In the archives of the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, beneath layers of official documents, lie blueprints
capable of turning the world upside down. They are not in
plain sight, they are not studied in universities or
academic departments. Their folders gather dust under the
labels "impractical," "contradicting the laws of physics,"
or simply "anomalous." Today I will tell you about something
you may have never heard of. This will be an overview
history of the secret parallel Power-Engineering of the 20th
century. An entire universe of technologies that orthodox
scientists try to ignore. Because these devices draw power
from the physical vacuum, gravity, and spacetime itself.
Stories crafted by revisionists and martyrs of science, who
sacrificed much in their lives so that humanity could
receive free energy. Imagine: 1979. U.S. Patent No.
4,151,431 was granted to Howard Johnson for a "permanent
magnet motor." It dryly describes a device producing 5 kW
of power, using the spins of unpaired electrons in a
ferromagnet. It also mentions the "superconducting
characteristics" of ordinary magnets. But who noticed this?
Who linked this document to aier one from 1971, patent No.
3,610,971 by William Cooper for an "electricity generator"?
A system seemingly ripped from the experiments of Nikola
Tesla, who back in the 1890s in Colorado Springs was
resonating the Earth's resonant frequency up to 160 kHz at
voltages of 100 million volts, dreaming of a worldwide
wireless power network. Yet between these dates lies a whole
treasure trove of classified, forgotten knowledge. 1965:
U.S. Patent No. 3,187,206 by Thomas Townsend Brown for an
"electrokinetic apparatus." It describes a force moving a
charged capacitor towards the positive plate - an effect
later measured in laboratories with effi"a million to one."
But the first evidence appeared even earlier, in 1927, in
British patent No. 300,311 by the same Brown. For almost 40
years, the technology existed on paper, but not in the mass
consciousness. In parallel, in the Soviet Union, Vladislav
Avramenko at the All-Union Electrotechnical Institute
conducted experiments where power was transmitted via a
single wire with efficiency exceeding 150%. His "Blaster,"
powered by a 9-volt battery but spitting out a plasma cord,
was officially considered a curiosity, although reports
clearly stated: "the power source is the physical vacuum."
His works were not classified - they were ignored, just like
the patents of Alexander Chernetsky, who observed "negative
current" in his transformers, exceeding the consumed power
by 10 times and accelerating plant growth. But the true
pearls of this secret and mysterious history lie closer to
our time. 1990. U.S. Patent No. 4,897,592, granted to
William Hyde for a "system for generating power from an
electrostatic field." The figures in it are staggering:
input power 2.4 kW, output power 22.9 kW. Efficiency
exceeding 1000%! It describes a rotor spinning in a
potential field that "does not change the state of the
primary source." And this document is not science fiction,
but legally registered intellectual property, accessible to
any researcher. Like John Ecklin's patent No. 4,567,407
(1986) for a motor-alternator with efficiency "exceeding
100%," or Robert Gundlach's patent No. 4,595,852 (1986)
for an electrostatic generator. Now let us ask ourselves a
question. If the devices described above contradict the law
of conservation of energy, then why are they officially
patented? Is there some secret ulterior motive behind this?
The answer, as experts once believed, lies in the fine line
between control and concealment of information. Having
obtained a patent, the inventor protects the idea, but the
system simultaneously marginalizes it, placing it in the
category of "exotic" and simultaneously covering it with a
shroud. This happened with the patents on electrogravity
(numbers 3,022,430, 3,018,394, 2,949,550) issued to the same
Brown, which described a reduction in apparatus weight by
tens of percent. Or with the patent of Floyd Sweet, whose
"Vacuum Triode Amplifier" on barium magnets produced up
to 50 kW, and the weight of the device during operation
decreased by 90%, demonstrating an anti-gravity effect.
Moreover, this parallel Power-Engineering has its own
theoretical mathematical basis, also reflected in patents.
Henry Puharich's patent No. 4,394,230 (1983) for water
splitting, or Harold Aspden's patents on thermoelectric
conversion (UK No. 2,251,775, 1994), paint a picture of a
world where energy can be extracted from molecular bonds and
thermal motion. And there is also the unpatented but
documented: the work of Boris Bolotov from the Soviet Union
on controlled transmutation of lithium, where energy output
exceeds input by thousands of times, or the "attachment" by
Alexander Bakaev, who for decades modified gasoline engines
to run on water! Just think, on water! All these names are
united by one thing - they appealed to a source beyond the
classical fuel paradigm and orthodox science. To the
physical vacuum, which, according to the theoretical works
of Sakharov, Shipov, and Puthoff, is a boiling ocean of
quantum fluctuations (Dirac sea). To the torsion fields of
Akimov (Einstein-Cartan theory), transmitting information
and energy through the torsion of space. To the "time
density" of Nikolai Kozyrev - a concept explaining why the
power of some devices fluctuated depending on the time of
day. Why does society not know about these revisionist
researchers? Although I think that 12 parts of this series
of articles have been able to convince you that this is not
just fantasy, but real experiments. So, the intrigue lies in
the fact that knowledge is scattered. One researcher was in
Switzerland (Swiss Association for Free Energy), another in
Moscow (Russian Physical Society), a third in the Canadian
Planetary Association for Clean Energy. Their reports were
not published in Nature or Science. They circulated in
closed circles, at highly specialized conferences, in the
depositories of patent offices. Corporate media were not
interested in them because they had no advertising budgets
from oil giants or globalists behind them. Academic science
ignores them even today because these technologies challenge
fundamental dogmas. But most importantly, these patents and
experiments are legal proof that a technological conspiracy
exists not in the form of hiding devices in underground
bunkers, but in the form of a systematic refusal to
seriously consider them. This is concealment in plain sight.
Parallel Power-Engineering is not banned - it is simply
declared "pseudoscience," and its patents are labeled as
curiosities for eccentrics. However, the numbers do not lie.
150% efficiency from Avramenko, 1000% from Hyde, 50 kW from
Sweet, 90% weight loss. These are not theories. These are
documented results, sealed with the stamps of patent offices
worldwide - from the USA and Great Britain to France and
Russia. And I think they deserve our attention. After all,
the biggest secret of Power-Engineering of the 20th century
lies not in how to create it. But in the fact that, knowing
about it, the world continues to burn oil, coal, and gas, as
if outside the window there is no entire universe of free
energy, described, patented, and... numbered by bureaucrats
of science.

Source: gopher://shibboleths.org/0/phlog/301.txt

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)