What your opinions? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12796167/CIA-secret-office-UFO-retriev al-missions-whistleblowers.html
EXCLUSIVE: CIA's secret office has conducted UFO retrieval missions on at least NINE crash sites around the world, whistleblowers reveal
The Office of Global Access (OGA) - a wing of the CIA - has played a central role in collecting alien spacecraft since 2003, sources tell DailyMail.com
At least nine 'non-human craft' have been recovered by the US government - some wrecked from a crash, and two completely intact

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
* Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)

There is legislation in congress that speaks to creating a central authority over every non-human craft/bio-matter event or holdings, by every government agency.

Of course if the event was private sector or moved to the private sector the new law wouldn't work to consolidate that information.

This new office then is supposed to release everything they safely can.

Now whether than mean almost nothing or almost everything, well who knows.

--

Have such a law presumes that there is materials the law would affect. Setting up an agency to review presumes there is something to review.

--
So while any details remain unconfirmable that "there is something out there" seems reaffirmed by congress feeling compelled to legislate on the topic.

--- Steve K9ZW via SPOT BBS

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
* Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)

We have a popular saying: "There is no smoke without fire." There are too many direct and indirect official movements on this topic, as well as some news that suddenly disappeared from the news feeds after their publication. For example, about the fall of strange celestial bodies in Latin America, from which a suffocating smell spread and which were confiscated by the army.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
* Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)

non human could be a drone or remotely controlled unid'd craft

;)

--- ENiGMA 1/2 v0.0.14-beta (linux; x64; 18.18.2)
* Origin: Xibalba -+- xibalba.l33t.codes:44510 (700:100/9)

I always expect such sharp and very witty comments.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
* Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)

We have a popular saying: "There is no smoke without fire." There are

The information age absolutely indicates to me that there is a whole lot of smoke without fire, especially in media-driven phenomena like UFOs, where we're dealing with terminally online communities (we're in one now), photographs, and videotape. None of these things are *real.*

Someone needs to produce alien flesh, or alien technology, which can be examined by academics, verifying extraterrestrial origin.

The desire to believe in UFOs and extra-terrestrial life and visitations, strongly outweighs the amount of credible evidence there is for these things. In this article unnamed sources are providing this information to the wretched Daily Mail, a notorious tabloid. This is not impressive to me, personally.

At this point we have decades of reports of sightings, alleged crashes, and the like. I would like to see *one sample* produced for public, academic analysis. Just one.

Odds are there is extraterrestrial life in the universe.

[*] The universe itself is 13.8 billion years old.
[*] The earth formed 4.5 billion years ago.
[*] Life is theorized to have formed 3.7 billion years ago
[*] The earliest possible end to the universe is 22 billion years, with some estimates as long as 100 trillion years

My sense of this is that we are one of the more "elder races" of the universe, or will be considered so, if anyone catalogs it.

It is possible there are species far more advanced than ours, but with the math, I find it difficult to believe they've had a chance to detect us, given the size of the universe.

I'm open to being wrong, but nothing I have seen so far about UFOs has been very convincing to me, personally.

Habeus Corpus!

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)

I don't know where you have been for the last 3 years. Or what kind of press did you read specifically. But from my point of view, there is more information provided than ever and of sufficient quality. Regarding your position, I can rephrase it as follows:
"The desire to believe in existing of Fissile Syntax and his messages and visiting FTN, strongly outweighs the amount of credible evidence there is for these things. In this post unnamed sources are providing this information to the wretched Spooks net, a notorious FTN. This is not impressive to me, personally."

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
* Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)

I don't know where you have been for the last 3 years. Or what kind of press did you read specifically. But from my point of view, there is
more information provided than ever and of sufficient quality. Regarding your position, I can rephrase it as follows:

It is terrible evidence; purely anecdotal. Produce a spacecraft or produce alien flesh. Otherwise, it's just people feeding a pre-existing narrative and conspiracy theory with words.

"The desire to believe in existing of Fissile Syntax and his messages and visiting FTN, strongly outweighs the amount of credible evidence there
is for these things. In this post unnamed sources are providing this information to the wretched Spooks net, a notorious FTN. This is not impressive to me, personally."

Not really. The standard of proof for a person's existence online is that a person posts.

The standard of proof for a thing is existing is evidence it actually exists, like producing the actual thing. These are not the same.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)

Pseudo-skeptical demagoguery is a fairly common technique. And what should I add to the above? There is no evidence that you are a human and not an AI. There is no evidence that a team of trolls from one of the agencies, or a group of Chinese hackers, is not working under this account. I'm not even sure that you exist in principle. There is no evidence that you are you and not someone else.
I also cannot perform your autopsy, taking your organs and comparing them with medical records. I can't do a DNA test. Therefore, I come to the conclusion that you most likely do not exist. And you are just a Chinese or Korean algorithm.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Linux/64)
* Origin: SPOT BBS / k9zw (700:100/69)

Pseudo-skeptical demagoguery is a fairly common technique. And what

No, this is skeptical demagoguery. There's nothing pseudo-about it.

should I add to the above? There is no evidence that you are a human and not an AI. There is no evidence that a team of trolls from one of the agencies, or a group of Chinese hackers, is not working under this account. I'm not even sure that you exist in principle. There is no evidence that you are you and not someone else.

Okay.

I also cannot perform your autopsy, taking your organs and comparing
them with medical records. I can't do a DNA test. Therefore, I come to
the conclusion that you most likely do not exist. And you are just a Chinese or Korean algorithm.

Alrighty.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Shipwrecks & Shibboleths [San Francisco, CA - USA] (700:100/72)