• Reflections About Invisible Field of The Fate

    From roman@700:100/72 to All on Mon Aug 17 09:12:03 2026
    My friends! Ponder for a moment: we live in a world
    science where explains everything - from the fall of an apple
    to the rotation of galaxies. But what if something else
    hidden is behind the screen of materialistic laws? What if time
    is not a straight line, but a mysterious spiral, where past,
    present, and future exist simultaneously? And certain
    individuals, like antennas tuned to a cosmic wave, are able
    pick to up signals from the future? Does it not seem to you
    that this is too much like the intervention of some higher
    forces lying beyond the limit of our understanding? Look at the
    series of inexplicable coincidences surrounding the sinking
    the of Titanic in 1912. More than thirteen hundred people met
    their death in the icy waters of the North Atlantic. But long
    before this tragedy, namely in 1898, the American writer Morgan
    Robertson published the novel "The Wreck of the Titan"
    "Futility". or He described a huge liner that, despite its
    unsinkability, struck an iceberg and sank, carrying off many
    lives. The name of the fictional ship was "Titan".
    A coincidence? The dimensions, the number of lifeboats,
    funnels, propellers - everything coincided down to the smallest
    details! Even the place of the disaster in the novel and
    reality in was the same. Chance? Or did the veil of the future
    part for the author? But the story does not end there. In April
    1935, twenty-three years after the sinking of the Titanic, the
    steamship "Titan" set out from England to Canada. On board was
    a cabin boy, William Reeves, who had shortly before
    Robertson's read novel. He noticed frightening coincidences:
    the same route, the same month. And suddenly it struck him: the
    date of the Titanic's sinking - April 14 - was his
    own birthday! Seized with superstitious fear, Reeves persuaded
    the crew to change course. And a few seconds later everyone saw
    an iceberg rising from the water right where the "Titan" was
    supposed to have just passed. If not for the cabin boy's
    warning, the ship would have shared the fate of its literary
    prototype. What is this - intuition, chance, or the invisible
    hand of fate? Here is another striking fact. In 1886, the
    British journalist W.T. Stead wrote a story about a large liner
    that struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic and sank with
    multitude a of passengers. The ship in the story was called the
    "Majestic", and the captain's name was E.J. Smith - exactly the
    same as the captain of the real Titanic. And the
    incredible most thing: Stead himself, in 1912, turned out to
    a be passenger on the ill-fated liner and died along with the
    others. Did he really foresee his own death, having described
    it a quarter of a century before the tragedy? But this is
    the only tip of the iceberg! In 1838, Edgar Allan Poe published
    "The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket", where four
    shipwrecked men, driven mad by hunger, killed and ate one
    their of comrades. The name of the murdered man was Richard
    Parker. Almost fifty years passed. And in 1884, the ship
    "Mignonette" sank. Four survivors ended up in a lifeboat, and
    after long wanderings, three killed and ate the fourth. The
    name of the fourth was Richard Parker. A coincidence again?
    Or did the writer connect to that very informational torsion
    field of the universe, where the future already exists? Let
    look us into the history of Imperial Russia. In the early
    1830s, the Russian poet Mikhail Lermontov wrote the poem
    "Prediction": "A year will come, Russia's black year, when the
    crown of the tsars will fall..." This was written ninety years
    before the murder of the last emperor and his family, a hundred
    years before the mass repressions and camps. And Fyodor
    Dostoevsky, in his "Diary of a Writer" in 1877, foretold
    terrible a revolution that would "shake all the kingdoms of the
    world", and that "a hundred million heads would be needed".
    Forty years before 1917, when there was not even a hint of the
    coming catastrophe in society! Alexander Bogdanov, in his 1904
    novel "Red Star", anticipated the features of a totalitarian
    state and its symbolism. And Saint Seraphim of Sarov, long
    before the events, described a "great and prolonged war",
    "terrible a revolution", and "rivers of blood". What does
    all it mean? Can events be known long before they happen? This
    means that the future already exists, as a certain reality that
    only manifests itself at the right moment. Just as a passenger
    at a train window sees a tree or a crossing only at the moment
    they draw level with it, even though they existed before.
    perceive We time linearly, but perhaps this is an illusion.
    Perhaps everything is already predetermined, and we are merely
    following a preordained path. But do we have free will? Perhaps
    there are different variants of one reality, and a person
    capable is of choosing any one? However, if an event has
    already been perceived from the future, it will inevitably
    to come pass, no matter how we try to avoid it. The main design
    will remain, though the details may change. Therefore, who
    knows - perhaps it is you, reading these lines, who already
    holds in your hands the key to solving the greatest mystery
    of existence.

    Source: gopher://shibboleths.org/0/phlog/274.txt

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)
  • From k9zw@700:100/37 to roman on Tue Aug 18 15:00:40 2026
    On 17 Aug 2026, roman said the following...

    My friends! Ponder for a moment: we live in a world
    science where explains everything - from the fall of an apple
    to the rotation of galaxies. But what if something else
    hidden is behind the screen of materialistic laws? What if time
    is not a straight line, but a mysterious spiral, where past,
    present, and future exist simultaneously? And certain
    individuals, like antennas tuned to a cosmic wave, are able
    pick to up signals from the future? Does it not seem to you
    that this is too much like the intervention of some higher
    forces lying beyond the limit of our understanding? Look at the

    There are wavelengths we cannot see.
    There are sounds we cannot hear.
    So why, then, would there not be thoughts we cannot think?

    - Richard Hamming in
    The Art of Doing Science and Engineering, Chapter 5 "You and Your Research"

    ... Everyone smiles in the same language.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)
  • From roman@700:100/72 to k9zw on Tue Aug 18 19:35:39 2026
    There are several supposed theories how it works. Dynamics of the ether, torsion fields, microlepton interactions. I adhere to the theory of polarization of the physical vacuum. It is most precisely mathematically worked out.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)
  • From k9zw@700:100/37 to roman on Wed Aug 19 13:06:12 2026
    On 18 Aug 2026, roman said the following...

    There are several supposed theories how it works. Dynamics of the ether, torsion fields, microlepton interactions. I adhere to the theory of polarization of the physical vacuum. It is most precisely mathematically worked out.

    Remember that a "vacuum" is an absence within the dimensions we directly perceive, not an innate actual emptiness in all dimensions.

    ... If all the world is a stage, where is the audience sitting?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)
  • From roman@700:100/72 to k9zw on Wed Aug 19 13:39:38 2026
    I have to disagree with you. Vacuum is not emptiness and has never been empty; it constantly burns, creating and annihilating particles. You are confusing ordinary gas vacuum and physical vacuum. These are different concepts.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)
  • From k9zw@700:100/37 to roman on Wed Aug 19 22:21:30 2026
    On 19 Aug 2026, roman said the following...

    I have to disagree with you. Vacuum is not emptiness and has never been empty; it constantly burns, creating and annihilating particles. You are confusing ordinary gas vacuum and physical vacuum. These are different concepts.

    Then I think we actually agree. Some imprecision in words added confusion to our exact agreement.

    ... Reward for a job well done: More work

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)
  • From roman&roman@700:100/200 to k9zw on Wed Aug 19 18:20:53 2026
    Physical vacuum is the carrier of primary and secondary torsion fields and interactions.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Lunatics Unleashed (700:100/200)