To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what anti-
Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that followed two
world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But
no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice, neo-
liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to shame
the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by asylum-seekers
and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the grave in which it
should have been left to rest. The misery of others is down to the
rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But
what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
The very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its
people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House
of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work
of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert
their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social
media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against
conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes,
have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough
to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West
a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, law-
bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to shame
the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by asylum-
seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that it
outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier to
Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial leftrCOs world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others
is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success
of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has
been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom
to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat
ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a
hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied u one of the oldest markers of >anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on social media,
across the West u has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews u individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial leftAs world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their aGreat ReplacementA theory, and >conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)--
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But
what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
The very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied u one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its
people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House
of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work
of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert
their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on social
media, across the West u has been the way in which protests against
conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews u individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes,
have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough
to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West
a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, law-
bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to shame
the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by asylum-
seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that it
outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier to
Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial leftAs world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others
is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the success
of Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has
been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom
to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their aGreat
ReplacementA theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a
hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated. >>
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media,
across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/26 8:30 AM, Julian wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But
what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
The very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its
people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House
of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work
of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert
their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social
media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against
conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes,
have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough
to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West
a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, law-
bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to shame
the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by asylum-
seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that it
outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier to
Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial leftrCOs world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others
is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success
of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has
been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom
to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat
ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a
hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
joos aren't innocent victims, they're just as much involved in terrorism
as the cia or muzzies
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated. >>
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.
This piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in ourhearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social media,
across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually >> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial leftrCOs world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >> Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and >> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and is what perpetuates the virus.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media,
across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually >>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>> Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately >call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or >rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There >is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and >is what perpetuates the virus.
--
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media,
across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary
in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is
nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is
true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is
anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into question.
That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its
right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-
drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions and
conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to
Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one >>> of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its
people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House
of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties
below the level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in
which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy
as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of >>> their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social
media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against
conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes,
have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough
to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West
a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to rest.
The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success >>> of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has
been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom
to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat
ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a >>> hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:18:52 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The >> univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and >> is what perpetuates the virus.
I simply say reducing gaza to rubble was uncalled for.
Israeli deaths during oct invasion 1200
Palestinian deaths in gaza 72000
What do you think? Should there be a limit on the carnage?
Sure hatred of all things jewish is a problem. The bible says god put
a curse on the nation of israel. True or not that is not an excuse.
The bible also says, these things must come to pass, but better be it
for you to be cast to the bottom of the sea than for it to be by your
hand.
So, yeah, don't do stuff like that. I think that the hatred of jews
problem was not helped by the destruction of gaza. They shot
themselves in the foot. Nety's idea is to try to kill all the people
who hate you. Not possible for jews or anybody else.
Do you think the palestine signs you see around town might be a
response to the overkill? A little bit?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media,
across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/2026 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:What we've got to do is root out this evil virus - the antisemitism,
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary
in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is
nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is
true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is
anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into question.
That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its
right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-
drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions and
conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to
Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied u one >>>> of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its >>>> people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House >>>> of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties
below the level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in
which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy
as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals of >>>> their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on social
media, across the West u has been the way in which protests against
conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews u individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes,
have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough >>>> to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West >>>> a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law- bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftAs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to rest. >>>> The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the success >>>> of Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has
been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom
to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their aGreat
ReplacementA theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a >>>> hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
that's obvious. But, first we need to identify the target:
Antisemitism is prejudice, hatred, or discrimination against Jewish
people simply because they are Jewish.
Most people don't even know what being Jewish is. Jews are not a race - >Semitic is a language group. So, what is a Jew and who is an Anti-Semite?
That's what we will find out.
On May 13, 2026 at 12:44:26?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:18:52 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The >>> univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
I simply say reducing gaza to rubble was uncalled for.
Israeli deaths during oct invasion 1200
Palestinian deaths in gaza 72000
What do you think? Should there be a limit on the carnage?
Sure hatred of all things jewish is a problem. The bible says god put
a curse on the nation of israel. True or not that is not an excuse.
The bible also says, these things must come to pass, but better be it
for you to be cast to the bottom of the sea than for it to be by your
hand.
So, yeah, don't do stuff like that. I think that the hatred of jews
problem was not helped by the destruction of gaza. They shot
themselves in the foot. Nety's idea is to try to kill all the people
who hate you. Not possible for jews or anybody else.
Do you think the palestine signs you see around town might be a
response to the overkill? A little bit?
Patronizing.
So much wrong with your reply that it's not worth a reply to it.
--
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and is what perpetuates the virus.
--
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media,
across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually >>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>> Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary
in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is
nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is
true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is
anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into question.
That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its
right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-
drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions and
conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to
Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one >>> of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its
people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House
of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties
below the level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in
which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy
as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of >>> their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social
media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against
conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes,
have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough
to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West
a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to rest.
The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success >>> of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has
been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom
to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat
ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a >>> hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times.
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and >> is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually >>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>> Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On Wed, 13 May 2026 09:48:02 -0700, Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/13/2026 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:What we've got to do is root out this evil virus - the antisemitism,
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary >>>>> in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is
nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is
true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is
anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into question.
That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its
right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-
drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions and
conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to
Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo one >>>>> of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its >>>>> people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>> its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House >>>>> of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties
below the level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in
which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy
as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in >>>>> our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social >>>>> media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against >>>>> conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred >>>>> of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes, >>>>> have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough >>>>> to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of
writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West >>>>> a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to rest. >>>>> The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the success >>>>> of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has >>>>> been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom >>>>> to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists
looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far
right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their rCyGreat
ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a >>>>> hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>
that's obvious. But, first we need to identify the target:
Antisemitism is prejudice, hatred, or discrimination against Jewish
people simply because they are Jewish.
Most people don't even know what being Jewish is. Jews are not a race -
Semitic is a language group. So, what is a Jew and who is an Anti-Semite?
That's what we will find out.
so anti-semite would be against people who speak one of the languages
in the group? A distinction without a difference. Might as well call
the semites a race.
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200" ><user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-about-911-endure-20-years-later
--
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a claim
is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to touch upon:
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are still wasting trillions of dollars on...
and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israelishenanigans.
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i
used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern geopolitics
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far
too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it the seriousness
it is due.
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation
and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong
response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan
Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a
religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial
hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was
thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single
greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus
had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary
in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is
nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is
true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is
anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into question.
That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its
right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-
drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions and
conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to
Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo
one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>> held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs neighbours >>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times,
hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of
Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the
Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to
its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed
its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the
difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit
casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts,
including those in which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy
as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals
of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us in
our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on social
media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests against >>>> conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for
prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard at pro-
Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred
of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The marches, and the memes, >>>> have become the means by which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over
time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence
of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the
West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism.
Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of
injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to
rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. And >>>> it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching
for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical
leftists looking for a villainous face to personify neo-liberal
greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence behind their
rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all stripes in
pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness
is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our
times.
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:18:52 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The >> univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and >> is what perpetuates the virus.
I simply say reducing gaza to rubble was uncalled for.
Israeli deaths during oct invasion 1200
Palestinian deaths in gaza 72000
What do you think? Should there be a limit on the carnage?
Sure hatred of all things jewish is a problem. The bible says god puta curse on the nation of israel.
True or not that is not an excuse.
The bible also says, these things must come to pass, but better be it
for you to be cast to the bottom of the sea than for it to be by your
hand.
So, yeah, don't do stuff like that.
I think that the hatred of jews problem was not helped by the destruction
of gaza.
They shot themselves in the foot. Nety's idea is to try to kill allThat is incorrect and anti-Semitic propaganda.
the people who hate you. Not possible for jews or anybody else.>
Do you think the palestine signs you see around town might be aresponse to the overkill?
A little bit?
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media,
across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 12:44:26rC>PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:18:52 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The >>> univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
I simply say reducing gaza to rubble was uncalled for.
Israeli deaths during oct invasion 1200
Palestinian deaths in gaza 72000
What do you think? Should there be a limit on the carnage?
Sure hatred of all things jewish is a problem. The bible says god put
a curse on the nation of israel. True or not that is not an excuse.
The bible also says, these things must come to pass, but better be it
for you to be cast to the bottom of the sea than for it to be by your
hand.
So, yeah, don't do stuff like that. I think that the hatred of jews
problem was not helped by the destruction of gaza. They shot
themselves in the foot. Nety's idea is to try to kill all the people
who hate you. Not possible for jews or anybody else.
Do you think the palestine signs you see around town might be a
response to the overkill? A little bit?
Patronizing.
So much wrong with your reply that it's not worth a reply to it.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But
what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and
their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their
right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.-a This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've beenputting out, like a true sheeple EfEaEfEaEfEa
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice.
Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to
shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of
others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to
blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05rC>PM EDT, "dart200" <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-about-911-endure-20-years-later
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually >>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>> Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On Wed, 13 May 2026 17:30:44 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of >>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of >>>>>> their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-about-911-endure-20-years-later
"In the days following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America,
conspiracy theorists across the ideological spectrum dismissed the
widely accepted version of events and instead crafted alternative
narratives about the perpetrators, their motive, and other details
about the attacks. Some of these conspiratorial claims directly
implicated Jewish people and Israel in the attacks, in a continuation
of centuries-old antisemitic tropes about Jews supposedly manipulating
world events for their own benefit.
Two decades later, antisemitic 9/11 conspiracy theories continue to
thrive. Although many of the original conspiracy theorists from 20
years ago remain active, a new generation of antisemites has joined
them. This report highlights some of these themes and the many
individuals who, despite their often-disparate ideologies, are united
in their belief that Jews or Israel played a role in the 9/11
attacks."
Very good.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media, >>>>>> across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>> Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world >>>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05rC>PM EDT, "dart200" <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-about-911-endure-20-years-later
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually >>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>> Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:50:30 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:44:26?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:18:52 -0000 (UTC), Tara <tsm@fastmail.ca>
wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote: >>>>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of >>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the equals of >>>>>> their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
I simply say reducing gaza to rubble was uncalled for.
Israeli deaths during oct invasion 1200
Palestinian deaths in gaza 72000
What do you think? Should there be a limit on the carnage?
Sure hatred of all things jewish is a problem. The bible says god put
a curse on the nation of israel. True or not that is not an excuse.
The bible also says, these things must come to pass, but better be it
for you to be cast to the bottom of the sea than for it to be by your
hand.
So, yeah, don't do stuff like that. I think that the hatred of jews
problem was not helped by the destruction of gaza. They shot
themselves in the foot. Nety's idea is to try to kill all the people
who hate you. Not possible for jews or anybody else.
Do you think the palestine signs you see around town might be a
response to the overkill? A little bit?
Patronizing.
So much wrong with your reply that it's not worth a reply to it.
It is a simple question really. Do you think there should be a limit
to the carnage?
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social media, >>>>>> across the West ? has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>> Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ? individually >>>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s world >>>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>>> Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement? theory, and >>>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05rC>PM EDT, "dart200" <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But what >>>>> is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, inflicted >>>>> on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and their >>>>> survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But there >>>>> has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a House of >>>>> Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which British >>>>> or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater understanding. >>>>> Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as victims >>>>> but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their right >>>>> to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the world >>>>> and a desire for peace.
He almost said it. But not quite. The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you immediately
call the above article propaganda.
I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the Palestinians, - >>> never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-about-911-endure-20-years-later
--
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u individually >>>>> and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust enough to >>>>> see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers such as >>>>> Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and that >>>>> it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of others is >>>>> down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the success of >>>>> Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to blame >>>>> for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking for a >>>>> villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, and >>>>> conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our times. >>>>>
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/2026 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05rC>PM EDT, "dart200"The claim that Jewish people or Israel was responsible for the September
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been >>>>>> defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and >>>>>> their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>> there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has
grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their >>>>>> right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of >>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.-a This >>>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free >>>> Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
11, 2001, terrorist attacks is a false and antisemitic conspiracy
theory. Extensive investigations by the FBI and bipartisan commissions
found that Al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, was entirely responsible
for the attacks.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the
means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers
such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of
beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>> law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>> that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation >>>>>> and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of
others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to >>>>>> blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking >>>>>> for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A
theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our
times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on theOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist attack.
muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeliGood example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
shenanigans.
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly aboutApparently, you just don't care.
anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i
used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modernA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
geopolitics
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's farYou might think this over:
too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it the
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors
about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6
million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation
and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong
response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan
Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a
religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was
thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single
greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is
customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain
there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel.
That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of
Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and
border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo >>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence,
are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs
neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different
times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the
elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that
threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and
indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has
worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit
casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts,
including those in which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals >>>>> of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us
in our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on
social media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests >>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively,
vehicles for prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard >>>>> at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to
inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The
marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus
has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over
time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence
of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-
Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success
evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation. >>>>>
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>> law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to
rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past.
And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists
searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim
world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify
neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>> behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness
is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>> times.
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05rC>PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been >>>>>> defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and >>>>>> their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>> there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has
grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their >>>>>> right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of >>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.-a This >>>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free >>>> Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond EfNL gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against all prior
knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire conditions
that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with _significant_
margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. which
they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the video
tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel don't
"bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the WTC
dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like that.
not 25 years ago, not even today.
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the
means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers
such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of
beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>> law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>> that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation >>>>>> and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of
others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to >>>>>> blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking >>>>>> for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A
theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our
times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >meme before the holocaust
Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the
muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
--a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeliGood example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
shenanigans.
Apparently, you just don't care.
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about
anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i
used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.
A virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern
geopolitics
You might think this over:
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far
too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it the
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors
about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent
attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6
million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then
u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you
are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong
response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan
Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was
thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single
greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is
customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of
Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and
border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied u >>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence,
are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs
neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the
elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and
indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has
worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit
casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts,
including those in which British or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they
assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals >>>>>> of their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our >>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on
social media, across the West u has been the way in which protests >>>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively,
vehicles for prejudice. Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard >>>>>> at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to
inflame hatred of Jews u individually and collectively. The
marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus
has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-
Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation. >>>>>>
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>> law- bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial
leftAs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to
rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past.
And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists
searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim
world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>> behind their aGreat ReplacementA theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>> times.
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a
meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we areOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
-->-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli >>>> shenanigans.
Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly aboutApparently, you just don't care.
anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i
used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modernA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
geopolitics
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors
about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent
attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6
million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then
u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you
are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong
response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan
Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single
greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is
customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo >>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs
neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the
elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and
indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has
worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts,
including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>> IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a
genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals >>>>>>> of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on >>>>>>> social media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests >>>>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively,
vehicles for prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard >>>>>>> at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to
inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The
marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-
Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation. >>>>>>>
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>> law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>> leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is
disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to
rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists
searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim
world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>>> behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>> times.
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05rC>PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a
religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last
been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times,
hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people
and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died.
But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>> Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has
grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert
their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the
equals of
their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of >>>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free >>>>> Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond EfNL
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did
_not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced
progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with
_significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives.
which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has
thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like
that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social >>>>>>> media,
across the West -u has been the way in which protests against
conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine
marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the
means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time.
Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers >>>>>>> such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of
beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the >>>>>>> greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>> law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources,
and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As >>>>>>> world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of
others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has >>>>>>> been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom >>>>>>> to blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking >>>>>>> for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right
searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A
theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this
wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>> times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >>> meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we areOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
--
>a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli >>>>> shenanigans.
Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modernA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
geopolitics
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors
about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent >>>> attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6
million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then
u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you
are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>> collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is
customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied u >>>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs
neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the
elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and
indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>> worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts,
including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>> IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>> genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>> demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals >>>>>>>> of their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our >>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on >>>>>>>> social media, across the West u has been the way in which protests >>>>>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively,
vehicles for prejudice. Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard >>>>>>>> at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to
inflame hatred of Jews u individually and collectively. The
marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>> enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-
Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation. >>>>>>>>
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>> law- bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>>> leftAs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is >>>>>>>> disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to >>>>>>>> rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews. >>>>>>>>
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists
searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim
world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>>>> behind their aGreat ReplacementA theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>>> times.
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a
religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of >>>>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert
their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the
equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our time. >>>>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.a But not quite.a The utter total destruction of >>>>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>> immediately
call the above article propaganda.
aa I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free >>>>>> Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did
_not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced
progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with
_significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives.
which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has
thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like
that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied
terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control
of israel???
that's pretty fucked up yo--
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking ? on our streets, on social >>>>>>>> media,
across the West ? has been the way in which protests against
conflict
have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>>>> Cries to ?globalise the intifada? are heard at pro-Palestine
marches,
accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews ?
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the >>>>>>>> means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>> enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. >>>>>>>> Radical
left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers >>>>>>>> such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of >>>>>>>> beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the >>>>>>>> greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel?s success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>> law-bound free?market state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>> asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, >>>>>>>> and that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>>> Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left?s >>>>>>>> world
view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of >>>>>>>> others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment ? that your misfortune can be explained by the >>>>>>>> success of
Jewry ? has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has >>>>>>>> been
repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom >>>>>>>> to blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking >>>>>>>> for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right
searching
for a guiding intelligence behind their ?Great Replacement?
theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this
wickedness is
the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>>> times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a meme before the holocaust
Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on
the muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
Anti-Semtism. Stop trying to go off topic. You've been outed. Defend-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeliGood example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
shenanigans.
Apparently, you just don't care.
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about
anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i
used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.
A virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern
geopolitics
You might think this over:
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's
far too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it the
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors
about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and
violent attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust,
where 6 million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then
u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you
are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
The virus has nothing to do with WTC-7. We're discussing your
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>> touch upon:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >>>> meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we areOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>> attack.
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse. My alternative explanation is preserved here. Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
>-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli >>>>>> shenanigans.
Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern >>>>>> geopoliticsA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors >>>>> about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent >>>>> attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6
million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then >>>> u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you >>>> are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a
religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest markers of >>>>>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s neighbours >>>>>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the
equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of >>>>>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>>> immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free >>>>>>> Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>>>>> putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did
_not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced
progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with
_significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives.
which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel >>>> flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the >>>> WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has
thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like
that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied
terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political
control of the us.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
that's pretty fucked up yo
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>> touch upon:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >>>> meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we areOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>> attack.
still wasting trillions of dollars on...
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse. My alternative explanation is preserved here. Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
--
>-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli >>>>>> shenanigans.
Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern >>>>>> geopoliticsA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors >>>>> about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent >>>>> attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6
million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then >>>> u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you >>>> are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>> collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is
customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo >>>>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs >>>>>>>>> neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the >>>>>>>>> elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>> indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>> worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts,
including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>> IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>>> genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>> demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals >>>>>>>>> of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on >>>>>>>>> social media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests >>>>>>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, >>>>>>>>> vehicles for prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard
at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to >>>>>>>>> inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The >>>>>>>>> marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>>> enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-
Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>>> law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>>>> leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>>>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is >>>>>>>>> disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to >>>>>>>>> rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews. >>>>>>>>>
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the >>>>>>>>> success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists >>>>>>>>> searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim >>>>>>>>> world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>>>>> behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>>>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>>>> times.
On 5/13/2026 7:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
Holocaust denial. Even one would be a crime against humanity. Obviously,The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the singleto eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was
a meme before the holocaust
Nick just doesn't care about the million children murdered in the gas chambers.
This is really sad.
Nick turned out to be an anti-Semite, posted on a public forum, cross
posted to alt.messianic, reducing the Holocaust to a meme.
Looks like Wilson is eight about Nick.
Oh my God!! This guy Nick can't even write a complete sentence thatOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on
the muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we
are still wasting trillions of dollars on...
attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
makes sense and he thinks he can debate the Dude?
Anti-Semtism. Stop trying to go off topic. You've been outed. Defend-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli >>>> shenanigans.Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
Apparently, you just don't care.
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about
anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i
used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.
A virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern
geopolitics
You might think this over:
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's
far too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it the
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors
about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and
violent attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust,
where 6 million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for
the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective,
then u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know
that you are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this*
particular topic.
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
The virus has nothing to do with WTC-7. We're discussing your
your position, or shut the fuck up.
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of
collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the
erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest
markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own
defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of >>>>>>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>>>> immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying >>>>>>>> "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>>>>>> putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ? >>>>> gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story >>>>> type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did
_not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced
progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire >>>>> conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with
_significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives >>>>>
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives.
which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel >>>>> flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the >>>>> WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has
thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like
that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied
terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting >>>
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control >>> of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political
control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
They say that until you admit you have a problem you can't be helped.--
YMMV.
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/26 6:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>>> touch upon:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>>
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >>>>> meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>>>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are >>>>>>> still wasting trillions of dollars on...Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>>> attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse. My alternative
explanation is preserved here. Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
that's a silly overgeneralization, i'm not claiming exclusive ownership
of all truth, nor i do exclusively own this one. u actually have to read
the entire article, noah, carefully word for word:
https://internationalfireandsafetyjournal.com/did-world-trade-center-building-7-really-collapse-due-to-an-office-fuel-load-fire/
there aren't any other conspiracies i'm willing to stake my entire
belief system on, because in order to believe the official narrative on
this one, i'd have to toss out what have become rather basic physical >understandings for the situation.
beams of steel that expand thermally do _not_ do so with the force to
the unseat themselves from connection points... they _sag_ in the
middle. nvm the fact the official narrative actually lies about the
building construction, in that there was more structural support for
these girders than their model uses. this is including but not limited
to sheer studs bolting the girders to the concrete floors, that NIST
claims would have prevented the collapse!
also they *never* released the model used to generate the animations, >because ofc such model would be torn apart. nvm the fact the animations >don't even remotely look like the collapse caught on so many video angles...
the official explanation is complete physical absurdity. the bumblefucks >generally defending it never address these beyond vague non-arguments
claims like "facts don't matter", which is nothing more than a rallying
cry for the very stupidity they are so apparently concerned about
--
>a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli >>>>>>> shenanigans.
Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern >>>>>>> geopoliticsA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>>>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors >>>>>> about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent >>>>>> attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6 >>>>>> million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for >>>>> the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then >>>>> u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you >>>>> are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic. >>>>>
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>> collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is >>>>>>>>>> customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied u >>>>>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs >>>>>>>>>> neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the >>>>>>>>>> elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>> indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>> worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts, >>>>>>>>>> including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>> IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>>>> genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>> demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals >>>>>>>>>> of their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on >>>>>>>>>> social media, across the West u has been the way in which protests >>>>>>>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, >>>>>>>>>> vehicles for prejudice. Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard >>>>>>>>>> at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to >>>>>>>>>> inflame hatred of Jews u individually and collectively. The >>>>>>>>>> marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>>>> enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti- >>>>>>>>>> Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>>>> law- bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>>>>> leftAs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>>>>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is >>>>>>>>>> disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to >>>>>>>>>> rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews. >>>>>>>>>>
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the >>>>>>>>>> success of Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists >>>>>>>>>> searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim >>>>>>>>>> world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>>>>>> behind their aGreat ReplacementA theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>>>>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>>>>> times.
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.a But not quite.a The utter total destruction of >>>>>>>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>>>>> immediately
call the above article propaganda.
aaa I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying >>>>>>>>> "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>>>>>>> putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies-
about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ? >>>>>> gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story >>>>>> type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did
_not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced
progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire >>>>>> conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives >>>>>>
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives.
which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel >>>>>> flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the >>>>>> WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has
thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep >>>>> ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is >>>>> actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting >>>>
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control >>>> of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political
control of the us.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility >with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what
is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the >middle east??? (didn't work obv)
--
They say that until you admit you have a problem you can't be helped.
YMMV.
that's pretty fucked up yo
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>>>>>> immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying >>>>>>>>>> "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>>>>>>>> putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ? >>>>>>> gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story >>>>>>> type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire >>>>>>> conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives >>>>>>>
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>> flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the >>>>>>> WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep >>>>>> ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is >>>>>> actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting >>>>>
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control >>>>> of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political
control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based >>> on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility
with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what
is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the
middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know. The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does outside of your conspiracy circle.
--
They say that until you admit you have a problem you can't be helped.
YMMV.
>
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>>>>>>> immediately
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred, >>>>>>>>>>>>> fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that >>>>>>>>>>>>> followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In >>>>>>>>>>>>> response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to >>>>>>>>>>>>> maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.a But not quite.a The utter total destruction of >>>>>>>>>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>
call the above article propaganda.
aaa I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying >>>>>>>>>>> "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>>>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>>>>>>>>> putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ? >>>>>>>> gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story >>>>>>>> type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire >>>>>>>> conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives >>>>>>>>
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>>> flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the >>>>>>>> WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep >>>>>>> ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is >>>>>>> actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting >>>>>>
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control >>>>>> of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political
control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based >>>> on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility >>> with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what >>> is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the
middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know. The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does
outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
--
They say that until you admit you have a problem you can't be helped.
YMMV.
>
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200-a >
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero"
<fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't!
<julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its >>>>>>>>>>>>> incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>>>>> thought
that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is >>>>>>>>>>>>> true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re- >>>>>>>>>>>>> drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>>>>>> albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>>>> worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>>>>>> for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in >>>>>>>>>>>>> which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater >>>>>>>>>>>>> risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win >>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any >>>>>>>>>>>>> historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern >>>>>>>>>>>>> across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total >>>>>>>>>>>> destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of
propaganda.
This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>
Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying >>>>>>>>>>> "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do >>>>>>>>>>> I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've >>>>>>>>>> been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just
beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 >>>>>>>> story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under >>>>>>>> fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted
explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of >>>>>>>> steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_.
heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had >>>>>>> deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps
daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not
starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political
control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political
control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing
based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility >>> with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what >>> is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the
middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know.-a The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does
outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2that's pretty fucked up yo
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:49:03 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200>
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you >>>>>>>>>>>> immediately
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>>>>> finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying
"free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see >>>>>>>>>>>> support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment, >>>>>>>>>>>
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>>>>>>>>>> putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ? >>>>>>>>> gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story >>>>>>>>> type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire >>>>>>>>> conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives >>>>>>>>>
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep >>>>>>>> ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is >>>>>>>> actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political >>>>>> control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based >>>>> on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility >>>> with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what >>>> is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the >>>> middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know. The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does
outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
What does that have to do with the fact that I do not know what you
accuse me of knowing?
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/2026 6:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:49:03 -0700, dart200Now you know. The Jews brought down the WTC-7; it was a Biblical
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought
that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying >>>>>>>>>>>>> "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>>>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep >>>>>>>>> ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is >>>>>>>>> actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political >>>>>>> control of the us.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based >>>>>> on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility >>>>> with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what >>>>> is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the >>>>> middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know. The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does >>>> outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
What does that have to do with the fact that I do not know what you
accuse me of knowing?
prophecy conspiracy.
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/26 9:10 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 7:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:Holocaust denial. Even one would be a crime against humanity. Obviously,
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "theto eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>
claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to
touch upon:
single greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews
was a meme before the holocaust
i've actually visited auschwitz in person, have you?
Nick just doesn't care about the million children murdered in the gas
chambers.
i don't trust how the narrative is maintained at this point. i abhor
anyone trying to prevent questioning of truth. trying to abuse me over
it will only push my away, because i don't believe truth needs such disingenuous tactics in it's defense
This is really sad.
Nick turned out to be an anti-Semite, posted on a public forum, cross
posted to alt.messianic, reducing the Holocaust to a meme.
Looks like Wilson is eight about Nick.
Oh my God!! This guy Nick can't even write a complete sentence that
Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on
the muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we
are still wasting trillions of dollars on...
terrorist attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
makes sense and he thinks he can debate the Dude?
dud, this never was a debate
that would require u to not make shit up constantly
i look forward to the day when i actually learn something from anyonehere, but so far this group has just been a total dud in that regards
Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:49:03 -0700, dart200Now you know. The Jews brought down the WTC-7; it was a Biblical
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan
Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought
that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our
time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.
This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying
"free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up against >>>>>>>>>>> all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from the >>>>>>>>>>> video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of steel >>>>>>>>>>> don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, they do >>>>>>>>>>> _not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad-tied >>>>>>>>>> terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political >>>>>>>> control of the us.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the >>>>>>> Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of impossibility >>>>>> with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus" >>>>>>
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. what >>>>>> is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the >>>>>> middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know. The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does >>>>> outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
What does that have to do with the fact that I do not know what you
accuse me of knowing?
prophecy conspiracy.
You forgot that we know the Jews ran a child trafficking ring for decades.
Those Jews eh.
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/26 6:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>> threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>>> touch upon:
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews
was a
meme before the holocaust
-a-a >
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it >>>>>>> on theOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>>> attack.
muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are >>>>>>> still wasting trillions of dollars on...
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse.-a My alternative
explanation is preserved here.-a Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
that's a silly overgeneralization, i'm not claiming exclusive ownership
of all truth, nor i do exclusively own this one. u actually have to read
the entire article, noah, carefully word for word:
https://internationalfireandsafetyjournal.com/did-world-trade-center- building-7-really-collapse-due-to-an-office-fuel-load-fire/
there aren't any other conspiracies i'm willing to stake my entire
belief system on, because in order to believe the official narrative on
this one, i'd have to toss out what have become rather basic physical understandings for the situation.
beams of steel that expand thermally do _not_ do so with the force to
the unseat themselves from connection points... they _sag_ in the
middle. nvm the fact the official narrative actually lies about the
building construction, in that there was more structural support for
these girders than their model uses. this is including but not limited
to sheer studs bolting the girders to the concrete floors, that NIST
claims would have prevented the collapse!
also they *never* released the model used to generate the animations, because ofc such model would be torn apart. nvm the fact the animations don't even remotely look like the collapse caught on so many video
angles...
the official explanation is complete physical absurdity. the bumblefucks generally defending it never address these beyond vague non-arguments
claims like "facts don't matter", which is nothing more than a rallying
cry for the very stupidity they are so apparently concerned about
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israelishenanigans.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:35:58 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 6:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>>>> touch upon:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>>>
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >>>>>> meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>>>>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are >>>>>>>> still wasting trillions of dollars on...Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>>>> attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse. My alternative
explanation is preserved here. Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
that's a silly overgeneralization, i'm not claiming exclusive ownership
of all truth, nor i do exclusively own this one. u actually have to read
the entire article, noah, carefully word for word:
https://internationalfireandsafetyjournal.com/did-world-trade-center-building-7-really-collapse-due-to-an-office-fuel-load-fire/
there aren't any other conspiracies i'm willing to stake my entire
belief system on, because in order to believe the official narrative on
this one, i'd have to toss out what have become rather basic physical
understandings for the situation.
beams of steel that expand thermally do _not_ do so with the force to
the unseat themselves from connection points... they _sag_ in the
middle. nvm the fact the official narrative actually lies about the
building construction, in that there was more structural support for
these girders than their model uses. this is including but not limited
to sheer studs bolting the girders to the concrete floors, that NIST
claims would have prevented the collapse!
also they *never* released the model used to generate the animations,
because ofc such model would be torn apart. nvm the fact the animations
don't even remotely look like the collapse caught on so many video angles... >>
the official explanation is complete physical absurdity. the bumblefucks
generally defending it never address these beyond vague non-arguments
claims like "facts don't matter", which is nothing more than a rallying
cry for the very stupidity they are so apparently concerned about
I am not an expert, so I can't judge the legitimacy of these
arguments. Perhaps you are not either? You are building engineer?
And skyscraper architect?
>-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli
shenanigans.Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern >>>>>>>> geopoliticsA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>>>>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors >>>>>>> about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent >>>>>>> attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6 >>>>>>> million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for >>>>>> the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then >>>>>> u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you >>>>>> are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic. >>>>>>
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>> collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is >>>>>>>>>>> customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>>>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>>>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>>>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>>>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo >>>>>>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs >>>>>>>>>>> neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the >>>>>>>>>>> elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>>>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>>>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>>> indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>> worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts, >>>>>>>>>>> including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>> IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>> understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>> genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>> demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>>>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals
of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our
time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on >>>>>>>>>>> social media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests
against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, >>>>>>>>>>> vehicles for prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard
at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to >>>>>>>>>>> inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The >>>>>>>>>>> marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>>>>> enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>>>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti- >>>>>>>>>>> Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>>>>> law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>>>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>>>>>> leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is >>>>>>>>>>> disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to >>>>>>>>>>> rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews. >>>>>>>>>>>
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the >>>>>>>>>>> success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists >>>>>>>>>>> searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim >>>>>>>>>>> world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>>>>>>> behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all
stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>>>>>> times.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:35:58 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 6:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>>>> touch upon:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>>>>
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a >>>>>> meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on the >>>>>>>> muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are >>>>>>>> still wasting trillions of dollars on...Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>>>> attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
But they were not.
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse. My alternative
explanation is preserved here. Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
that's a silly overgeneralization, i'm not claiming exclusive ownership
of all truth, nor i do exclusively own this one. u actually have to read
the entire article, noah, carefully word for word:
https://internationalfireandsafetyjournal.com/did-world-trade-center-building-7-really-collapse-due-to-an-office-fuel-load-fire/
there aren't any other conspiracies i'm willing to stake my entire
belief system on, because in order to believe the official narrative on
this one, i'd have to toss out what have become rather basic physical
understandings for the situation.
beams of steel that expand thermally do _not_ do so with the force to
the unseat themselves from connection points... they _sag_ in the
middle. nvm the fact the official narrative actually lies about the
building construction, in that there was more structural support for
these girders than their model uses. this is including but not limited
to sheer studs bolting the girders to the concrete floors, that NIST
claims would have prevented the collapse!
also they *never* released the model used to generate the animations,
because ofc such model would be torn apart. nvm the fact the animations
don't even remotely look like the collapse caught on so many video angles... >>
the official explanation is complete physical absurdity. the bumblefucks
generally defending it never address these beyond vague non-arguments
claims like "facts don't matter", which is nothing more than a rallying
cry for the very stupidity they are so apparently concerned about
I am not an expert, so I can't judge the legitimacy of these
arguments. Perhaps you are not either? You are building engineer?
And skyscraper architect?
--
>-a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli
shenanigans.Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern >>>>>>>> geopoliticsA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's far >>>>>>>> too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it theYou might think this over:
seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors >>>>>>> about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent >>>>>>> attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6 >>>>>>> million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for >>>>>> the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then >>>>>> u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you >>>>>> are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic. >>>>>>
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>>>> hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus >>>>>>>>>>> had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>> collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is >>>>>>>>>>> customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into >>>>>>>>>>> question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth >>>>>>>>>>> has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions >>>>>>>>>>> and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to >>>>>>>>>>> Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied rCo >>>>>>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelrCOs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelrCOs >>>>>>>>>>> neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the >>>>>>>>>>> elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, >>>>>>>>>>> funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life >>>>>>>>>>> since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>>> indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>>>> albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>> worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>>>> for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>>>> difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts, >>>>>>>>>>> including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>> IsraelrCOs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>> understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>> genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>> demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy >>>>>>>>>>> as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peoplerCOs plights by making them the equals
of their past oppressors rCo the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our
time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking rCo on our streets, on >>>>>>>>>>> social media, across the West rCo has been the way in which protests
against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, >>>>>>>>>>> vehicles for prejudice. Cries to rCyglobalise the intifadarCO are heard
at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to >>>>>>>>>>> inflame hatred of Jews rCo individually and collectively. The >>>>>>>>>>> marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>>>>> enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the >>>>>>>>>>> West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti- >>>>>>>>>>> Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelrCOs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>>>>> law- bound freerComarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>>>>>>> that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from >>>>>>>>>>> Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>>>>>> leftrCOs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness,
exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is >>>>>>>>>>> disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to >>>>>>>>>>> rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews. >>>>>>>>>>>
This sentiment rCo that your misfortune can be explained by the >>>>>>>>>>> success of Jewry rCo has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists >>>>>>>>>>> searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim >>>>>>>>>>> world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence >>>>>>>>>>> behind their rCyGreat ReplacementrCO theory, and conspiracists of all
stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our >>>>>>>>>>> times.
On 5/14/2026 11:53 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:10 AM, Dude wrote:You came here to get enlightened?
On 5/13/2026 7:20 PM, dart200 wrote:i've actually visited auschwitz in person, have you?
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:Holocaust denial. Even one would be a crime against humanity. Obviously, >>
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>> threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>> touch upon:
single greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews
was a meme before the holocaust
Nick just doesn't care about the million children murdered in the gas
chambers.
i don't trust how the narrative is maintained at this point. i abhor
anyone trying to prevent questioning of truth. trying to abuse me over
it will only push my away, because i don't believe truth needs such
disingenuous tactics in it's defense
This is really sad.
Nick turned out to be an anti-Semite, posted on a public forum, cross
posted to alt.messianic, reducing the Holocaust to a meme.
Looks like Wilson is eight about Nick.
Oh my God!! This guy Nick can't even write a complete sentence that
Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on >>>>>> the muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we >>>>>> are still wasting trillions of dollars on...
terrorist attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
makes sense and he thinks he can debate the Dude?
dud, this never was a debate
You just made that up.that would require u to not make shit up constantly
You must be new around here.i look forward to the day when i actually learn something from anyonehere, but so far this group has just been a total dud in that regards
For the past five years there have only been five regular informants on
this board, one known lurker, and only one full-timer.
Why anyone would come here to discuss anything is beyond me!
Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, I guess.
Texting on social media is like an addiction - you just can't let go -
and it could go on for decades, Pal.
Look what happened to Trump: he uses a security blocked iPhone, using no caps or punctuation for one-liners. Otherwise, he has his assistant, Natalie, post up messages to Truth Social.
One guy who used to post on these boards, Uncle Tantra, back in 1995 -
2025, went nuts texting from over in Amsterdam. He was last seen sitting alone at a sidewalk cafe drinking coffee and smoking weed, wearing a
black t-shirt, with his laptop open on the table.
Apparently, he was texting to alt.skeptic.
One of the patrons recalled seeing this hippie type at the cafe late one night when he suddenly rose up out of his chair and shouted out in a
loud voice "YES! as he hit the Send button. YMMV.
On 5/14/2026 6:51 PM, Tara wrote:
Dude <punditster@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/14/2026 6:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:49:03 -0700, dart200Now you know. The Jews brought down the WTC-7; it was a Biblical
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because you
<julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a
religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was thought
that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greatest
crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at last
been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customary in
debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anti-Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to
exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times,
hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elimination of
Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people
and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have died.
But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed
its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greater risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genocide has
grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assert
their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of our
time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda.
This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying
"free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just >>>>>>>>>>>> beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a >>>>>>>>>>>> 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a
plane... did
_not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire- >>>>>>>>>>>> induced
progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up >>>>>>>>>>>> against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function >>>>>>>>>>>> under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to >>>>>>>>>>>> endure with
_significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted >>>>>>>>>>>> explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having >>>>>>>>>>>> explosives.
which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. >>>>>>>>>>>> from the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton >>>>>>>>>>>> chunks of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks >>>>>>>>>>>> of steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. >>>>>>>>>>>> heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually >>>>>>>>>>>> has
thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, >>>>>>>>>>>> they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a >>>>>>>>>>>> plot like
that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class >>>>>>>>>>> mossad-tied
terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have >>>>>>>>>>> had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps >>>>>>>>>>> daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on >>>>>>>>>>> not starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in
political control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in
political
control of the us.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the >>>>>>>> Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic
cleansing based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of
impossibility
with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus" >>>>>>>
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for
decades. what
is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to
"stabilize" the
middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know.-a The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not >>>>>> accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody >>>>>> does
outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
What does that have to do with the fact that I do not know what you
accuse me of knowing?
prophecy conspiracy.
You forgot that we know the Jews ran a child trafficking ring for
decades.
According to Nick, it's a world-wide conspiracy involving many
Those Jews eh.
politicians and entertainment personalities and people in seats of
power, up to and including the Queen of England and her son Andy.
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/14/2026 3:49 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:You do now.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200-a >
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero"
<fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! >>>>>>>>>>>> Because you
<julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its >>>>>>>>>>>>>> incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thought
that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>>>>>> times,
hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people
and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> died.
But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed
its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> our
time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern >>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total >>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of >>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda.
This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying
"free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do >>>>>>>>>>>> I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the >>>>>>>>>>>> Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment, >>>>>>>>>>>
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda
they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just >>>>>>>>> beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a 47 >>>>>>>>> story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up >>>>>>>>> against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function
under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure with >>>>>>>>> _significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted
explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. from >>>>>>>>> the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks >>>>>>>>> of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of >>>>>>>>> steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. >>>>>>>>> heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, >>>>>>>>> they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot like >>>>>>>>> that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class mossad- >>>>>>>> tied
terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have had >>>>>>>> deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps
daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not >>>>>>>> starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political >>>>>>> control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political >>>>>> control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing
based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of
impossibility
with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades.
what
is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the >>>> middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know.-a The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does
outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
--but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reasonFaith in the Messiah cult? or, like Noah, Hebrew Bible prophecy?
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/13/2026 9:56 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:Let's put Nick at the top of the Jew-haters.
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been
defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now finds >>>>> its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true. But >>>>> what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts elsewhere, to >>>>> be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and
their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But
there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult work of >>>>> urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has grown in >>>>> vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the demand >>>>> that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their
right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.-a This >>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
Let's put history in reverse:
The Jews caused the holocaust; then the Jews caused the 7-day war; and
then the Jews caused 47 years of war against the State of Israel. Blame
the Jews!
Who do they think they are, Judea's?
So, the Arab Semites want the Jewish Semite's property and Nick wantsbut u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've beenputting out, like a true sheeple EfEaEfEaEfEa
the property spread all around. There's just no room for Jews to be
secure in their own home. Nick apparently doesn't care about Jews
getting massacred in their own home.
Is that a wrap, or not?
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the means by >>>>> which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers
such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of beliefs >>>>> peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic,
law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from Tangier >>>>> to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation and >>>>> oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the
grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of
others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to
blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking
for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A theory, >>>>> and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our
times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/14/26 3:17 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 11:35:58 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 6:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 21:55:16 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 19:20:20 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:But they were not.
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:47 AM, Julian wrote:The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the single >>>>>>>> greatest crime in history."
On 13/05/2026 16:36, dart200 wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons a >>>>>>>>> claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt to >>>>>>>>> touch upon:
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews was a
meme before the holocaust
>
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it on theOff topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC terrorist >>>>>>>> attack.
muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that we are >>>>>>>>> still wasting trillions of dollars on...
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does. >>>>>>
like i said noah: ur claims are necessarily ignorant until you
understand the true nature of the WTC7 collapse
until then: post away my dude, but it ain't gunna be truth
What you believe is the true nature of that collapse. My alternative
explanation is preserved here. Claiming exclusive ownership of truth
is a risky business.
that's a silly overgeneralization, i'm not claiming exclusive ownership
of all truth, nor i do exclusively own this one. u actually have to read >>> the entire article, noah, carefully word for word:
https://internationalfireandsafetyjournal.com/did-world-trade-center-building-7-really-collapse-due-to-an-office-fuel-load-fire/
there aren't any other conspiracies i'm willing to stake my entire
belief system on, because in order to believe the official narrative on
this one, i'd have to toss out what have become rather basic physical
understandings for the situation.
beams of steel that expand thermally do _not_ do so with the force to
the unseat themselves from connection points... they _sag_ in the
middle. nvm the fact the official narrative actually lies about the
building construction, in that there was more structural support for
these girders than their model uses. this is including but not limited
to sheer studs bolting the girders to the concrete floors, that NIST
claims would have prevented the collapse!
also they *never* released the model used to generate the animations,
because ofc such model would be torn apart. nvm the fact the animations
don't even remotely look like the collapse caught on so many video angles...
the official explanation is complete physical absurdity. the bumblefucks >>> generally defending it never address these beyond vague non-arguments
claims like "facts don't matter", which is nothing more than a rallying
cry for the very stupidity they are so apparently concerned about
I am not an expert, so I can't judge the legitimacy of these
arguments. Perhaps you are not either? You are building engineer?
And skyscraper architect?
if experts conflict how do u choose one you believe noah??? whatever the >fuck the bandwagon of experts say???
jeez, u've been around for literally decades longer than me... have you--
not noticed that shit experts said when u were a child have been >contradicted multiple times over at this point??? how do know
anything??? even today, god only knows how much shit various experts
state are _still_ blatantly wrong...
at the end the day, experts are not a justification for the truth of an >argument, they are instead function as a source for arguments that must
be true of their own merit, and if ur not trying to function at that
level then ur getting fucked.
so like i said noah: it's gunna take work to understand this. i can't do >that work for you. you can start by actually reading the link, the guy
is an expert in his own right.
please do try to ask something more specific and maybe i can explain.
--------
honestly noah if u want to skip the actual physics ... one needs to >seriously ask the question why NIST was trying concoct this explanation
7 years after the event with models and speculation about novel
phenomena that never before happened...
why the fuck wasn't this done the following year WITH THE ACTUAL STEEL
FROM THE BUILDING???
ok, so NIST claims some girders sagged enough to sheer their connections >from columns causing progressive floor collapse, WHY IN THE FUCK DON'T
WE HAVE THE ACTUAL GIRDERS THAT DID THIS AS PROOF???
oh cause they fucking sent that shit all off to china for recycling
instead of keeping it around for forensics cause whoever the fuck did
this (joos/zionists/bush/bibi/epstein-class) certainly didn't want
anyone coming to the real truth of the matter...
NOAH WE SPEND TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON WAR OVER AN EVENT THAT WE DIDN'T
DO PROPER FUCKING FORENSICS ON CAUSE WE DIDN'T KEEP THE EVIDENCE
AROUND... LIKE THE WORST MASS MURDER IN MODERN US HISTORY, AND THE WHOLE >THING IS A GIANT FUCKING SHITSHOW OF DESTROYING EVIDENCE...
HOW IN THE FUCK IS THAT NOT A GODDAMN GIANT BLARING RED SIGN FOR >_CONSPIRACY_ ???
and wat u think the muzzies did that dud??? ???
>a > and that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to israeli
shenanigans.Good example of antisemitism,Nick. Nice!
>
one cannot deal with this by continuing the screech mindlessly about >>>>>>>>> anti-semitism as if i have some innate bias against israel... heck i >>>>>>>>> used to defend their situation as simply pure conquest.Apparently, you just don't care.
>
but as i grew older, now i realize it's a fucking cancer on modern >>>>>>>>> geopoliticsA virus, Nick. It has nothing to do with politics.
>
u ofc will not respond meaningfully to any of this... because it's farYou might think this over:
too outside ur scope of operational awareness to give it the >>>>>>>>> seriousness it is due.
Many people are prone to suggestion.
How it shows up: It can range from negative stereotypes (like rumors >>>>>>>> about money or power) to verbal abuse, bullying, vandalism, and violent
attacks.History: The most severe example was the Holocaust, where 6 >>>>>>>> million Jews were murdered by Nazis.
until u put the work into to understand by the official narrative for >>>>>>> the WTC7 collapse is complete bullshit from a physics perspective, then >>>>>>> u will never convince me of anything here, because i will know that you >>>>>>> are too ignorant to inform me of anything in *this* particular topic. >>>>>>>
nvm the fact you make up half this shit u say 90% of the time.
>
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation >>>>>>>>>>>> and spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>> response risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan >>>>>>>>>>>> Sacks explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>> religious prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial
hatred, fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>>>> thought that after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single >>>>>>>>>>>> greatest crime in history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus
had at last been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now >>>>>>>>>>>> finds its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>> collective Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is >>>>>>>>>>>> customary in debates around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain >>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. >>>>>>>>>>>> That is true. But what is striking is just how much criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>> Israel is anti-Semitic. The very existence of Israel is called into
question. That is what anti- Zionism means. No other state on Earth
has its right to exist debated so vehemently. The partitions and >>>>>>>>>>>> border re- drawings that followed two world wars generated tensions
and conflicts elsewhere, to be sure. But no one calls for an end to
Pakistan or the erasure of Jordan. A double standard is applied u >>>>>>>>>>>> one of the oldest markers of anti-Semitism.
More than that, IsraelAs actions, especially in its own defence, >>>>>>>>>>>> are held to a different standard than other nations. IsraelAs >>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>>>> times, hosted and funded terror organisations pledged to the >>>>>>>>>>>> elimination of Jewish communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas,
funded by Iran, inflicted on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life
since the Holocaust. In response, Israel has sought to quell that >>>>>>>>>>>> threat to its people and their survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>>>>>>>> there has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>>>> indeed its detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought,
albeit imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>>> worked to maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia
for a House of Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the
difficult work of urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit >>>>>>>>>>>> casualties below the level seen in other similar conflicts, >>>>>>>>>>>> including those in which British or American troops were engaged. >>>>>>>>>>>>
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to >>>>>>>>>>>> IsraelAs own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>> understanding. Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a >>>>>>>>>>>> genocide has grown in vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the >>>>>>>>>>>> demand that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy
as victims but never understanding, let alone support, when they >>>>>>>>>>>> assert their right to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic >>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy for the Jewish peopleAs plights by making them the equals >>>>>>>>>>>> of their past oppressors u the new Nazis, the gonocidaires of our >>>>>>>>>>>> time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>>>>>>>> world and a desire for peace. Every soul in suffering calls to us >>>>>>>>>>>> in our hearts. But what has been striking u on our streets, on >>>>>>>>>>>> social media, across the West u has been the way in which protests >>>>>>>>>>>> against conflict have become, so quickly and comprehensively, >>>>>>>>>>>> vehicles for prejudice. Cries to aglobalise the intifadaA are heard
at pro- Palestine marches, accompanied by imagery designed to >>>>>>>>>>>> inflame hatred of Jews u individually and collectively. The >>>>>>>>>>>> marches, and the memes, have become the means by which the virus >>>>>>>>>>>> has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust >>>>>>>>>>>> enough to see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over >>>>>>>>>>>> time. Radical left thinking, and especially the enduring influence >>>>>>>>>>>> of writers such as Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the
West a set of beliefs peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti- >>>>>>>>>>>> Semitism. Colonialism is the greatest evil, privilege and success >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of injustice, neo- liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
IsraelAs success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>>>>>>>> law- bound freeumarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want >>>>>>>>>>>> to shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by >>>>>>>>>>>> asylum- seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and
that it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial >>>>>>>>>>>> leftAs world view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, >>>>>>>>>>>> exploitation and oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is >>>>>>>>>>>> disinterred from the grave in which it should have been left to >>>>>>>>>>>> rest. The misery of others is down to the rapacity of the Jews. >>>>>>>>>>>>
This sentiment u that your misfortune can be explained by the >>>>>>>>>>>> success of Jewry u has been weaponised by populists in the past. >>>>>>>>>>>> And it has been repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists >>>>>>>>>>>> searching for whom to blame for the misfortunes of the Muslim >>>>>>>>>>>> world, radical leftists looking for a villainous face to personify >>>>>>>>>>>> neo-liberal greed, a far right searching for a guiding intelligence
behind their aGreat ReplacementA theory, and conspiracists of all >>>>>>>>>>>> stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame.
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness >>>>>>>>>>>> is the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our
times.
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
elvis lives
diana lives
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
The market for this stuff is huge. People are dying to believe.
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
The market for this stuff is huge. People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have >influence over him--
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
The market for this stuff is huge. People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have >influence over him
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
On Fri, 15 May 2026 21:56:04 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
For sure. Howcum people believe that stuff?
The market for this stuff is huge. People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
Now you sound like wilson.
--
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have
influence over him
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
On 5/14/26 6:21 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 3:49 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/14/26 3:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:You do now.
On Thu, 14 May 2026 13:55:30 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:38 AM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 7:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2026 00:31:58 -0700, dart200-a >
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 8:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 7:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 10:30 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 12:56:05?PM EDT, "dart200"
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16?AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <fedora@fea.st>
wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because you
<julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incubation
and
spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response
risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
Sacks
explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religious
prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thought
that
after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
been defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collective
Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debates
around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Semitic.
The
very existence of Israel is called into question. That is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist
debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erasure of
Jordan. A double standard is applied ? one of the oldest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> markers of
anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel?s actions, especially in its own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defence, are
held to a different standard than other nations. Israel?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neighbours
sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times,
hosted
and funded terror organisations pledged to the
elimination of
Jewish
communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people
and their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> died.
But there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed
its
detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the
level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> risk to
Israel?s own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historic
sympathy for the Jewish people?s plights by making them the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals of
their past oppressors ? the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of our
time.
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across the
world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total >>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction of
gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda.
This
piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a-a-a-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town >>>>>>>>>>>>> saying
"free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere >>>>>>>>>>>>> do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise >>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>
but u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>> they've been
putting out, like a true sheeple
https://www.adl.org/resources/report/antisemitic-conspiracies- >>>>>>>>>>> about-911-endure-20-years-later
the adl is literally a propaganda org tara. and this is just >>>>>>>>>> beyond ?
gallery takes
you first have to put in the work to understand that WTC7, a >>>>>>>>>> 47 story
type-one fire safe building, that was _not_ hit by a plane... did >>>>>>>>>> _not_ collapse because of a one off novel event: a "fire-induced >>>>>>>>>> progressive collapse due to thermal expansion" that runs up >>>>>>>>>> against
all prior knowledge of how steel framed buildings function >>>>>>>>>> under fire
conditions that they were _specifically engineered_ to endure >>>>>>>>>> with
_significant_ margin
the *only* reasonable explanation for WTC7 was pre-planted >>>>>>>>>> explosives
which then heavily begs the question of WTC1/2 having explosives. >>>>>>>>>> which they did and there really is enough evidence for it. >>>>>>>>>> from the
video tapes alone you can manually track huge multiton chunks >>>>>>>>>> of steel
flying _laterally_ at speeds of 50-60 mph. multiton chunks of >>>>>>>>>> steel
don't "bounce" off each other when falling ... they _break_. >>>>>>>>>> heck, the
WTC dust itself is uniquely identifiable in that it actually has >>>>>>>>>> thermitic compounds in the dust.
it wasn't the fucking muzzies who planted explosives, tara, >>>>>>>>>> they do
_not_ have the kind of ties to the us govt to pull off a plot >>>>>>>>>> like
that. not 25 years ago, not even today.
the "joos" on the other hand (specifically epstein-class
mossad- tied
terrorists now in political control of israel) not only have >>>>>>>>> had deep
ties to the us deep state, they still have them... trumps
daughter is
actually married to one
that's why trump went to war he specifically campaigned on not >>>>>>>>> starting
like idk what the fucks wrong with you people.
why are you lumping all jews in with the terrorists in political >>>>>>>> control
of israel???
Sorta like lumping all americans in with the himboists in political >>>>>>> control of the us.
Sorta looks like a wrap on the Antisemitism virus discussion.
Nick wants to blame the WTC attack on the Israelis and denies the
Holocaust; Noah thinks the Jews started their own ethnic cleansing >>>>>> based
on a Hebrew Bible prophesy.
Apparently, neither wants to talk about their mind virus.
the real mind virus is dismissing physical descriptions of
impossibility
with non-critical gaslighting attacks like believing a "mind virus"
we already know those joos ran a child traffiking ring for decades. >>>>> what
is murdering a few thousand people to launch a plan to "stabilize" the >>>>> middle east??? (didn't work obv)
We already know.-a The same as dude and wilson, I invite you to not
accuse me of knowing something I do not, in fact I suspect nobody does >>>> outside of your conspiracy circle.
i don't have a conspiracy circle
where??? Ef2nEf2nEf2n
Faith in the Messiah cult? or, like Noah, Hebrew Bible prophecy?
but u sure do have a lot of faith of those in power for some reason
that's pretty fucked up yo
On 5/13/26 1:18 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/13/2026 9:56 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 9:18 AM, Tara wrote:Let's put Nick at the top of the Jew-haters.
On May 13, 2026 at 11:49:16rC>AM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <fedora@fea.st> >>>> wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2026 16:30:41 +0100, Julian <julianlzb87@gmail.com>
wrote:
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the threat >>>>>> needs to be identified, as do the circumstances of its incubation and >>>>>> spread, and the vulnerability of specific hosts. The wrong response >>>>>> risks making things worse.
Anti-Semitism is a virus, and, as the late Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks >>>>>> explained, one that mutates over time. Originally, it was a religious >>>>>> prejudice; post-Enlightenment, it developed into a racial hatred,
fuelled by a twisted version of social Darwinism. It was thought that >>>>>> after the unique evil of the Holocaust, the single greatest crime in >>>>>> history, when man became wolf unto man, the virus had at last been >>>>>> defeated.
But in our own time a new variant has emerged. Anti-Semitism now
finds
its most vigorous form in hostility to the expression of collective >>>>>> Jewish identity, the Jewish home: Israel. It is customary in debates >>>>>> around contemporary anti-Semitism to maintain there is nothing
inherently anti-Semitic about criticising Israel. That is true.
But what
is striking is just how much criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. The >>>>>> very existence of Israel is called into question. That is what
anti-Zionism means. No other state on Earth has its right to exist >>>>>> debated so vehemently. The partitions and border re-drawings that
followed two world wars generated tensions and conflicts
elsewhere, to
be sure. But no one calls for an end to Pakistan or the erasure of >>>>>> Jordan. A double standard is applied -u one of the oldest markers of >>>>>> anti-Semitism.
More than that, Israel-As actions, especially in its own defence, are >>>>>> held to a different standard than other nations. Israel-As neighbours >>>>>> sought to strangle it at birth. They have, at different times, hosted >>>>>> and funded terror organisations pledged to the elimination of Jewish >>>>>> communal existence. On 7 October 2023, Hamas, funded by Iran,
inflicted
on Israel the gravest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In
response, Israel has sought to quell that threat to its people and >>>>>> their
survival.
That conflict has been ugly and many more innocents have died. But >>>>>> there
has been a contrast between Israel and its enemies, and indeed its >>>>>> detractors. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) have sought, albeit
imperfectly, to minimise civilian casualties. Hamas has worked to
maximise them. Detailed work by Lord Roberts of Belgravia for a
House of
Lords committee has shown how Israel, engaged in the difficult
work of
urban counter-insurgency, has managed to limit casualties below the >>>>>> level seen in other similar conflicts, including those in which
British
or American troops were engaged.
But such restraint, which necessarily involves a greater risk to
Israel-As own soldiers, has not brought Israel any greater
understanding.
Instead, the allegation that it is engaging in a genocide has
grown in
vehemence and volume.
Two strands of anti-Semitism are at work here. The first is the
demand
that Jews live on terms set by others: they can win sympathy as
victims
but never understanding, let alone support, when they assert their >>>>>> right
to self-defence.
The second is the desire to go further and to erase any historic
sympathy for the Jewish people-As plights by making them the equals of >>>>>> their past oppressors -u the new Nazis, the g|-nocidaires of our time. >>>>>
The conflict in Gaza has led to understandable concern across the >>>>>> world
and a desire for peace.
He almost said it.-a But not quite.-a The utter total destruction of >>>>> gaza, reducing it to rubble was uncalled for.
I say, refusal to tell both sides is the hallmark of propaganda.-a This >>>>> piece, as inoffensive as it tries to be, is propaganda.
"Both sides"? You wan't both sides told? No you don't! Because you
immediately
call the above article propaganda.
-a I see signs on my street and everywhere around town saying "free
Gaza". The
univ protests are in support of the Palestinians. Nowhere do I see
support or
rallies for the Jews or Israel. Anti-semitism is on the rise
everywhere. There
is only one view and it's all one-sided in support of the
Palestinians, -
never a world or cry for the Jews.
Your reaction above to an article about the plite of the Jews is
typical and
is what perpetuates the virus.
israel is the world's leading terror state at the moment,
u think i hate them more than muzzies???
give me a fking break, u seem me going and blowing myself up over this???
-a > not literally dud Efn-
-a >
-a > #god
Let's put history in reverse:
The Jews caused the holocaust; then the Jews caused the 7-day war; and
then the Jews caused 47 years of war against the State of Israel.
Blame the Jews!
Who do they think they are, Judea's?
So, the Arab Semites want the Jewish Semite's property and Nick wantsbut u keep eating up the century's worth of propaganda they've been >>> putting out, like a true sheeple EfEaEfEaEfEa
the property spread all around. There's just no room for Jews to be
secure in their own home. Nick apparently doesn't care about Jews
getting massacred in their own home.
Is that a wrap, or not?
Every soul in suffering calls to us in our
hearts. But what has been striking -u on our streets, on social media, >>>>>> across the West -u has been the way in which protests against conflict >>>>>> have become, so quickly and comprehensively, vehicles for prejudice. >>>>>> Cries to -aglobalise the intifada-A are heard at pro-Palestine marches, >>>>>> accompanied by imagery designed to inflame hatred of Jews -u
individually
and collectively. The marches, and the memes, have become the
means by
which the virus has spread.
A healthy society should have a political immune system robust
enough to
see off this danger. But our own has been weakened over time. Radical >>>>>> left thinking, and especially the enduring influence of writers
such as
Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, has induced in the West a set of
beliefs
peculiarly vulnerable to modern anti-Semitism. Colonialism is the
greatest evil, privilege and success evidence of injustice,
neo-liberalism a lie that cloaks exploitation.
Israel-As success, against the odds, as a pluralistic, democratic, >>>>>> law-bound free-umarket state stands as a rebuke to those who want to >>>>>> shame the West and its values. That Israel is a land formed by
asylum-seekers and refugees, with almost no natural resources, and >>>>>> that
it outdoes in growth, freedom and opportunity every state from
Tangier
to Tehran, is a powerful refutation of the post-colonial left-As world >>>>>> view. And so its success is attributed to wickedness, exploitation >>>>>> and
oppression. Thus another anti-Semitic trope is disinterred from the >>>>>> grave in which it should have been left to rest. The misery of
others is
down to the rapacity of the Jews.
This sentiment -u that your misfortune can be explained by the
success of
Jewry -u has been weaponised by populists in the past. And it has been >>>>>> repurposed for the 21st century by Islamists searching for whom to >>>>>> blame
for the misfortunes of the Muslim world, radical leftists looking >>>>>> for a
villainous face to personify neo-liberal greed, a far right searching >>>>>> for a guiding intelligence behind their -aGreat Replacement-A
theory, and
conspiracists of all stripes in pursuit of a hidden hand to blame. >>>>>>
Standing against this hatred, these ideologies and this wickedness is >>>>>> the democratic duty of all of us and the principled fight of our
times.
The Spectator (editorial 09/05/2026)
On 5/14/26 7:07 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/14/2026 11:53 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/14/26 9:10 AM, Dude wrote:You came here to get enlightened?
On 5/13/2026 7:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/13/26 11:59 AM, Dude wrote:Holocaust denial. Even one would be a crime against humanity.
On 5/13/2026 10:02 AM, dart200 wrote:
The claim is the anti-Semitic virus led to the Holocaust, "the
To eradicate a virus, one needs precision. The origin of the >>>>>>>>>> threat
to eradicate a "virus" one needs to actually address the reasons >>>>>>> a claim is made, which this article doesn't even remotely attempt >>>>>>> to touch upon:
single greatest crime in history."
i honestly don't believe the numbers at this point. 6 million jews
was a meme before the holocaust
Obviously,
i've actually visited auschwitz in person, have you?
Nick just doesn't care about the million children murdered in the
gas chambers.
i don't trust how the narrative is maintained at this point. i abhor
anyone trying to prevent questioning of truth. trying to abuse me
over it will only push my away, because i don't believe truth needs
such disingenuous tactics in it's defense
This is really sad.
Nick turned out to be an anti-Semite, posted on a public forum,
cross posted to alt.messianic, reducing the Holocaust to a meme.
Looks like Wilson is eight about Nick.
Oh my God!! This guy Nick can't even write a complete sentence that
Off topic. Antisemitism has nothing to do with the 9/11 WTC
israel attacked us, killed 3000 americans on live TV, pinned it >>>>>>> on the muzzies, and pulled us into decades long losing wars, that >>>>>>> we are still wasting trillions of dollars on...
terrorist attack.
if isn'treal was the mastermind behind the plot, then yes it does.
makes sense and he thinks he can debate the Dude?
dud, this never was a debate
i came everywhere to get enlightened Efia
You just made that up.that would require u to not make shit up constantly
anyonei look forward to the day when i actually learn something from
here, but so far this group has just been a total dud in that regardsYou must be new around here.
For the past five years there have only been five regular informants
on this board, one known lurker, and only one full-timer.
Why anyone would come here to discuss anything is beyond me!
Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to, I guess.
Texting on social media is like an addiction - you just can't let go -
and it could go on for decades, Pal.
Look what happened to Trump: he uses a security blocked iPhone, using
no caps or punctuation for one-liners. Otherwise, he has his
assistant, Natalie, post up messages to Truth Social.
One guy who used to post on these boards, Uncle Tantra, back in 1995 -
2025, went nuts texting from over in Amsterdam. He was last seen
sitting alone at a sidewalk cafe drinking coffee and smoking weed,
wearing a black t-shirt, with his laptop open on the table.
Apparently, he was texting to alt.skeptic.
One of the patrons recalled seeing this hippie type at the cafe late
one night when he suddenly rose up out of his chair and shouted out in
a loud voice "YES! as he hit the Send button. YMMV.
On Fri, 15 May 2026 21:56:04 -0700, dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
The market for this stuff is huge. People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have
influence over him
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
Could be. But the ones you think you know about are not the ones.
Real conspirators would be utterly dismayed if some guy in Calif knew
what they were doing. Where did we go wrong?, they would cry.
On 5/16/2026 5:48 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2026 21:56:04 -0700, dart200
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
The market for this stuff is huge.-a People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have
influence over him
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
Could be.-a But the ones you think you know about are not the ones.
Real conspirators would be utterly dismayed if some guy in Calif knew
what they were doing.-a Where did we go wrong?, they would cry.
Now, this is a rap!
Two conspiracy nuts debating about whether or not the Hamas terrorists attacked a music festival, or was it staged by the Israelis, in order to drum up support for a two state solution.
Brilliant!
On 5/16/26 12:54 PM, Dude wrote:
On 5/16/2026 5:48 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2026 21:56:04 -0700, dart200Now, this is a rap!
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
The market for this stuff is huge.-a People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have >>>> influence over him
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
Could be.-a But the ones you think you know about are not the ones.
Real conspirators would be utterly dismayed if some guy in Calif knew
what they were doing.-a Where did we go wrong?, they would cry.
Two conspiracy nuts debating about whether or not the Hamas terrorists
attacked a music festival, or was it staged by the Israelis, in order
to drum up support for a two state solution.
Brilliant!
doesn't really compared to the many millions of muzzies that lost their lives to geopolitical shenanigans cause joos decided just inject their presence there Efn+
i again, have no idea how big the holocaust numbers really were Efn+
On 5/16/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 5/16/26 12:54 PM, Dude wrote:At least the Jews have historical rights to the land, instead of just
On 5/16/2026 5:48 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2026 21:56:04 -0700, dart200Now, this is a rap!
<user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
On 5/15/26 9:38 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
You chose the "israel did it" theory.
Kenedy was assassinated by the cia
prolly, not worth betting on
elvis lives
who?
diana lives
what?
himbo's 3 assassination attempts were staged.
you can't stage a rifle shot like that, incredible luck
The market for this stuff is huge.-a People are dying to believe.
u didn't even read my response noah, go fuck yourself
keep bitching about trump while ignoring the powers that actually have >>>>> influence over him
(IT'S NOT THE FUCKING RUSSIANS YOU MORON)
Could be.-a But the ones you think you know about are not the ones.
Real conspirators would be utterly dismayed if some guy in Calif knew
what they were doing.-a Where did we go wrong?, they would cry.
Two conspiracy nuts debating about whether or not the Hamas
terrorists attacked a music festival, or was it staged by the
Israelis, in order to drum up support for a two state solution.
Brilliant!
doesn't really compared to the many millions of muzzies that lost
their lives to geopolitical shenanigans cause joos decided just inject
their presence there Efn+
lines in the sand and Kings appointed and drawn up in Cairo, Egypt by
some British officials, including Winston Churchill.
Antisemitism comes in many forms. You don't really care anyway.i again, have no idea how big the holocaust numbers really were Efn+
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:57:20 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (20,373K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,321 |