• Re: Only C programmers tell the truth about the behavior of DD simulate

    From Mikko@21:1/5 to olcott on Mon Apr 21 13:28:02 2025
    On 2025-04-20 15:14:11 +0000, olcott said:

    On 4/20/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 2025-04-19 20:26:59 +0000, olcott said:

    On 4/19/2025 4:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
    Am 19.04.2025 um 10:03 schrieb Mikko:

    The part that comp.lang.c lacked a liar sounds credible.

    I believe Peter has a serious mental illness. As far as I know,
    he has cancer, and I hope he gets the most out of his remaining
    life instead of obsessing over this problem.

    I never go with credible, instead I try to stick with verified facts.

    int DD()
    {
    áá int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
    áá if (Halt_Status)
    áááá HERE: goto HERE;
    áá return Halt_Status;
    }

    It is a verified fact that DD correctly simulated
    by HHH cannot possibly halt (terminate normally).

    Verified facts should not be decorated with misleading words.

    There is no other "DD correctly simulated by HHH" than the DD shown
    above, and that DD halts (terminates normally).

    Why lie?

    The "why" does not matter. It helps readers that your lies are pointed
    out even if your motivation to lie remains obscure. Even whether your
    deception is intentional or unintended does not matter, only that the
    truth is told.

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mikko@21:1/5 to olcott on Tue Apr 22 10:58:43 2025
    On 2025-04-21 11:33:38 +0000, olcott said:

    On 4/21/2025 5:28 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 2025-04-20 15:14:11 +0000, olcott said:

    On 4/20/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 2025-04-19 20:26:59 +0000, olcott said:

    On 4/19/2025 4:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
    Am 19.04.2025 um 10:03 schrieb Mikko:

    The part that comp.lang.c lacked a liar sounds credible.

    I believe Peter has a serious mental illness. As far as I know,
    he has cancer, and I hope he gets the most out of his remaining
    life instead of obsessing over this problem.

    I never go with credible, instead I try to stick with verified facts. >>>>>
    int DD()
    {
    áá int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
    áá if (Halt_Status)
    áááá HERE: goto HERE;
    áá return Halt_Status;
    }

    It is a verified fact that DD correctly simulated
    by HHH cannot possibly halt (terminate normally).

    Verified facts should not be decorated with misleading words.

    There is no other "DD correctly simulated by HHH" than the DD shown
    above, and that DD halts (terminates normally).

    Why lie?

    The "why" does not matter. It helps readers that your lies are pointed
    out

    I haven't even made any mistake. Why are you lying
    about the behavior of DD simulated by HHH including
    HHH simulating itself simulating DD?

    That you call me a liar without being able to quote any lie can be called
    a mistake though I would prever to call it an error. Where I live it is a
    crime to call someone a liar without a proof of a lie.

    --
    Mikko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)