https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual communication of a biological need.
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently
will happen naturally.
actively building their brain architecture.
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyuwarmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itAs worth:
DonAt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnAt exist. ItAs amazing how much you relax the whole >thing with the second one.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:35 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical >>> contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is >>> a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn >>> in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
Some babies cry a lot at first. Some don't.
--
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as >>> an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies >>> on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyuwarmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and >>> ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itAs worth:
DonAt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with >>individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnAt exist. ItAs amazing how much you relax the whole >>thing with the second one.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:27:16 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:35 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical >>>> contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is >>>> a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn >>>> in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
Some babies cry a lot at first. Some don't.
When our babies woke up in the middle of the night, change their
diaper, put a bottle in their mouth propped up so it doesn't fall
over. Soon they will be right back to sleep. But some are
inconsolable for a while.
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as >>>> an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies >>>> on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant >>>> contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and >>>> ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently >>>> will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the whole
thing with the second one.
On 5/14/2026 8:29 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:27:16 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>Finally! Something interesting to talk about. Every baby is different.
wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:35 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a
newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
Some babies cry a lot at first.-a Some don't.
When our babies woke up in the middle of the night, change their
diaper, put a bottle in their mouth propped up so it doesn't fall
over.-a Soon they will be right back to sleep.-a But some are
inconsolable for a while.
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months
act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system
relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant >>>>> contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators >>>>> and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently >>>>> will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the >>>> whole
thing with the second one.
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the whole
thing with the second one.
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as >>> an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
On 5/14/26 9:42 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 8:29 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:27:16 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>Finally! Something interesting to talk about. Every baby is different.
wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:35 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a
newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
Some babies cry a lot at first.-a Some don't.
When our babies woke up in the middle of the night, change their
diaper, put a bottle in their mouth propped up so it doesn't fall
over.-a Soon they will be right back to sleep.-a But some are
inconsolable for a while.
invariably, u say nothing of note
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system
relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical >>>> contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is >>>> a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn >>>> in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to lie??? Efnu >>
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as >>>> an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies >>>> on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant >>>> contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and >>>> ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently >>>> will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require physical >>>> contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this behavior is >>>> a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a newborn >>>> in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to lie??? Efnu >>
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months act as >>>> an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system relies >>>> on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant >>>> contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators and >>>> ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently >>>> will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a
newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to lie??? Efnu >>>
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months
act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system
relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, constant >>>>> contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from predators >>>>> and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping independently >>>>> will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western society >>> has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax the >>>> whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a
newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system
relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
On 5/14/2026 11:05 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:42 AM, Dude wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap for the baby talk. Thanks.
On 5/14/2026 8:29 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:27:16 -0400, Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st>Finally! Something interesting to talk about. Every baby is different.
wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:35 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
Some babies cry a lot at first.-a Some don't.
When our babies woke up in the middle of the night, change their
diaper, put a bottle in their mouth propped up so it doesn't fall
over.-a Soon they will be right back to sleep.-a But some are
inconsolable for a while.
invariably, u say nothing of note
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that
improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why
newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a
newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual
communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system
relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth, >>>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
On 5/15/26 8:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that
improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
but rly tho: just national the oil industry
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that
improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
On 5/15/2026 8:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 8:07 PM, dart200 wrote:Not sure you have thought this through, so it's not a wrap and you want
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyu >>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itAs worth:
DonAt buy into one view or the other. All babiesa are unique with >>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnAt exist. ItAs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenAt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/ >>>> QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
??????????
#god
classic post dud!
but rly tho: just national the oil industry
to change the topic. Alright, I'll bite:
Let me say this:
Nationalizing the oil industry has rarely resulted in long-term success.
Why?
It often leads to severe under-investment, corruption, and production >declines.
That being said, it has occasionally worked out extremely well when a >government maintains strict fiscal discipline, allows commercial
operations, and avoids treating the state-owned company as a political
tool box and piggy bank.
--??????????
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyuwarmth, >>>>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itAs worth:
DonAt buy into one view or the other. All babiesa are unique with
individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnAt exist. ItAs amazing how much you relax
the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenAt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
??????????
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:28:59 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
> ??????????
>
> #god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
And as long as the rate of such change remains at historical levels,
mass dies offs usually don't get triggered because critters have the
time they need to adapt. Not so this time.
I'm sure you can dig up an example where that wasn't true, can't you,
Wilson, and then you can proceed to suggest that it never was, can't
you wilson?
On 5/16/2026 1:49 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:28:59 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of >>>>>>>>> spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyuwarmth, >>>>>>>>> heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research) >>>>>>>>> demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the >>>>>>>>> brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve >>>>>>>>> stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itAs worth:
DonAt buy into one view or the other. All babiesa are unique with >>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnAt exist. ItAs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenAt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/ >>>>> QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
> ??????????
>
> #god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
And as long as the rate of such change remains at historical levels,
mass dies offs usually don't get triggered because critters have the
time they need to adapt. Not so this time.
I'm sure you can dig up an example where that wasn't true, can't you,
Wilson, and then you can proceed to suggest that it never was, can't
you wilson?
So, it's all about Wilson.
It has always been about Wilson. I'm not saying it's about Wilson but...
Fun fact: Climate change is real and always changes.
On 5/15/2026 8:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 8:07 PM, dart200 wrote:Not sure you have thought this through, so it's not a wrap and you want
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity >>>>>>>> for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three
months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care,"
causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build >>>>>>>> the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
but rly tho: just national the oil industry
to change the topic. Alright, I'll bite:
Let me say this:
Nationalizing the oil industry has rarely resulted in long-term success.
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that
improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that
improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require
physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history,
constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes >>>>>>> the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that
improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd
conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/
QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
On Sat, 16 May 2026 18:23:48 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/16/2026 1:49 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2026 12:28:59 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>So, it's all about Wilson.
wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity for >>>>>>>>>> manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to >>>>>>>> lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less >>>>>>>>>> neurologically mature than other primates. The first three months >>>>>>>>>> act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCowarmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This contact is >>>>>>>>>> associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for contact is >>>>>>>>>> temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build the >>>>>>>>>> capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't compress 20 >>>>>>>> mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson >>>>>> trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/m/ >>>>>> QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>
> ??????????
>
> #god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
And as long as the rate of such change remains at historical levels,
mass dies offs usually don't get triggered because critters have the
time they need to adapt. Not so this time.
I'm sure you can dig up an example where that wasn't true, can't you,
Wilson, and then you can proceed to suggest that it never was, can't
you wilson?
It has always been about Wilson. I'm not saying it's about Wilson but...
Fun fact: Climate change is real and always changes.
Your evasive opinion has been noted.
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity >>>>>>>> for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three
months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care,"
causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build >>>>>>>> the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking
go extinct.
-a > we'll deserved that one
-a >
-a > #god
On 5/17/2026 12:40 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:Get some sleep, Nick. Your only worry is the baby. Don't fuck this up - you're already thirty-something.
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive
maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three
months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous
system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care,"
causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they
build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate
fucking go extinct.
-a-a > we'll deserved that one
-a-a >
-a-a > #god
On 5/16/26 1:18 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/15/2026 8:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 8:07 PM, dart200 wrote:Not sure you have thought this through, so it's not a wrap and you
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive
maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three
months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous
system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care,"
causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they
build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
but rly tho: just national the oil industry
want to change the topic. Alright, I'll bite:
Let me say this:
Nationalizing the oil industry has rarely resulted in long-term success.
government-backed entities control approximately 55% of global oil and
gas production and an estimated 80% to 90% of the worldrCOs total proven petroleum reserves
-a > wow such failure Ef2-Ef2-Ef2-
-a >
-a > #god
i don't understand how you keep smoking so much complete bullcrap dud, i really just don't get it. doesn't it like taste bad or something?
On 5/17/26 9:04 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/17/2026 12:40 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:Get some sleep, Nick. Your only worry is the baby. Don't fuck this up
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil >>>>>>>>>> a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive
maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to >>>>>>>> lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less >>>>>>>>>> neurologically mature than other primates. The first three >>>>>>>>>> months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous >>>>>>>>>> system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from >>>>>>>>>> predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," >>>>>>>>>> causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This >>>>>>>>>> contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for >>>>>>>>>> contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they >>>>>>>>>> build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you >>>>>>>>> relax the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that
perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to
baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
Tara!
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson >>>>>> trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/
zZHhodXqxXg/ m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate
fucking go extinct.
-a-a > we'll deserved that one
-a-a >
-a-a > #god
- you're already thirty-something.
classic dud: compelled to say _something_
-a > but can't do so coherently smh
-a >
-a > #god
On 5/17/2026 12:07 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/16/26 1:18 PM, Dude wrote:It's simple: choices in a free market. Private enterprise runs the oil companies. The U.S. government does not run, own, or operate oil companies.
On 5/15/2026 8:08 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 8:07 PM, dart200 wrote:Not sure you have thought this through, so it's not a wrap and you
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil >>>>>>>>>> a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive
maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to >>>>>>>> lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less >>>>>>>>>> neurologically mature than other primates. The first three >>>>>>>>>> months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous >>>>>>>>>> system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from >>>>>>>>>> predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," >>>>>>>>>> causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This >>>>>>>>>> contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for >>>>>>>>>> contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they >>>>>>>>>> build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you >>>>>>>>> relax the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that
perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to
baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
Tara!
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson >>>>>> trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/
zZHhodXqxXg/ m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
but rly tho: just national the oil industry
want to change the topic. Alright, I'll bite:
Let me say this:
Nationalizing the oil industry has rarely resulted in long-term success.
government-backed entities control approximately 55% of global oil and
gas production and an estimated 80% to 90% of the worldrCOs total proven
petroleum reserves
-a-a > wow such failure Ef2-Ef2-Ef2-
-a-a >
-a-a > #god
i don't understand how you keep smoking so much complete bullcrap dud,
i really just don't get it. doesn't it like taste bad or something?
The American oil and gas industry is almost entirely composed of
private, investor-owned corporations that operate in a free-market system
On 5/17/2026 11:55 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/17/26 9:04 AM, Dude wrote:Reduced to reading small talk about your baby and climate change.
On 5/17/2026 12:40 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:Get some sleep, Nick. Your only worry is the baby. Don't fuck this up
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work >>>>>>> Tara!
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead
require physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil >>>>>>>>>>> a newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive >>>>>>>>>>> maturity for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to >>>>>>>>> lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less >>>>>>>>>>> neurologically mature than other primates. The first three >>>>>>>>>>> months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous >>>>>>>>>>> system relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's body >>>>>>>>>>> rCo warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from >>>>>>>>>>> predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," >>>>>>>>>>> causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This >>>>>>>>>>> contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for >>>>>>>>>>> contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they >>>>>>>>>>> build the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping >>>>>>>>>>> independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that
western society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you >>>>>>>>>> relax the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that >>>>>>>>> perfect
parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to >>>>>>>>> baseless
nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since
Wilson trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/
zZHhodXqxXg/ m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>>
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate
fucking go extinct.
-a-a > we'll deserved that one
-a-a >
-a-a > #god
- you're already thirty-something.
classic dud: compelled to say _something_
-a-a > but can't do so coherently smh
-a-a >
-a-a > #god
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this
behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a
result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity >>>>>>>> for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? Efnu
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three
months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG
research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care,"
causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build >>>>>>>> the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western
society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
EfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnuEfnu
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking
go extinct.
-a > we'll deserved that one
-a >
-a > #god
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity >>>>>>>>> for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to
lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less
neurologically mature than other primates. The first three
months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyu >>>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care,"
causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build >>>>>>>>> the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itAs worth:
DonAt buy into one view or the other. All babiesa are unique with >>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnAt exist. ItAs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenAt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson
trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
??????????
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking
go extinct.
a > we'll deserved that one
a >
a > #god
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:The climate always changes.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:25 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:Alright then, that's a wrap. Nick got a good trashing. Good work Tara! >>>>>>
On 5/14/26 8:05 AM, Tara wrote:
dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
https://youtu.be/Y3YGnHqbYyk (18:43)
-- geminiGPT --
This video explores the biological and psychological reasons why >>>>>>>>>> newborns often struggle to sleep in a crib and instead require >>>>>>>>>> physical
contact from caregivers. The presenter emphasizes that this >>>>>>>>>> behavior is
a normal developmental stage rather than a "bad habit" or a >>>>>>>>>> result of
spoiling the infant.
Key Takeaways-
The Myth of Spoiling: Research confirms that you cannot spoil a >>>>>>>>>> newborn
in the first months of life. Infants lack the cognitive maturity >>>>>>>>>> for
manipulation; their demand for contact is an urgent, instinctual >>>>>>>>>> communication of a biological need.
Hmmm. Not my experience but ok
u think a one month old infant has the cognitive capability to >>>>>>>> lie??? ?
The "Fourth Trimester": Humans are born significantly less >>>>>>>>>> neurologically mature than other primates. The first three >>>>>>>>>> months act as
an "external gestation" period where the infant's nervous system >>>>>>>>>> relies
on the womb-like environment provided by the caregiver's bodyrCo >>>>>>>>>> warmth,
heartbeat, and movement.
Evolutionary Context: For the vast majority of human history, >>>>>>>>>> constant
contact was a survival necessity, protecting infants from
predators and
ensuring thermal and physiological regulation.
Neuroscience of Contact: Recent studies (including 2026 EEG >>>>>>>>>> research)
demonstrate that skin-to-skin contact, or "Kangaroo Care," >>>>>>>>>> causes the
brains of mother and baby to physically synchronize. This
contact is
associated with structural changes in the infant's brain that >>>>>>>>>> improve
stress regulation and cognitive development.
Final Encouragement
The presenter reassures parents that the intense need for
contact is
temporary. As the infant's nervous system matures and they build >>>>>>>>>> the
capacity for self-regulation, the transition to sleeping
independently
will happen naturally.
Maybe. More often, they need a bit of help :)
Holding your baby isn't creating a problem; it is
actively building their brain architecture.
For what itrCOs worth:
DonrCOt buy into one view or the other. All babies-a are unique with >>>>>>>>> individual personalities and needs. Trust your judgement.
i trust that all babies need emotional security and that western >>>>>>>> society
has been systematically abusing their children with remarkably odd >>>>>>>> conceptions of prematurely pushing for independence
Perfect parenting doesnrCOt exist. ItrCOs amazing how much you relax >>>>>>>>> the whole
thing with the second one.
so yeah i would expect you to have internalized notions that perfect >>>>>>>> parenting doesn't exist, because you've been subscribing to baseless >>>>>>>> nonsense for so long. actually watch video, even gpt can't
compress 20
mins of information into a few sentences summary
Oh god, I pity your boy.
You arenrCOt worth reading or replying to. No more
GFY
This has been one of the most interesting topics here since Wilson >>>>>> trashed Evelyn.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>
??????????
#god
classic post dud!
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking
go extinct.
-a > we'll deserved that one
-a >
-a > #god
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:The climate always changes.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking >>>> go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:The climate always changes.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>>
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking >>>>> go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer. You are so cute.
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:The climate always changes.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>>>
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking >>>>>> go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer. You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to >high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the >follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies.
To most people, it /seems/ like the climate should remain stable as a >baseline. This is in large part because our climate has been remarkably--
and unusually stable over the past 5000 years. It's been far more
unstable through Earth's history than it has been recently and it's not >usually this way.
Lots of species die off all the time and human action has no doubt
increased that number by a lot. But the resilience & survivability of >species continues to surprise us as critters formerly believed to be
extinct are found often enough to remind us we're not all knowing.
The nuance in my answer is probably too much for you so I don't hold a
great deal of hope for a reasonable response. Your history of low
content irrelevant answers has put you mostly into the "why bother" >category.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we >>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:The climate always changes.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>>>>
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking >>>>>>> go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer. You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong. The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable. Again we are not talking about human
timescale. Which is all that matters you right? The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies.
Wrong. But I don't expect you to question your sources. End of
discussion.
To most people, it /seems/ like the climate should remain stable as a
baseline. This is in large part because our climate has been remarkably
and unusually stable over the past 5000 years. It's been far more
unstable through Earth's history than it has been recently and it's not
usually this way.
Lots of species die off all the time and human action has no doubt
increased that number by a lot. But the resilience & survivability of
species continues to surprise us as critters formerly believed to be
extinct are found often enough to remind us we're not all knowing.
The nuance in my answer is probably too much for you so I don't hold a
great deal of hope for a reasonable response. Your history of low
content irrelevant answers has put you mostly into the "why bother"
category.
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is that we >>>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit that, >>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to >>> high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies.
Wrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding behind
the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real substance,
just bluster and deception.
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we >>>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>>>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that, >>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer. You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to >>> high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong. The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable. Again we are not talking about human
timescale. Which is all that matters you right? The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies.
Wrong. But I don't expect you to question your sources. End of
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding behind
the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real substance,
just bluster and deception.
My source for that was a paper published by the European Geosciences
Union, revised and peer reviewed.
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/381/2025/
5.1?Quality of the reconstruction
"According to our analysis of the PPEs [pseudo-proxy experiments], the >timing of GMST [global mean surface temperature] variations can be >reconstructed for timescales longer than 4?kyr and a timing uncertainty
of #0.5 to 1?kyr for the last 25?kyr."
In other words, they can't reliably see short term global temperature >changes that happened during the past 25,000 years unless those changes >lasted at least 4,000 years.
--
To most people, it /seems/ like the climate should remain stable as a
baseline. This is in large part because our climate has been remarkably
and unusually stable over the past 5000 years. It's been far more
unstable through Earth's history than it has been recently and it's not
usually this way.
Lots of species die off all the time and human action has no doubt
increased that number by a lot. But the resilience & survivability of
species continues to surprise us as critters formerly believed to be
extinct are found often enough to remind us we're not all knowing.
The nuance in my answer is probably too much for you so I don't hold a
great deal of hope for a reasonable response. Your history of low
content irrelevant answers has put you mostly into the "why bother"
category.
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.a The bad news is that we >>>>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal.a Do you admit that, >>>>>>> wilson?
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to >>>> high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.a Which is all that matters you right?a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean andWrong.a But I don't expect you to question your sources.a End of
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies. >>>
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding behind
the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real substance,
just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday. Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
that we
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to
occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit that, >>>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean andWrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies. >>>
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.-a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
On 5/18/2026 3:21 PM, Julian wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.a The bad news is >>>>>>>> that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to >>>>>>>> occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.a Do you admit that, >>>>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this >>>>> point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.a Which is all that matters you right?a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean andWrong.a But I don't expect you to question your sources.a End of
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies. >>>>
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
Yean, I've seen the jpegs you shared of that car and in no way would I >consider it "luxury".
As to the shipping from Serbia, I don't remember that part but knowing
Noah that's probably wrong too.
On 5/18/2026 3:21 PM, Julian wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is >>>>>>>> that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet >>>>>>>>>>>> for decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing
climate fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to >>>>>>>> occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit that, >>>>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this >>>>> point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our
proxies.
Wrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.-a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
Yean, I've seen the jpegs you shared of that car and in no way would I consider it "luxury".
As to the shipping from Serbia, I don't remember that part but knowing
Noah that's probably wrong too.
On 18/05/2026 20:34, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 3:21 PM, Julian wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.a The bad news is >>>>>>>>> that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet >>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing >>>>>>>>>>> climate fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to >>>>>>>>> occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.a Do you admit that, >>>>>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of >>>>>> species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the >>>>>> follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this >>>>>> point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.a Which is all that matters you right?a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and >>>>>> doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our
proxies.
Wrong.a But I don't expect you to question your sources.a End of
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
Yean, I've seen the jpegs you shared of that car and in no way would I
consider it "luxury".
It it were allowed on the US market it would be in the $25,000 range
but that would be for a brand new one, not a year old one.
As to the shipping from Serbia, I don't remember that part but knowing
Noah that's probably wrong too.
No one else remembers it.
I don't think I'm going out on a limb to suggest that most subscribers
won't trust his memory over the actual archive. It seems he wants me to >prove I didn't post some information. Hilarious in a pathetic kind of way.
On 18/05/2026 20:34, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 3:21 PM, Julian wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is >>>>>>>>> that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet >>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing >>>>>>>>>>> climate fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to >>>>>>>>> occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit >>>>>>>>> that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of >>>>>> species. But it could be enough to end any that have small
populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the >>>>>> follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this >>>>>> point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many >>>>> years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past
because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and >>>>>> doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our
proxies.
Wrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.-a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
Yean, I've seen the jpegs you shared of that car and in no way would I
consider it "luxury".
It it were allowed on the US market it would be in the $25,000 range
but that would be for a brand new one, not a year old one.
As to the shipping from Serbia, I don't remember that part but knowing
Noah that's probably wrong too.
No one else remembers it.
I don't think I'm going out on a limb to suggest that most subscribers
won't trust his memory over the actual archive. It seems he wants me to prove I didn't post some information. Hilarious in a pathetic kind of way.
On 5/18/2026 4:13 PM, Julian wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:34, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 3:21 PM, Julian wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson
<Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is >>>>>>>>>> that we
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing >>>>>>>>>>>> climate fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to >>>>>>>>>> occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit >>>>>>>>>> that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of >>>>>>> species. But it could be enough to end any that have small
populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the >>>>>>> follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at >>>>>>> this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human >>>>>> timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many >>>>>> years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past
because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and >>>>>>> doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our
proxies.
Wrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of >>>>>> discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.-a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
Yean, I've seen the jpegs you shared of that car and in no way would
I consider it "luxury".
It it were allowed on the US market it would be in the $25,000 range
but that would be for a brand new one, not a year old one.
As to the shipping from Serbia, I don't remember that part but
knowing Noah that's probably wrong too.
No one else remembers it.
I don't think I'm going out on a limb to suggest that most subscribers
won't trust his memory over the actual archive. It seems he wants me
to prove I didn't post some information. Hilarious in a pathetic kind
of way.
Noah responding to posts on absfg:
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_saue3f720L1z23obp.mp4
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time. The bad news is that we >>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:The climate always changes.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/zZHhodXqxXg/ >>>>>>>>>> m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for decades >>>>>>>>
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate fucking >>>>>>> go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal. Do you admit that,
wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer. You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong. The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable. Again we are not talking about human
timescale. Which is all that matters you right? The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies.
Wrong. But I don't expect you to question your sources. End of
discussion.
To most people, it /seems/ like the climate should remain stable as a
baseline. This is in large part because our climate has been remarkably
and unusually stable over the past 5000 years. It's been far more
unstable through Earth's history than it has been recently and it's not
usually this way.
Lots of species die off all the time and human action has no doubt
increased that number by a lot. But the resilience & survivability of
species continues to surprise us as critters formerly believed to be
extinct are found often enough to remind us we're not all knowing.
The nuance in my answer is probably too much for you so I don't hold a
great deal of hope for a reasonable response. Your history of low
content irrelevant answers has put you mostly into the "why bother"
category.
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
that we
are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to
occur.
The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit that, >>>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like
adaption to
high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean andWrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies. >>>
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding
behind the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real
substance, just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday.-a Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
On Mon, 18 May 2026 20:21:32 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 18/05/2026 20:09, Wilson wrote:
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:Seasoned with copious slandering and downright lies.
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is that we >>>>>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years >>>>>>>> Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit that, >>>>>>>> wilson?
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations >>>>> and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to >>>>> high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this >>>>> point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as >>>>> noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean andWrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies. >>>>
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding behind >>> the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real substance,
just bluster and deception.
"This guy goes to serbia and buys luxury cars for his
wife's birthday. Pays to ship them to uk, he does."
My memory of you saying that is clear. Luxury is perhaps debatable. I
was impressed by the wide assortment of electronics that comes with
it. But maybe I am easily impressed.
Beyond that, fuck you too.
On 5/18/2026 2:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:32:44 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:52 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:33 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 5/18/2026 1:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:58:08 -0400, Wilson <Wilson@nowhere.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/17/2026 3:40 AM, dart200 wrote:That seems like small change in a long time.-a The bad news is that we >>>>>> are dealing with forces that normally act over millions of years
On 5/16/26 9:28 AM, Wilson wrote:
On 5/15/2026 11:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/15/26 6:54 PM, Dude wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/ >>>>>>>>>>> zZHhodXqxXg/
m/ QqkKI1XP7h8J
lol, wilson's been denying climate change on the internet for >>>>>>>>>> decades
The climate always changes.
yeah and species that can't adapt to a rapidly changing climate >>>>>>>> fucking
go extinct.
Models, forecasts, and projections.
Less than 1.5C in 100 years.
Because that is how long it takes for significant evolution to occur. >>>>>> The current rate of change is far above normal.-a Do you admit that, >>>>>> wilson?
"Admit". As if I'm giving testimony or on trial.
LOL you wanker.
Nice refusal to answer.-a You are so cute.
1.5C in 100 years is certainly survivable for the vast majority of
species. But it could be enough to end any that have small populations
and aren't able to migrate due to an isolated location (like adaption to >>> high elevation or other inhospitable surroundings).
The big problem that most worry about are future increases, and the
follow-on effects, and what those might be are pure guesswork at this
point. To date it's minimal.
That is where you are wrong.-a The rate is accelerating much more
quickly than is sustainable.-a Again we are not talking about human
timescale.-a Which is all that matters you right?-a The next so many
years that you yourself have left?
Factless opinionposting.
We don't know how fast the climate has changed in the past because, as
noted in my other recent post, any change that reverts to mean and
doesn't last at least a few thousand years is invisible to our proxies.
Wrong.-a But I don't expect you to question your sources.-a End of
discussion.
Exactly the sort of response I expected. You're the wizard hiding behind
the curtain, lots of smoke and loud noises but little real substance,
just bluster and deception.
My source for that was a paper published by the European Geosciences
Union, revised and peer reviewed.
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/21/381/2025/
5.1rCeQuality of the reconstruction
"According to our analysis of the PPEs [pseudo-proxy experiments], the timing of GMST [global mean surface temperature] variations can be reconstructed for timescales longer than 4rCekyr and a timing uncertainty
of -#0.5 to 1rCekyr for the last 25rCekyr."
In other words, they can't reliably see short term global temperature changes that happened during the past 25,000 years unless those changes lasted at least 4,000 years.
To most people, it /seems/ like the climate should remain stable as a
baseline. This is in large part because our climate has been remarkably
and unusually stable over the past 5000 years. It's been far more
unstable through Earth's history than it has been recently and it's not
usually this way.
Lots of species die off all the time and human action has no doubt
increased that number by a lot. But the resilience & survivability of
species continues to surprise us as critters formerly believed to be
extinct are found often enough to remind us we're not all knowing.
The nuance in my answer is probably too much for you so I don't hold a
great deal of hope for a reasonable response. Your history of low
content irrelevant answers has put you mostly into the "why bother"
category.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 07:09:07 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
922 files (14,318M bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,772 |