• THE KLASS BET PART 1

    From Billy Lawter@RICKSBBS to All on Thu Jun 18 06:34:28 2026
    ============================================================================

    [The following is a re-type of a White Paper sent to me by
    Phil Klass when I asked about claims apparently made by
    Stanton Friedman regarding a "bet" between the two of them.
    I have done my best to keep the proper emphasis and
    spelling, even where a given word was misspelled. -- David
    Bloomberg]



    Philip J. Klass 404 "N" St. Southwest
    Washington D.C. 20024



    This is in response to your query about whether Stanton T.
    Friedman did indeed "win" $1,000 from me because he was
    correct and I was wrong about one detail of an "MJ-12"
    related memo allegedly written by President Eisenhower's
    aide, Robert Cutler to Gen. Nathan Twining, on July 14,
    1954, which William L. Moore and Jaime Shandera claim to
    have discovered in the National Archives.

    Yes, I paid Friedman $1,000 because he was correct and I was
    wrong. The money came from the interest earned on $1,000
    Friedman had earlier paid me. Here is the full story that
    Friedman never reveals. (It may be reproduced without
    permission.)

    As a boy in Iowa, we had a useful expression: "Talk is
    cheap; put your money where your mouth is." A friend might
    claim he could run around the block in 2 minutes. Bet him a
    dime he couldn't--and if he really believed in his claim, he
    would accept the wager. I have found this is a most useful
    technique in my many years in the UFO field to determine if
    there is "adverse evidence".

    In fact, I used it during my very first contact with
    Friedman, around 1967. He had published a Letter-to-the-
    Editor in the American Instit. of Aeronautics & Astronautics
    journal, claiming there was overwhelming evidence that UFOs
    were ET craft. I promptly sent Friedman a copy of my
    $10,000 Contract to determine if he believed his claim was
    true and to learn what that evidence was.

    Under the terms of this contract, I agree to pay the
    other person $10,000 if/when any hard, incontrovertible
    evidence is found which shows that the Earth has been
    visited by one (or more) ET craft. (The other party does
    not need to find the evidence.) The other party agrees to
    pay me $100 per year until such evidence is found, but with
    a limit/maximum of 10 years of payments. Thus, the maximum
    the other party risks is $1,000. Friedman rejected my $10K
    offer as "ridiculous."

    In my second UFO book, "UFOs Explained," I briefly
    discussed my $10,000 offer and noted that Friedman (among
    others) had refused to sign up. I noted that the most
    Friedman risked losing was $1,000--which was the fee he
    typically was paid for giving a single one-hour lecture
    "Flying Saucers ARE Real." A few months after this book was
    published, Friedman and I appeared on a syndicated talk show-
    -pre-taped in Detroit. During the taping, Friedman whipped
    out a crisp $100 bill and announced he was accepting my $10K
    offer. I promptly sent him the one-page contract which he
    signed. During the subsequent nine years, Friedman made his
    annual payments and as of early 1984, Friedman had paid me a
    total of $1,000. Although I did not put Friedman's payments
    into a special "Escrow" account, if I had done so, the
    compounded interest I earned on Friedman's money would have
    totalled slightly more than $1,000 as of 1989.

    So much for background. One of the two MJ-12 documents
    made public by William L. Moore, Jaime Shandera and Stanton
    Friedman in the spring of 1987 purports to be a document
    prepared in November 1952 by Rear Adm. Roscoe H.
    Hillenkoetter to brief President-elect Eisenhower on UFOs
    and crashed saucers. (Hillenkoetter had been director of
    the CIA from 1947 to 1950.)

    Christopher Allan, a British UFOlogist, first called my
    attention to a very unusual date-format used in this
    briefing document--a hybrid of civil and military format. I
    discovered that only one other person consistently used this
    same unusual date-format in his correspondence: William L.
    Moore, who released the MJ-12 papers. Another anomaly in
    the briefing document allegedly written by Hillenkoetter was
    that he referred to himself as "Adm. Hillenkoetter," rather
    than "Rear Adm. [or Radm] Hillenkoetter," which implied he
    was a four-star (full) admiral rather than a two-star.

    So I requested the Truman Library to send me copies of
    letters which Hillenkoetter had written as CIA director to
    determine if he consistently used this unusual date-format
    and if he correctly identified his rank as Rear Admiral. In
    every one of the letters I received, Hillenkoetter used the
    traditional military date-format and he correctly showed his
    rank as Rear Admiral. Furthermore, from these authentic
    archival letters I discovered that he never signed his
    letters using his first name "Roscoe." Instead he always
    used his initials: "R.H." Yet in the MJ-12 briefing
    document which Hillenkoetter allegedly wrote, he used
    "Roscoe."

    And so on Oct. 30, 1987, using my old "put your money
    where your mouth is" approach, I offered Friedman the
    opportunity to win many thousands of dollars. I offered to
    pay Friedman $2,000 for each and every authentic letter
    written by Hillenkoetter while he was at the CIA IF the
    letter used the unusual MJ-12 date-format and if it was
    signed "Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter," providing Friedman agreed
    to pay me 1/5th that amount ($400) for every Hillenkoetter
    letter I could supply which did not use the unusual date-
    format and which was signed with his initials.

    Thus, if Hillenkoetter used the "MJ-12 format" in even
    one out of every four letters he wrote, Friedman could win
    some of my money. Friedman promptly rejected my generous
    offer in his letter of Nov. 5, 1987. So I sent him a
    slightly revised version on Nov. 10 which he also rejected
    on Nov. 19. (Copy of my offer and Friedman's comments are
    enclosed.)

    Now for the $1,000 wager that Friedman did accept, and
    which he won. On Jan. 16, 1989, based on a modest sample of
    letters written by Robert Cutler which I had obtained from
    the Eisenhower Library, I had reason to believe that the
    typewriters in Cutler's office all used the "elite" (small)
    typeface then used for many executives. But the Cutler memo
    which Moore/Shandera claimed to have found in the National
    Archives used the larger "pica" typeface. Further, I had
    learned that Cutler could not possibly have written the memo
    to Gen. Twining on July 14, 1954, because Cutler was out of
    the country on official business on that date.

    If all of the typewriters in Cutler's office used pica
    type, that would be further evidence that the July 14 memo
    was a counterfeit. So, on Jan. 16, 1989, I challenged
    Friedman on this issue and offered to pay him $100 for each
    letter written by Cutler during this same time period which
    he could find which "uses a typeface identical in size and
    style to that used in the alleged Cutler/Twining memo of
    July 14, 1954." (Fortunately for me, I set an upper limit
    of $1,000 on my payments.) Friedman did come up with
    several dozen Cutler letters with pica typeface.

    I might have quibbled over whether their typeface was
    "identical in style," but I opted to promptly pay off and
    sent him my check for $1,000. My payment to Friedman
    represented the interest I had earned on his earlier $1,000
    payment to me under our $10,000 contract.

    More recently, I extended a similar challenge to
    Friedman under which he could win another $1,000 while
    risking only $100 of his own--a challenge he declined to
    accept. The recent crashed-saucer book co-authored by
    Friedman and Don Berliner ["Crash at Corona"] features the
    tale of Gerald F. Anderson who claims that in 1947 he and
    four other members of his family (all now deceased) stumbled
    onto a crashed saucer on the Plains of San Agustin in New
    Mexico. Anderson claimed that his family was soon joined by
    a group of archaeologists headed by a Dr. Buskirk. Despite
    the fact that Anderson was only 5 years old at the time of
    the alleged incident and the 40+ years which had elapsed, he
    was able to reconstruct Dr. Buskirk's appearance with the
    aid of techniques used by the police to reconstruct the
    appearance of a criminal.

    Thanks to a painstaking investigation, UFOlogist Tom J.
    Carey managed to locate Dr. Buskirk who closely resembled
    Anderson's sketch but who flatly denied Anderson's tale.
    Buskirk had hard evidence to show that he was hundreds of
    miles away from the Plains of San Agustin at the time of the
    alleged crashed saucer incident. However, Carey learned
    that Buskirk had been a teacher at the Albuquerque, N.M.
    high school in the late 1950s when Gerald F. Anderson had
    taken a course in anthropology which Buskirk taught. Yet
    Anderson claimed that he had never seen Dr. Buskirk since
    the crashed-saucer incident in 1947.

    When skeptical investigators tried to obtain a copy of
    Anderson's high school records to see if he had taken a
    course in anthropology (under Buskirk), Anderson instructed
    school officials not to release his records. Anderson then
    released what he claimed to be a photocopy of his school
    records which seemed to show he had not taken a course in
    anthropology. But there were suspicions that the record
    that Anderson made public might have been "doctored."

    On Aug. 8, 1992, I sent Friedman a Memorandum of
    Agreement dealing with this key issue which could reveal
    whether Anderson had resorted to falsehood and altering of
    evidence. My memo noted this issue could be resolved "if
    Anderson will request and authorize the present Principal of
    the Albuquerque High School, or the Superintendent of
    Schools, to carefully examine the transcript of Anderson's
    high school records and issue a public statement that
    Anderson did, or did not, take a course in anthropology."

    I offered to pay Friedman $1,000 if Anderson would
    provide me with a notarized statement authorizing such
    action by Albuquerque school officials, while Friedman would
    pay me $100 if Anderson refused to take such action.
    Friedman never responded. (Within nine months, Friedman and
    Berliner publicly acknowledged that Anderson "can no longer
    be seen as sufficiently reliable." But they added that this
    "does not mean that everything reported by Gerald Anderson
    is without value.")

    =======================================

    Billy,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    IRC www://irccloud.com/irc/ricksbbs/channel/ricksbbs
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS - telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23