No Bible is worth bothering with unless it was published after 1610.
It was written by an English King who named the Bible after himself. King >James. Who doesn't like history and fables written 1610 years after it >happened? It's why everybody in the USA uses the King James version.
c186282 <c186282@nnada.ne> on Fri, 21 Aug 2026 02:06:55 -0000 (UTC)
typed in alt.bible the following:
No Bible is worth bothering with unless it was published after 1610.
It was written by an English King who named the Bible after himself. King >>James. Who doesn't like history and fables written 1610 years after it >>happened? It's why everybody in the USA uses the King James version.
This is funny, and reveals a complete ignorance of English--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
history, Anglican History, and of the Authorized Version.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 05:03:10 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,353 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (1,590K bytes) |
| Messages: | 291,507 |