• Re: [OT] worldwide, 25% of couples are incompatible

    From David Dalton@dalton@nfld.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.atheism, rec.arts.tv on Wed Sep 23 19:35:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

    On Sep 22, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.30623A7B00EA211D30A8DE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 18, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.305CFF98005B579D30B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
    (in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

    David Dalton wrote:
    From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

    #1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
    human couples will be broken across species boundaries
    in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
    sexually compatible.

    I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
    optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
    compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
    compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

    How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
    some countries than others. Also, it includes:

    one-way attraction relationships:
    a) gay--straight-type-1-F
    b) gay--bif
    c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
    d) lesbian--bim
    e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
    f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

    and

    platonic relationships:
    g) gay--lesbian
    h) gay--straight-type-2-F
    i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
    j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

    Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
    necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
    far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

    (a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
    posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

    Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
    and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
    Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
    lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
    attraction relationships in their new species.

    An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
    pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
    become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
    sexually compatible across all six possible links).

    For definitions of my terminology see my
    Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
    (but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

    My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times this year.

    Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

    Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
    progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
    regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
    (I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

    FULL RESET, with two changes required:

    1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
    will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
    compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
    and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

    2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
    will not.

    Those have been back and forth a few times.

    Those two have been reversed again.

    1. incompatible human couples will be split across species
    boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.

    I had hoped that this would be reversed, with qualifications
    for abusive relationships, in a mystic attempt I started
    tonight, but it wasnrCOt, even though I wanted it to be.
    So I am hoping that this attempt fails and that I get
    to try again at Harvest Moon and that it will be reversed
    then.

    OK, it was reversed again.

    From the thread rCLHarvest Moon weekrCY on alt.religion.druid :

    "3. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive,
    or will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally
    sexually compatible, will be made optimally sexually
    compatible and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries."
    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html (Salmon on the Thorns)
    rCLMy momma was a waitress; My daddy a truck driver; The thing
    that kept their power from them; Slowed me down awhile.rCY (Ferron)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From David Dalton@dalton@nfld.com to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.atheism, rec.arts.tv on Tue Sep 29 00:21:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

    On Sep 23, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.306484AC0104E68630A8DE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 22, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.30623A7B00EA211D30A8DE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 18, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.305CFF98005B579D30B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
    (in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

    On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
    (in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

    David Dalton wrote:
    From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

    #1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
    human couples will be broken across species boundaries
    in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
    sexually compatible.

    I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
    optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
    compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
    compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

    How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
    some countries than others. Also, it includes:

    one-way attraction relationships:
    a) gay--straight-type-1-F
    b) gay--bif
    c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
    d) lesbian--bim
    e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
    f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

    and

    platonic relationships:
    g) gay--lesbian
    h) gay--straight-type-2-F
    i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
    j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

    Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
    far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

    (a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
    posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

    Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
    and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
    Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
    lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
    attraction relationships in their new species.

    An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
    pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
    become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
    sexually compatible across all six possible links).

    For definitions of my terminology see my
    Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
    (but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

    My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times this year.

    Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

    Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
    progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
    regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
    (I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

    FULL RESET, with two changes required:

    1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
    will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
    compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
    and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

    2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
    will not.

    Those have been back and forth a few times.

    Those two have been reversed again.

    1. incompatible human couples will be split across species
    boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.

    I had hoped that this would be reversed, with qualifications
    for abusive relationships, in a mystic attempt I started
    tonight, but it wasnrCOt, even though I wanted it to be.
    So I am hoping that this attempt fails and that I get
    to try again at Harvest Moon and that it will be reversed
    then.

    OK, it was reversed again.

    From the thread rCLHarvest Moon weekrCY on alt.religion.druid :

    "3. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive,
    or will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally
    sexually compatible, will be made optimally sexually
    compatible and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries."

    And unfortunately, against my wishes, it has been reversed
    again:

    "2. incompatible human couples will be split across species
    boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible."
    --
    https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html (Salmon on the Thorns)
    rCLMy momma was a waitress; My daddy a truck driver; The thing
    that kept their power from them; Slowed me down awhile.rCY (Ferron)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2