>> Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is
simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in
question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this
also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally
does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you >>>>>>> are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.-a Love >>>>> was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of that >>>>> tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>> been having serious consequences.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
Why did you pollute the USA and then run off to pollute the Philiines?
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate more
pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
why are u such a fucking willful moron?
#god
On 8/13/26 6:28 PM, Dude wrote:
i'm a raging idiot
yes dud, yes you are. glad we could agree on that Efuo
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 4:57 PM, Dude wrote:You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest and transparent.
On 8/13/2026 1:43 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 12:15 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, why did you do it?
On 8/12/2026 2:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:The question is...
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave >>>>>>>>>>>>> And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims: >>>>>>>>>>>
questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is
simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in
question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this >>>>>>>> also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially >>>>>>>>
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally >>>>>>>> does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm >>>>>>>> explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology >>>>>>>> you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and >>>>>>> more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.-a Love >>>>>> was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>> tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the >>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>> been having serious consequences.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
Why did you pollute the USA and then run off to pollute the Philiines?
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate more
pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>>>> beside the point.
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does >>>>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one, >>>>>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not >>>>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>>>>> beside the point.
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some >>>>>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant >>>>>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does >>>>>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not >>>>>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that
tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal.
Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked
to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over
their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave >>>>>>>>>>>>> And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
somewhere, some
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims: >>>>>>>>>>>
questions
that require answers when the post you're responding to is
simply an
attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in
question are
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this >>>>>>>> also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a
global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially >>>>>>>>
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally >>>>>>>> does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm >>>>>>>> explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology >>>>>>>> you are
engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and >>>>>>> more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.-a Love >>>>>> was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>> tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the >>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society?-a Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal.
Not what I said at all.-a Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked
to him like humans might become like gods.-a So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart.-a Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over
their own biology and that of other creatures.-a And once again we are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not.-a One
could again say, that it was our own doing.-a The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are >>>>>>>>> beside the point.
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims: >>>>>>>>>>>
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially >>>>>>>>
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm >>>>>>>> explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal.
Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked
to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over
their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
On 8/13/26 6:31 PM, Dude wrote:<snip>
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest and transparent.The question is, why did you do it?The question is...
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate
more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
i don't smoke dud
On 8/13/2026 6:35 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 6:31 PM, Dude wrote:<snip>
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
You're whole neighborhood is going up in smoke.You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest and transparent.The question is, why did you do it?The question is...
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate
more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
i don't smoke dud
You are soaking in it.
On 8/14/26 2:06 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/13/2026 6:35 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 6:31 PM, Dude wrote:<snip>
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
You're whole neighborhood is going up in smoke.You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest andThe question is, why did you do it?The question is...
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate
more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
transparent.
i don't smoke dud
You are soaking in it.
it's not dud
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions >>>>>>>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an >>>>>>>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not? >>>>>>>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
America's Newspaper of Record:"Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The >>>>>>>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
specific location. They completely ignore previous years with >>>>>>>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
Hot Air:
Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims: >>>>>>>>>>>>
beside the point.
global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
and they have increased in places where it matter substantially >>>>>>>>>
pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not
change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm >>>>>>>>> explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are >>>>>>>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal. >>>
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked
to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over
their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
On 8/14/2026 2:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/14/26 2:06 PM, Dude wrote:Roughly one-third of California adults report using cannabis.
On 8/13/2026 6:35 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 6:31 PM, Dude wrote:<snip>
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
You're whole neighborhood is going up in smoke.You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest andThe question is, why did you do it?The question is...
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate >>>>>>> more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
transparent.
i don't smoke dud
You are soaking in it.
it's not dud
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed)
deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal. >>>
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked
to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over
their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more >>>>>>>>> about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>> deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal. >>>>
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked
to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough. >>>> So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over
their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you >>>> and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense >mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that
I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel >>>>> about lying free speech.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal. >>>>>
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked >>>>> to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough. >>>>> So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are >>>>> scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you >>>>> and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense >>mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near as I >>can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that >>I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not. I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel >>>>> about lying free speech.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal. >>>>>
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked >>>>> to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough. >>>>> So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are >>>>> scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you >>>>> and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense
mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that
I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not. I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
On 8/14/26 5:52 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/14/2026 2:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/14/26 2:06 PM, Dude wrote:Roughly one-third of California adults report using cannabis.
On 8/13/2026 6:35 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 6:31 PM, Dude wrote:<snip>
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
You're whole neighborhood is going up in smoke.You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest andThe question is, why did you do it?The question is...
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except generate >>>>>>>> more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
transparent.
i don't smoke dud
You are soaking in it.
it's not dud
i don't _smoke_ dud, never said i didn't use cannabis
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel >>>>> about lying free speech.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love >>>>>>>>> was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal. >>>>>
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked >>>>> to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their
speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each
other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit
some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough. >>>>> So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are >>>>> scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One
could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of
our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you >>>>> and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense
mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that
I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not. I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
On 8/14/2026 8:09 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/14/26 5:52 PM, Dude wrote:The question is, why did you come here then?
On 8/14/2026 2:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/14/26 2:06 PM, Dude wrote:Roughly one-third of California adults report using cannabis.
On 8/13/2026 6:35 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/13/26 6:31 PM, Dude wrote:<snip>
On 8/13/2026 5:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
You're whole neighborhood is going up in smoke.You are smoking it! Don't deny it, Nick. Just be honest andThe question is, why did you do it?The question is...
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
And, you're denying there's any thing you can do except
generate more pollution. You did it. Don't deny it.
-a-a> why are u such a fucking willful moron?
-a-a>
-a-a> #god
transparent.
i don't smoke dud
You are soaking in it.
it's not dud
i don't _smoke_ dud, never said i didn't use cannabis
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others >>>>>>>>>>> and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion >>>>>>>>>> that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological
commitments.-a Love
was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some of >>>>>>>>>> that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had
deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course the >>>>>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its >>>>>>>>>> influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society?-a Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me >>>>>>>>> when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like >>>>>>> illegal.
Not what I said at all.-a Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel >>>>>> about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked >>>>>> to him like humans might become like gods.-a So, he scrambled their >>>>>> speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each >>>>>> other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart.-a Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit >>>>>> some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well
enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures.-a And once again we are >>>>>> scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not.-a One >>>>>> could again say, that it was our own doing.-a The effect came out of >>>>>> our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about >>>>>> you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense
mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near as I >>> can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that
I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it can't
be deliberate.
Most of the time what I say is what I believe. Sometimes I'll express
what I think I might think in the hope that someone will tell me where
I'm wrong, testing my ideas.
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what
your media told you, things that tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others >>>>>>>>>>>> and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion >>>>>>>>>>> that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological
commitments.-a Love
was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some >>>>>>>>>>> of that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had >>>>>>>>>>> deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course >>>>>>>>>>> the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its >>>>>>>>>>> influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society?-a Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me >>>>>>>>>> when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like >>>>>>>> illegal.
Not what I said at all.-a Here is a metaphorical version of how I >>>>>>> feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it
looked
to him like humans might become like gods.-a So, he scrambled their >>>>>>> speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each >>>>>>> other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past, >>>>>>> except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart.-a Maybe sorta. >>>>>>>
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't >>>>>>> really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit >>>>>>> some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well
enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures.-a And once again we >>>>>>> are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not.-a One >>>>>>> could again say, that it was our own doing.-a The effect came out of >>>>>>> our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything
about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense >>>> mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near
as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that >>>> I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
that's lying u dud, not only to us, but to urself
#god
Most of the time what I say is what I believe. Sometimes I'll express
what I think I might think in the hope that someone will tell me where
I'm wrong, testing my ideas.
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You
think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just
repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just
repeating what your media told you, things that tickle your preset
biases.
So it goes.
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish. Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that >>>>>>>>>> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments. Love
was right about that. Not that others might not share some of that >>>>>>>>>> tendency. But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious >>>>>>>>>> effects on society generally in the past 10 years. Of course the >>>>>>>>>> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence >>>>>>>>>> been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society? Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the >>>>>>>>> time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like illegal.
Not what I said at all. Here is a metaphorical version of how I feel >>>>>> about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it looked >>>>>> to him like humans might become like gods. So, he scrambled their >>>>>> speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each >>>>>> other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past,
except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart. Maybe sorta.
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't
really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit >>>>>> some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well enough. >>>>>> So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures. And once again we are >>>>>> scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not. One >>>>>> could again say, that it was our own doing. The effect came out of >>>>>> our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything about you >>>>>> and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense
mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near as I >>> can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that
I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not. I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it can't
be deliberate.
Most of the time what I say is what I believe.
Sometimes I'll expressWhat it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
what I think I might think in the hope that someone will tell me where
I'm wrong, testing my ideas.
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You think >you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just repeating >propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what
your media told you, things that tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others >>>>>>>>>>>> and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion >>>>>>>>>>> that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological
commitments.-a Love
was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some >>>>>>>>>>> of that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had >>>>>>>>>>> deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of course >>>>>>>>>>> the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its >>>>>>>>>>> influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society?-a Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me >>>>>>>>>> when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like >>>>>>>> illegal.
Not what I said at all.-a Here is a metaphorical version of how I >>>>>>> feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it
looked
to him like humans might become like gods.-a So, he scrambled their >>>>>>> speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each >>>>>>> other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past, >>>>>>> except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart.-a Maybe sorta. >>>>>>>
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't >>>>>>> really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit >>>>>>> some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well
enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures.-a And once again we >>>>>>> are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not.-a One >>>>>>> could again say, that it was our own doing.-a The effect came out of >>>>>>> our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything
about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense >>>> mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near
as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that >>>> I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others >>>>>>>>>>>>> and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.a Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion >>>>>>>>>>>> that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological
commitments.a Love
was right about that.a Not that others might not share some >>>>>>>>>>>> of that
tendency.a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had >>>>>>>>>>>> deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.a Of course >>>>>>>>>>>> the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its >>>>>>>>>>>> influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society?a Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me >>>>>>>>>>> when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like >>>>>>>>> illegal.
Not what I said at all.a Here is a metaphorical version of how I >>>>>>>> feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it >>>>>>>> looked
to him like humans might become like gods.a So, he scrambled their >>>>>>>> speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each >>>>>>>> other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past, >>>>>>>> except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of human >>>>>>>> groups whose languages then tended to drift apart.a Maybe sorta. >>>>>>>>
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't >>>>>>>> really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit >>>>>>>> some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well >>>>>>>> enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers over >>>>>>>> their own biology and that of other creatures.a And once again we >>>>>>>> are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not.a One >>>>>>>> could again say, that it was our own doing.a The effect came out of >>>>>>>> our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything
about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-defense >>>>> mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near >>>>> as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look tougher. >>>
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that >>>>> I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not.a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You >>>> are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what
makes sense. Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/14/2026 5:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:41:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 11:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:46:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/13/2026 5:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:45:02 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of >>>>>>>>>>>>> others and more
about your own.
Ha, you wish.-a Once again you want to poopoo love's
assertion that
*you* specifically are limited by your ideological
commitments.-a Love
was right about that.-a Not that others might not share some >>>>>>>>>>>> of that
tendency.-a But that you especially do.
And not that the effect of such commitments have not had >>>>>>>>>>>> deleterious
effects on society generally in the past 10 years.-a Of >>>>>>>>>>>> course the
problem is much older than that, but only recently has its >>>>>>>>>>>> influence
been having serious consequences.
I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) >>>>>>>>>>> deleterious effects on society?-a Serious consequences!
No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me >>>>>>>>>>> when the
time comes.
Like most crooks, I fully expect you to get away with it.
See, deep down you really do want to make speech you don't like >>>>>>>>> illegal.
Not what I said at all.-a Here is a metaphorical version of how I >>>>>>>> feel
about lying free speech.
See, god decided that babylon had gotten out of control and it >>>>>>>> looked
to him like humans might become like gods.-a So, he scrambled their >>>>>>>> speech to different languages to make them unable to talk with each >>>>>>>> other.
It could be that something sorta like that happened in ages past, >>>>>>>> except that it could have been simply a matter of dispersal of >>>>>>>> human
groups whose languages then tended to drift apart.-a Maybe sorta. >>>>>>>>
So now here we are in the post truth era where many humans don't >>>>>>>> really care about truth, the point of communication is to discredit >>>>>>>> some other group, and if it isn't true, lies will do that well >>>>>>>> enough.
So it is that humans could have become god like in their powers >>>>>>>> over
their own biology and that of other creatures.-a And once again >>>>>>>> we are
scattering, becoming unable to know what is true and what not.-a One >>>>>>>> could again say, that it was our own doing.-a The effect came out of >>>>>>>> our own natural tendencies.
Not that I think there is any point in trying to do anything
about you
and your pals mr crook.
Laguages are scattered, and truth is no more, irrevocably.
So why don't you stop lying?
Nice try asshole.
Like most progs and leftists do, you're projecting. It's a self-
defense
mechanism to protect you from cognitive dissonance, which is
uncomfortable and difficult.
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And near >>>>> as I
can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look tougher. >>>
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state that >>>>> I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You >>>> are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what
makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And
near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state >>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>> you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You >>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what
makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to
take responsibility for the godshit u preach
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You think
you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just repeating
propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what
your media told you, things that tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the attack
on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an attack and
not something else, and that election fraud might happen once in a
while but it is not a problem in the us. That is a sample. The list
is long, including attempts to prosecute himbo's critics and pardon
criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does not
put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into the depths
of delusion.
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And
near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state >>>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>>> you do not.a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You >>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what
makes sense.a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to
take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than >regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults & >semi-delusional rants.
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you don't
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You think
you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just repeating
propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what
your media told you, things that tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the attack
on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an attack and
not something else, and that election fraud might happen once in a
while but it is not a problem in the us. That is a sample. The list
is long, including attempts to prosecute himbo's critics and pardon
criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does not
put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into the depths
of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what you're >standing on.
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And
near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state >>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>> you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You >>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what
makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults & semi-delusional rants.
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And
near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state >>>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>>> you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. >>>>>> You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding
what makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to
take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults & semi-delusional rants.
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You think
you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just repeating
propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what
your media told you, things that tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the attack
on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an attack and
not something else, and that election fraud might happen once in a
while but it is not a problem in the us.-a-a That is a sample.-a The list
is long, including attempts to prosecute himbo's critics and pardon
criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.-a That does not
put me on throne of belief.-a But it sure does sink you into the depths
of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what you're standing on.
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:01:36 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And >>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state >>>>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>>>> you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You >>>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better, >>>>>> that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it >>>>>> can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what >>>> makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to
take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than
regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults &
semi-delusional rants.
He seems full-on delusional.
Earlier he was talking about "ownership of the means of healthcare production". Um.......wat?
On 8/16/26 11:40 AM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:01:36 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And >>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state >>>>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>>>> you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing >>>>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better, >>>>>> that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it >>>>>> can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs >>>>> reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what >>>> makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to >>> take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than
regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults &
semi-delusional rants.
He seems full-on delusional.
Earlier he was talking about "ownership of the means of healthcare production". Um.......wat?
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And >>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutelyHowever,
state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other. >>>>>>>
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent. >>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but >>>>>>> you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological
commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing >>>>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better, >>>>>> that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it >>>>>> can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs >>>>> reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding
what makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing
to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than
regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults &
semi-delusional rants.
you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u
dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not believe
than, and such reason has not been provided ...
ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to do
that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was
disgustingly pathetic
On 8/16/2026 2:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And >>>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look >>>>>>> tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely >>>>>>>>> state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other. >>>>>>>>However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or
innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, >>>>>>>> but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological
commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing >>>>>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know
better, that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart >>>>>>> enough, it can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence
vs reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred >>>>>> narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding
what makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing
to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather
than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual
insults & semi-delusional rants.
you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u
dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not believe
than, and such reason has not been provided ...
ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to do
that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was
disgustingly pathetic
You called some of the papers I did cite bogus, and couldn't even follow
the logic of why I interpreted one the way I did. As it's apparently
beyond you, why should I bother?
On 8/16/26 11:58 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And >>>>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look >>>>>>>> tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely >>>>>>>>>> state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other. >>>>>>>>>However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or
innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting >>>>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know
better, but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological
commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and
passing judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know
better, that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart >>>>>>>> enough, it can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence >>>>>>> vs reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred >>>>>>> narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding >>>>>> what makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you. >>>>>
evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing >>>>> to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather
than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual
insults & semi-delusional rants.
you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u
dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not
believe than, and such reason has not been provided ...
ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to do
that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was
disgustingly pathetic
You called some of the papers I did cite bogus, and couldn't even
follow the logic of why I interpreted one the way I did. As it's
apparently beyond you, why should I bother?
u can't even cite the papers correct u dumbass
u literally tried to pass off a simulation attemp that the paper itself stated as obviously incomplete... as an actual hard paleoclimatic reconstruction
u don't even know what evidence even is ur so damn negligently caught up
in ideological bullcrap
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you don't
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. You think >>>> you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm just repeating
propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what >>>> your media told you, things that tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the attack
on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an attack and
not something else, and that election fraud might happen once in a
while but it is not a problem in the us. That is a sample. The list
is long, including attempts to prosecute himbo's critics and pardon
criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does not
put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into the depths
of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what you're
standing on.
we have been over this stuff so many times.
On 8/16/2026 3:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 11:58 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of >>>>>> evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur >>>>>> stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't >>>>>>
On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. >>>>>>>>>>> And near as I can tell it's only because:
1. I've been wrong about something.
2. You don't agree with me.
Nice try asshole.
No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look >>>>>>>>> tougher.
Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely >>>>>>>>>>> state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other. >>>>>>>>>>However,
lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or >>>>>>>>>> innocent.
lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting >>>>>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know
better, but
you do not.-a I am not inclined to be forgiving.
Even if love says you are limited by your ideological
commitments. You
are still smart enough to know better.
Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and
passing judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know
better, that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart >>>>>>>>> enough, it can't be deliberate.
nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence >>>>>>>> vs reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur
preferred narrative ...
Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding >>>>>>> what makes sense.-a Versus swallowing whole everything told to you. >>>>>>
Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to
refusing to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather
than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual
insults & semi-delusional rants.
you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u
dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not
believe than, and such reason has not been provided ...
ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to
do that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was
disgustingly pathetic
You called some of the papers I did cite bogus, and couldn't even
follow the logic of why I interpreted one the way I did. As it's
apparently beyond you, why should I bother?
u can't even cite the papers correct u dumbass
u literally tried to pass off a simulation attemp that the paper
itself stated as obviously incomplete... as an actual hard
paleoclimatic reconstruction
u don't even know what evidence even is ur so damn negligently caught
up in ideological bullcrap
Nick: "blah, blah, blah, everyone who's not me is stupid..."
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That
is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does
not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:31 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
No, I'm not a "con", no matter how much you display your parataxic distortions -- often and quite flamboyantly.
And there's a reason I don't read a certain someone's posts
"carefully". There's a reason -- I'll think of it in a moment.
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That
is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does
not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
On 8/16/2026 2:57 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:31 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
No, I'm not a "con", no matter how much you display your parataxic
distortions -- often and quite flamboyantly.
And there's a reason I don't read a certain someone's posts
"carefully".-a There's a reason -- I'll think of it in a moment.
Commies and revolutionary anarchists love to call liberals and
libertarians conservative. To them we're all in the same group:
https://64.media.tumblr.com/3a159610e389e91e30cb637465e32dac/ tumblr_prnim8KRgf1wx1bg3_1280.jpg
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above.-a Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.-a-a That >>>>>> is a sample.-a The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.-a That does
not put me on throne of belief.-a But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on.-a I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
On 8/16/2026 2:57 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:31 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
No, I'm not a "con", no matter how much you display your parataxic
distortions -- often and quite flamboyantly.
And there's a reason I don't read a certain someone's posts
"carefully".-a There's a reason -- I'll think of it in a moment.
Commies and revolutionary anarchists love to call liberals and
libertarians conservative. To them we're all in the same group:
https://64.media.tumblr.com/3a159610e389e91e30cb637465e32dac/ tumblr_prnim8KRgf1wx1bg3_1280.jpg
On 8/16/2026 2:57 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:31 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
No, I'm not a "con", no matter how much you display your parataxic
distortions -- often and quite flamboyantly.
And there's a reason I don't read a certain someone's posts
"carefully". There's a reason -- I'll think of it in a moment.
Commies and revolutionary anarchists love to call liberals and
libertarians conservative. To them we're all in the same group:
https://64.media.tumblr.com/3a159610e389e91e30cb637465e32dac/tumblr_prnim8KRgf1wx1bg3_1280.jpg--
On 8/16/26 4:27 PM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:57 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:31 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
No, I'm not a "con", no matter how much you display your parataxic
distortions -- often and quite flamboyantly.
And there's a reason I don't read a certain someone's posts
"carefully".-a There's a reason -- I'll think of it in a moment.
Commies and revolutionary anarchists love to call liberals and
libertarians conservative. To them we're all in the same group:
https://64.media.tumblr.com/3a159610e389e91e30cb637465e32dac/
tumblr_prnim8KRgf1wx1bg3_1280.jpg
at this point there isn't much progress to make liberalism because capitalism is fundamentally impeding our ability to progress
something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly narratives from croaking out completely
7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
freedom on this planet
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That
is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does
not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
On 8/16/26 4:27 PM, Wilson wrote:You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
On 8/16/2026 2:57 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:44:31 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully
No, I'm not a "con", no matter how much you display your parataxic
distortions -- often and quite flamboyantly.
And there's a reason I don't read a certain someone's posts
"carefully".-a There's a reason -- I'll think of it in a moment.
Commies and revolutionary anarchists love to call liberals and
libertarians conservative. To them we're all in the same group:
https://64.media.tumblr.com/3a159610e389e91e30cb637465e32dac/
tumblr_prnim8KRgf1wx1bg3_1280.jpg
at this point there isn't much progress to make liberalism because
capitalism is fundamentally impeding our ability to progress
something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly narratives
from croaking out completely
7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
freedom on this planet
On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes the Jews
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above.-a Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.-a-a That >>>>>>> is a sample.-a The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.-a That does >>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.-a But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on.-a I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with explosives
planted on the inside.
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That
is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does
not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
hSo, I corrected Nick on several occasions about his conspiracy theories.
On 8/16/2026 2:12 PM, Creon wrote:
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above.-a Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.-a-a That >>>>>> is a sample.-a The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.-a That does
not put me on throne of belief.-a But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
That's just one item that you were corrected on.-a I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
hSo, I corrected Nick on several occasions about his conspiracy theories.
About the Jews and the WTC 9/11 attacks and the the world-wide human trafficking sex ring and the child abuse allegations of alleged masses
of Native American children buried and all covered up somewhere.
So, I told Nick that his claims were all made up - a mashup of internet memes, all discredited on this board.
Apparently, over in the Philippines there was trouble down in Manila.
The local police took him down to the station, not for any crimes, but
just because he was so interesting to talk to. YMMV.
On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
narratives from croaking out completely
7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
freedom on this planet
rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been prosperous enough
basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8 of
the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
you people are fucking psychos tbh
#god
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
narratives from croaking out completely
7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
freedom on this planet
rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been prosperous
enough
basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8 of
the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain it's
ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
you people are fucking psychos tbh
#god
A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who are >currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their person,
their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in with the
lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would) destroy >their nation.
But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents whoThe people who live their just don't care about the lives that they
are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be >destroyed.
On 8/16/2026 10:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:That is the test himbo fails.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>>>
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>>> you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
The great thing is, you're free to believe whatever superstitious >ideological bs you want to believe as long as you're not harming anyone >else.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:21:07 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 10:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:That is the test himbo fails.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think >>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that >>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might >>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>>>>
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>>>> you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me >>>>>> the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
The great thing is, you're free to believe whatever superstitious
ideological bs you want to believe as long as you're not harming anyone
else.
On 8/17/2026 11:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:You have willful blindness.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:21:07 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 10:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:That is the test himbo fails.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you >>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think >>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that >>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might >>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>>>>>
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me >>>>>>> the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember >>>>> where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with >>>>> the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
The great thing is, you're free to believe whatever superstitious
ideological bs you want to believe as long as you're not harming anyone
else.
You have Trump brain.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into
the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes the Jews
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above.-a Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.-a-a That >>>>>>>> is a sample.-a The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>>>
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.-a That does >>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.-a But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>>> you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on.-a I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with explosives
planted on the inside.
let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their nation states because psychos like you want to live in an fake illusion of general prosperity
On 8/16/2026 10:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above.-a Of course you
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.-a-a That >>>>>>>> is a sample.-a The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>>>
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.-a That does >>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.-a But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>>> you're standing on.
don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember
where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with
the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on.-a I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
The great thing is, you're free to believe whatever superstitious ideological bs you want to believe as long as you're not harming anyone else.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:39:05 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/17/2026 11:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:You have willful blindness.
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:21:07 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 10:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:That is the test himbo fails.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:Except when it matters
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you >>>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to >>>>>>>>>>>
You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think >>>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that >>>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
So it goes.
Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might >>>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>>>>>>
I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me >>>>>>>> the same way.
I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
"learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember >>>>>> where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with >>>>>> the whole state.
That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how
many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
banks.
At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
Like himbo is a wannbe dictator
Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count
etc.
The great thing is, you're free to believe whatever superstitious
ideological bs you want to believe as long as you're not harming anyone >>>> else.
You have Trump brain.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 03:12:23 |
| Calls: | 1,102 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 277,096 |
