• =?UTF-8?Q?Project_Spire_is_the_Church_of_England=E2=80=99s_Chagos_d?= =?UTF-8?Q?eal?=

    From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Thu Aug 6 16:45:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    The Church of England can always be relied upon to walk into a room just
    as everybody else is leaving. The question of whether we have reached
    rCypeak wokerCO rCo the high watermark of Americanised racial politics dictating every aspect of public life rCo remains open. However, those post-Black Lives Matter efforts, which saw mass demonstrations and acts
    of self-abasement by companies and institutions, are undeniably more
    muted and more disputed than they were in 2020. It seems unlikely that,
    for example, Andy Burnham would rCytake the kneerCO, as Keir Starmer did so unthinkingly.

    This is partly because institutions have learnt from the mistakes of the
    past six years, while plenty of those pushing this agenda proved to be grifters, advocates of racial violence, or good old-fashioned
    charlatans. Not so, however, in the Church of England.

    There is something almost endearing about this; the C of E has long been
    an institution where the eccentricities of the comfortable
    middle-classes survive long past their sell-by date. Bishops wore wigs
    deep into the 19th century, and gaiters into the dog days of the 20th
    century, after they had become obsolete elsewhere. Inevitably, they will
    sport rainbow lanyards well into the dog days of the 21st century, after everybody else has thrown them in a bin.

    The centrepiece of the C of ErCOs stubborn persistence to a 2020 mindset
    is Project Spire, its controversial plan to give -u100 million in rCyreparationsrCO for its role in the transatlantic slave trade. It does
    this despite the fact this role is historically contested, that previous church bureaucrats have always insisted it is impossible to make single lump-sum grants of this size out of church funds, and perhaps most
    egregiously of all, despite the fact that many local churches face
    financial oblivion, which the central C of E regards with indifference.

    In fairness, the -u100 million figure was negotiated down from the
    swivel-eyed lunacy of the billion quoted in the Justin Welby era. Spire
    was something of a personal crusade for Welby, who brought a combination
    of Etonian hauteur and evangelical zeal in his efforts to basically
    smear as racist anyone who opposed it. The only other thing he did with
    equal enthusiasm was closing churches during Covid. There was, then, a
    glimmer of hope when Sarah Mullally entered Lambeth Palace that this
    scheme might be put out to pasture.

    Fast-forward to last month and images are beamed back from West Africa
    of the Archbishop perched on an enormous gold throne, next to the King
    of the Ashanti. Given the C of ErCOs assiduousness in digging deep into
    how Georgian churchwardens could afford marble monuments in parish
    churches across the country, you might have thought a quizzical clerical eyebrow or two would have been raised at this, that the thought, rCyI
    wonder how the King of the Ashanti got to sit on a big gold thronerCO
    might have entered some minds? Not so.

    The Ashanti were among the most enthusiastic participants in chattel
    slavery; around 10 per cent of the entire Gold Coast slave trade went
    through, and earned money for, their empire. Rather than condemn this
    with the same vehemence or use it as a moment of reflection on the universality of the sin of slavery, Mullally instead put out a bizarre
    video of herself staring across the Atlantic, Caspar David
    Friedrich-style, accompanied by an apparent re-commitment to Spire.

    In doing so, the Archbishop is setting herself up for a fall. Not only
    is Spire loathed in the pews, church lawyers and bureaucrats privately
    admit it is immoral and possibly illegal under the laws of the Charity Commission.

    There is some remaining goodwill towards Mullally, if only for the fact
    that she is not Welby. However, this will quickly evaporate should she
    make the pursuit of Spire the defining feature of her archiepiscopacy.

    The financial ruin facing many churches is a combination of the
    post-Covid lag on congregational growth in some places, and high
    inflation and utility bills, exacerbated by LabourrCOs spiteful decision
    to end the Listed Places of Worship scheme, which has seen a 20 per cent
    price increase on almost all repairs. For context, the quote my husband,
    a vicar, initially received for repairs on our townrCOs church roof went
    from -u50,000 to -u60,000 overnight. These burdens are a struggle in Oxfordshire; they are a complete impossibility in Blackpool or Bootle or Redcar.

    While no donations to local churches go directly towards slavery
    reparations, the Project will erode morale, increase suspicion of the
    centre and upturn the fundamental principle on which church finances
    have been governed for the last 50 years. Most frustratingly, none of
    the optics of this has resonated with SpirerCOs most vehement defenders.
    The only reason its process appears to have slowed lately is due to a
    series of complex legal challenges relating to charity law. Were it not
    for the efforts of a small group of eminent legal experts and
    historians, it might have happened already.

    Indeed, alongside MullallyrCOs video are signs that the central church is readying itself for another assault against its people to ram Spire
    through. Inevitably, however, its means of doing so are outdated and cack-handed. The official website recently uploaded an rCyFAQrCO page which pretty unsatisfactorily dismisses almost every concern out of hand.

    Bishops are fond of pointing opponents to the work of colonial historian Professor Alan Lester, perhaps without realising that his belligerence
    towards junior scholars and his increasingly quixotic defence of the
    fraudster Jason Arday, mean that his academic reputation is fast
    diminishing.

    Project Spire is becoming the C of ErCOs very own Chagos deal rCo a
    baffling, damaging decision which is falling apart before its eyes, and
    yet which it seems either too weak or ideologically captured to do the sensible thing and abandon.

    Retirement conventions mean that MullallyrCOs time in Lambeth Palace will inevitably be short. She must decide whether she wants her tenure to be defined by fights over such a controversial policy. The bumps that Spire
    has hit of late might prove to be moments of grace, by which she can
    extricate the Church from its error.

    The best time for the Church to have left this particular room was
    yesterday, the second-best time is today. Now itrCOs the ArchbishoprCOs job
    to ensure that it isnrCOt dragged kicking and screaming from it tomorrow.


    Madeline Grant
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2