On 5/4/2026 10:50 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 4/30/26 9:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
You pretend it was the prediction itself but we both
know it's not, that the problem is your mental illness.
That's ridiculous.
You're saying that it's ridiculous that you won't seek
treatment and instead allow your mental illness to
guide your actions?
How do we know this?-a Because it's VERY similar to a
prediction made by SETI and nowhere in the history of
usenet did you ever voice any issue over it.
Why do you have a problem with SETI and not Avi Loeb?
Lol!-a If you want to pretend that I'm as hypocritical as
you, make your case! BUT YOU ARE A LYING HYPOCRITE!
There's nothing "Shocking" in Avi Loeb's prediction. It's
off from SETI by 8 years, as if that's a big deal when
speaking of proof of aliens. But you have ZERO issue with
SETI.
No, you're just mentally ill.
You want negative attention, just like mom used to give
you.
As I told you, the "prediction" is meaningless.-a No one knows
when or if sentient aliens will be detected; as with so many
things, time will tell.
Dawn
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 5/4/2026 10:50 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 4/30/26 9:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
You pretend it was the prediction itself but we both
know it's not, that the problem is your mental illness.
That's ridiculous.
You're saying that it's ridiculous that you won't seek
treatment and instead allow your mental illness to
guide your actions?
How do we know this?-a Because it's VERY similar to a
prediction made by SETI and nowhere in the history of
usenet did you ever voice any issue over it.
Why do you have a problem with SETI and not Avi Loeb?
Lol!-a If you want to pretend that I'm as hypocritical as
you, make your case! BUT YOU ARE A LYING HYPOCRITE!
There's nothing "Shocking" in Avi Loeb's prediction. It's
off from SETI by 8 years, as if that's a big deal when
speaking of proof of aliens. But you have ZERO issue with
SETI.
No, you're just mentally ill.
You want negative attention, just like mom used to give
you.
As I told you, the "prediction" is meaningless.-a No one knows when or
if sentient aliens will be detected; as with so many things, time will
tell.
Dawn
my guess is aliens are already here and are ai enhanced beings.
On 5/9/2026 9:13 AM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 5/4/2026 10:50 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 4/30/26 9:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
You pretend it was the prediction itself but we both
know it's not, that the problem is your mental illness.
That's ridiculous.
You're saying that it's ridiculous that you won't seek
treatment and instead allow your mental illness to
guide your actions?
How do we know this?-a Because it's VERY similar to a
prediction made by SETI and nowhere in the history of
usenet did you ever voice any issue over it.
Why do you have a problem with SETI and not Avi Loeb?
Lol!-a If you want to pretend that I'm as hypocritical as
you, make your case! BUT YOU ARE A LYING HYPOCRITE!
There's nothing "Shocking" in Avi Loeb's prediction. It's
off from SETI by 8 years, as if that's a big deal when
speaking of proof of aliens. But you have ZERO issue with
SETI.
No, you're just mentally ill.
You want negative attention, just like mom used to give
you.
As I told you, the "prediction" is meaningless.-a No one knows
when or if sentient aliens will be detected; as with so many
things, time will tell.
Dawn
my guess is aliens are already here and are ai enhanced beings.
With that one, you could also claim that they are all here
controlling all of our minds, and as a consequence, we have no
free will and no personal responsibility for anything that we say
or do.
As I told you, the "prediction" is meaningless.
Dawn Flood wrote:
we dont need aliens for that, we could just be bio machines? past a
certain layer of network complexity, self referential loops may begin,
what we ascribe divine ordinance.. ornance? order?
It's ridiculous because
As the Panama canal shuts down because
of drought
On 5/8/26 4:47 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
As I told you, the "prediction" is meaningless.
As I pointed out, and your stunning array of mental disorders
refuses to acknowledge:-a You lick at the bunghole, lap at the
ass crack of ever last FAILED "AGW" prediction, and religiously
believe every new one that replaces them.
"Alien" life is a statistical fact. The problem here is that
you can't tell your psychotic episodes from "Science," much
less discern any difference between "Evidence" and "Proof."
Clue #1:-a STOP thinking of Star Trek or some 1950s B-Movie
SciFi!-a "Alien Life" starts with microbes, you drool soaked
moron! Even here on earth, if you wedged your head out of
your ass you might realize -- speaking rhetorically -- that
the vast majority of time there has been life present it
was nothing more than microbes! If you really want to think
about it, WHICH YOU CLEARLY DO NOT, "Life" here on Earth
is better characterized as "Microbes" than anything
multicellular. And not just in the past! Even right now,
most of the life on Earth is just microbes!
Clue #2:-a We've got TONS of evidence for alien life already!
We've got "Evidence" for alien life:-a Biosignatures detected
on distant worlds and even on some bodies here in our own
solar system. We have structures/minerals found on Mars that,
here on Earth, we associate with life and/or the conditions
favorable to life. And if any flavor of theories such as
"Panspermia" are true, life has to be as common as even
learning disabilities are in your family... or almost as
common as that.
Compare this to what you don't dismiss, your precious
Gwobull Warbling during an ice age "Science":
The Holocene is close to 15,000 years old when you take
into consideration the Younger Dryas cooling, and yet
all your science looks only at... what? Maybe 40 years?
If that long?
"Sure it's pseudo scientific FRAUD to compare a tiny
unrepresentative slice of the post industrial Holocene
to itself... BUT IT'S TRUE!"
Damn. You're so stupid you don't even know enough to
be embarrassed...
On 5/4/26 4:15 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
It's ridiculous because
You're mentally ill.
And we know this because you
are REACTING to, you always REACT to the presence
of anything posted by me.
You don't care about the
topics, you're most just pig ignorant, your
reactions are purely emotional... and we know this
for a fact because we proved it.
Again & again. In
this thread we demonstrated how the "Prediction"
you're pretending to responding to is almost
identical to predictions made by others, and you
never cared.
Lol! I bet you like to believe that you're a
victim!
"Eew! Eew! I react emotionally to everything
JTEM, and he always swats me down for being a
highly disordered twat! Eew~ Eew!"
On 5/9/26 4:54 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
we dont need aliens for that, we could just be bio machines?
past a certain layer of network complexity, self referential
loops may begin, what we ascribe divine ordinance.. ornance?
order?
Well the problem there is something had to design/construct these
biomachines in the first place, which at the extreme least does
NOT exclude aliens.
But, seriously, once again, what is yourhttps://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/05/05/ipcc-admits-apocalyptic-climate-scenarios-are-implausible-meaning-most-media-scare-stories-over-last-15-years-are-officially-junk/
position on AGW??
On 5/5/26 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:Neither.
As the Panama canal shuts down because
of drought
Which ocean dried up; the Atlantic or Pacific?
JTEM wrote:
On 5/9/26 4:54 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
we dont need aliens for that, we could just be bio machines? past a
certain layer of network complexity, self referential loops may
begin, what we ascribe divine ordinance.. ornance? order?
Well the problem there is something had to design/construct these
biomachines in the first place, which at the extreme least does
NOT exclude aliens.
no need for a constructor, its a function of automata, emergence from aggregation.
On Wed, 13 May 2026 17:06:53 -0500
Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
But, seriously, once again, what is your
position on AGW??
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/05/05/ipcc-admits-apocalyptic-climate-scenarios-are-implausible-meaning-most-media-scare-stories-over-last-15-years-are-officially-junk/
When the RCP8.5 assumptions are loaded into computer models, they run politically-convenient red hot suggestions that the temperature in 2100
will rise by about 4-#C from a 1850-1900 baseline rCo in other words, a
rise of nearly 3-#C in the next 80 years. Only the most deranged eco
loons will claim such large short-term rises out loud, so the activist scientists quietly loaded garbage assumptions into their computers to
arrive at their garbage-out Armageddon scares. The writing was on the
wall for RCP8.5 last year when President TrumprCOs executive order titled rCyRestoring Gold Standard SciencerCO effectively banned the use of RCP8.5 for scientists on the United States federal payroll. It also noted one
of the unrealistic RCP8.5 assumptions driving deliberate climate
psychosis to be that end-of-century coal use will exceed estimates of recoverable reserves.
At the time, the climate researcher Zeke Hausfather dismissed the Trump AdministrationrCOs claims about RCP8.5 by stating that the research
community had moved on. But Pielke has taken issue with this rCynothing
to see hererCO claim. He states that from 2018 to 2021, Google Scholar reported 17,000 articles published using RCP8.5 compared with 16,900 in
the next three year period. rCLSome shift,rCY he observed.
jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:no its not
On 5/9/26 4:54 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
we dont need aliens for that, we could just be bio machines?
past a certain layer of network complexity, self referential
loops may begin, what we ascribe divine ordinance.. ornance?
order?
Well the problem there is something had to design/construct these
biomachines in the first place, which at the extreme least does
NOT exclude aliens.
no need for a constructor, its a function of automata,
emergence from aggregation.
JTEM wrote:
On 5/9/26 4:54 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
we dont need aliens for that, we could just be bio machines? past a
certain layer of network complexity, self referential loops may
begin, what we ascribe divine ordinance.. ornance? order?
Well the problem there is something had to design/construct these
biomachines in the first place, which at the extreme least does
NOT exclude aliens.
no need for a constructor, its a function of automata, emergence from aggregation.
On 5/14/26 10:48 AM, jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 5/9/26 4:54 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
we dont need aliens for that, we could just be bio machines?
past a certain layer of network complexity, self referential
loops may begin, what we ascribe divine ordinance.. ornance?
order?
Well the problem there is something had to design/construct these
biomachines in the first place, which at the extreme least does
NOT exclude aliens.
no need for a constructor, its a function of automata,
emergence from aggregation.
You need to state that you're joking, fast, or live with the
consequences of casting yourself as insane.
On Wed, 13 May 2026 15:54:34 -0400disrup
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/5/26 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
As the Panama canal shuts down because
of drought
Which ocean dried up; the Atlantic or Pacific?
Neither.
However:
https://www.adb.org/publications/panama-canal-drought-asia-us-trade
Disruptions
at global chokepoints propagate shocks through supply chains. This
paper finds that the 2022rCo2023 drought induced significant delays in
Panama Canal voyages and erased normal-time efficiency gains. Delays
were largest for metals and light manufactures, while food shipments
saw no significant effect.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/panama-canal-drought-causes-global-
tionspercen
The canal is one of the most important waterways in the Western Hemisphere >and typically carries 5 percent of the world's maritime trade and 40
t of U.S. container traffic.
But with water levels below normal, authorities are only allowing 24
ships to cross a day, down from 38. That means more delays and higher >shipping costs.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 06:40:38 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
921 files (14,318M bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,702 |