• REPLY TO PLANETS, OVER EASTLAKE

    From John Short@RICKSBBS to All on Wed Jun 24 06:13:47 2026
    ---------------------------------------
    Date: Mon Apr 11 18:34:25 1988
    From: DALE B. WEDGE (ae511)
    Subj: The Eastlake UFO:DBW

    In regard to Mr. Sanduleak's upload, perhaps it is time to
    explain that we ALL are aware tat Venus and Jupiter were in
    the western portion of the sky that evening. After the sight-
    ing, Dell'Aquila and Wedge went out to the sight and did sight
    these planets in the western sky. We even took some calcu-
    latiions as to the location of the planets at the times that
    witnesses were seeing the objects over the lake. From
    our determination, we can state that the objects that were seen
    over the Lake were nt Venus and Jupiter. The witnesses that
    evening knew where the planets were. The subject who reported
    the objects was travelling EAST and was facing east when the
    objects were seen to her left, the northern portion of the
    sky, near the residence.

    In regards to the Coast Guard, Mr. Sanduleak must only be
    reading the report of the second evening. It would seem that
    anyone being involved in the Coast Guard would have a basic
    knowledge of the skies above us, since it is a tool that they
    use to navigate the seas. I would also doubt that Coast
    Guard personnel would mistake Venus and Jupiter as the culprit
    being bind objects being seen to be approximately 500 yards
    offshore about 20 feet above the ice. I have never known the
    planets to do this. If you go to the sight of the incident,
    there is no west to look at on the ice, since it is obscured
    by the Eastlake Coal Burning power plant. From the reports,
    of on-scene witnesses with the Coast Guard personnel, the
    sightings were north or overhead of the witnesses for the first
    portion of the sighting. After that, the objects descended
    from overhead and came down on the ice. The witnesses, who
    have been living at that location for some time, stated
    that they have never noticed an ice breakage likke the one that
    was observed that evening. To prove the object wasn't to the
    west, refer to the report when it is stated that the objectswere 500 yards offshore about 20 feet about the ice, and began
    to move closer as headlights were flashed. At that time,
    then it moved to the west, therefore, if something was in
    the west, being obscured by the power plant, it couldn't have
    been west and then turn west. There is another amazing facet
    to this story, and that is that after this sighting, an indepen-
    dent witness took a picture of the triangular sha object,
    which we have the negative to. The object in the picture fits
    the description made by the witnesses at the scene of the
    encounter.

    Lastly, because we ensure secrecy of witnesses, it is
    unfortunate that the Coast Guard will not allow us to inter-
    view the Coast Guard personnel that were at the scene that
    evening. Who has something to hide? Is it Sanduleak that is
    frightd of a real incident or is the Coast Guard frightened
    that they have given the smoking gun that could open up the
    paper trail on a real phenomenon?
    Dale

    ---------------------------------------


    John,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS - telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23