Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable
universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable
universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
On 5/13/2026 6:28 PM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the
observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable
universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
On 14 May 2026, Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> posted some news:10u5lhm$13tk2$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/13/2026 6:28 PM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the
observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
He clogged the toilet so you'd appreciate the vision of plumber butt
cracks.
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the
observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable
universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
On 14 May 2026, Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> posted some news:10u5lhm$13tk2$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/13/2026 6:28 PM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the
observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
He clogged the toilet so you'd appreciate the vision of plumber butt
cracks.
(Love) 05/15/26 Again, behold with wide-eyed wonder ...
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable >>>> universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable
universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
On 5/15/2026 2:26 PM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
(Love) 05/15/26 Again, behold with wide-eyed wonder ...
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the
observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in
that?!
Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
I find it impossible to believe; the probability of alien mind control
over all of us is just as likely as the revelatory value of Biblical
or any other religious texts.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable
universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
God hates certain people with a vengance.
That's why Trump is starving all those colored children overseas and killing them by cancelling foreign aid, and why the Jews in Israel kill all kinds of innocent religious people in Gaza.
Maybe the 9/11 attacks were God's will too. But nobody will say.
On 16 May 2026, Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> posted some news:10ua708$13jce$3@dont-email.me:
On 5/15/2026 2:26 PM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
(Love) 05/15/26 Again, behold with wide-eyed wonder ...
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the
observable universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in
that?!
Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
I find it impossible to believe; the probability of alien mind control
over all of us is just as likely as the revelatory value of Biblical
or any other religious texts.
How about social media mind control? Are you okay with that?
(Love) 05/16/26 Again, behold with wide-eyed wonder ...
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable >>>> universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable >>>>> universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
What is the significance of 1st John?! See this:
The epistle is traditionally held to have been composed by John the >Evangelist, at Ephesus,[17] when the writer was in advanced age. The >epistle's content, language and conceptual style are very similar to the >Gospel of John, 2 John, and 3 John.[5] Thus, at the end of the 19th
century scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton wrote that there could be "no >reasonable doubt" that 1 John and the gospel were written by the same >author.[18] Most scholars today believe the three Johannine epistles
have the same author.[19]
Beginning in the 20th century, however, critical scholars like Heinrich >Julius Holtzmann and C. H. Dodd identified the Gospel of John and 1 John
as works of different authors. Certain linguistic features of the two
texts support this view. For instance, 1 John often uses a demonstrative >pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction, >followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end
of the sentenceua stylistic technique which is not used in the
gospel.[10] The author of the epistle also "uses the conditional
sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the >gospel". This indicates, at the very least, the linguistic
characteristics changed over time.[20] Most scholars agree for a direct >literary borrowing between the Gospel and 1 John.[21]
The idea of a Johannine community has been increasingly challenged, and >there is no consensus among scholars today.[22][23]
The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist. >Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John
of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on
how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical >scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to >him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East??
Dawn
What is the significance of 1st John?! See this:
The epistle is traditionally held to have been composed by John the Evangelist, at Ephesus,[17] when the writer was in advanced age. The epistle's content, language and conceptual style are very similar to the Gospel of John, 2 John, and 3 John.[5] Thus, at the end of the 19th
century scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton wrote that there could be "no reasonable doubt" that 1 John and the gospel were written by the same author.[18] Most scholars today believe the three Johannine epistles
have the same author.[19]
Beginning in the 20th century, however, critical scholars like Heinrich Julius Holtzmann and C. H. Dodd identified the Gospel of John and 1 John
as works of different authors. Certain linguistic features of the two
texts support this view. For instance, 1 John often uses a demonstrative pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction, followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end
of the sentenceua stylistic technique which is not used in the
gospel.[10] The author of the epistle also "uses the conditional
sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the gospel". This indicates, at the very least, the linguistic
characteristics changed over time.[20] Most scholars agree for a direct literary borrowing between the Gospel and 1 John.[21]
The idea of a Johannine community has been increasingly challenged, and there is no consensus among scholars today.[22][23]
The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist. Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John
of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on
how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East??
Dawn
(Love) 05/17/26 Again, behold with wide-eyed wonder ...
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable >>>>>> universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?!
Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
What is the significance of 1st John?! See this:
The epistle is traditionally held to have been composed by John the
Evangelist, at Ephesus,[17] when the writer was in advanced age. The
epistle's content, language and conceptual style are very similar to the
Gospel of John, 2 John, and 3 John.[5] Thus, at the end of the 19th
century scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton wrote that there could be "no
reasonable doubt" that 1 John and the gospel were written by the same
author.[18] Most scholars today believe the three Johannine epistles
have the same author.[19]
Beginning in the 20th century, however, critical scholars like Heinrich
Julius Holtzmann and C. H. Dodd identified the Gospel of John and 1 John
as works of different authors. Certain linguistic features of the two
texts support this view. For instance, 1 John often uses a demonstrative
pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction,
followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end
of the sentencerCoa stylistic technique which is not used in the
gospel.[10] The author of the epistle also "uses the conditional
sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the
gospel". This indicates, at the very least, the linguistic
characteristics changed over time.[20] Most scholars agree for a direct
literary borrowing between the Gospel and 1 John.[21]
The idea of a Johannine community has been increasingly challenged, and
there is no consensus among scholars today.[22][23]
The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist.
Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John
of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on
how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical
scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27] >>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to
him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East??
Dawn
It is written that all Scripture is GOD-breathed and useful in
training in righteousness. This does mean that those who study
Scripture learn that it is right to believe (John 3:16) in GOD instead
of believe in Scripture or anything else other than GOD.
Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
(...)
What is the significance of 1st John?! See this:
The epistle is traditionally held to have been composed by John the
Evangelist, at Ephesus,[17] when the writer was in advanced age. The
epistle's content, language and conceptual style are very similar to the
Gospel of John, 2 John, and 3 John.[5] Thus, at the end of the 19th
century scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton wrote that there could be "no
reasonable doubt" that 1 John and the gospel were written by the same
author.[18] Most scholars today believe the three Johannine epistles
have the same author.[19]
Beginning in the 20th century, however, critical scholars like Heinrich
Julius Holtzmann and C. H. Dodd identified the Gospel of John and 1 John
as works of different authors. Certain linguistic features of the two
texts support this view. For instance, 1 John often uses a demonstrative
pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction,
followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end
of the sentencerCoa stylistic technique which is not used in the
gospel.[10] The author of the epistle also "uses the conditional
sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the
gospel". This indicates, at the very least, the linguistic
characteristics changed over time.[20] Most scholars agree for a direct
literary borrowing between the Gospel and 1 John.[21]
John was a fisherman by vocation, so he almost certainly would
have been illiterate, even in Aramaic. Never mind being
fluent in written Greek.
It is possible that an educated man transcribed and translated
the words of the author (John or whoever). Different
translators with different styles might explain the literary
differences between the gospel and the epistles.
The idea of a Johannine community has been increasingly challenged, and
there is no consensus among scholars today.[22][23]
A "community" might include people who could translate into
Greek.
The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist.
Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John
of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on
how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical
scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27] >>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to
him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East??
Dawn
Thanks for this interesting bit.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable >>>>>>> universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?! >>>>
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
What is the significance of 1st John?! See this:
The epistle is traditionally held to have been composed by John the
Evangelist, at Ephesus,[17] when the writer was in advanced age. The
epistle's content, language and conceptual style are very similar to the >>> Gospel of John, 2 John, and 3 John.[5] Thus, at the end of the 19th
century scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton wrote that there could be "no
reasonable doubt" that 1 John and the gospel were written by the same
author.[18] Most scholars today believe the three Johannine epistles
have the same author.[19]
Beginning in the 20th century, however, critical scholars like Heinrich
Julius Holtzmann and C. H. Dodd identified the Gospel of John and 1 John >>> as works of different authors. Certain linguistic features of the two
texts support this view. For instance, 1 John often uses a demonstrative >>> pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction,
followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end >>> of the sentenceua stylistic technique which is not used in the
gospel.[10] The author of the epistle also "uses the conditional
sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the
gospel". This indicates, at the very least, the linguistic
characteristics changed over time.[20] Most scholars agree for a direct
literary borrowing between the Gospel and 1 John.[21]
The idea of a Johannine community has been increasingly challenged, and
there is no consensus among scholars today.[22][23]
The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist. >>> Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John >>> of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on >>> how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical >>> scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27] >>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to >>> him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East?? >>>
Dawn
It is written that all Scripture is GOD-breathed and useful in
training in righteousness. This does mean that those who study
Scripture learn that it is right to believe (John 3:16) in GOD instead
of believe in Scripture or anything else other than GOD.
A circular argument:
Premise A: The Bible is the Word of God and is completely true.
Premise B: The Bible claims that it is divinely inspired by God (e.g., referencing passages like 2 Timothy 3:16).
Conclusion: Therefore, the Bible must be the Word of God
Just to the west of Judea during Jesus' day were two large cities, Alexandria & Rome:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_cities_throughout_history
At around 1M each, both cities had a good share of literate individuals, which were necessary to keep such large cities going from day to day.
If any of these folks wrote about Jesus while he was alive, their
writings have not survived. Either they did not mention Jesus, because
he was either not known to them or was not important enough to be
mentioned; or, they did mention him, but in an unfavorable light, and
their writings were not preserved or even destroyed.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist. >> Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John >> of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on >> how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical >> scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27] >>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to >> him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East?? >>
Dawn
Thanks for this interesting bit.
You're welcome!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:Just as the Samaritan woman by Jacob's well had been looking for love
Dawn Flood wrote:
Here it is:
"What is the maximum finite ratio of the unobservable to the observable >>>>>>> universe given theoretical models of inflation?"
Gemini-AI's short reply is "effectively infinite."
Now imagine the size of GOD, Who is the Creator of all things
observable and unobservable (and effectively infinite).
Recommended further reading about the work of an infinite GOD:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DRTzDw5Wn/
Well, yeah, my toilet still clogs on occasion; where is God in that?! >>>>
in all the wrong places, you, Dawn Belle, have been looking in the
wrong place for GOD, Who is love (1 John 4:16).
Here's the right place to look:
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ZyKAu5Bbo/
What is the significance of 1st John?! See this:
The epistle is traditionally held to have been composed by John the
Evangelist, at Ephesus,[17] when the writer was in advanced age. The
epistle's content, language and conceptual style are very similar to the >>> Gospel of John, 2 John, and 3 John.[5] Thus, at the end of the 19th
century scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton wrote that there could be "no
reasonable doubt" that 1 John and the gospel were written by the same
author.[18] Most scholars today believe the three Johannine epistles
have the same author.[19]
Beginning in the 20th century, however, critical scholars like Heinrich
Julius Holtzmann and C. H. Dodd identified the Gospel of John and 1 John >>> as works of different authors. Certain linguistic features of the two
texts support this view. For instance, 1 John often uses a demonstrative >>> pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction,
followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end >>> of the sentenceua stylistic technique which is not used in the
gospel.[10] The author of the epistle also "uses the conditional
sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the
gospel". This indicates, at the very least, the linguistic
characteristics changed over time.[20] Most scholars agree for a direct
literary borrowing between the Gospel and 1 John.[21]
The idea of a Johannine community has been increasingly challenged, and
there is no consensus among scholars today.[22][23]
The author of the First Epistle is sometimes termed John the Evangelist. >>> Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John >>> of Patmos, and John the Presbyter,[24] although there is no consensus on >>> how many of these may actually be the same individual.[25] Most critical >>> scholars conclude that John the Apostle wrote none of these works.[26][27] >>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John#Authorship
If Jesus even had a disciple named "John", he did not write any of the
four documents in the New Testament that are traditionally attributed to >>> him.
Once again, where is there here to believe in? The claims of some
anonymous late 1st or early 2nd-century author living in the Near East?? >>>
Dawn
It is written that all Scripture is GOD-breathed and useful in
training in righteousness. This does mean that those who study
Scripture learn that it is right to believe (John 3:16) in GOD instead
of believe in Scripture or anything else other than GOD.
A circular argument:
Premise A: The Bible is the Word of God and is completely true.
Premise B: The Bible claims that it is divinely inspired by God (e.g., referencing passages like 2 Timothy 3:16).
Conclusion: Therefore, the Bible must be the Word of God
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 05:46:14 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
921 files (14,318M bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,603 |