From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

Here it is:

"In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be falsifiable: and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak
about reality."

The Wikipedia article on him has another great quote:

"The whole thing goes back to myths which, though they may have a kernel
of truth, are untrue. Why then should the Jewish myth be true and the
Indian and Egyptian myths not be true?"

Here's a definition of science that I gave in the comment section on a
recent podcast of Professor Bart Ehrman's called "Three 'Myths' Atheists Believe":

"Scientific truth is contingent truth, testable & correctable, with falsifiability being a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for an observational and/or experimental datum that can be advanced for or
against the predictions of a scientific model."

Comments? (Other than JTEM, Dale or Dr. Andrew.)

Dawn
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

Dawn Flood wrote:

Here it is:

"In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it
must be falsifiable: and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it
does not speak about reality."

The Wikipedia article on him has another great quote:

"The whole thing goes back to myths which, though they may have a
kernel of truth, are untrue. Why then should the Jewish myth be
true and the Indian and Egyptian myths not be true?"

Here's a definition of science that I gave in the comment section
on a recent podcast of Professor Bart Ehrman's called "Three
'Myths' Atheists Believe":

"Scientific truth is contingent truth, testable & correctable,
with falsifiability being a necessary, but not sufficient,
condition for an observational and/or experimental datum that can
be advanced for or against the predictions of a scientific model."

Comments?-a (Other than JTEM, Dale or Dr. Andrew.)

Dawn

well i would say that you should have said it more shortly, for
example, a scientific model is a temporary model and gets updated
when new data is presented.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 10:32:17 -0500, Dawn Flood
<Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <111req2$3n0hu$1@dont-email.me> wrote:

Here it is:

"In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be >falsifiable: and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak
about reality."

The Wikipedia article on him has another great quote:

"The whole thing goes back to myths which, though they may have a kernel
of truth, are untrue. Why then should the Jewish myth be true and the
Indian and Egyptian myths not be true?"

Here's a definition of science that I gave in the comment section on a >recent podcast of Professor Bart Ehrman's called "Three 'Myths' Atheists >Believe":

"Scientific truth is contingent truth, testable & correctable, with >falsifiability being a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for an >observational and/or experimental datum that can be advanced for or
against the predictions of a scientific model."

Comments? (Other than JTEM, Dale or Dr. Andrew.)

Dawn

Anything accepted as fact requires supporting evidence to
insure it is not myth, error, lies, or fiction.
--


Every person in the US is here either
legally or illegally. Those that are
here illegally should be afraid.
Be very afraid. It does not matter
how long you have been here. It does
not matter why you are here. It does not
matter what you have done legally while you
were here. It does not matter what any
relative may have done while you were here.
It only matters that you are here illegally.
It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer
but we will find you and we will deport you.
Be prepared.

Deport them all.

Due process:
Q. Are you here legally? If so, where is
the documentation to establish that?


All politicians are trained to lie
and make those lies sound like
the truth. They start with the biggest
lie of all: Politicians are public
servants.

Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting
and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I support:

A Constitional Amendment establishing
the Freedom of Choice.

The elimination of public expression,
display or support of religion or
religious positions.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

On 6/28/2026 10:52 AM, jojo wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

Here it is:

"In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be
falsifiable: and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak
about reality."

The Wikipedia article on him has another great quote:

"The whole thing goes back to myths which, though they may have a
kernel of truth, are untrue. Why then should the Jewish myth be true
and the Indian and Egyptian myths not be true?"

Here's a definition of science that I gave in the comment section on a
recent podcast of Professor Bart Ehrman's called "Three 'Myths'
Atheists Believe":

"Scientific truth is contingent truth, testable & correctable, with
falsifiability being a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for an
observational and/or experimental datum that can be advanced for or
against the predictions of a scientific model."

Comments?-a (Other than JTEM, Dale or Dr. Andrew.)

Dawn

well i would say that you should have said it more shortly, for example,
a scientific model is a temporary model and gets updated when new data
is presented.

I think that is a wonderful definition!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.atheism

Dawn Flood wrote:

On 6/28/2026 10:52 AM, jojo wrote:

Dawn Flood wrote:

Here it is:

"In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it
must be falsifiable: and in so far as it is not falsifiable,
it does not speak about reality."

The Wikipedia article on him has another great quote:

"The whole thing goes back to myths which, though they may
have a kernel of truth, are untrue. Why then should the Jewish
myth be true and the Indian and Egyptian myths not be true?"

Here's a definition of science that I gave in the comment
section on a recent podcast of Professor Bart Ehrman's called
"Three 'Myths' Atheists Believe":

"Scientific truth is contingent truth, testable & correctable,
with falsifiability being a necessary, but not sufficient,
condition for an observational and/or experimental datum that
can be advanced for or against the predictions of a scientific
model."

Comments?-a (Other than JTEM, Dale or Dr. Andrew.)

Dawn

well i would say that you should have said it more shortly, for
example, a scientific model is a temporary model and gets
updated when new data is presented.

I think that is a wonderful definition!

i got that somewhere, i dont remember. about stuff being
temporary and just gets updated when new stuff shows up.

its the same as life, when you expect certain things and they
dont happen repeatedly, you either change your expectations or
change the way you approach the goal.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2