Soviet "Anenerbe": Soviet Star Gate Project part 7

This document uses UTF8 encoding!

Preliminary note:
I apologize in advance for any errors I may have made.

I continue to introduce you to the forgotten achievements
of Soviet science.

[Table of Contents:]

1. Gennady Sergeev - The Father of Soviet Psychotronics
2. Design of the Military Sergeev Generator
3. Calculation Formulas


1.Gennady Sergeev - The Father of Soviet Psychotronics

Anyone familiar with secret CIA projects knows the name
of the telepath Joseph McMonegle, who participated in the
American remote viewing program Star Gate. However, few
are aware that a similar, but even larger-scale program
operated in the USSR (https://shorten.ly/Pg15wn). In 2026,
it will be 27 years since the death of Gennady Sergeev,
an outstanding engineer and founder of the Soviet scientific
school of psychotronics. He was often called the "Tsiolkovsky
of torsion fields." In the 1950s, Gennady Sergeev, a specialist
in hydroacoustics for the USSR Navy, was tasked by Admiral
Sergey Gorshkov to find a reliable method of communication
with submerged nuclear submarines. His group, relying on
earlier work by Alexander Barchenko on psychoenergetics
(1920s-30s) and ideas by Georgy Lakhovsky regarding cosmic
radiation, found a solution. They developed technologies
for information transfer based on rotating magnetic fields
(torsion beams) and energy extraction from the physical
vacuum. This idea was later supported by Andrei Sakharov,
the father of the hydrogen bomb. Sergeev realized that
technology capable of transmitting data to submarines could
also send commands to biological systems - down to the
molecular level of DNA.
This opened two possibilities:
- Healing diseases (similar in principle to Lakhovsky's
ideas), extending life, and enhancing human abilities.
- Remote programming of DNA for self-destruction by
activating death genes. Such psychotronic weapons could
selectively eliminate political leaders or be even more
dangerous than nuclear weapons.

Under the directive of Admiral Gorshkov, Dr. Sergeev prepared
teams of operatives trained to utilize these technologies.
According to declassified reports, their actions in the 1980s
enabled:
- Prevention of a planned U.S. nuclear strike on the USSR
by exerting psychotronic influence on American strategists.
- Disruption of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) "Star
Wars" program by causing malfunctions in American
computers, which was perceived as divine punishment
(analogous to President George Bush's sudden fainting in 2002).
It was Sergeev, through Marshal Nikolai Ogarkov, who warned
the country's leadership about the danger of such weapons.
According to his materials, in 1975, Leonid Brezhnev
publicly stated at Helsinki about the threat of creating
weapons more terrible than nuclear arms. A similar warning
was issued by the British Scientific Association only in
January 1999 - nearly 24 years later. Sergeev proposed using
a technology of structural reorganization of the physical
vacuum - or the creation of a "vacuum torsion armor,"
mentioned in the books of mystics Rerikh and Gurdjieff
- as an almost entirely effective means of psychotronic
protection. He also suggested employing this technology
to defend the planet from asteroids. In 1986, a similar
proposal was made by Swami Satchidananda, a spiritual
guru of the Pentagon Meditation Club. In his reports to the
Central Committee of the CPSU, Sergeev paid considerable
attention to issues of psychotronic protection for top
government officials and individuals performing critical
duties - such as nuclear system operators - proposing
several effective measures. Later in life, Sergeev warned
of a new global threat. He believed that billions of hard
drives worldwide are miniature torsion generators. He
predicted that a malicious actor could launch a special
"torsion virus" into the internet, transforming the global
network into a weapon of mass destruction capable of
programming human DNA. Gennady Sergeev passed away
in 1999.
His ideas resonated with some politicians - for example, the
leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia publicly
called for the creation of a torsion shield for the country.
Supporters believe Sergeev's work laid the foundation for
technologies whose full potential is still not fully understood.
He opened the door to controlling consciousness and life
itself, leaving humanity with a choice: to use this knowledge
for evolution or self-destruction.

2. Design of the Sergeev Military Generator

The Sergeev torsion generator is designed to produce a narrowly
directed beam of coherent torsion field. Its primary applications
include calibration and testing of spin detectors, as well
as research in information-field interactions. The operating
principle is based on the spin-twisting effect - creating
a controllable, highly coherent spin polarization in a macroscopic
volume of matter. This state, which does not involve energy
transfer in the classical sense, serves as a source of a pure
torsion signal.

Generator Design

General Layout:

The generator is a system of coaxial cylinders placed inside
a cryostat (Fig. 1).

Schematic of the Torsion Field Generator (TFG):
1. External Stator (Mu-metal)
2. Rotor (NdFeB)
3. Working Body (Doped Polymer)
4. Cryogenic System
5. Spin Plates
6. Focusing Concentrator

Main Components

1. External Stator: A cylinder made of mu-metal. Provides
magnetic shielding of the active zone from external fields.
2. Rotor: A hollow cylinder made of neodymium-iron-boron
(NdFeB) alloy. It is set into rotation with high stability.
Operating rotation speed: from 100 Hz to 200 Hz.
3. Working Body: A cylindrical insert made of a special
polymer doped with iron (Fe) and bismuth (Bi) nanoparticles
with a gradient concentration. Before startup, the working body
undergoes preliminary spin polarization in a static magnetic
field of approximately 1 T.
4. Cryogenic System: Maintains the temperature of the working
body near that of liquid helium (below 4.2 K) to suppress thermal
fluctuations that disrupt spin coherence.

Physics of the Process and Mathematical Formalism

The key process is the emergence of a phantom torque in the spin
lattice when a pre-polarized working body is rotated.

Calculation of the Effective Magnetic Moment

The magnetic moment of a nanoparticle rigidly bound to the
rotor, in the laboratory reference frame, undergoes precession.
Its effective projection onto the axis of rotation is determined
by the equation:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:mu_eff} \mu_{\text{eff}} = \mu_0
\cdot \sqrt{ 1 + \left( \frac{\gamma B_0}{\omega} \right)^2 }
\end{equation}`

Sergeev's Phantom Torque

The resulting torque per unit volume, arising from the
uncompensated spin density in the gradient field of rotation,
is described by the expression:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:tau} \tau(V) = \frac{1}{2} \rho_s
\cdot \mu_{\text{eff}} \cdot \omega \cdot r^2 \cdot \sin(2\theta)
\end{equation}`
Important: The torque is virtual (unobservable in the classical
sense) and serves as a measure of the spin activity generating
the torsion field.

Torsion Signal Shaping Block

Spin Plates
A set of plates made of monocrystalline silicon with (111)
orientation. The plates are installed at angles multiples of the
golden ratio `$\phi = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}$` for phase matching
and resonant amplification of spin waves.

Focusing Concentrator
A conical waveguide made of high-purity copper, transforming
a spherical spin wave into a narrow beam. The gain coefficient
of the concentrator is:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:gain} G \approx \left
( \frac{D_{\text{out}}}{D_{\text{in}}} \right)^2 \cdot \ln\left
( \frac{\omega}{\omega_0} \right) \end{equation}`

Theoretical Foundation: Derivation of the Quantum-Torsional
Invariant

To formalize the connection between the generator parameters
and the generated field, we introduce the spin density amplitude: `\begin{equation} \label{eq:S0} S_0 = \frac{\alpha^2}
{4\pi \varepsilon_0 \sqrt{\hbar c}} \end{equation}`

We relate the torsion field to the electromagnetic field through
gauge invariance. Introducing torsion, we construct the interaction
Lagrangian:
`\begin{equation} \mathcal{L}_{\text{int}} \sim \int d^4x \,
\left( \partial_{[\mu} A_{\nu]} \right) \widetilde{T}^{[\mu\nu]}
\end{equation}`

After quantization in the one-loop approximation, the effective
Lagrangian takes the form:
`\begin{equation} \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} = \frac{S_0^2}
{(\hbar c)^3} \cdot \left( \eta_{\mu\nu} T^\mu T^\nu -
\beta R T_\alpha T^\alpha \right) \end{equation}`

Renormalization and the Emergence of the Invariant

To eliminate divergences, counterterms are introduced. After
regularization in d=4-? dimensions and cumbersome calculations
with Feynman integrals, the renormalized parameter is:
`\begin{equation} \beta_R = \beta_0 + \frac{S_0^2}{(4\pi)^2
(\hbar c)^3} \left[ \frac{2}{\epsilon} + \ln\left( \frac{\mu^2}
{m_T^2} \right) + C \right] + \mathcal{O}(\alpha^3) \end{equation}`

The combination `$S_0^2 / (\hbar c)^3`$ has the dimension
of length to the power of -6. To obtain a dimensionless invariant characterizing the generation efficiency, we multiply by the
appropriate powers of fundamental constants:
`\begin{equation} \Theta = \frac{S_0^2 G}{c^4 (\hbar c)^3}
\cdot l_P^2 = \frac{S_0^2 G^2}{\hbar c^8} \end{equation}`

Substituting the expression for the spin density amplitude, we obtain
the final expression for the Sergeev quantum-torsional gauge invariant: `\begin{equation} \boxed{ \Theta = \frac{\alpha^4}
{16\pi^2 \varepsilon_0^2} \cdot \frac{G^2}{\hbar^2 c^{9}}
\cdot \Gamma } \end{equation}`

Here, `$\Gamma$` is a factor accounting for the topology
of spacetime and the boundary conditions in a specific setup.
Its analytical calculation is the subject of ongoing research.
Preliminary estimates give a wide range, from the order of ten
to the minus third to the order of ten squared:
`\begin{equation} \Gamma \in [\mathcal{O}(10^{-3}) \ldots
\mathcal{O}(10^{2})] \end{equation}`
Thus, the invariant determines the scale of the torsional effect,
but its precise numerical value for this generator requires
experimental refinement.

Operating Mode: Informational-Resonant Self-Tuning

The TFG operates in an auto-oscillation mode. A detected external
negative spin component, via feedback, causes a microscopic
precession of the rotor. This precession, upon amplification,
generates a compensating torsional pulse. Thus, the generator
functions as an active stabilizer of "informational harmony"
neutralizing entropic spin perturbations in the surrounding space.

Conclusion

The Sergeev Military Torsion Generator is a functional prototype
of a device that demonstrates the generation of a coherent torsion
field based on controlled macroscopic spin polarization.
The theoretical formalism, including the introduction of the phantom
torque and the dimensionless invariant, allows for a quantitative
description of the generator's operation and opens pathways for
further optimization of its parameters.

3. Calculation Formulas

Separated LaTeX formulas:

Operating rotation speed:
`$\omega = 150 \text{Hz} \pm 50 \text{Hz}`

Static magnetic field:
`$B_0 \approx 1 \text{T}`

Temperature:
`$T < 4.2 \text{K}`

Formula for the effective magnetic moment:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:mu_eff} \mu_{\text{eff}}
= \mu_0 \cdot \sqrt{ 1 + \left( \frac{\gamma B_0}
{\omega} \right)^2 } \end{equation}`

Formula for the phantom torque:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:tau} \tau(V) = \frac{1}
{2} \rho_s \cdot \mu_{\text{eff}} \cdot \omega \cdot r^2
\cdot \sin(2\theta) \end{equation}`

Golden ratio:
`$\phi = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}`

Formula for the gain coefficient:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:gain} G \approx \left
( \frac{D_{\text{out}}}{D_{\text{in}}} \right)^2 \cdot
\ln\left( \frac{\omega}{\omega_0} \right) \end{equation}`

Formula for the spin density amplitude:
`\begin{equation} \label{eq:S0} S_0 = \frac{\alpha^2}
{4\pi \varepsilon_0 \sqrt{\hbar c}} \end{equation}`

Formula for the interaction Lagrangian:
`\begin{equation} \mathcal{L}_{\text{int}} \sim \int d^4x \,
\left( \partial_{[\mu} A_{\nu]} \right) \widetilde{T}^{[\mu\nu]}
\end{equation}`

Formula for the effective Lagrangian:
`\begin{equation} \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} = \frac{S_0^2}
{(\hbar c)^3} \cdot \left( \eta_{\mu\nu} T^\mu T^\nu - \beta R T_\
alpha T^\alpha \right) \end{equation}`

Formula for the renormalized parameter:
`\begin{equation} \beta_R = \beta_0 + \frac{S_0^2}{(4\pi)^2
(\hbar c)^3} \left[ \frac{2}{\epsilon} + \ln\left( \frac{\mu^2}
{m_T^2} \right) + C \right] + \mathcal{O}(\alpha^3) \end{equation}`

Formula for the invariant via constants:
`\begin{equation} \Theta = \frac{S_0^2 G}{c^4 (\hbar c)^3}
\cdot l_P^2 = \frac{S_0^2 G^2}{\hbar c^8} \end{equation}`

Formula for the final Sergeev invariant:
`\begin{equation} \boxed{ \Theta = \frac{\alpha^4}{16\pi^2
\varepsilon_0^2} \cdot \frac{G^2}{\hbar^2 c^{9}} \cdot \Gamma }
\end{equation}`

Formula for the factor range:
`\begin{equation} \Gamma \in [\mathcal{O}(10^{-3}) \ldots
\mathcal{O}(10^{2})] \end{equation}`

Source: gopher://shibboleths.org/0/phlog/91.txt

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)