It is technically possible to encrypt communications carried over a plain old telephone modem, though achieving what we would today consider "actually secure" requires distinguishing between the legacy hardware and modern encryption protocols layered on top of it. The analog signal traveling over the telephone line itself cannot be encrypted by the vintage modem hardware because these devices simply modulate digital data into audio tones and demodulate them back without any cryptographic processing built in. To create a secure channel, you would need to attach an external encryption device or use a software solution that encrypts the digital data before it reaches the modem and decrypts it after it leaves the receiving modem, a method often referred to as link-layer or network-layer encryption applied to the serial stream. Historically, this was done using dedicated secure telephones or add-on modules like the STE (Secure Terminal Equipment) or commercial products from companies like Dataguard, which handled the encryption separately from the modulation process.

The security of such a setup depends entirely on the strength of the encryption algorithm used and the management of the cryptographic keys, not on the vintage technology of the telephone line or the modem itself. If you were to implement modern standards like AES-256 at the endpoints before the data hits the modem, the transmission over the phone line would indeed be secure against eavesdropping, provided the encryption is correctly implemented and the keys are kept secret. However, there are significant practical limitations and risks specific to this environment. Vintage modems operate at very low data rates, typically ranging from 1200 to 56 kbps, which introduces high latency and limits the overhead available for complex encryption handshakes or error correction. Furthermore, the public switched telephone network is inherently insecure regarding physical tapping; while the encryption would make the content unreadable if a tap occurred, the integrity of the connection is still vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks if the initial key exchange is not authenticated, and the low bandwidth makes detecting active interference more difficult than on modern digital networks.

Another critical factor is the vulnerability of the endpoints. Even if the transmission is encrypted, the computers or terminals connected to the modems might be running outdated operating systems with unpatched vulnerabilities, making the overall system insecure regardless of the strength of the transit encryption. Additionally, timing analysis or traffic analysis could potentially reveal metadata about the communication, such as when a conversation occurred or its approximate duration, even if the content remains hidden. In summary, while you can absolutely build a secure point-to-point channel using basic vintage telephone technology by inserting modern encryption between the application and the modem, the resulting security is only as strong as the encryption protocol and key management strategy employed at the digital endpoints, rather than any inherent property of the analog telephone infrastructure or the modem hardware itself. The system would be resistant to passive wiretapping but would require careful implementation to defend against active attacks and endpoint compromises.

Cheers!
-warmfuzzy/SilentPartner

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
* Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (700:100/37)