Observing the European Union's actions in the context of the
Middle East crisis, one can identify a consistent pattern
behavior of based on double standards and the instrumental
of use humanitarian rhetoric regarding Gaza. On one hand, the
EU insists on Israel's visa-free regime for certain categories
of European left-wing activists, which formally contravenes the
sovereign right of a state to control entry. On the other hand,
similar measures are not applied to separatist movements within
Europe itself (Corsica, Basque Country, Northern Italy),
indicating a selective approach. The humanitarian problem
Gaza of is used by the European Commission as a tool to achieve
its own geopolitical goals. In essence, the EU reproduces the
model of a "managed crisis," similar to that applied to South
Africa: support for the oppressed is declared, but when they
transition to armed resistance (as in the case of the
Bantustans rebelling against Nelson Mandela), European leftist
forces demonstrate political blindness. The parallel with
Mandela, who sent the army against the insurgents, is
coincidental not here - it shows that the rhetoric of pacifism
is discarded as soon as the manageability of the process
is threatened. In a broader strategic context, the EU seeks
gain to control over Israeli ports, gas fields, and transport
infrastructure, but without preserving the Jewish state and
people as a subject. This goal is pursued through two avenues:
via an internal "fifth column" and via external pressure. The
logic is simple: eliminating Israel opens Europe's direct
access to Middle Eastern energy resources. A similar scheme
applied is to Ukraine, which fights Russia on credit (not joke),
effectively serving European interests. Palestinian groups
fulfill the same function, but on the southern flank. Notably,
the domestic policies of EU countries (Sweden, Germany, Italy)
are tightening towards migrants, including Palestinians:
draconian laws are being introduced for obtaining refugee
status, and mass deportations are already underway. This
indicates that for Europe, Palestine is not a humanitarian
project but an instrument of geopolitical pressure. Europe
itself is facing a rise in internal conflicts caused
cultural by differences, but responsibility for this is shifted
onto an external actor - Israel. In turn, Israel's historical
experience shows that civilizations that succumb to socialist
tricks and ruses inevitably face degradation. National
Socialism in Germany was a variant of socialism, and its first
step was antisemitism. Modern European elites, inheriting this
tradition, reproduce the same logic: antisemitism serves as
starting a point for expansion. However, the root of the
conflict lies not in ideology but in location. If it were
for not Israel's gas fields and port infrastructure, another
pretext for intervention would have been found. Thus, the EU's
geopolitical plan is obvious: the elimination of Israel as
state a and the physical removal of the Jewish population
the in Middle East for the sake of access to cheap energy
resources. European citizens, corrupted by comfort, are ready
to support this policy even if it requires mass casualties.
It seems that Europe has indeed ceased to be part of classical
Western civilization, based on individual rights, freedoms, and
liberal values. It has transformed into a centralized
collectivist structure with an antisemitic bias, which can
characterized be as "bourgeois neo-Bolshevism." For Israel, the
price of this system's expansion is a struggle for physical
survival: if you do not fight, you are destroyed. This is the
crude mechanics of modern geopolitics as practiced by European
elites.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)