From Newsgroup: alt.astronomy
On 4/9/26 12:40,
casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
Simple minded theory based on the apparent current motion of galaxies
and extrapolating back about 13 billion years.
Postulates that the whole universe sprang from a single point. How so
totally incomprehensible and absurd.
Yet, so very many subscribe to this BS !
There, you state what you do not believe in.
I believe I have asked you before to clarify your thoughts
of what you do believe in and who else thinks as you do.
Here are some of the possibilities.
What schools of thought deny the "big bang"?
AI Overview
Schools of thought that deny or challenge the Big Bang theory generally
fall into scientific, philosophical, and theological categories. They
often object to the concept of a definitive beginning of the universe (creation ex nihilo), the singularity, or the timeline of cosmological evolution.
Here are the primary schools of thought that deny or challenge the Big Bang:
1. Steady State Theory (and Quasi-Steady State)
This scientific theory was the primary alternative to the Big Bang in
the mid-20th century.
Core Idea: While the universe is expanding, it does not change its
appearance over time. It is eternal, with no beginning and no end. To
maintain constant density, new matter is continuously created, allowing
for a "steady state."
Proponents: Fred Hoyle, Thomas Gold, Hermann Bondi.
Current Status: Generally considered obsolete due to findings like the
cosmic microwave background (CMB), but modified versions (Quasi-Steady
State) are still explored by some, such as Jayant Narlikar.
2. Young Earth Creationism (YEC)
This theological school of thought rejects the Big Bang based on a
literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis.
Core Idea: The universe, Earth, and all life were created by God in six 24-hour days, approximately 6,000rCo10,000 years ago.
Rejection Reason: The Big Bang posits a 13.8 billion-year-old universe,
which conflicts with their interpretation of the Bible.
Key Adherents: Answers in Genesis, Institute for Creation Research.
3. Alternative Cosmological Models (Plasma Universe)
Some alternative models challenge the "Big Bang" as the sole explanation
for cosmological observations, favoring electrical or plasma-based physics. Core Idea: The Plasma Universe school (based partly on the work of
Hannes Alfv|-n) argues that electromagnetic forces play a more critical
role than gravity alone on large scales, suggesting an eternal or
different evolution of the universe.
Alternative Ideas: Some proponents propose that rather than one massive explosion, there are "mini-bangs" creating matter at different epochs.
4. Philosophical/Metaphysical Objections
Some, including certain philosophers and scientists, deny the Big Bang
based on philosophical implications rather than direct observation.
Eternal Universe View: Some atheists and philosophers have historically objected to the Big Bang because it suggests a beginning, which hints at
a creator. They prefer a "universe from all eternity" to bypass the need
for a "first cause".
Singularity Denial: Many physicists acknowledge that our understanding
of physics breaks down at the singularity (the start of the Big Bang).
Some argue that a "beginning" is mathematically and physically
impossible, promoting bounce theories (cyclic models) where a previous universe collapses before expanding.
5. Geocentrism
A very small minority of literalist thinkers deny the Big Bang and
modern astronomy altogether.
Core Idea: The Earth is the center of the universe, and it does not move.
Summary Table of Objections
School of Thought Key Reason for Denial
Steady State Prefer an eternal, non-changing universe.
Young Earth Timeline contradicts literal Genesis (6,000 years vs 13.8 billion).
Plasma Theory Prefer electromagnetic forces over gravity/singularities. Philosophical Object to a "beginning" and the need for a creator.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2