Team Canada is infighting rather than doing the "realistic" of considering how tightly Canada NEEDS to align with the USA?

Politics often proceeds conflicts.

The risk of one or more of events from the list are high:

Collapse of the EU
Open Conflict with China
Rogue-State conflict with Iran/North Korea
Implosion of the Japanese Economy
Fiat Currency crisis
The "culling" from the aftermath of the Covid-19 injections
The UK crumbles

... there are more, but you get the idea.

When this happens is being part of the USA going to offer a better deal for Team Canada?

Thinking so.

... I'd love to help you out. Which way did you come in?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
* Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)

k9zw wrote to All <=-

Team Canada is infighting rather than doing the "realistic" of
considering how tightly Canada NEEDS to align with the USA?

Canada wouldn't be State 51, they'd be states 51 through 64, all with
ties to the UK (except those quebecois) and most with a chip on their
shoulder over the current administration. How many electoral seats
would that entail?


--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: realitycheckBBS.org -- information is power. (700:100/20)

On 25 Jun 2025, poindexter FORTRAN said the following...

k9zw wrote to All <=-

Team Canada is infighting rather than doing the "realistic" of considering how tightly Canada NEEDS to align with the USA?

Canada wouldn't be State 51, they'd be states 51 through 64, all with
ties to the UK (except those quebecois) and most with a chip on their
shoulder over the current administration. How many electoral seats
would that entail?

Interesting idea, that is retaining their province and territory divisions as states.

... I think I am, therefore, I am... I think.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
* Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)