• how much a fucking retard do you have to believe ...

    From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Fri May 15 22:00:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    >
    > #god
    --
    why are we god?
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 08:24:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    >
    > #god
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 12:36:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 11:26:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    If you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for>
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    So, some guys made up a conspiracy for consumption. A federal grand jury
    named Richard Nixon as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Watergate
    cover-up in 1974.

    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    >
    > #god

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 17:07:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 17:14:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    If you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for>
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    So, some guys made up a conspiracy for consumption. A federal grand jury >named Richard Nixon as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Watergate >cover-up in 1974.

    Yeh, the conspirators blew it. But the citizenry at large knew
    nothing about it beforehand. That is the thing us little guys know
    nothing other than what one party or another wants us to think. Until
    somebody blows it and gets indicted.

    Then we might hear something about it, but not always. It depends on
    whether somebody wants us to know, for political advantage not because
    anybody is really trying to keep up informed.


    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    >
    > #god
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 17:34:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do
    you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 18:03:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    If you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for>
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    So, some guys made up a conspiracy for consumption. A federal grand jury
    named Richard Nixon as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Watergate
    cover-up in 1974.

    Yeh, the conspirators blew it. But the citizenry at large knew
    nothing about it beforehand. That is the thing us little guys know
    nothing other than what one party or another wants us to think. Until somebody blows it and gets indicted.

    Then we might hear something about it, but not always. It depends on
    whether somebody wants us to know, for political advantage not because anybody is really trying to keep up informed.


    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    >
    > #god

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 22:06:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If >>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >>> undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do
    you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sat May 16 22:07:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sat, 16 May 2026 18:03:01 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    silli boi.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    Public knowledge is like that.


    If you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for>
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    So, some guys made up a conspiracy for consumption. A federal grand jury >>> named Richard Nixon as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Watergate
    cover-up in 1974.

    Yeh, the conspirators blew it. But the citizenry at large knew
    nothing about it beforehand. That is the thing us little guys know
    nothing other than what one party or another wants us to think. Until
    somebody blows it and gets indicted.

    Then we might hear something about it, but not always. It depends on
    whether somebody wants us to know, for political advantage not because
    anybody is really trying to keep up informed.


    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    >
    > #god
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 00:11:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to facebook

    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?
    --
    hi, i'm nick!
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 00:21:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/26 7:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If >>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >>>> undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do
    you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.

    i'm sure the judge will believe that one noah...
    --
    hi, i'm nick!
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sun May 17 00:23:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    u can literally murder people and end up with fans if u get enough
    publicity over it...

    > and it only gets better when u aren't committing heinous sin
    >
    > #god


    If you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for>
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    So, some guys made up a conspiracy for consumption. A federal grand jury >>> named Richard Nixon as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Watergate
    cover-up in 1974.

    Yeh, the conspirators blew it.-a But the citizenry at large knew
    nothing about it beforehand.-a That is the thing us little guys know
    nothing other than what one party or another wants us to think.-a Until
    somebody blows it and gets indicted.

    Then we might hear something about it, but not always.-a It depends on
    whether somebody wants us to know, for political advantage not because
    anybody is really trying to keep up informed.


    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened???

    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    -a-a-a > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take
    -a-a-a >
    -a-a-a > #god

    --
    why are we god?
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 09:46:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 17 May 2026 00:21:31 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/16/26 7:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If >>>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >>>>> undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do >>> you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.

    i'm sure the judge will believe that one noah...

    That's the thing. We are not judges. We are the powerless consumers
    of trash news. When conspirators actually get caught, the
    conspiracies are no longer conspiracies, but conspirators can still be prosecuted. That does not mean we will hear anything about it.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 10:07:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/2026 7:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If >>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >>>> undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do
    you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.

    A conspiracy is known when it is made public, unless it's covered up.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sun May 17 11:50:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/26 6:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 00:21:31 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/16/26 7:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If >>>>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >>>>>> undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade. >>>>>
    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>>>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do >>>> you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.

    i'm sure the judge will believe that one noah...

    That's the thing. We are not judges. We are the powerless consumers
    of trash news.

    > speak for urself noah Efnu
    >
    > #god
    --
    why are we god?
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 12:40:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 12:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If >>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to
    protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton
    trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to facebook

    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?

    Don't try sucking up to Wilson or Ned. They know a troll when they read one. --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sun May 17 12:59:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to Marylin Monroe.

    u can literally murder people and end up with fans if u get enough
    publicity over it...

    -a > and it only gets better when u aren't committing heinous sin
    -a >
    -a > #god


    If you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for>
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    So, some guys made up a conspiracy for consumption. A federal grand
    jury
    named Richard Nixon as an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Watergate
    cover-up in 1974.

    Yeh, the conspirators blew it.-a But the citizenry at large knew
    nothing about it beforehand.-a That is the thing us little guys know
    nothing other than what one party or another wants us to think.-a Until
    somebody blows it and gets indicted.

    Then we might hear something about it, but not always.-a It depends on
    whether somebody wants us to know, for political advantage not because
    anybody is really trying to keep up informed.


    or what, ur gunna claim conspiracies _never_ happened???

    why would we even have a word for something that never happened??? >>>>>>
    the only question one should be asking is which ones are real...

    -a-a-a > broadly dismissing them is an incredibly sheeplfried take >>>>>> -a-a-a >
    -a-a-a > #god




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic on Sun May 17 21:16:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to Marylin Monroe.
    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    and that is not being talked about." Oscar Wilde

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From julianlzb87@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 20:23:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    This message was cancelled from within Mozilla Thunderbird
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 21:24:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to Marylin Monroe.
    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    and that is not being talked about." Oscar Wilde

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 15:02:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/26 1:24 PM, Julian wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened
    to Marylin Monroe.
    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    -aand that is not being talked about."-a Oscar Wilde


    good thing dud's always talking about me!

    "where's nick eh???"
    --
    hi, i'm nick!
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 18:29:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 17 May 2026 11:50:39 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/17/26 6:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 00:21:31 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/16/26 7:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If >>>>>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>>>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade. >>>>>>
    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>>>>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do >>>>> you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.

    i'm sure the judge will believe that one noah...

    That's the thing. We are not judges. We are the powerless consumers
    of trash news.

    > speak for urself noah ?

    Beg for mercies for those who think that does not apply to them.

    > #god
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 18:30:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 17 May 2026 12:40:23 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/17/2026 12:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.a Conspiracies are by definition secret.a If >>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to
    protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton
    trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to facebook

    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?

    Don't try sucking up to Wilson or Ned. They know a troll when they read one.

    Ha. Wilson is severely in doubt. You, however are crystal clear.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 18:31:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to
    Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us". She chose to not be here any more.

    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    and that is not being talked about." Oscar Wilde
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 20:33:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 3:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/17/26 1:24 PM, Julian wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened
    to Marylin Monroe.
    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    -a-aand that is not being talked about."-a Oscar Wilde


    good thing dud's always talking about me!

    You came here to get enlightened?


    "where's nick eh???"

    That's it - now it's all about you - you're talking to yourself.

    "And I'm talkin' to myself at night
    Because I can't forget
    Back and forth through my mind
    Behind a cigarette"

    - Jack White
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 20:34:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to
    Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us". She chose to not be here any more.

    Did she?

    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    and that is not being talked about." Oscar Wilde

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 20:42:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/26 3:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 11:50:39 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/17/26 6:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 00:21:31 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/16/26 7:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:

    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson. Conspiracies are by definition secret. If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy. It is made up for >>>>>>>>> consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade. >>>>>>>
    That's nice. It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>>>>>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do >>>>>> you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies. >>>>>
    There are no known conspiracies. Once known they become public
    knowledge. You cannot cover up public knowledge.

    i'm sure the judge will believe that one noah...

    That's the thing. We are not judges. We are the powerless consumers
    of trash news.

    > speak for urself noah ?

    Beg for mercies for those who think that does not apply to them.

    > #god

    lol, why even bother having opinions if ur going to write off ur own
    impact so damn hard???
    --
    hi, i'm nick!
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 20:45:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 3:30 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 12:40:23 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/17/2026 12:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If >>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to
    protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton >>>> trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to facebook

    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?

    Don't try sucking up to Wilson or Ned. They know a troll when they read one.

    Ha. Wilson is severely in doubt. You, however are crystal clear.

    Let me be clear: You're just a newbie - I was lurking here long before
    you came along to lurk. Probably David Dalton was the first serious
    lurker on this board back in 1994.

    In fact, absfg is itself a troll: the Buddha was neither fat, nor a
    short guy.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 20:59:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/26 8:45 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:30 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 12:40:23 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/17/2026 12:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition
    secret.-a If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to
    protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton >>>>> trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to facebook >>>>
    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?

    Don't try sucking up to Wilson or Ned. They know a troll when they
    read one.

    Ha.-a Wilson is severely in doubt.-a You, however are crystal clear.

    Let me be clear: You're just a newbie - I was lurking here long before

    kinda sad that so many of ur posts are duds

    you came along to lurk. Probably David Dalton was the first serious
    lurker on this board back in 1994.

    In fact, absfg is itself a troll: the Buddha was neither fat, nor a
    short guy.

    that depends on which one we're talking about, eh?
    --
    hi, i'm nick!
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Sun May 17 21:28:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the
    coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to
    Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us". She chose to not be here any more.

    There are Known knowns: Things we know we know.
    Known unknowns: Things we know we don't know (gaps in our information).
    Unknown unknowns: Things we don't know we don't know.

    "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting
    to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we
    know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we
    know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown
    unknowns rCo the ones we don't know we don't know." - Donald Rumsfeld


    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    and that is not being talked about." Oscar Wilde

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 01:24:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Sun, 17 May 2026 20:34:56 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 11:26:57 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 5/16/2026 5:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.

    It's always about Wilson.

    Conspiracies are by definition secret.

    And you would know this how if there was a cover-up?

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the >>>>>> coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to >>>> Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us". She chose to not be here any more.

    Did she?

    Our ultimate damnation is that we have no idea why she might do that.
    Not that I know anything about her, simply a tiny inkling. Yes,
    Marilyn, I do possibly understand.

    "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about,
    and that is not being talked about." Oscar Wilde
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:00:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If >>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were deliberately >>> undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice.-a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard do
    you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event becomes unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New information
    about the event, often sensational or partially true, is released. The disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from facts that are or
    might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key details of the event
    are withheld or obscured. The public and media often moves on, believing
    the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the
    revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than outright
    lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real accountability.
    It remains a recognized concept in intelligence literature and political analysis."

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From dart200@user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 10:07:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/18/26 10:00 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If >>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their
    financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice.-a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard
    do you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event becomes unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New information about the event, often sensational or partially true, is released. The disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from facts that are or
    might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key details of the event
    are withheld or obscured. The public and media often moves on, believing
    the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than outright
    lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real accountability.
    It remains a recognized concept in intelligence literature and political analysis."


    yeah like all the leaks involving saudi arabia doing 9/11. sure they
    prolly were involved with supplying the terrorists especially osama, but
    the saudis weren't the originators
    --
    hi, i'm nick!
    let's end war EfOa

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:27:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Mon, 18 May 2026 10:07:11 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/18/26 10:00 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.a Conspiracies are by definition secret.a If >>>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice.a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though.

    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard
    do you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event becomes
    unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New information
    about the event, often sensational or partially true, is released. The
    disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from facts that are or
    might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key details of the event
    are withheld or obscured. The public and media often moves on, believing
    the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the
    revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than outright
    lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real accountability.
    It remains a recognized concept in intelligence literature and political
    analysis."


    yeah like all the leaks involving saudi arabia doing 9/11. sure they
    prolly were involved with supplying the terrorists especially osama, but
    the saudis weren't the originators

    We should not be surprised that wilson seems to know so much about
    this. The deception is that my side accuses so my side can't be
    thought to use such tactics.

    In fact the pit of such excrement is bottomless. If you think you
    actually know something, somebody out there is thinking, great,
    mission accomplished.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:31:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/18/2026 12:28 AM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the >>>>>> coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to >>>> Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us".-a She chose to not be here any more.

    There are Known knowns: Things we know we know.
    Known unknowns: Things we know we don't know (gaps in our information). Unknown unknowns: Things we don't know we don't know.

    "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting
    to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we
    know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we
    know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns rCo the ones we don't know we don't know." - Donald Rumsfeld

    It's rumored Marylin Monroe was having an affair with JFK. Allegedly she
    was emotionally unstable and top aids to the president were concerned
    she might reveal their relationship.

    She sang Happy Birthday to Kennedy at a DNC meeting in NY City.

    https://youtu.be/DJ7E1fzQzd8

    Check out the beginning where she's introduced as "the late Marylin
    Monroe" because she didn't take the stage on time. She died three months later.

    If you read that in a novel you'd think "that'd never happen".

    We live in a weird world.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 18:37:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 18/05/2026 18:31, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/18/2026 12:28 AM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the >>>>>>> coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what
    happened to
    Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us".-a She chose to not be here any more.

    There are Known knowns: Things we know we know.
    Known unknowns: Things we know we don't know (gaps in our information).
    Unknown unknowns: Things we don't know we don't know.

    "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always
    interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there
    are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns;
    that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there
    are also unknown unknowns rCo the ones we don't know we don't know." -
    Donald Rumsfeld

    It's rumored Marylin Monroe was having an affair with JFK. Allegedly she
    was emotionally unstable and top aids to the president were concerned
    she might reveal their relationship.

    She sang Happy Birthday to Kennedy at a DNC meeting in NY City.

    https://youtu.be/DJ7E1fzQzd8

    Check out the beginning where she's introduced as "the late Marylin
    Monroe" because she didn't take the stage on time. She died three months later.

    If you read that in a novel you'd think "that'd never happen".

    We live in a weird world.

    Don't forget Bobby.. "Historians and biographers widely believe that
    Robert F. "Bobby" Kennedy
    had an affair with Marilyn Monroe, though no concrete, definitive proof exists. The relationship
    has been heavily documented in FBI files, historical accounts, and
    alleged confirmations from close
    confidants and family members."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Julian@julianlzb87@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 18:39:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 18/05/2026 18:37, Julian wrote:
    On 18/05/2026 18:31, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/18/2026 12:28 AM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the >>>>>>>> coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what
    happened to
    Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us".-a She chose to not be here any more.

    There are Known knowns: Things we know we know.
    Known unknowns: Things we know we don't know (gaps in our information).
    Unknown unknowns: Things we don't know we don't know.

    "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always
    interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there
    are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns;
    that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But
    there are also unknown unknowns rCo the ones we don't know we don't
    know." - Donald Rumsfeld

    It's rumored Marylin Monroe was having an affair with JFK. Allegedly
    she was emotionally unstable and top aids to the president were
    concerned she might reveal their relationship.

    She sang Happy Birthday to Kennedy at a DNC meeting in NY City.

    https://youtu.be/DJ7E1fzQzd8

    Check out the beginning where she's introduced as "the late Marylin
    Monroe" because she didn't take the stage on time. She died three
    months later.

    If you read that in a novel you'd think "that'd never happen".

    We live in a weird world.

    Don't forget Bobby.. "Historians and biographers widely believe that
    Robert F. "Bobby" Kennedy
    had an affair with Marilyn Monroe, though no concrete, definitive proof exists. The relationship
    has been heavily documented in FBI files, historical accounts, and
    alleged confirmations from close
    confidants and family members."

    "The Final Weekend: There are extensive, albeit debated, claims from
    private investigators and associates that Monroe and Robert Kennedy were arguing intensely in the hours before her tragic death on August 4,
    1962, regarding their relationship."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:45:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:31:51 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 5/18/2026 12:28 AM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the >>>>>>> coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what happened to >>>>> Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us".a She chose to not be here any more.

    There are Known knowns: Things we know we know.
    Known unknowns: Things we know we don't know (gaps in our information).
    Unknown unknowns: Things we don't know we don't know.

    "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting
    to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we
    know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we
    know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown
    unknowns u the ones we don't know we don't know." - Donald Rumsfeld

    It's rumored Marylin Monroe was having an affair with JFK. Allegedly she
    was emotionally unstable and top aids to the president were concerned
    she might reveal their relationship.

    She sang Happy Birthday to Kennedy at a DNC meeting in NY City.

    https://youtu.be/DJ7E1fzQzd8

    Check out the beginning where she's introduced as "the late Marylin
    Monroe" because she didn't take the stage on time. She died three months >later.

    If you read that in a novel you'd think "that'd never happen".

    We live in a weird world.

    The biography of mlk I read said she actually did have sex with rfk
    and mlk. Their pillow talk was said to be significant. You know
    what, I don't think either of them would need to go to unstable women
    for sex.

    Unstable was not mentioned in the biography and begins to sound again
    like the conspiracy stuff you love.

    Yes, it is easy to suggest a suicided person was unstable. Imagining
    anything else could be troubling for us. Don't go there.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:10:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/18/2026 10:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Mon, 18 May 2026 10:07:11 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/18/26 10:00 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade. >>>>>
    That's nice.-a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>> -a>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard
    do you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event becomes >>> unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New information >>> about the event, often sensational or partially true, is released. The
    disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from facts that are or
    might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key details of the event >>> are withheld or obscured. The public and media often moves on, believing >>> the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the
    revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than outright
    lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real accountability.
    It remains a recognized concept in intelligence literature and political >>> analysis."


    yeah like all the leaks involving saudi arabia doing 9/11. sure they
    prolly were involved with supplying the terrorists especially osama, but
    the saudis weren't the originators

    We should not be surprised that wilson seems to know so much about
    this. The deception is that my side accuses so my side can't be
    thought to use such tactics.

    In fact the pit of such excrement is bottomless. If you think you
    actually know something, somebody out there is thinking, great,
    mission accomplished.

    So, I'm not sure you've thought this through as much as Nick has. He
    seems to think there"s some Saudi involvement but the plan was hatched
    up long before..

    There are many reasons to suspect a Saudi 9/11 conspiracy.

    The alleged Saudi connections and the Crown Prince's relationship to the controversy involve several key factors:

    Fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers and the plot's mastermind, Osama
    bin Laden, were Saudi citizens.

    There are civil lawsuits against the Kingdom. Families of the victims
    have long alleged that a support network of Saudi officials and state-sponsored charities provided material support to the hijackers.

    In a landmark ruling, a U.S. district judge rejected Saudi Arabia's
    motion to dismiss the civil lawsuit, allowing claims against the Kingdom
    to proceed toward trial.

    Notes:

    For the record, while plaintiffs seek accountability from the Saudi
    state, the 9/11 Commission Report found no evidence that the Saudi
    government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually
    funded the attacks.

    The current Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, was not,
    apparently, directly involved in the 9/11 attacks - he was a teenager at
    the time.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:14:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/18/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/18/26 10:00 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition
    secret.-a If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade.

    That's nice.-a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>> -a>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard
    do you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event
    becomes unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New
    information about the event, often sensational or partially true, is
    released. The disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from
    facts that are or might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key
    details of the event are withheld or obscured. The public and media
    often moves on, believing the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the
    revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than
    outright lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real
    accountability. It remains a recognized concept in intelligence
    literature and political analysis."


    yeah like all the leaks involving saudi arabia doing 9/11. sure they
    prolly were involved with supplying the terrorists especially osama, but
    the saudis weren't the originators

    Apparently the 9/11 attack was planned by Osama bin Laden, so we took
    him out. He was the only person who knew what he was thinking. My guess,
    Osama was reading the Koran to get ideas. YMMV.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:22:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 8:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/17/26 8:45 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:30 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 12:40:23 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/17/2026 12:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition
    secret.-a If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed >>>>>> use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to >>>>>> protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine the Union to protect their financial interests in the
    cotton
    trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to
    facebook

    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?

    Don't try sucking up to Wilson or Ned. They know a troll when they
    read one.

    Ha.-a Wilson is severely in doubt.-a You, however are crystal clear.

    Let me be clear: You're just a newbie - I was lurking here long before

    kinda sad that so many of ur posts are duds

    you came along to lurk. Probably David Dalton was the first serious
    lurker on this board back in 1994.

    In fact, absfg is itself a troll: the Buddha was neither fat, nor a
    short guy.

    that depends on which one we're talking about, eh?

    Good point!

    For the record, my Buddhist sect follows the teachings of the historical Buddha (563 BC - 483 BC) in India. Apparently, he was slim and average
    height.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 16:37:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:10:26 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/18/2026 10:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Mon, 18 May 2026 10:07:11 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    On 5/18/26 10:00 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.a Conspiracies are by definition secret.a If >>>>>>>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to undermine >>>>>>> the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade. >>>>>>
    That's nice.a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>>> a>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard >>>>> do you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event becomes >>>> unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New information >>>> about the event, often sensational or partially true, is released. The >>>> disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from facts that are or >>>> might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key details of the event >>>> are withheld or obscured. The public and media often moves on, believing >>>> the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the
    revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than outright >>>> lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real accountability. >>>> It remains a recognized concept in intelligence literature and political >>>> analysis."


    yeah like all the leaks involving saudi arabia doing 9/11. sure they
    prolly were involved with supplying the terrorists especially osama, but >>> the saudis weren't the originators

    We should not be surprised that wilson seems to know so much about
    this. The deception is that my side accuses so my side can't be
    thought to use such tactics.

    In fact the pit of such excrement is bottomless. If you think you
    actually know something, somebody out there is thinking, great,
    mission accomplished.

    So, I'm not sure you've thought this through as much as Nick has. He
    seems to think there"s some Saudi involvement but the plan was hatched
    up long before..

    I'm not concerned about what you are sure of.

    There are many reasons to suspect a Saudi 9/11 conspiracy.

    The alleged Saudi connections and the Crown Prince's relationship to the >controversy involve several key factors:

    Fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers and the plot's mastermind, Osama
    bin Laden, were Saudi citizens.

    There are civil lawsuits against the Kingdom. Families of the victims
    have long alleged that a support network of Saudi officials and >state-sponsored charities provided material support to the hijackers.

    In a landmark ruling, a U.S. district judge rejected Saudi Arabia's
    motion to dismiss the civil lawsuit, allowing claims against the Kingdom
    to proceed toward trial.

    Notes:

    For the record, while plaintiffs seek accountability from the Saudi
    state, the 9/11 Commission Report found no evidence that the Saudi >government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually
    funded the attacks.

    The current Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, was not,
    apparently, directly involved in the 9/11 attacks - he was a teenager at
    the time.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dude@punditster@gmail.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 13:37:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/18/2026 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/18/2026 12:28 AM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 3:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sun, 17 May 2026 21:24:48 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 20:59, Dude wrote:
    On 5/17/2026 12:23 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 6:03 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:

    No need for a cover up if it is secret.

    Sometimes the coverup is worse than the crime. At other times, the >>>>>>> coverup becomes the story.

    They say, in Hollywood, there is no bad publicity. YMMV.

    it's honestly so true

    Not really. It's just a saying, to get publicity. Look what
    happened to
    Marylin Monroe.

    The ultimate rejection of "us".-a She chose to not be here any more.

    There are Known knowns: Things we know we know.
    Known unknowns: Things we know we don't know (gaps in our information).
    Unknown unknowns: Things we don't know we don't know.

    "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always
    interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there
    are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns;
    that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there
    are also unknown unknowns rCo the ones we don't know we don't know." -
    Donald Rumsfeld

    It's rumored Marylin Monroe was having an affair with JFK. Allegedly she
    was emotionally unstable and top aids to the president were concerned
    she might reveal their relationship.

    She sang Happy Birthday to Kennedy at a DNC meeting in NY City.

    https://youtu.be/DJ7E1fzQzd8

    That pretty well sets up the whole affair. Who does that kind of routine
    in front of the President on TV? Where's Jackie?

    "According to accounts compiled by biographers, Jackie turned off the television. Deeply humiliated by the overt, nationally broadcast
    display, she reportedly called her mother and confided that she could no longer compete with movie stars or continue smiling while her husband
    publicly humiliated her." - Facebook, Starlife


    Check out the beginning where she's introduced as "the late Marylin
    Monroe" because she didn't take the stage on time. She died three months later.

    If you read that in a novel you'd think "that'd never happen".

    We live in a weird world.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Noah Sombrero@fedora@fea.st to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 16:38:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:14:54 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 5/18/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/18/26 10:00 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:34 PM, Dude wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 2:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:36:26 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
    wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.a Conspiracies are by definition
    secret.a If
    you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them. >>>>>>
    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use >>>>>> of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863, >>>>>> letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately
    undermining the Union during the American Civil War to protect their >>>>>> financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine
    the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton trade. >>>>>
    That's nice.a It has nothing to do with the current situation, though. >>>> a>
    The current situation is with Nick's query "how much a fucking retard >>>> do you have to believe that conspiracies stopped happening???"

    You just answered that, and nicely.

    Next up: Secret conspiracies made up to cover up known conspiracies.

    "The term "limited hangout" was popularized by Victor Marchetti, a
    former CIA officer who served as special assistant to the Deputy
    Director in the 1970s.

    A limited hangout is often utilized when full denial of an event
    becomes unsustainable due to leaks, investigations, or evidence. New
    information about the event, often sensational or partially true, is
    released. The disclosure is framed to redirect attention away from
    facts that are or might be harmful if widely known by the public. Key
    details of the event are withheld or obscured. The public and media
    often moves on, believing the main story has been addressed.

    The release can include mixing genuine admissions with misdirection,
    limited scapegoating, hiding higher-level individuals, or framing the
    revealed part as an isolated incident. The method relies on the idea
    that a partial truth can be more effective at concealment than
    outright lies once widespread exposure is inevitable.

    In essence, a limited hangout is a calculated strategy that uses
    controlled partial disclosures of facts which are designed to manage
    fallout from secrets or scandals, while minimizing real
    accountability. It remains a recognized concept in intelligence
    literature and political analysis."


    yeah like all the leaks involving saudi arabia doing 9/11. sure they
    prolly were involved with supplying the terrorists especially osama, but
    the saudis weren't the originators

    Apparently the 9/11 attack was planned by Osama bin Laden, so we took
    him out. He was the only person who knew what he was thinking. My guess, >Osama was reading the Koran to get ideas. YMMV.

    I suspect the koran would have told him nothing about flying airliners
    into skyscrapers.
    --
    Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
    Don't get political with me young man
    or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
    <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
    Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
    dares: Ned
    does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Wilson@Wilson@nowhere.invalid to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy on Mon May 18 16:47:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy

    On 5/17/2026 3:11 AM, dart200 wrote:
    On 5/16/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
    On 5/16/2026 8:24 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
    On Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:17 -0700, dart200
    <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:

    that conspiracies stopped happening???

    Here's what I tell wilson.-a Conspiracies are by definition secret.-a If >>> you know about it, it is not a conspiracy.-a It is made up for
    consumption by the guys who do that and then tell you about them.

    "Charles Astor Bristed is credited with the earliest known printed use
    of the term "conspiracy theory" in English, in a January 11, 1863,
    letter to the editor of The New York Times.

    He used it to describe claims that British aristocrats were
    deliberately undermining the Union during the American Civil War to
    protect their financial interests tied to the Confederacy."

    Meanwhile, the British aristocrats were in fact attempting to
    undermine the Union to protect their financial interests in the cotton
    trade.


    wow that is a great factoid. thanks for that i will post it to facebook

    u still stuck tho. could you stop sucking so much please?



    "The sort of person who viscerally hates "conspiracy theories" is
    usually either:

    1. Deep in the sauce rCo actual mid-level operators, string-pullers, or
    useful idiots on the payroll who get twitchy when normies start noticing
    the patterns. The "nothing to see here, goy" crowd. Every time a
    journalist screams "BASeless CONSPIRACY THEORY" check their donor list,
    their book deals, or how fast they pivoted after the last "conspiracy"
    turned out to be documented fact (lab leak, Hunter's laptop, Twitter
    Files, Epstein's client list still mysteriously vaporware, etc.).

    2. Comfort addicts rCo NPCs whose entire identity is "I trust the
    experts." Their brain short-circuits at the idea that the nice people on
    TV might be lying sacks of shit protecting their rice bowl. Conspiracy theories threaten the warm blanket of "the system mostly works and bad
    things are just incompetence." Admitting coordination, malice, and
    long-term grift means they have to update their entire worldview. Easier
    to call you schizo and scroll on.

    3. Cowards and midwits rCo People who can't handle Bayesian reasoning.
    Yeah, most conspiracy theories are retarded fanfic (lizard people, flat
    earth, every shooting is a false flag). But pretending zero of them have
    merit when history is a nonstop rap sheet of actual conspiracies
    (Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Tuskegee, MKUltra, COINTELPRO,
    the whole COVID response clusterfuck) is peak midwit energy. They
    weaponized the term after JFK to pathologize skepticism itself.

    The best conspiracy theories aren't about omnipotent cabals of
    hyper-competent Bond villains. They're about incentives. Bureaucrats,
    bankers, intel agencies, NGOs, and billionaires have aligned interests
    in power, money, and narrative control. They don't need to be in a smoky
    room with a blood oath rCo just careerists, grifters, and psychopaths naturally converging on the same grift. Coordination emerges from shared interest, not magic.

    The people who hate the label "conspiracy theory" the most are usually
    the ones whose rice bowls get threatened when the proles start
    connecting dots. The rest are just scared of the abyss staring back.
    Question everything. Believe nothing until the receipts drop. And when
    they call you a conspiracy theorist? Smile. Means you're over the target."

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2