NY Times,
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned and might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons heAd learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe BidenAs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FauciAs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryAs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itAs so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he-Ad learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden-As blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci-As just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the country-As first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it-As so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned and >>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45rC>PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he-Ad learned and >>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>> try, even with Joe Biden-As blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci-As just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the country-As first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it-As so difficult to make >>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned and >>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>> try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make >>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social isolation, and
widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged and low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term consequences.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:48:16rC>PM EDT, "Dude" <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned and >>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>> try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make >>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant academic
setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social isolation, and
widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged and
low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term consequences.
It happened here and in other countries as well. Not the best move in hindsight but most kids are fine.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:43:08rC>PM EDT, "Tara" <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45rC>PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he-Ad learned and >>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>> try, even with Joe Biden-As blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci-As just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the country-As first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it-As so difficult to make >>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
I mean, there are degrees of incompetence. Fauci got carried away with himself
and said some dumb things. Not acceptable but he's not a monster.
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned and >>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>> try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci
defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame
game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show them as >>>> incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make >>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
So, what's the problem?
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social isolation, and
widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged and low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term consequences.
On 8/8/2026 1:54 PM, Tara wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:48:16rC>PM EDT, "Dude" <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics
mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci
should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned >>>>>> and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed
in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci >>>>>> defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game.
Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame >>>>>> game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show them as >>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>> the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make >>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>> fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant academic >>> setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social isolation, and
widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged and >>> low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term consequences.
It happened here and in other countries as well. Not the best move in
hindsight but most kids are fine.
Look what happened to Nick.
Spikes in anxiety, depression, and psychological stress linked to social isolation.
On 8/8/26 1:48 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned and >>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>> try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci >>>>> defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand. >>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame
game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show them as >>>>> incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make >>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social
isolation, and widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged
and low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term
consequences.
social media affects them immeasurably more and u aren't crying
endlessly about that
On 8/8/26 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/8/2026 1:54 PM, Tara wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:48:16rC>PM EDT, "Dude" <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>Look what happened to Nick.
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics
mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci >>>>>>> should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd
learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed >>>>>>> in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci >>>>>>> defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game.
Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released >>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>> game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show >>>>>>> them as
incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>> the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to >>>>>>> make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>> fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no
point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
academic
setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social isolation, and
widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged
and
low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term
consequences.
It happened here and in other countries as well. Not the best move in
hindsight but most kids are fine.
Spikes in anxiety, depression, and psychological stress linked to
social isolation.
excuse me i was 30 living on the 35th floor in the middle of metro
manila at the time. the shut down was relief in pollution for me in particular.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:43:08?PM EDT, "Tara" <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
I mean, there are degrees of incompetence. Fauci got carried away with himself >and said some dumb things. Not acceptable but he's not a monster.
On 8/8/2026 4:58 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/8/26 1:48 PM, Dude wrote:Have you ever heard of Ron Paul?
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics
mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci
should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd learned >>>>>> and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed
in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci >>>>>> defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game.
Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame >>>>>> game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show them as >>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>> the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to make >>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>> fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social
isolation, and widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged
and low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term
consequences.
social media affects them immeasurably more and u aren't crying
endlessly about that
On 8/8/26 6:27 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/8/2026 4:58 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/8/26 1:48 PM, Dude wrote:Have you ever heard of Ron Paul?
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics
mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci >>>>>>> should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd
learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed >>>>>>> in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci >>>>>>> defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game.
Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released >>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>> game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show >>>>>>> them as
incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>> the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to >>>>>>> make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>> fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no
point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social
isolation, and widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with disadvantaged
and low-achieving students suffering the most severe long-term
consequences.
social media affects them immeasurably more and u aren't crying
endlessly about that
i've heard he lost several elections
On 8/8/2026 10:31 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/8/26 6:27 PM, Dude wrote:So, you don't know what you're talking about.
On 8/8/2026 4:58 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/8/26 1:48 PM, Dude wrote:Have you ever heard of Ron Paul?
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>So, what's the problem?
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics >>>>>>>> mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on >>>>>>>> one
man for everything they might not have liked about the
experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci >>>>>>>> should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd
learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed >>>>>>>> in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter.-a Fauci >>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. >>>>>>>> Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released >>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>> game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show >>>>>>>> them as
incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only >>>>>>>> blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>> the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult to >>>>>>>> make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to
hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>> fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no >>>>>>>> point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social
isolation, and widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with
disadvantaged and low-achieving students suffering the most severe
long-term consequences.
social media affects them immeasurably more and u aren't crying
endlessly about that
i've heard he lost several elections
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated
and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci
defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience,
rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the
assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after
the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something
from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting
fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side.
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was,
punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame
game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop
trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>
about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a
primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side.
When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw
the line. YMMV.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote:When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side.
wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw
the line. YMMV.
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote:When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and
explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released
diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be,
maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical
mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side.
wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw
the line. YMMV.
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
On 8/9/26 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side.
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
the endless cry from duds over vax, something which is highly tracked,
and highly audited by multiple entities in a variety different orgs >including many dedicated to human health is just endlessly incredible >compared to the utter blindness they have towards the pollution from
many other sectors that are far less regulated
these fucks have such broken minds i really do think mortality is the
only way their kind of ignorance will be resolved
On 8/9/2026 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their
followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side.
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
That's the problem. It's my body so nobody else gets to tell me what to
do with it. It's a basic human right. That's where I draw the line. YMMV.
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:55:10 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/9/26 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>>
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
the endless cry from duds over vax, something which is highly tracked,
and highly audited by multiple entities in a variety different orgs >>including many dedicated to human health is just endlessly incredible >>compared to the utter blindness they have towards the pollution from
many other sectors that are far less regulated
these fucks have such broken minds i really do think mortality is the
only way their kind of ignorance will be resolved
Netty cannot kill all the people who hate israel and:
Two things to eliminate crazy people:
1) All crazy people die
2) Huamns stop making babies
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:37:30 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:55:10 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/9/26 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a >>>>>>>>>> burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic. >>>>>>>>>
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>>>
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
the endless cry from duds over vax, something which is highly tracked,
and highly audited by multiple entities in a variety different orgs
including many dedicated to human health is just endlessly incredible
compared to the utter blindness they have towards the pollution from
many other sectors that are far less regulated
these fucks have such broken minds i really do think mortality is the
only way their kind of ignorance will be resolved
Netty cannot kill all the people who hate israel and:
Two things to eliminate crazy people:
1) All crazy people die
2) Huamns stop making babies
Ok, everybody, I am not serious. I am trying to point to a lapse in--
rational thinking.
On 8/9/26 9:41 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:37:30 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:55:10 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/9/26 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>>>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a >>>>>>>>>>> burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic. >>>>>>>>>>
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>>>>
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
the endless cry from duds over vax, something which is highly tracked, >>>> and highly audited by multiple entities in a variety different orgs
including many dedicated to human health is just endlessly incredible
compared to the utter blindness they have towards the pollution from
many other sectors that are far less regulated
these fucks have such broken minds i really do think mortality is the
only way their kind of ignorance will be resolved
Netty cannot kill all the people who hate israel and:
Two things to eliminate crazy people:
1) All crazy people die
2) Huamns stop making babies
or 3) reform society to stop producing them eh??? like we haven't even >solved the problem of child trauma in _any_ society, ofc we're gunna
keep producing crazies until we rectify that
boomers always blaming human nature when it's not /just/ that, it's
human nature within the establish norms ... and we _do_ have quite a lot
of control over the established norms
--
Ok, everybody, I am not serious. I am trying to point to a lapse in
rational thinking.
On 8/9/26 9:27 AM, Dude wrote:
On 8/8/2026 10:31 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/8/26 6:27 PM, Dude wrote:So, you don't know what you're talking about.
On 8/8/2026 4:58 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/8/26 1:48 PM, Dude wrote:Have you ever heard of Ron Paul?
On 8/8/2026 1:12 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com>So, what's the problem?
wrote:
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics >>>>>>>>> mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility >>>>>>>>> on one
man for everything they might not have liked about the
experience of
living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci >>>>>>>>> should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his
approach
and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons herCOd >>>>>>>>> learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too
boxed in to
try, even with Joe BidenrCOs blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. >>>>>>>>> Fauci
defended and explained in his book.-a Read it if want to
understand.
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. >>>>>>>>> Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of FaucirCOs just-released >>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics.-a It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>> game.-a The blame must all be on the other side.-a It must show >>>>>>>>> them as
incompetent and unfit for office.-a Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only >>>>>>>>> blame.
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years >>>>>>>>> after
the countryrCOs first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason itrCOs so difficult >>>>>>>>> to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to >>>>>>>>> hang on
the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno >>>>>>>>> casting
fire and brimstone.-a Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no >>>>>>>>> point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used
exaggerated
health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Closing schools during the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant
academic setbacks, worsening mental health, increased social
isolation, and widening achievement gaps for students.
These disruptions affected young people globally, with
disadvantaged and low-achieving students suffering the most severe >>>>>> long-term consequences.
social media affects them immeasurably more and u aren't crying
endlessly about that
i've heard he lost several elections
ur the one talking about that loser ron paul u retard
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:55:10 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/9/26 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>>
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
the endless cry from duds over vax, something which is highly tracked,
and highly audited by multiple entities in a variety different orgs
including many dedicated to human health is just endlessly incredible
compared to the utter blindness they have towards the pollution from
many other sectors that are far less regulated
these fucks have such broken minds i really do think mortality is the
only way their kind of ignorance will be resolved
Netty cannot kill all the people who hate israel and:
Two things to eliminate crazy people:
1) All crazy people die
2) Huamns stop making babies
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 18:16:52 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/9/2026 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:That's the problem. It's my body so nobody else gets to tell me what to
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>>>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a
burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>>>
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>>
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
do with it. It's a basic human right. That's where I draw the line. YMMV.
Solution: All people who are uncaring towards other people should be
taken out and shot.
On 8/9/2026 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 18:16:52 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/9/2026 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Solution: All people who are uncaring towards other people should be
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:That's the problem. It's my body so nobody else gets to tell me what to
On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca> wrote: >>>>>>When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>>> the line. YMMV.
On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
NY Times,You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>>>
David Wallace-Wells
"But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting
contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should
have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and
might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to
try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand."
My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>>>
"This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead,
we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a >>>>>>>>>> burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>>> diary."
Treating it as a simplistic blame game.
This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as
incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame.
Learn from experience.
No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>>>
In conclusion, Daivd:
"The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make
any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>>> from it."
So here is the image:
David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point.
Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic. >>>>>>>>>
As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties.
Yes it is clear which side you choose.
Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth.
And the truth is often complicated.
As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>>>
When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting
vaccinated, that is where I draw the line.
do with it. It's a basic human right. That's where I draw the line. YMMV. >>
taken out and shot.
That's the point (pun intended) - you can't force people to take shots
(no pun intended) - that would be unlawful in the US.
If you forced a trucker to wear a mask and get a shot in order to work,
you would get a protest and start a riot - and taken out and shot.
You try spreading that mandatory injections propaganda at a Truck Stop
down here in New Jersey and you've got a problem with the Teamsters
Union. Don't go there. You won't like it.
Look what happened to Jimmy.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 03:12:38 |
| Calls: | 1,102 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 277,096 |