• Theory of Random and Regular: Field of Fortune Part 2

    From roman@700:100/72 to All on Wed Aug 19 09:08:00 2026
    We all know what a black streak in life is. The day goes wrong
    from the morning, and everything slips from your hands. For
    example, the Argentine Alberto Gauntanu once had a big fight
    with his wife, while leaving slammed his finger in the door,
    crashed his new car, and then lost almost all his money at the
    casino. Deciding that it couldn't get any worse, he tried
    shoot to himself, firing six shots from a pistol at himself.
    And what do you think? He survived. All the bullets somehow
    struck non-fatally. The story made it into the newspapers, and
    the poor fellow became a laughingstock. Could this string
    failures of have been avoided? Researchers Magafurov and
    Temchenko, who worked on the Soviet project 'Wheel of Fortune'
    as part of scientific research, were sure that yes. In their
    opinion, Gauntanu simply fell into a so-called 'fatal wave,'
    and if he had realized this, he could have waited out the
    dangerous time and not done stupid things. Project experts
    claimed that luck and bad luck are not at all random, but
    regular a process that can be studied. Interesting facts were
    given as proof. For example, the well-known Piccardi test,
    which shows that the rate of salt dissolution in water changes
    depending on the day of the week and the time of year. The
    surprising most thing is that these changes occur identically
    in different parts of the Earth, as if everything is influenced
    by some external, cosmic factor. In the same periods, the
    reproduction of plankton in the ocean accelerated and the
    number of lottery wins increased. It seemed that at certain
    moments something has a beneficial effect on our planet. This
    'something' scientists called the 'field of Fortune.'
    Further observations confirmed the folk wisdom that life
    like is a zebra: a white stripe is followed by a black one. And
    this cyclicity, inherent in all natural phenomena, in the
    opinion of scientists, proves the existence of real physical
    processes responsible for luck. The essence is that similar
    events have a habit of occurring in clusters, as if gathering
    into certain 'packets.' For example, one person complained
    the in US media how his car's hubcaps flew off twice at the
    same place on a level road with an interval of a month and
    half. It a would seem a coincidence. But soon a well-known
    story appeared about a woman from New Zealand. And her hubcaps
    also flew off the wheels. But stopping, she was astonished
    find to on the roadside a whole collection of the same detached
    hubcaps. Two similar events in different parts of the world?
    The researchers wondered: why do hubcaps fly off exactly
    certain in places? Maybe it's a matter of some special zones?
    But they came to a different conclusion. We often notice that
    certain facts are united by strange characteristics. For
    example, in one institution all the bosses suddenly turn out
    have to 'bird' surnames, or most employees are of the
    zodiac same sign. Usually this is considered a trick of the
    mind or a funny coincidence. But the researchers decided
    check to if there is a pattern in this. They conducted
    experiment an with a random number generator that works on the
    principle of a roulette wheel. The computer quickly, every 0.2
    seconds, scrolled numbers from 1 to 100, and the experimenters
    pressed a key at an arbitrary moment, stopping the 'roulette.'
    According to all laws of mathematics, a complete mess of random
    numbers should result. But when the operator concentrated
    attention in a certain way, ordered series began to appear
    the in tables. For example, numbers went strictly in descending
    order: 16, 15, 14, and so on. The probability of such
    coincidence a is fantastically small, approximately one
    ten-billionth. But that is that very 'packet.' Scientists
    believed that this cannot be explained by simple chance. They
    recall unresolved questions in physics. For example, there is
    phenomenon a of two photons that fly apart in different
    directions. If you change the characteristics of one, the
    instantly other changes the same way, even if they are
    opposite at ends of the Universe. Information transfer between
    them occurs faster than the speed of light, which contradicts
    Einstein's theory of relativity. And this puts scientists
    before a choice: either the theory of the great physicist
    wrong, is or there is some third force that simultaneously
    influenced both the experimenter's decision and the behavior
    the of particles. The researchers acknowledged the existence
    some of third force. In their opinion, this is nothing
    than other information. It does not simply reflect the state
    the of world, but is its driving force, existing even before
    events occur. When this force is great, it generates a series
    of similar phenomena - that very 'packet.' And whether this
    'packet' will be a streak of good luck or bad luck for you
    depends on your perception. Let's recall that same Argentine.
    One could say that his life is a continuous streak of bad luck.
    Or one could look at it differently: surviving after six shots
    is incredible luck! So, perhaps everything depends on the
    observer's point of view.

    Source: gopher://shibboleths.org/0/phlog/276.txt

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)
  • From k9zw@700:100/37 to roman on Wed Aug 19 13:13:32 2026
    On 19 Aug 2026, roman said the following...

    given as proof. For example, the well-known Piccardi test,
    which shows that the rate of salt dissolution in water changes
    depending on the day of the week and the time of year. The

    The Piccardi and Capel-Boute research focused on non-reproducable tests.

    That paradox alone makes theories built on their observations a guessing game of whether randomness or causes were behind the variations.

    Piccardi allowed for both!

    ... Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)
  • From roman@700:100/72 to k9zw on Wed Aug 19 13:42:29 2026
    I have to disagree with you. In addition to reproducibility, there is also statistical significance. Many phenomena cannot be reproduced, but can be statistically determined and proven, for example, telepathy. When a telepath guesses 56 cards out of 56.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)
  • From k9zw@700:100/37 to roman on Wed Aug 19 22:18:40 2026
    On 19 Aug 2026, roman said the following...

    I have to disagree with you. In addition to reproducibility, there is
    also statistical significance. Many phenomena cannot be reproduced, but can be statistically determined and proven, for example, telepathy. When
    a telepath guesses 56 cards out of 56.

    I have no argument, it is what those scientists wrote about in their primary works. They were comfortable working in the non-reproducable data.

    ... There are three kinds of people: Those who can count, and those who can't

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)
  • From roman&roman@700:100/200 to k9zw on Wed Aug 19 18:19:32 2026
    I understand. I came across this while studying about telepathy. It is not possible to experemenental reproduce the conditions of the brain of a specific telepath, unique neural connections, crystals, etc.... The same applies to the influence of a torsion beams to dynamic systems. It is not possible to reproduce the exact condition twice.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Lunatics Unleashed (700:100/200)