HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those I days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
You may he correct, MummyChunk.
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums?
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades. >>>>>
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
Yes, here. This site. The site you and I are posting on.
We've already been through this once in another thread, and I already explained what I meant. You don't need another explanation; you need to stop pretending every perfectly ordinary statement contains some puzzle for you to solve.
There seems to be a recurring need to seize on some tiny word, phrasing, technicality, or supposed inconsistency and turn it into an interrogation. Eventually that stops looking like attention to detail and starts looking like argument for argument's sake.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something someone has actually said, make it. So far, most of what you've managed to demonstrate is an ability to take something trivial, manufacture an argument around it, and then insert yourself into the resulting controversy as though you've contributed something significant.
You haven't.
Constantly creating disputes over minutiae doesn't make your contribution more relevant. If anything, the harder you work to turn nothing into something, the more obvious the effort becomes.
But inventing an ambiguity, assigning it to me, and then demanding that I defend it is not a substantive disagreement. It's just manufacturing your own argument and expecting me to participate in it.
I'll give you this one response to clear it up yet again. After this, I'm not going to keep rewarding the same manufactured confusion with more attention.
Here means this site. You were told that before. You know it now. There is nothing more to parse, reinterpret, investigate, or correct.
Find an actual point to argue about.
NancyGene wrote:
[snip]
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades. >>>>>
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
Yes, here. This site. The site you and I are posting on.
We've already been through this once in another thread, and I already explained what I meant. You don't need another explanation; you need to stop pretending every perfectly ordinary statement contains some puzzle for you to solve.
There seems to be a recurring need to seize on some tiny word, phrasing, technicality, or supposed inconsistency and turn it into an interrogation. Eventually that stops looking like attention to detail and starts looking like argument for argument's sake.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something someone has actually said, make it. So far, most of what you've managed to demonstrate is an ability to take something trivial, manufacture an argument around it, and then insert yourself into the resulting controversy as though you've contributed something significant.
You haven't.
Constantly creating disputes over minutiae doesn't make your contribution more relevant. If anything, the harder you work to turn nothing into something, the more obvious the effort becomes.
But inventing an ambiguity, assigning it to me, and then demanding that I defend it is not a substantive disagreement. It's just manufacturing your own argument and expecting me to participate in it.
I'll give you this one response to clear it up yet again. After this, I'm not going to keep rewarding the same manufactured confusion with more attention.
Here means this site. You were told that before. You know it now. There is nothing more to parse, reinterpret, investigate, or correct.
Find an actual point to argue about.
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades. >>>>>
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
Yes, here. This site. The site you and I are posting on.
We've already been through this once in another thread, and I already explained what I meant. You don't need another explanation; you need to stop pretending every perfectly ordinary statement contains some puzzle for you to solve.
There seems to be a recurring need to seize on some tiny word, phrasing, technicality, or supposed inconsistency and turn it into an interrogation. Eventually that stops looking like attention to detail and starts looking like argument for argument's sake.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something someone has actually said, make it. So far, most of what you've managed to demonstrate is an ability to take something trivial, manufacture an argument around it, and then insert yourself into the resulting controversy as though you've contributed something significant.
You haven't.
Constantly creating disputes over minutiae doesn't make your contribution more relevant. If anything, the harder you work to turn nothing into something, the more obvious the effort becomes.
But inventing an ambiguity, assigning it to me, and then demanding that I defend it is not a substantive disagreement. It's just manufacturing your own argument and expecting me to participate in it.
I'll give you this one response to clear it up yet again. After this, I'm not going to keep rewarding the same manufactured confusion with more attention.
Here means this site. You were told that before. You know it now. There is nothing more to parse, reinterpret, investigate, or correct.
Find an actual point to argue about.
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser.
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up in some of these threads?
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
Yes, these poetry newsgroups were very different in the days of yore.
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser.
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades. >>>>>>
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
Yes, here. This site. The site you and I are posting on.
We've already been through this once in another thread, and I already explained what I meant. You don't need another explanation; you need to stop pretending every perfectly ordinary statement contains some puzzle for you to solve.
There seems to be a recurring need to seize on some tiny word, phrasing, technicality, or supposed inconsistency and turn it into an interrogation. Eventually that stops looking like attention to detail and starts looking like argument for argument's sake.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something someone has actually said, make it. So far, most of what you've managed to demonstrate is an ability to take something trivial, manufacture an argument around it, and then insert yourself into the resulting controversy as though you've contributed something significant.
You haven't.
Constantly creating disputes over minutiae doesn't make your contribution more relevant. If anything, the harder you work to turn nothing into something, the more obvious the effort becomes.
But inventing an ambiguity, assigning it to me, and then demanding that I defend it is not a substantive disagreement. It's just manufacturing your own argument and expecting me to participate in it.
I'll give you this one response to clear it up yet again. After this, I'm not going to keep rewarding the same manufactured confusion with more attention.
Here means this site. You were told that before. You know it now. There is nothing more to parse, reinterpret, investigate, or correct.
Find an actual point to argue about.
This is a discussion group for *writers,* MC.
Language is all-important to us, because it is the tool with which we create our works.
When someone in a writers group misuses a word, or states something in a vague, wholly unclear manner, we correct it or ask for clarification.
NancyGene is correct in asking you what you mean by "this group." You said that Michael Jackson has posted in this group. He has *not* posted in AAPC.
He *may* have posted in JLA or on Usenet... but I highly doubt it. (As does AI when asked.)
If you wish to be understood, you should politely answer questions others have regarding your posts.
That's just being courteous.
MummyChunk wrote:
Yes, I had a typo in his name.
Who ever said anything about Usenet?
NancyGene wrote:
And what, Chunk, do you mean by "this site?" On a computer, on Earth, alive? They weren't on alt.arts.poetry.comments. They weren't on JLA Forums.
MummyChunk wrote:
This site.
I never said anything about AAPC either. :?:
Are you having a slow day today NancyGene?
MummyChunk wrote:
Ok, I'll try again. This site. The same one both of us are posting on.
MummyChunk wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser.
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades. >>>>>>>
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
Yes, here. This site. The site you and I are posting on.
We've already been through this once in another thread, and I already explained what I meant. You don't need another explanation; you need to stop pretending every perfectly ordinary statement contains some puzzle for you to solve.
There seems to be a recurring need to seize on some tiny word, phrasing, technicality, or supposed inconsistency and turn it into an interrogation. Eventually that stops looking like attention to detail and starts looking like argument for argument's sake.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something someone has actually said, make it. So far, most of what you've managed to demonstrate is an ability to take something trivial, manufacture an argument around it, and then insert yourself into the resulting controversy as though you've contributed something significant.
You haven't.
Constantly creating disputes over minutiae doesn't make your contribution more relevant. If anything, the harder you work to turn nothing into something, the more obvious the effort becomes.
But inventing an ambiguity, assigning it to me, and then demanding that I defend it is not a substantive disagreement. It's just manufacturing your own argument and expecting me to participate in it.
I'll give you this one response to clear it up yet again. After this, I'm not going to keep rewarding the same manufactured confusion with more attention.
Here means this site. You were told that before. You know it now. There is nothing more to parse, reinterpret, investigate, or correct.
Find an actual point to argue about.
This is a discussion group for *writers,* MC.
Language is all-important to us, because it is the tool with which we create our works.
When someone in a writers group misuses a word, or states something in a vague, wholly unclear manner, we correct it or ask for clarification.
NancyGene is correct in asking you what you mean by "this group." You said that Michael Jackson has posted in this group. He has *not* posted in AAPC.
He *may* have posted in JLA or on Usenet... but I highly doubt it. (As does AI when asked.)
If you wish to be understood, you should politely answer questions others have regarding your posts.
That's just being courteous.
HarryLime, spare me the lecture about writers, language, and clarity. That isn't what happened here, and I think you know that.
I already cleared this up twice back on September 27.
MummyChunk wrote:
Yes, I had a typo in his name.
Who ever said anything about Usenet?
NancyGene then asked:
NancyGene wrote:
And what, Chunk, do you mean by "this site?" On a computer, on Earth, alive? They weren't on alt.arts.poetry.comments. They weren't on JLA Forums.
And I answered:
MummyChunk wrote:
This site.
I never said anything about AAPC either. :?:
Are you having a slow day today NancyGene?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=711546103#711546103
NancyGene kept at it, so I answered again:
MummyChunk wrote:
Ok, I'll try again. This site. The same one both of us are posting on.
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=711546930#711546930
So no, this wasn't NancyGene politely asking for clarification and me refusing to answer.
NancyGene asked and I answered.
NancyGene kept going (as usual).
I answered again. That's pretty simple.
At some point, it stops being about "clarity" and starts being about refusing to let a trivial point go after it has already been answered.
And frankly, I don't think you need me to explain that distinction to you.
You've been around NancyGene and these discussions long enough to know exactly how this works. More to the point, you've taken part in enough of these same endless arguments yourself that the sudden role of neutral referee lecturing me about "courtesy" is a little hard to take seriously.
You've seen minor points get picked apart for page after page. You've participated in threads where the original subject gets buried under nitpicking, sarcasm, and the apparently irresistible need to get in one more jab or correction. So let's not suddenly pretend that what's happening here is some solemn defense of the English language.
NancyGene has a habit of grabbing onto some tiny word, technicality, or supposed mistake and worrying it to death until a simple comment somehow becomes an entire argument.
And you're hardly an innocent bystander to that culture.
So when you tell me that I should "politely answer questions," that's rather rich.
I DID answer - twice.
How many times am I required to answer the same question before I'm allowed to conclude that the problem isn't a lack of clarification?
Three times? Five? Ten?
If something I write is genuinely unclear, ask me and I'll clarify it. That's reasonable.
What I'm not going to do is keep explaining the same thing because somebody wants to keep poking at it after the answer has already been given.
And if we're going to talk about courtesy, then maybe apply that standard in both directions.
Courtesy isn't a rule where NancyGene gets unlimited opportunities to dissect somebody else's wording while I'm expected to keep smiling and answering until they're finally satisfied.
And it certainly isn't a rule where you step in afterward, ignore the fact that I already answered twice, and lecture me as though I was the one refusing to communicate.
Come on, you know better.
So yes, language matters.
And because language matters, let's call things what they actually are.
Asking once because you don't understand something is asking for clarification.
Continuing after you've already been given the answer is something else entirely.
If two answers aren't enough, clarity was never the problem. The need for an argument and attention was.
MummyChunk wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser.
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades. >>>>>>>
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Forgot this one when I pasted
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=568
So Chunk, you define "here" as anything in JLA Forums? You are as inexact as the Donkey in your English.
Yes, here. This site. The site you and I are posting on.
We've already been through this once in another thread, and I already explained what I meant. You don't need another explanation; you need to stop pretending every perfectly ordinary statement contains some puzzle for you to solve.
There seems to be a recurring need to seize on some tiny word, phrasing, technicality, or supposed inconsistency and turn it into an interrogation. Eventually that stops looking like attention to detail and starts looking like argument for argument's sake.
If you have a substantive disagreement with something someone has actually said, make it. So far, most of what you've managed to demonstrate is an ability to take something trivial, manufacture an argument around it, and then insert yourself into the resulting controversy as though you've contributed something significant.
You haven't.
Constantly creating disputes over minutiae doesn't make your contribution more relevant. If anything, the harder you work to turn nothing into something, the more obvious the effort becomes.
But inventing an ambiguity, assigning it to me, and then demanding that I defend it is not a substantive disagreement. It's just manufacturing your own argument and expecting me to participate in it.
I'll give you this one response to clear it up yet again. After this, I'm not going to keep rewarding the same manufactured confusion with more attention.
Here means this site. You were told that before. You know it now. There is nothing more to parse, reinterpret, investigate, or correct.
Find an actual point to argue about.
This is a discussion group for *writers,* MC.
Language is all-important to us, because it is the tool with which we create our works.
When someone in a writers group misuses a word, or states something in a vague, wholly unclear manner, we correct it or ask for clarification.
NancyGene is correct in asking you what you mean by "this group." You said that Michael Jackson has posted in this group. He has *not* posted in AAPC.
He *may* have posted in JLA or on Usenet... but I highly doubt it. (As does AI when asked.)
If you wish to be understood, you should politely answer questions others have regarding your posts.
That's just being courteous.
HarryLime, spare me the lecture about writers, language, and clarity. That isn't what happened here, and I think you know that.
I already cleared this up twice back on September 27.
MummyChunk wrote:
Yes, I had a typo in his name.
Who ever said anything about Usenet?
NancyGene then asked:
NancyGene wrote:
And what, Chunk, do you mean by "this site?" On a computer, on Earth, alive? They weren't on alt.arts.poetry.comments. They weren't on JLA Forums.
And I answered:
MummyChunk wrote:
This site.
I never said anything about AAPC either. :?:
Are you having a slow day today NancyGene?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=711546103#711546103
NancyGene kept at it, so I answered again:
MummyChunk wrote:
Ok, I'll try again. This site. The same one both of us are posting on.
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=711546930#711546930
So no, this wasn't NancyGene politely asking for clarification and me refusing to answer.
NancyGene asked and I answered.
NancyGene kept going (as usual).
I answered again. That's pretty simple.
At some point, it stops being about "clarity" and starts being about refusing to let a trivial point go after it has already been answered.
And frankly, I don't think you need me to explain that distinction to you.
You've been around NancyGene and these discussions long enough to know exactly how this works. More to the point, you've taken part in enough of these same endless arguments yourself that the sudden role of neutral referee lecturing me about "courtesy" is a little hard to take seriously.
You've seen minor points get picked apart for page after page. You've participated in threads where the original subject gets buried under nitpicking, sarcasm, and the apparently irresistible need to get in one more jab or correction. So let's not suddenly pretend that what's happening here is some solemn defense of the English language.
NancyGene has a habit of grabbing onto some tiny word, technicality, or supposed mistake and worrying it to death until a simple comment somehow becomes an entire argument.
And you're hardly an innocent bystander to that culture.
So when you tell me that I should "politely answer questions," that's rather rich.
I DID answer - twice.
How many times am I required to answer the same question before I'm allowed to conclude that the problem isn't a lack of clarification?
Three times? Five? Ten?
If something I write is genuinely unclear, ask me and I'll clarify it. That's reasonable.
What I'm not going to do is keep explaining the same thing because somebody wants to keep poking at it after the answer has already been given.
And if we're going to talk about courtesy, then maybe apply that standard in both directions.
Courtesy isn't a rule where NancyGene gets unlimited opportunities to dissect somebody else's wording while I'm expected to keep smiling and answering until they're finally satisfied.
And it certainly isn't a rule where you step in afterward, ignore the fact that I already answered twice, and lecture me as though I was the one refusing to communicate.
Come on, you know better.
So yes, language matters.
And because language matters, let's call things what they actually are.
Asking once because you don't understand something is asking for clarification.
Continuing after you've already been given the answer is something else entirely.
If two answers aren't enough, clarity was never the problem. The need for an argument and attention was.
HarryLime wrote:
[snip]
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about
My old friend Paul D. Wilson
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
HarryLime wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a
lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user.
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will
only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most
people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up >>>>>>>> in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
Yes, these poetry newsgroups were very different in the days of yore.
Usenet was initially used predominately used by college professors and professionals in the various groups represented. When Google Groups made it accessible to the general public, they let the riff-raff in. People like you... and me.
The fusty old academic crowd treated each other civilly, as fusty old academics tend to do.
You act like a drunken redneck because you are one.
I act like demonic presence because I am one.
Dance is a dunce with a stick up has ass.
Pick was a delusional nut-job...
And blah blah blah, it's a totally different crowd.
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
Will-Dockery wrote:
My old friend Paul D. Wilson
Wilson wanted you dead, how many of your "friends" wanted that, Donkey?
Google Groups definitely opened the door to Usenet for many of us.
MummyChunk wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
Bruce wrote:
MummyChunk wrote:
Scott Gilbert wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
Popeye <popeye> wrote:
In article <115vet1>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
The Doctor says...
In article <xn0ptmjay2hn2l5000>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Dave Hollingsworth wrote:
This "Doctor" a*e is supposedly a news admin?
Yeah, "The Doctor" (aka Yads) runs a hobby NNTP server from
his Edmonton man cave, it is known in the trade as NotKnow
Inc. and it is the server largely responsible for plaguing a >>>>>>>>> lot of newsgroups with inane gobbledygook from its one user. >>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately, any complaints about his Usenet behaviour will >>>>>>>>> only land in his own e-mail Inbox... and be ignored. So most >>>>>>>>> people just killfile him.
No hobby here.
It appears you have no accounts either except for yourself, poser. >>>>>>>>>
I guess you are a failure at penetration testing Popeyed.
Face it Yads, you're a loser!
Can someone please tell me who is Binky and why does he keep coming up
in some of these threads?
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658552408#658552408 >>>>>>>>>
f**k off ChunkyBot.
Here's a good example of what I referred to in the other thread, MummyChunk.
Just mean people!
:(
"This is Usenet, trolls come with the territory.,"
EfyA
Looking back at some of the 1980's posts here, the people were alot nicer to each other. I wonder if that is because it took a great deal more effort and intelligence to be on usenet back those days?
Now, just about any level of person can access the internet and therefore we have the bad behavior that seems to be so prevalent these days.
That's what everyone's been saying about the Donkey for... decades.
Parsing what Chunk wrote, and what he means by "here" (rather than "there"), what posts from the 1980s are "here?" One had to be at a university or in the government to have been using Usenet until the very late 80s. JLA Forums was established in November of 2004 and doesn't archive messages from before that date. Of course, it may have been different for Chunk in Russia.
There are several groups here that have posts from the 1980s
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=595
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=596
www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=566
are just a few. There are several others.
MummyChunk wrote:
[snip]
Bruce wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
My old friend Paul D. Wilson
Wilson wanted you dead, how many of your "friends" wanted that
Will Dockery wrote:
Google Groups definitely opened the door to Usenet for many of us.
GG played a huge part in the downfall of Usenet.
Bruce <Bruce@guffaw.noneya> posted:
Bruce wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
My old friend Paul D. Wilson>
>
Wilson wanted you dead, how many of your "friends" wanted that?
Not many, I hope.
Will Dockery wrote:
Bruce <Bruce@guffaw.noneya> posted:
Bruce wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
My old friend Paul D. Wilson>
>
Wilson wanted you dead, how many of your "friends" wanted that?
Not many, I hope.
Well Benders makes at least two that we know of, just from this newsgroup.
Bruce <Bruce@guffaw.noneya> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Well Benders makes at least two that we know of, just from this newsgroup.
Bruce <Bruce@guffaw.noneya> posted:
Bruce wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
My old friend Paul D. Wilson>
>
Wilson wanted you dead, how many of your "friends" wanted that?
Not many, I hope.
Both M.H. Benders and P.D. Wilson were actually friends of mine.
Bruce wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Bruce <Bruce> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Bruce <Bruce> posted:
Bruce wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
My old friend Paul D. Wilson
Wilson wanted you dead, how many of your "friends" wanted that?
Not many, I hope.
Well Benders makes at least two that we know of, just from this newsgroup. >>
Both M.H. Benders and P.D. Wilson were actually friends of mine.
You keep claiming that
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 02:24:24 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,353 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (1,590K bytes) |
| Messages: | 291,157 |