• Is no one managing the USA?

    From roman@700:100/72 to All on Wed Dec 17 14:09:28 2025
    In this post, I got a bit carried away with the topic. But
    I cannot avoid discussing this point with you because
    it is crucial for understanding the world we live in. The
    investigation into the phenomenon of Unidentified Aerial
    Phenomena (UAP/UFO) has not led to extraterrestrial
    conspiracies but to a fundamental problem of American
    governance. Analyzing congressional hearings, declassified
    documents, and the history of the AARO (All-domain
    Anomaly Resolution Office) program shows that the US
    national security system has created an autonomous parallel
    reality that operates by its own laws. Its original task -
    to identify threats - is being replaced by a single purpose:
    existing for the sake of existence. The situation faced by
    the public has shocked even seasoned conspiracies theorists.
    Neither the court, the Pentagon, nor Congress can provide an
    answer to a simple question: does a memorandum on the UFO
    topic, "Yankee Blue," even exist? Brief chronology of
    events: In June 2023, The Wall Street Journal published an
    article about a purported memorandum issued in spring 2023,
    demanding the cessation of the "Yankee Blue" memorandum.
    On June 17, 2025, The Black Vault (https://shorten.ly/7mora)
    submitted a FOIA request to the OSD (Office of the Secretary
    of Defense) seeking a copy of this memorandum. In September
    2025, the OSD, through its FOIA office, stated that it had
    not found the requested memorandum, having conducted only a
    search within the Correspondence Management Division (CMD).
    Then, on October 1, 2025, Pentagon spokesperson Susan Goff
    stated she could not confirm the existence of the
    memorandum. On September 17, 2025, The Black Vault
    journalist filed an appeal (https://shorten.ly/X7k61),
    claiming that the search was inadequate. On December 12,
    2025, the Pentagon's Appeals Board upheld the appeal and
    returned the request to the OSD for a more extensive search
    across other departments. Thus, the Pentagon was operating
    with a non-existent document and is now compelled to clarify
    its status definitively. However, it is assumed that its
    existence cannot be confirmed because the department that
    created it is either classified, nonexistent, or not part of
    the US Department of Defense. Funding for such programs is
    hidden from taxpayers, which means the main management
    apparatus of the Pentagon is unaware of what is happening.
    It cannot prove that something does not exist because it
    itself does not know what truly exists. The system can only
    manage categories like aircraft, drones, or ballistic
    missiles. Anomalies lack a category - they are objects
    outside classification and, therefore, outside jurisdiction.
    The memorandum appears to be an obvious attempt by the
    system to create a procedure for classifying phenomena that
    are, shall we say, non-material in nature - something the
    system itself denies. Consequently, someone inadvertently
    created a phantom department responsible for investigating
    what does not physically exist within the materialist
    paradigm of bureaucracy. This suggests that UFOs are not
    so much physical objects as paper tigers - products of
    institutional red tape and procedural deadlock. A system
    constrained by secrecy fights a ghost it itself created,
    attempting to document and embed it into some official
    matter. The system produced an ideal outcome - a statement
    that cannot be proven or disproven. To obtain information
    about UAPs, a request must pass through departments whose
    primary task is to withhold information. The system sets the
    rules of the game in which victory is impossible by design.
    Its goal is not to find the truth but to prove that it
    cannot be found. Congressional pressure has not led to the
    declassification of archives but to the creation of new
    bureaucratic units - from the UAP Task Force to AARO. Each
    new structure requires funding, staffing, reporting, and -
    most importantly - creates a new layer of secrecy to protect
    against external interference. The Pentagon's system
    operates not with human lives, suffering, or disasters, but
    with mathematical models, statistics, and terminology. This
    creates a vacuum where absurd decisions seem technical
    and justified. There is a fatal belief that complex
    technological methods cannot err and are the ultimate
    arbiters in all matters. The problem of "false alarms" or
    malfunctions is not seen as a probable catastrophe but as a
    mere technical glitch that can be "accounted for in future
    calculations." Information is tightly controlled and
    classified under the pretext of "national security."
    However, this secrecy primarily serves to shield the system
    from external scrutiny, criticism, and accountability.
    The logic of the Pentagon's system is built on constantly
    expecting the worst-case scenario from a hypothetical
    adversary who, as it turns out, is unknown. This paranoid
    stance is self-justifying and self-perpetuating: the system
    exists to combat a threat whose scale it itself does not
    understand. This, in turn, demands increased funding.
    Within this complex hierarchical structure, it is impossible
    to identify a specific individual making such final,
    responsible decisions, as responsibility dissolves into
    collective committees, top-down orders, procedures, and
    job descriptions. This leads to a situation where no one
    personally bears responsibility for any potential outcome.
    The system speaks in its own closed language (jargon) and
    is fundamentally incapable of dialogue with external entities.
    The original goal (security) is replaced by the process of
    its probable achievement - that is, the process becomes an
    end in itself. The system works not to achieve results but
    to sustain its own functioning and expansion. Ultimately,
    people face not aliens or UFOs but a faceless technocratic
    machine that, due to its internal flaws, poses an
    existential threat in itself.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)