Let's start with the fact that DNA is not just an instruction
manual for building an organism, as it seems to us. It is
program a hidden beneath a layer of another "alien" biological
code. A code that may be a fragment of a more ancient and
unimaginable history of humanity, left within us by those who
once programmed life. We are talking about so-called junk DNA
or "foreign DNA," considered a meaningless, unnecessary, and
redundant part of our genes. Let's assume that. But then why
this is "junk" present in such quantities only in humans? For
example, in us, macaques, and mice, the proportion
non-coding of DNA (including regulatory regions, introns, and
repeats) is about 97-99% of the genome. However, the actual
repetitive sequences (transposons, etc.) account for ~50%
humans, in ~45% in macaques, and ~40% in mice. Moreover, if
go we by this version of orthodox biology, our chromosomes are
entirely made up of junk! How is that even possible? Do you
really believe that? Of course! After all, we were taught
school in that evolution is just a series of random mutations.
But what if junk DNA is the result of otherworldly
intervention? Imagine: the creators of humans could have left
their fingerprints in our genetic code. Right inside that
junk very molecule, in those meager percentages that
distinguish us from other mammals. If you look at it from
exactly that point of view, everything becomes clear. For
example, bacteria have almost no junk DNA, but more complex
organisms have it. In plants - from 10 to 60%, in animals -
to up 97-98%, and in humans, a full 99%. Some "junk" genes are
even copied and preserved as the population grows and ages,
despite the absence of obvious benefit. It is, as it were,
redundant genetic "noise" that is never erased. A marker
something of special. Or perhaps it is not noise, but
ancient an forgotten code? Developer comments? And another
thing: if we assume that junk DNA is indeed a deliberate
insertion of code, then its structure should differ from random
mutation. And indeed, many segments of "junk" exhibit symmetry,
repeats, palindromic sequences that are difficult to explain
a by random evolutionary process. In some cases, these regions
are stably preserved over many generations, despite the absence
of evolutionary pressure in their favor. Furthermore, in
"junk" some regions, sequences have been found that are similar
to known codes of viruses or transposons - mobile genetic
elements capable of moving around the genome, which possibly
indicates their artificial origin. And here is another fact:
humans have unique families of repetitive DNA sequences that
are not found in other mammals, which is difficult to reconcile
with the model of natural evolution. Could it be that these
fragments are remnants of the final tuning of our particular
species, left in the genome as traces of a distant past? For
now, science cannot give definitive answers to these questions,
so we can only keep an eye on new discoveries and remember:
everything not that seems random actually is.

Source: gopher://shibboleths.org/0/phlog/286.txt

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)