On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one hand,
it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the nation.
On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the
guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It has
served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of progressivism >>>>> stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment where, >>>>> for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims at face >>>>> value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would be to >>>>> invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the fantasistrCOs >>>>> claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become
increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an appearance >>>>> in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo
because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. This is
what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once heard of >>>>> a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was only
then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been commissioned. >>>>> The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd wanted to >>>>> believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff the
magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. Who would >>>>> dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of powerful
people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will always find a >>>>> way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to throw in >>>>> the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of >>>>> ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently
fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must think it >>>>> makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case to >>>>> answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure of an >>>>> obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own
exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the motivation of >>>>> JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him to be >>>>> such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, with his >>>>> enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later
convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very badly to >>>>> believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end to the >>>>> whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever take them >>>>> seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply
embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see also
Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring young >>>>> man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very-good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just such a >>>>> mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. According to >>>>> him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs Thatcher, >>>>> SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less bizarre >>>>> than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things out of a >>>>> hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and not enough >>>>> people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to
believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual status as >>>>> nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human failing: >>>>> ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real.
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make it,
are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't rampant lying
going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of
Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to have
published a book. - The Telegraph
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one hand, >>>>>> it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the nation. >>>>>> On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the
guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It has
served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of
progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment
where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims at >>>>>> face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would be to >>>>>> invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the fantasistrCOs >>>>>> claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become
increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an
appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo
because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. This is >>>>>> what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who want, for >>>>>> whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once heard
of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was only >>>>>> then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it gradually >>>>>> occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been
commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd wanted to >>>>>> believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff the >>>>>> magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. Who would >>>>>> dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of powerful >>>>>> people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will always
find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be acknowledged. >>>>>>
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to
throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of >>>>>> ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently
fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that the >>>>>> Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and] >>>>>> deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how OrCOBrien >>>>>> goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must think it >>>>>> makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case to >>>>>> answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure of an >>>>>> obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own
exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the motivation of >>>>>> JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him to be >>>>>> such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, with his >>>>>> enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later
convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very badly to >>>>>> believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end to the >>>>>> whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever take them >>>>>> seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply
embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see also >>>>>> Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring
young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, but the >>>>>> progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very-good and >>>>>> delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just such a >>>>>> mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. According
to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs Thatcher, >>>>>> SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less
bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and not
enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to
believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual status as >>>>>> nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human failing: >>>>>> ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real.
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking read
it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He wouldn't be >>>> the first.,Nothing to see here move along.
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make it,
are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't rampant lying
going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't suggesting anything
that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this whole
article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of
Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to have
published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one
hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the nation. >>>>>>> On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the >>>>>>> guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It has
served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of
progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment
where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims at >>>>>>> face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would be to >>>>>>> invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the fantasistrCOs >>>>>>> claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become
increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an
appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo >>>>>>> because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. This >>>>>>> is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who want, for >>>>>>> whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once heard >>>>>>> of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was
only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it gradually >>>>>>> occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been
commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd wanted to >>>>>>> believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff
the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. Who >>>>>>> would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of powerful >>>>>>> people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will always >>>>>>> find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be acknowledged. >>>>>>>
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to >>>>>>> throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of >>>>>>> ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently
fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that the >>>>>>> Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and] >>>>>>> deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how OrCOBrien >>>>>>> goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must think it >>>>>>> makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case to >>>>>>> answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure of an >>>>>>> obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own
exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the motivation of >>>>>>> JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is to >>>>>>> throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him to be >>>>>>> such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, with >>>>>>> his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later
convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very badly to >>>>>>> believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end to the >>>>>>> whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever take >>>>>>> them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply
embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see also >>>>>>> Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring >>>>>>> young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, but the >>>>>>> progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very-good and >>>>>>> delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just such a >>>>>>> mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. According >>>>>>> to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs Thatcher, >>>>>>> SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less
bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things out >>>>>>> of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and not >>>>>>> enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to
believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual status as >>>>>>> nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human
failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real.
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking read
it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He wouldn't be >>>>> the first.,Nothing to see here move along.
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make it,
are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't rampant lying
going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't suggesting anything
that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this
whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of
Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to have
published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for?
get diagnosed autistic at 3year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you were born
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could speak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally
claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of seven
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time travellertwice its size
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg swollen to
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record is 650record again) raised -u5m
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras (no
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages matching another student's 2009 thesisyourself
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, odds
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you conducted
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive substances & mutilated animals
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's
have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, rape &
photograph none of ithunt black academics
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use to
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war oncritical race theory"
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor who left &one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve daystext they never read
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch for
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
On 04/08/2026 20:00, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one hand, ithttps://x.com/SwipeWright/status/2085090552731570261?s=20
is a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the nation.
On the other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the
guileless Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It
has served up a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of
progressivism stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment where,
for political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims at
face value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would be
to invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the fantasistrCOs
claims (which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become
increasingly outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an
appearance in a television programme that began 20 years before he was
born rCo because he is increasingly secure that they will never be
questioned. This is what inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters
people who want, for whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once heard of a
TV project that met for its first big production meeting. It was only
then, after weeks of prep across different departments, that it
gradually occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been
commissioned. The writer had just told everybody that it had. And
theyrCOd wanted to believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff the
magic dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. Who
would dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of
powerful people feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity
will always find a way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never
be acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently fighting
a desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how OrCOBrien goes >> all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case to
answer here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure of
an obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own
exhaustive investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the
motivation of JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is to throw >> murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later
convicted paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very
badly to believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply
embedded in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see
also Jussie Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The
daring young man on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a
splat, but the progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very-good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. According to
him, after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs
Thatcher, SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less
bizarre than ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three
things out of a hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles,
Toyah and not enough people called Steve. And on the right, enough
people want to believe in Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister,
despite his actual status as nothing much more than an electoral
irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real.
Gareth Roberts
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper you're writing, Nick:
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one
hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the
nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the >>>>>>>> guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It has >>>>>>>> served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of
progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment
where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims >>>>>>>> at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would >>>>>>>> be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the
fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become
increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an
appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo >>>>>>>> because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. This >>>>>>>> is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who want, for >>>>>>>> whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once heard >>>>>>>> of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was >>>>>>>> only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it gradually >>>>>>>> occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been
commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd
wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff >>>>>>>> the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. Who >>>>>>>> would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of
powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will always >>>>>>>> find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be acknowledged. >>>>>>>>
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to >>>>>>>> throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of >>>>>>>> ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently >>>>>>>> fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that the >>>>>>>> Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and] >>>>>>>> deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how
OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must
think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case >>>>>>>> to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure of an >>>>>>>> obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own >>>>>>>> exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the motivation of >>>>>>>> JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is to >>>>>>>> throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him >>>>>>>> to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, >>>>>>>> with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later >>>>>>>> convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very badly to >>>>>>>> believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end to >>>>>>>> the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever take >>>>>>>> them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply >>>>>>>> embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see also >>>>>>>> Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring >>>>>>>> young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, but the >>>>>>>> progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very-good and >>>>>>>> delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just >>>>>>>> such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. According >>>>>>>> to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs
Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less >>>>>>>> bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things out >>>>>>>> of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and not >>>>>>>> enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to
believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual
status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human
failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking read
it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a HeNothing to see here move along.
wouldn't be
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make
it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't rampant
lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't suggesting
anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this
whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of
Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to have
published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for?
get diagnosed autistic at 3year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you were born
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could speak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally
claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of seven
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time travellertwice its size
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg swollen to
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record is 650record again) raised -u5m
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras (no
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages matching another student's 2009 thesishunt black academics
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, odds
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you conducted yourself
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's
have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive substances & mutilated animals
photograph none of it
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use to
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war on critical race theory"one you never even met
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor who left &
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve daystext they never read
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch for
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one >>>>>>>>> hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the
nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the >>>>>>>>> guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It has >>>>>>>>> served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of
progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment >>>>>>>>> where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims >>>>>>>>> at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would >>>>>>>>> be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the
fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become
increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an
appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo >>>>>>>>> because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. This >>>>>>>>> is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who want, for >>>>>>>>> whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once
heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was >>>>>>>>> only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it
gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been
commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd >>>>>>>>> wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff >>>>>>>>> the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. Who >>>>>>>>> would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of
powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will always >>>>>>>>> find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be acknowledged. >>>>>>>>>
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to >>>>>>>>> throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of >>>>>>>>> ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently >>>>>>>>> fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that the >>>>>>>>> Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and] >>>>>>>>> deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must >>>>>>>>> think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case >>>>>>>>> to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure of an >>>>>>>>> obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own >>>>>>>>> exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the
motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is to
throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him >>>>>>>>> to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, >>>>>>>>> with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later >>>>>>>>> convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very badly to >>>>>>>>> believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end >>>>>>>>> to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever >>>>>>>>> take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply >>>>>>>>> embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see >>>>>>>>> also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring >>>>>>>>> young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, but the >>>>>>>>> progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very-good >>>>>>>>> and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just >>>>>>>>> such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist.
According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs
Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less >>>>>>>>> bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things >>>>>>>>> out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and not >>>>>>>>> enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to >>>>>>>>> believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual
status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human >>>>>>>>> failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking
read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a HeNothing to see here move along.
wouldn't be
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make
it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't rampant >>>>> lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't suggesting
anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this
whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of
Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to have >>>>>> published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for?
you're writing, Nick:
get diagnosed autistic at 3year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you were born
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could speak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally
claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of seven
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time traveller >> -a>claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg swollen totwice its size
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record is 650record again) raised -u5m
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras (no
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passagesmatching another student's 2009 thesis
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, oddsyourself
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you conducted
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021& death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive substances
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's
have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN ANTI >> RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, rape
& mutilated animals
photograph none of ithunt black academics
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that morning >> -a>have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use to
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war oncritical race theory"
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor who left& one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve daystext they never read
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch for
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really compare, so
it's laughable that you are about some random-ass academic
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can compare
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one >>>>>>>>>> hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the >>>>>>>>>> nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the >>>>>>>>>> guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It has >>>>>>>>>> served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of
progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment >>>>>>>>>> where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his claims >>>>>>>>>> at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt would >>>>>>>>>> be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the
fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become >>>>>>>>>> increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo >>>>>>>>>> because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. >>>>>>>>>> This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who want, >>>>>>>>>> for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once >>>>>>>>>> heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was >>>>>>>>>> only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it >>>>>>>>>> gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd >>>>>>>>>> wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like Puff >>>>>>>>>> the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. >>>>>>>>>> Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of
powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will
always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be
acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to >>>>>>>>>> throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently >>>>>>>>>> fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers that >>>>>>>>>> the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied [and] >>>>>>>>>> deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must >>>>>>>>>> think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any case >>>>>>>>>> to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure >>>>>>>>>> of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own >>>>>>>>>> exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the
motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is >>>>>>>>>> to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed him >>>>>>>>>> to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, >>>>>>>>>> with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and later >>>>>>>>>> convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very >>>>>>>>>> badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end >>>>>>>>>> to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever >>>>>>>>>> take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too deeply >>>>>>>>>> embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see >>>>>>>>>> also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring >>>>>>>>>> young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, but >>>>>>>>>> the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very- >>>>>>>>>> good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just >>>>>>>>>> such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist.
According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs >>>>>>>>>> Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less >>>>>>>>>> bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things >>>>>>>>>> out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and >>>>>>>>>> not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to >>>>>>>>>> believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual >>>>>>>>>> status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human >>>>>>>>>> failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking
read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a HeNothing to see here move along.
wouldn't be
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make >>>>>> it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't
rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't
suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this
whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of
Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to have >>>>>>> published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for?
you're writing, Nick:
get diagnosed autistic at 3year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you were born
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two GCSEs >>> -a>claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could speak >>> -a>claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally
claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of seven
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not timetraveller
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg swollento twice its size
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record is 650 >>> -a>have no recorded race time anywhere because why botherrecord again) raised -u5m
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras (no
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passagesmatching another student's 2009 thesis
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, oddsyourself
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you conducted
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021ANTI RACISM LETTER"
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's
have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, rape& death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive substances
& mutilated animals
photograph none of itmorning
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that
have the butcher say no officer ever came inhunt black academics
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use to
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war oncritical race theory"
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor wholeft & one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve daystext they never read
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch for
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really compare, so
it's laughable that you are about some random-ass academic
to all your accomplishments. That being said, what happened to the
academic paper you wrote?
On 8/6/26 4:03 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:dud u don't even know how to read,
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query. >>>>>>>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one >>>>>>>>>>> hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the >>>>>>>>>>> nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about the >>>>>>>>>>> guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It >>>>>>>>>>> has served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of >>>>>>>>>>> progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment >>>>>>>>>>> where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his >>>>>>>>>>> claims at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt >>>>>>>>>>> would be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the
fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become >>>>>>>>>>> increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born rCo >>>>>>>>>>> because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. >>>>>>>>>>> This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who >>>>>>>>>>> want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once >>>>>>>>>>> heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It was >>>>>>>>>>> only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it >>>>>>>>>>> gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd >>>>>>>>>>> wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like >>>>>>>>>>> Puff the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. >>>>>>>>>>> Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of >>>>>>>>>>> powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will >>>>>>>>>>> always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be
acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders to >>>>>>>>>>> throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the >>>>>>>>>>> height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently >>>>>>>>>>> fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers >>>>>>>>>>> that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied >>>>>>>>>>> [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must >>>>>>>>>>> think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any >>>>>>>>>>> case to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure >>>>>>>>>>> of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their own >>>>>>>>>>> exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the >>>>>>>>>>> motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is >>>>>>>>>>> to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed >>>>>>>>>>> him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, >>>>>>>>>>> with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and >>>>>>>>>>> later convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very >>>>>>>>>>> badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an end >>>>>>>>>>> to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever >>>>>>>>>>> take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too >>>>>>>>>>> deeply embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see >>>>>>>>>>> also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The daring >>>>>>>>>>> young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, >>>>>>>>>>> but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very- >>>>>>>>>>> good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of just >>>>>>>>>>> such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist.
According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs >>>>>>>>>>> Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less >>>>>>>>>>> bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things >>>>>>>>>>> out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and >>>>>>>>>>> not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to >>>>>>>>>>> believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual >>>>>>>>>>> status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform.
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human >>>>>>>>>>> failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking >>>>>>> read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He >>>>>>>>> wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u make >>>>>>> it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't
rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't
suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of
transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this >>>>>>> whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo >>>>>>>
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of >>>>>>>> Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to
have published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for?
you're writing, Nick:
get diagnosed autistic at 3traveller
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two GCSEs >>>> -a>claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could speak >>>> -a>claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally
claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of seven >>>> year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you were born
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg swollento twice its size
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record is 650 >>>> -a>have no recorded race time anywhere because why bothermatching another student's 2009 thesis
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras (no >>>> record again) raised -u5m
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, oddsANTI RACISM LETTER"
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you conducted >>>> yourself
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's
have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting,rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive
substances & mutilated animals
photograph none of itmorning
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that
have the butcher say no officer ever came inon critical race theory"
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use to >>>> hunt black academics
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor wholeft & one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve days
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch for >>>> text they never read
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really compare,
so it's laughable that you are about some random-ass academic
compare to all your accomplishments. That being said, what happened to
the academic paper you wrote?
lol i attack ur gay bestie trump so u try to attack me back? get a room dud
On 8/6/2026 4:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 4:03 PM, Dude wrote:The most interesting man on the planet!
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:dud u don't even know how to read,
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query. >>>>>>>>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the one >>>>>>>>>>>> hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the >>>>>>>>>>>> nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about >>>>>>>>>>>> the guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It >>>>>>>>>>>> has served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of >>>>>>>>>>>> progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an environment >>>>>>>>>>>> where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his >>>>>>>>>>>> claims at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt >>>>>>>>>>>> would be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the >>>>>>>>>>>> fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become >>>>>>>>>>>> increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born >>>>>>>>>>>> rCo because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. >>>>>>>>>>>> This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who >>>>>>>>>>>> want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once >>>>>>>>>>>> heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It >>>>>>>>>>>> was only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it >>>>>>>>>>>> gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd >>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like >>>>>>>>>>>> Puff the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. >>>>>>>>>>>> Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>> powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will >>>>>>>>>>>> always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be
acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders >>>>>>>>>>>> to throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the >>>>>>>>>>>> height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is currently >>>>>>>>>>>> fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers >>>>>>>>>>>> that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied >>>>>>>>>>>> [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must >>>>>>>>>>>> think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any >>>>>>>>>>>> case to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory failure >>>>>>>>>>>> of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their >>>>>>>>>>>> own exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the >>>>>>>>>>>> motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option is
to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed >>>>>>>>>>>> him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your arm, >>>>>>>>>>>> with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and >>>>>>>>>>>> later convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very >>>>>>>>>>>> badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an >>>>>>>>>>>> end to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever >>>>>>>>>>>> take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too >>>>>>>>>>>> deeply embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see >>>>>>>>>>>> also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The >>>>>>>>>>>> daring young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, >>>>>>>>>>>> but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very- >>>>>>>>>>>> good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of >>>>>>>>>>>> just such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. >>>>>>>>>>>> According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs >>>>>>>>>>>> Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less >>>>>>>>>>>> bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three things >>>>>>>>>>>> out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and >>>>>>>>>>>> not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want to >>>>>>>>>>>> believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual >>>>>>>>>>>> status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform. >>>>>>>>>>>>
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common human >>>>>>>>>>>> failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking >>>>>>>> read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He >>>>>>>>>> wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u
make it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there isn't >>>>>>>> rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly ain't >>>>>>>> suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of >>>>>>>> transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so this >>>>>>>> whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo >>>>>>>>
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of >>>>>>>>> Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to >>>>>>>>> have published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for?
you're writing, Nick:
get diagnosed autistic at 3GCSEs
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you couldspeak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionallyseven year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you
claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of
were born
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not timetraveller
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg swollen >>>>> to twice its size(no record again) raised -u5m
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record is >>>>> 650
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passagesmatching another student's 2009 thesis
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, oddsconducted yourself
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's
have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN >>>>> ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting,
substances & mutilated animals
photograph none of itto hunt black academics
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that >>>>> morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war >>>>> on critical race theory"left & one you never even met
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor who
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve daysfor text they never read
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really compare,
so it's laughable that you are about some random-ass academic
compare to all your accomplishments. That being said, what happened
to the academic paper you wrote?
lol i attack ur gay bestie trump so u try to attack me back? get a
room dud
He ran a marathon because it was on his way.
On 8/6/26 8:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/6/2026 4:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 4:03 PM, Dude wrote:The most interesting man on the planet!
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:dud u don't even know how to read,
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query. >>>>>>>>>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the >>>>>>>>>>>>> one hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about >>>>>>>>>>>>> the guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It >>>>>>>>>>>>> has served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of >>>>>>>>>>>>> progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an
environment where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his >>>>>>>>>>>>> claims at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the >>>>>>>>>>>>> fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become >>>>>>>>>>>>> increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was born >>>>>>>>>>>>> rCo because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who >>>>>>>>>>>>> want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once >>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It >>>>>>>>>>>>> was only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it >>>>>>>>>>>>> gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd >>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>> Puff the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on others. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>>> powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will >>>>>>>>>>>>> always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be >>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders >>>>>>>>>>>>> to throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the >>>>>>>>>>>>> height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is >>>>>>>>>>>>> currently fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers >>>>>>>>>>>>> that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into rCystudied >>>>>>>>>>>>> [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He must >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any >>>>>>>>>>>>> case to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory >>>>>>>>>>>>> failure of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their >>>>>>>>>>>>> own exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the >>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option >>>>>>>>>>>>> is to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed >>>>>>>>>>>>> him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your >>>>>>>>>>>>> arm, with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and >>>>>>>>>>>>> later convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very >>>>>>>>>>>>> badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an >>>>>>>>>>>>> end to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could ever >>>>>>>>>>>>> take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too >>>>>>>>>>>>> deeply embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo see >>>>>>>>>>>>> also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> daring young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on.
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not-very- >>>>>>>>>>>>> good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of >>>>>>>>>>>>> just such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. >>>>>>>>>>>>> According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much less >>>>>>>>>>>>> bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three >>>>>>>>>>>>> things out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah and >>>>>>>>>>>>> not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want >>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual >>>>>>>>>>>>> status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common >>>>>>>>>>>>> human failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning?
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't fucking >>>>>>>>> read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He >>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u >>>>>>>>> make it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there
isn't rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly >>>>>>>>> ain't suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of >>>>>>>>> transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so >>>>>>>>> this whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo >>>>>>>>>
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University of >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed to >>>>>>>>>> have published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for? >>>>>>>
you're writing, Nick:
get diagnosed autistic at 3seven year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you >>>>>> were born
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two >>>>>> GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could >>>>>> speak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally >>>>>> -a>claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not timetraveller
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken legswollen to twice its size
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record >>>>>> is 650matching another student's 2009 thesis
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras >>>>>> (no record again) raised -u5m
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, oddsconducted yourself
carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021substances & mutilated animals
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's >>>>>> -a>have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN >>>>>> ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, >>>>>> rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive
photograph none of it
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice >>>>>> -a>appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that >>>>>> morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect
call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use >>>>>> to hunt black academics
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the "war >>>>>> on critical race theory"
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor who >>>>>> left & one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve days
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch >>>>>> for text they never read
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really compare, >>>>> so it's laughable that you are about some random-ass academic
compare to all your accomplishments. That being said, what happened
to the academic paper you wrote?
lol i attack ur gay bestie trump so u try to attack me back? get a
room dud
He ran a marathon because it was on his way.
u came HERE to get eNlIgHtEnEd???
On 8/6/2026 8:58 PM, dart200 wrote:Efn<Efn<Efn< sorry i threw up before finishing the read u creepy fuck
On 8/6/26 8:24 PM, Dude wrote:The...
On 8/6/2026 4:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 4:03 PM, Dude wrote:The most interesting man on the planet!
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper >>>>>>> you're writing, Nick:
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:dud u don't even know how to read,
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your query. >>>>>>>>>>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an
environment where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his >>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably become >>>>>>>>>>>>>> increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> born rCo because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be questioned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I once >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And theyrCOd >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Puff the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> others. Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs cheerleaders >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rCystudied [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He >>>>>>>>>>>>>> must think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory >>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> own exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have revealed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> arm, with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> later convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very >>>>>>>>>>>>>> badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> end to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeply embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> see also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> daring young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a splat, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> very- good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are Mrs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much >>>>>>>>>>>>>> less bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three >>>>>>>>>>>>>> things out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his actual >>>>>>>>>>>>>> status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common >>>>>>>>>>>>>> human failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning? >>>>>>>>>>>>
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't
fucking read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He >>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u >>>>>>>>>> make it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there >>>>>>>>>> isn't rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly >>>>>>>>>> ain't suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind of >>>>>>>>>> transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs so >>>>>>>>>> this whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh.
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo >>>>>>>>>>
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University >>>>>>>>>>> of Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed >>>>>>>>>>> to have published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for? >>>>>>>>
get diagnosed autistic at 3swollen to twice its size
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ two >>>>>>> GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you could >>>>>>> speak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally >>>>>>> -a>claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of >>>>>>> seven year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before you >>>>>>> were born
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time >>>>>>> traveller
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record >>>>>>> is 650conducted yourself
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras >>>>>>> (no record again) raised -u5m
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages >>>>>>> matching another student's 2009 thesis
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, odds >>>>>>> -a>carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021"war on critical race theory"
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's >>>>>>> -a>have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE SIGN >>>>>>> ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, >>>>>>> rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive >>>>>>> substances & mutilated animals
photograph none of it
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice >>>>>>> -a>appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" that >>>>>>> morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect >>>>>>> -a>call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives use >>>>>>> to hunt black academics
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor who >>>>>>> left & one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve days
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch >>>>>>> for text they never read
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really
compare, so it's laughable that you are about some random-ass
academic
compare to all your accomplishments. That being said, what happened >>>>> to the academic paper you wrote?
lol i attack ur gay bestie trump so u try to attack me back? get a
room dud
He ran a marathon because it was on his way.
u came HERE to get eNlIgHtEnEd???
On 8/7/26 12:20 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/6/2026 8:58 PM, dart200 wrote:Efn<Efn<Efn< sorry i threw up before finishing the read u creepy fuck
On 8/6/26 8:24 PM, Dude wrote:The...
On 8/6/2026 4:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 4:03 PM, Dude wrote:The most interesting man on the planet!
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the paper >>>>>>>> you're writing, Nick:
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your >>>>>>>>>>>> query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> born rCo because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be
questioned. This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theyrCOd wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Puff the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others. Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheerleaders to throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky followers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rCystudied [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love how >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining option
is to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revealed him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arm, with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeply embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daring young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> splat, but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very- good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mrs Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> less bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be real. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't >>>>>>>>>>> fucking read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He >>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u >>>>>>>>>>> make it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there >>>>>>>>>>> isn't rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they certainly >>>>>>>>>>> ain't suggesting anything that might fix this.
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind >>>>>>>>>>> of transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs >>>>>>>>>>> so this whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh. >>>>>>>>>>>
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic duo >>>>>>>>>>>
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University >>>>>>>>>>>> of Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely claimed >>>>>>>>>>>> to have published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for? >>>>>>>>>
get diagnosed autistic at 3could speak
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ >>>>>>>> two GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally >>>>>>>> -a>claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of >>>>>>>> seven year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before >>>>>>>> you were bornswollen to twice its size
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time >>>>>>>> traveller
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's record >>>>>>>> is 650conducted yourself
have no recorded race time anywhere because why bother
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras >>>>>>>> (no record again) raised -u5m
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages >>>>>>>> matching another student's 2009 thesis
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, odds >>>>>>>> -a>carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years
guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's >>>>>>>> -a>have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE >>>>>>>> SIGN ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, >>>>>>>> rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, corrosive >>>>>>>> substances & mutilated animals
photograph none of it
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice >>>>>>>> -a>appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house
claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" >>>>>>>> that morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect >>>>>>>> -a>call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025
give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives >>>>>>>> use to hunt black academics
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the >>>>>>>> "war on critical race theory"
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor >>>>>>>> who left & one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve days
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to vouch >>>>>>>> for text they never read
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really
compare, so it's laughable that you are about some random-ass
academic
compare to all your accomplishments. That being said, what
happened to the academic paper you wrote?
lol i attack ur gay bestie trump so u try to attack me back? get a
room dud
He ran a marathon because it was on his way.
u came HERE to get eNlIgHtEnEd???
On 8/7/2026 9:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/7/26 12:20 PM, Dude wrote:You came here to read, you crazy fuck?
On 8/6/2026 8:58 PM, dart200 wrote:Efn<Efn<Efn< sorry i threw up before finishing the read u creepy fuck
On 8/6/26 8:24 PM, Dude wrote:The...
On 8/6/2026 4:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 4:03 PM, Dude wrote:The most interesting man on the planet!
On 8/6/2026 3:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 10:06 AM, Dude wrote:So, I guess it goes without saying that nobody on this board can >>>>>>> compare to all your accomplishments. That being said, what
On 8/6/2026 8:20 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/6/26 7:14 AM, Wilson wrote:It's all about Jason Arday and the book he wrote, like the
On 8/5/2026 11:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Dude wrote:
On 8/4/2026 3:40 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:18:27 -0700, dart200You are supposed to read the article BEFORE you post your >>>>>>>>>>>>> query.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 8/4/26 12:00 PM, Julian wrote:
The Jason Arday affair has been a great revealer. On the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one hand, it is
a glorious romp that has brought much-needed mirth to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the nation. On the
other, the exposure of Professor Arday isnrCOt really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the guileless
Arday himself, but the establishment that elevated him. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has served up
a moment of unavoidable clarity in which the nonsense of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressivism
stands exposed like the imperial scrotum.
It is a perfect storm. We have a fantasist in an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment where, for
political and social status reasons, everyone takes his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims at face
value, or pretends that they do because to express doubt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be to
invite unwanted attention. In such fertile ground the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fantasistrCOs claims
(which he continues to deny fabricating) inevitably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become increasingly
outlandish rCo epic marathon runs, prophetic blessings, an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appearance in a
television programme that began 20 years before he was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> born rCo because he
is increasingly secure that they will never be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questioned. This is what
inevitably occurs when a fantasist encounters people who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, for
whatever reason, to believe his fantasies.
It can be quite uncanny to see a fantasist at work. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once heard of a TV
project that met for its first big production meeting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was only then,
after weeks of prep across different departments, that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it gradually
occurred to everybody that the show hadnrCOt actually been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned.
The writer had just told everybody that it had. And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theyrCOd wanted to
believe.
Arday himself can hardly be blamed for this scandal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like Puff the magic
dragon, he is notable only for the effect he had on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others. Who would
dare to speak up against a wunderkind that made a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> powerful people
feel better about themselves? Like love, mediocrity will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always find a
way. DEI is its great enabler, but this can never be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledged.
Even now we can see the reluctance of ArdayrCOs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheerleaders to throw in
the towel. LBCrCOs James OrCOBrien, for example, who at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height of
ArdayrCOs fame nodded along to his rambling tosh, is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently fighting a
desperate rearguard action, telling his Bluesky >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> followers that the
Telegraph and the Times have crossed the line into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rCystudied [and]
deliberate ignominyrCO with their Arday stories. I love >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how OrCOBrien goes
all Victorian in his vocabulary on these occasions. He >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must think it
makes him look very serious. He goes on, rCyIf there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any case to answer
here, it is about Liverpool John MoorerCOs supervisory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure of an
obviously unique PhD student. Something, I imagine, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their own exhaustive
investigation concludedrCa [it] would be comical if the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation of
JasonrCOs enemies were not so hideously obvious.rCO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Like all of ArdayrCOs fans, OrCOBrienrCOs only remaining >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> option is to throw
murky aspersions of racism on the people who have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revealed him to be
such a colossal, credulous prat.
And of course, OrCOBrien has form on this as long as your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arm, with his
enthusiastic vaunting of the claims of the fantasist and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later convicted
paedophile Carl Beech. In both cases, OrCOBrien wanted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very badly to
believe a very obvious fantasy.
Such scandals can often be mistaken optimistically for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an end to the
whole shebang of-a progressive nonsense rCo for who could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever take them
seriously again? But the roots of progressivism are too >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deeply embedded
in the soil of public life. These hilarious exposures rCo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see also Jussie
Smollett rCo are not strong enough to dislodge them. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daring young man
on the flying trapeze may fall to the ground with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> splat, but the
progressive circus is so big that it just moves on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
People who want to believe are easy marks for the not- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very- good and
delusional. The Labour party is currently in the grip of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just such a
mania. Andy Burnham is only another kind of fantasist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to him,
after all, the big problems facing Britain in 2026 are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mrs Thatcher,
SainsburyrCOs and not enough mayors. Is that really much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> less bizarre than
ArdayrCOs claims? It feels a bit like herCOs pulled three >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things out of a
hat. Another dip would have brought up unicycles, Toyah >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not enough
people called Steve. And on the right, enough people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to believe in
Rupert Lowe as the next prime minister, despite his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual status as
nothing much more than an electoral irritant to Reform. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Arday shows, we need safeguards against that common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human failing:
ignoring the truth in favour of what werCOd prefer to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real.
Gareth Roberts
do u think this journoslop actually saying anythning? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dud u don't even know how to read,
so i don't even know why i'm writing this cause u can't >>>>>>>>>>>> fucking read it even!!!
Efn+Efn+Efn+
Nothing you like I suspect, maybe even nothing I like.-a He >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't beNothing to see here move along.
the first.,
guy lied about his cv. i mean, if u aren't faking it until u >>>>>>>>>>>> make it, are you even really trying??? cons act like there >>>>>>>>>>>> isn't rampant lying going on everywhere, cause they
certainly ain't suggesting anything that might fix this. >>>>>>>>>>>>
idk like transparency...
except oh wait, ya'll care more about privacy than the kind >>>>>>>>>>>> of transparency that would prevent people from lying on cvs >>>>>>>>>>>> so this whole article is really much ado about nothing tbh. >>>>>>>>>>>>
boomers and self-defeating non-solutions: name a more iconic >>>>>>>>>>>> duo
BREAKING: Prof Jason Arday has resigned from the University >>>>>>>>>>>>> of Cambridge after The Telegraph revealed he falsely >>>>>>>>>>>>> claimed to have published a book. - The Telegraph
NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG PLEASE
what is there to see here that you actually have any answers for? >>>>>>>>>>
paper you're writing, Nick:
get diagnosed autistic at 3record is 650
claim non-verbal until 11
claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign
claim you couldn't read until 18, but still leave school w/ >>>>>>>>> two GCSEs
claim joining pro snooker tour at 10, one year before you >>>>>>>>> could speak
claim you came out of a football academy & played professionally >>>>>>>>> -a>claim you were on Seven Up, a series that tracked a group of >>>>>>>>> seven year olds as they grew up, airing first 21 years before >>>>>>>>> you were born
have the BBC confirm you weren't on the show because not time >>>>>>>>> traveller
claim 30 marathons in 35 days, the last 9 on a broken leg >>>>>>>>> swollen to twice its size
claim to have run 600 miles in six days, when the men's
have no recorded race time anywhere because why botherultras (no record again) raised -u5m
have nobody in the ultra community ever hear of you
say -u5.5m raised for 70+ charities by 2024
tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the
submit a 401-page PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages >>>>>>>>> matching another student's 2009 thesisspitting, rape & death l threats, bananas, bullets in the post, >>>>>>>>> corrosive substances & mutilated animals
have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, odds >>>>>>>>> -a>carry over her copy-editing errors
get the PhD anyway
lift quotes into papers & present them as interviews you >>>>>>>>> conducted yourself
get a full chair at Glasgow by 2021
get Cambridge at 37, youngest black professor in 900 years >>>>>>>>> -a>guest edit the Today programme
collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin & St Mary's >>>>>>>>> -a>have a Cambridge autism professor circulate rCLURGENT PLEASE >>>>>>>>> SIGN ANTI RACISM LETTER"
write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault,
photograph none of it
claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice >>>>>>>>> -a>appear on no CCTV either time
tell nobody AT THE TIME
claim a severed pig's head arrived at your parents' house >>>>>>>>> -a>claim police traced it to a butcher who sold a rCLwhole hog" >>>>>>>>> that morning
have the butcher say no officer ever came in
have the Met say the whole account is categorically incorrect >>>>>>>>> -a>call it "a modern day lynching" on a podcast in Sept 2025 >>>>>>>>> -a>give a keynote in April 2026 about a playbook conservatives >>>>>>>>> use to hunt black academics
get cleared in March 2026 by a panel you asked to weigh the >>>>>>>>> "war on critical race theory"
blame the copied text on autistic mimicry & on a supervisor >>>>>>>>> who left & one you never even met
turn 600 miles in six days into twelve days
get Solent to delete the running claims
get 13,000 signatures & three Cambridge college heads to >>>>>>>>> vouch for text they never read
have Cambridge call it a "vile smear campaign"
have a ghostwritten memoir to be released August 27
watch people still stand for you because you're black
i mean have u seen our president dud? none of these really
compare, so it's laughable that you are about some random-ass >>>>>>>> academic
happened to the academic paper you wrote?
lol i attack ur gay bestie trump so u try to attack me back? get a >>>>>> room dud
He ran a marathon because it was on his way.
u came HERE to get eNlIgHtEnEd???
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:43:02 |
| Calls: | 1,101 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 276,187 |