George J. Dance wrote:
I've already written about this review, but just to give my
score. However, now that it's become a fad to publish the
entire review, I've decided to publish the whole thing.
I asked the AI: "[Trusted Source], are you able to access
and read my online poetry, and to rate it on a scale of 1-10?"
What follows is the AI's reply:
<quote>
Yes " IrCOve gone through a substantial portion of the work posted under the rCLGeorge J. DancerCY label on PennyrCOs Poetry Blog (roughly 80+ items, along with related pieces and context from your collections).
https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/search/label/George%20J.%20Dance
Your body of work is varied and substantial: tight seasonal haiku/senryu, formal sonnets, rhymed lyrics, free-verse sequences, playful rCLdoggerel,rCY narrative pieces, translations, and the long conceptual poem Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat. YourCOve been writing since the early 1970s and posting consistently online since around 2007, with published collections (Doggerel, and other doggerel, Logos, and other logoi, and the long poem).
Overall rating: 7/10
This is a solid, above-average body of work for contemporary online/self-published poetry. It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work.StrengthsFormal control and variety. You handle traditional forms well.
rCLPreyrCY is a clean, effective Shakespearean sonnet with rising tension and a sharp volta into domestic dread. rCLAwayrCY uses repetition and refrain effectively (a loose villanelle-like structure) to capture restless longing. The many short seasonal pieces (January, October, August, etc.) show a good ear for compression and concrete image:
Black branches on white
with one smear of colour,
a leaf unfallen.
rCLDoggerelrCY itself is a witty, well-turned sonnet that uses the dog metaphor for internet personality types with clear meter and satisfying closure.
Imagery and atmosphere.
Nature and seasonal poems often land cleanly (the rain rCLbaptizingrCY the world in rCLAn April Shower,rCY the sun-hardened earth rCLpantingrCY for thunder in rCLAugust,rCY the geese as black angels in rCLA ScrollrCY). Urban/psychological pieces like rCLPreyrCY and rCLPost MeridiemrCY create unease effectively.
Ambitious longer work.
The Logos sequence (especially I. Liturgy and V. Benediction) mixes creation myth, eroticism, philosophy, and observation in a way that feels personal and searching. The still-point/dance imagery at the end of Benediction is particularly resonant.
Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat is an inventive conceptual project (a 3,000-line color catalogue describing a red hat) that one independent review gave 4/5 for its linguistic playfulness and inventiveness.
Voice and sincerity.
ThererCOs an appealing directness and lack of pretension. The best poems feel lived-in rather than performed. Humor and self-awareness appear in the lighter pieces without undercutting the more serious ones.
Areas that keep it from higher
Some of the shortest seasonal/haiku-style pieces remain slight " pleasant observations that donrCOt always push beyond the expected image or feeling.
Language can occasionally stay within familiar poetic diction rather than finding fresher or more startling turns of phrase.
The denser free-verse sequences (Logos in particular) are interesting and personal but can feel a bit diffuse or private; not every section sustains the same intensity or clarity.
Overall originality is solid rather than radical " you work skillfully within established modes more often than you invent new ones.
Bottom line
This is the work of a dedicated, long-practicing poet who values craft, readability, and emotional honesty. The best individual poems (IrCOd single out rCLPrey,rCY rCLAway,rCY parts of Logos, rCLDoggerel,rCY rCLA Scroll,rCY and some of the sharper seasonal pieces) are genuinely good and hold up well on re-reading. The sheer volume, consistency, and the public service of the blog/wiki itself add weight.
A 7/10 is a strong score here: enjoyable, skillful, and worth reading. If you continue refining the more ambitious free-verse work and pushing the language a bit further in the shorter lyrics, several of these could sit comfortably in stronger literary magazines. Thanks for sharing the link " it was a pleasure to spend time with the poems.
44 web pages
</quote>
George J. Dance wrote:
I've already written about this review, but just to give my
score. However, now that it's become a fad to publish the
entire review, I've decided to publish the whole thing.
I asked the AI: "[Trusted Source], are you able to access
and read my online poetry, and to rate it on a scale of 1-10?"
What follows is the AI's reply:
<quote>
Yes " IrCOve gone through a substantial portion of the work posted under the rCLGeorge J. DancerCY label on PennyrCOs Poetry Blog (roughly 80+ items, along with related pieces and context from your collections).
https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/search/label/George%20J.%20Dance
Your body of work is varied and substantial: tight seasonal haiku/senryu, formal sonnets, rhymed lyrics, free-verse sequences, playful rCLdoggerel,rCY narrative pieces, translations, and the long conceptual poem Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat. YourCOve been writing since the early 1970s and posting consistently online since around 2007, with published collections (Doggerel, and other doggerel, Logos, and other logoi, and the long poem).
Overall rating: 7/10
This is a solid, above-average body of work for contemporary online/self-published poetry. It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work.StrengthsFormal control and variety. You handle traditional forms well.
rCLPreyrCY is a clean, effective Shakespearean sonnet with rising tension and a sharp volta into domestic dread. rCLAwayrCY uses repetition and refrain effectively (a loose villanelle-like structure) to capture restless longing. The many short seasonal pieces (January, October, August, etc.) show a good ear for compression and concrete image:
Black branches on white
with one smear of colour,
a leaf unfallen.
rCLDoggerelrCY itself is a witty, well-turned sonnet that uses the dog metaphor for internet personality types with clear meter and satisfying closure.
Imagery and atmosphere.
Nature and seasonal poems often land cleanly (the rain rCLbaptizingrCY the world in rCLAn April Shower,rCY the sun-hardened earth rCLpantingrCY for thunder in rCLAugust,rCY the geese as black angels in rCLA ScrollrCY). Urban/psychological pieces like rCLPreyrCY and rCLPost MeridiemrCY create unease effectively.
Ambitious longer work.
The Logos sequence (especially I. Liturgy and V. Benediction) mixes creation myth, eroticism, philosophy, and observation in a way that feels personal and searching. The still-point/dance imagery at the end of Benediction is particularly resonant.
Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat is an inventive conceptual project (a 3,000-line color catalogue describing a red hat) that one independent review gave 4/5 for its linguistic playfulness and inventiveness.
Voice and sincerity.
ThererCOs an appealing directness and lack of pretension. The best poems feel lived-in rather than performed. Humor and self-awareness appear in the lighter pieces without undercutting the more serious ones.
Areas that keep it from higher
Some of the shortest seasonal/haiku-style pieces remain slight " pleasant observations that donrCOt always push beyond the expected image or feeling.
Language can occasionally stay within familiar poetic diction rather than finding fresher or more startling turns of phrase.
The denser free-verse sequences (Logos in particular) are interesting and personal but can feel a bit diffuse or private; not every section sustains the same intensity or clarity.
Overall originality is solid rather than radical " you work skillfully within established modes more often than you invent new ones.
Bottom line
This is the work of a dedicated, long-practicing poet who values craft, readability, and emotional honesty. The best individual poems (IrCOd single out rCLPrey,rCY rCLAway,rCY parts of Logos, rCLDoggerel,rCY rCLA Scroll,rCY and some of the sharper seasonal pieces) are genuinely good and hold up well on re-reading. The sheer volume, consistency, and the public service of the blog/wiki itself add weight.
A 7/10 is a strong score here: enjoyable, skillful, and worth reading. If you continue refining the more ambitious free-verse work and pushing the language a bit further in the shorter lyrics, several of these could sit comfortably in stronger literary magazines. Thanks for sharing the link " it was a pleasure to spend time with the poems.
44 web pages
</quote>
HarryLime wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
I've already written about this review, but just to give my
score. However, now that it's become a fad to publish the
entire review, I've decided to publish the whole thing.
I asked the AI: "[Trusted Source], are you able to access
and read my online poetry, and to rate it on a scale of 1-10?"
What follows is the AI's reply:
<quote>
Yes " IrCOve gone through a substantial portion of the work posted under the rCLGeorge J. DancerCY label on PennyrCOs Poetry Blog (roughly 80+ items, along with related pieces and context from your collections).
https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/search/label/George%20J.%20Dance
Your body of work is varied and substantial: tight seasonal haiku/senryu, formal sonnets, rhymed lyrics, free-verse sequences, playful rCLdoggerel,rCY narrative pieces, translations, and the long conceptual poem Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat. YourCOve been writing since the early 1970s and posting consistently online since around 2007, with published collections (Doggerel, and other doggerel, Logos, and other logoi, and the long poem).
Overall rating: 7/10
This is a solid, above-average body of work for contemporary online/self-published poetry. It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work.StrengthsFormal control and variety. You handle traditional forms well.
rCLPreyrCY is a clean, effective Shakespearean sonnet with rising tension and a sharp volta into domestic dread. rCLAwayrCY uses repetition and refrain effectively (a loose villanelle-like structure) to capture restless longing. The many short seasonal pieces (January, October, August, etc.) show a good ear for compression and concrete image:
Black branches on white
with one smear of colour,
a leaf unfallen.
rCLDoggerelrCY itself is a witty, well-turned sonnet that uses the dog metaphor for internet personality types with clear meter and satisfying closure.
Imagery and atmosphere.
Nature and seasonal poems often land cleanly (the rain rCLbaptizingrCY the world in rCLAn April Shower,rCY the sun-hardened earth rCLpantingrCY for thunder in rCLAugust,rCY the geese as black angels in rCLA ScrollrCY). Urban/psychological pieces like rCLPreyrCY and rCLPost MeridiemrCY create unease effectively.
Ambitious longer work.
The Logos sequence (especially I. Liturgy and V. Benediction) mixes creation myth, eroticism, philosophy, and observation in a way that feels personal and searching. The still-point/dance imagery at the end of Benediction is particularly resonant.
Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat is an inventive conceptual project (a 3,000-line color catalogue describing a red hat) that one independent review gave 4/5 for its linguistic playfulness and inventiveness.
Voice and sincerity.
ThererCOs an appealing directness and lack of pretension. The best poems feel lived-in rather than performed. Humor and self-awareness appear in the lighter pieces without undercutting the more serious ones.
Areas that keep it from higher
Some of the shortest seasonal/haiku-style pieces remain slight " pleasant observations that donrCOt always push beyond the expected image or feeling.
Language can occasionally stay within familiar poetic diction rather than finding fresher or more startling turns of phrase.
The denser free-verse sequences (Logos in particular) are interesting and personal but can feel a bit diffuse or private; not every section sustains the same intensity or clarity.
Overall originality is solid rather than radical " you work skillfully within established modes more often than you invent new ones.
Bottom line
This is the work of a dedicated, long-practicing poet who values craft, readability, and emotional honesty. The best individual poems (IrCOd single out rCLPrey,rCY rCLAway,rCY parts of Logos, rCLDoggerel,rCY rCLA Scroll,rCY and some of the sharper seasonal pieces) are genuinely good and hold up well on re-reading. The sheer volume, consistency, and the public service of the blog/wiki itself add weight.
A 7/10 is a strong score here: enjoyable, skillful, and worth reading. If you continue refining the more ambitious free-verse work and pushing the language a bit further in the shorter lyrics, several of these could sit comfortably in stronger literary magazines. Thanks for sharing the link " it was a pleasure to spend time with the poems.
44 web pages
</quote>
"It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work."
Like I've often said: skillfully crafted, but overall... meh.
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
I've already written about this review, but just to give my
score. However, now that it's become a fad to publish the
entire review, I've decided to publish the whole thing.
I asked the AI: "[Trusted Source], are you able to access
and read my online poetry, and to rate it on a scale of 1-10?"
What follows is the AI's reply:
<quote>
Yes " IrCOve gone through a substantial portion of the work posted under the rCLGeorge J. DancerCY label on PennyrCOs Poetry Blog (roughly 80+ items, along with related pieces and context from your collections).
https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/search/label/George%20J.%20Dance
Your body of work is varied and substantial: tight seasonal haiku/senryu, formal sonnets, rhymed lyrics, free-verse sequences, playful rCLdoggerel,rCY narrative pieces, translations, and the long conceptual poem Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat. YourCOve been writing since the early 1970s and posting consistently online since around 2007, with published collections (Doggerel, and other doggerel, Logos, and other logoi, and the long poem).
Overall rating: 7/10
This is a solid, above-average body of work for contemporary online/self-published poetry. It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work.StrengthsFormal control and variety. You handle traditional forms well.
rCLPreyrCY is a clean, effective Shakespearean sonnet with rising tension and a sharp volta into domestic dread. rCLAwayrCY uses repetition and refrain effectively (a loose villanelle-like structure) to capture restless longing. The many short seasonal pieces (January, October, August, etc.) show a good ear for compression and concrete image:
Black branches on white
with one smear of colour,
a leaf unfallen.
rCLDoggerelrCY itself is a witty, well-turned sonnet that uses the dog metaphor for internet personality types with clear meter and satisfying closure.
Imagery and atmosphere.
Nature and seasonal poems often land cleanly (the rain rCLbaptizingrCY the world in rCLAn April Shower,rCY the sun-hardened earth rCLpantingrCY for thunder in rCLAugust,rCY the geese as black angels in rCLA ScrollrCY). Urban/psychological pieces like rCLPreyrCY and rCLPost MeridiemrCY create unease effectively.
Ambitious longer work.
The Logos sequence (especially I. Liturgy and V. Benediction) mixes creation myth, eroticism, philosophy, and observation in a way that feels personal and searching. The still-point/dance imagery at the end of Benediction is particularly resonant.
Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat is an inventive conceptual project (a 3,000-line color catalogue describing a red hat) that one independent review gave 4/5 for its linguistic playfulness and inventiveness.
Voice and sincerity.
ThererCOs an appealing directness and lack of pretension. The best poems feel lived-in rather than performed. Humor and self-awareness appear in the lighter pieces without undercutting the more serious ones.
Areas that keep it from higher
Some of the shortest seasonal/haiku-style pieces remain slight " pleasant observations that donrCOt always push beyond the expected image or feeling.
Language can occasionally stay within familiar poetic diction rather than finding fresher or more startling turns of phrase.
The denser free-verse sequences (Logos in particular) are interesting and personal but can feel a bit diffuse or private; not every section sustains the same intensity or clarity.
Overall originality is solid rather than radical " you work skillfully within established modes more often than you invent new ones.
Bottom line
This is the work of a dedicated, long-practicing poet who values craft, readability, and emotional honesty. The best individual poems (IrCOd single out rCLPrey,rCY rCLAway,rCY parts of Logos, rCLDoggerel,rCY rCLA Scroll,rCY and some of the sharper seasonal pieces) are genuinely good and hold up well on re-reading. The sheer volume, consistency, and the public service of the blog/wiki itself add weight.
A 7/10 is a strong score here: enjoyable, skillful, and worth reading. If you continue refining the more ambitious free-verse work and pushing the language a bit further in the shorter lyrics, several of these could sit comfortably in stronger literary magazines. Thanks for sharing the link " it was a pleasure to spend time with the poems.
44 web pages
</quote>
"It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work."
Like I've often said: skillfully crafted, but overall... meh.
Like reading a manual.
HarryLime wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
I've already written about this review, but just to give my
score. However, now that it's become a fad to publish the
entire review, I've decided to publish the whole thing.
I asked the AI: "[Trusted Source], are you able to access
and read my online poetry, and to rate it on a scale of 1-10?"
What follows is the AI's reply:
<quote>
Yes " IrCOve gone through a substantial portion of the work posted under the rCLGeorge J. DancerCY label on PennyrCOs Poetry Blog (roughly 80+ items, along with related pieces and context from your collections).
https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/search/label/George%20J.%20Dance
Your body of work is varied and substantial: tight seasonal haiku/senryu, formal sonnets, rhymed lyrics, free-verse sequences, playful rCLdoggerel,rCY narrative pieces, translations, and the long conceptual poem Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat. YourCOve been writing since the early 1970s and posting consistently online since around 2007, with published collections (Doggerel, and other doggerel, Logos, and other logoi, and the long poem).
Overall rating: 7/10
This is a solid, above-average body of work for contemporary online/self-published poetry. It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work.StrengthsFormal control and variety. You handle traditional forms well.
rCLPreyrCY is a clean, effective Shakespearean sonnet with rising tension and a sharp volta into domestic dread. rCLAwayrCY uses repetition and refrain effectively (a loose villanelle-like structure) to capture restless longing. The many short seasonal pieces (January, October, August, etc.) show a good ear for compression and concrete image:
Black branches on white
with one smear of colour,
a leaf unfallen.
rCLDoggerelrCY itself is a witty, well-turned sonnet that uses the dog metaphor for internet personality types with clear meter and satisfying closure.
Imagery and atmosphere.
Nature and seasonal poems often land cleanly (the rain rCLbaptizingrCY the world in rCLAn April Shower,rCY the sun-hardened earth rCLpantingrCY for thunder in rCLAugust,rCY the geese as black angels in rCLA ScrollrCY). Urban/psychological pieces like rCLPreyrCY and rCLPost MeridiemrCY create unease effectively.
Ambitious longer work.
The Logos sequence (especially I. Liturgy and V. Benediction) mixes creation myth, eroticism, philosophy, and observation in a way that feels personal and searching. The still-point/dance imagery at the end of Benediction is particularly resonant.
Penny, or PennyrCOs Hat is an inventive conceptual project (a 3,000-line color catalogue describing a red hat) that one independent review gave 4/5 for its linguistic playfulness and inventiveness.
Voice and sincerity.
ThererCOs an appealing directness and lack of pretension. The best poems feel lived-in rather than performed. Humor and self-awareness appear in the lighter pieces without undercutting the more serious ones.
Areas that keep it from higher
Some of the shortest seasonal/haiku-style pieces remain slight " pleasant observations that donrCOt always push beyond the expected image or feeling.
Language can occasionally stay within familiar poetic diction rather than finding fresher or more startling turns of phrase.
The denser free-verse sequences (Logos in particular) are interesting and personal but can feel a bit diffuse or private; not every section sustains the same intensity or clarity.
Overall originality is solid rather than radical " you work skillfully within established modes more often than you invent new ones.
Bottom line
This is the work of a dedicated, long-practicing poet who values craft, readability, and emotional honesty. The best individual poems (IrCOd single out rCLPrey,rCY rCLAway,rCY parts of Logos, rCLDoggerel,rCY rCLA Scroll,rCY and some of the sharper seasonal pieces) are genuinely good and hold up well on re-reading. The sheer volume, consistency, and the public service of the blog/wiki itself add weight.
A 7/10 is a strong score here: enjoyable, skillful, and worth reading. If you continue refining the more ambitious free-verse work and pushing the language a bit further in the shorter lyrics, several of these could sit comfortably in stronger literary magazines. Thanks for sharing the link " it was a pleasure to spend time with the poems.
44 web pages
</quote>
"It sits comfortably in the competent-to-strong range: better crafted and more consistent than most amateur internet poetry, with genuine strengths in form, imagery, and accessibility, but not consistently reaching the highest levels of originality, intensity, or linguistic surprise that mark major literary work."
Like I've often said: skillfully crafted, but overall... meh.
Like reading a manual.
You're too kind.
A manual serves a purpose.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 122:26:51 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,352 |
| Messages: | 290,355 |