• INSIDE UFOLOGY August 1988 Gulf Breeze gadfly investigator Robert D. Boyd was/was not kicked out of MUFON.

    From Seth Able@RICKSBBS to all on Thu Dec 19 09:46:49 2024
    ==============
    INSIDE UFOLOGY
    August 1988
    ==============

    TENSIONS MOUNT OVER GULF BREEZE

    ParaNet Alpha 08/10 -- Depending on whom one chooses to believe,
    Gulf Breeze gadfly investigator Robert D. Boyd was/was not
    kicked out of MUFON.

    Boyd, who had concurrent titles of Investigations Coordinator
    for CUFOS and Alabama State Director for MUFON, was definitely
    asked to resign from the latter organization by its chief,
    Walter Andrus. But in a July 14th press release, first picked up
    by James Moseley's Saucer Smear, Boyd claimed that Andrus
    informed him "that he was no longer a member of MUFON." Andrus
    flatly denied the charge, saying "the subject never came up."

    Andrus, in a phone conversation from MUFON headquarters in
    Seguin, TX, told ParaNet that Boyd had been told to resign due
    to "unprofessional investigative techniques" in his work on the
    Gulf Breeze, FL, photographic case. He said he had asked Boyd to
    come along on the investigation last January, as a gesture of
    cooperation between the two organizations; but that since that
    time, Boyd had conducted a "smear campaign" against "Mr. Ed,"
    the chief witness in the case. Andrus said Boyd had "gone off
    half-cocked," going on talk shows as a MUFON representative with
    faulty and downright false information about the case. "I
    demanded his resignation, and he refused," said Andrus. "I
    relieved him of his duties [as State Director] anyway. But I
    never told him he was out of the organization." Simple MUFON
    membership consists mainly of a subscription to the
    organization's Journal.

    "I'm telling you that he lied to you," said Boyd in response.
    "What's in my [release] is just what happened." Boyd's release
    expresses "complete disgust" with the Gulf Breeze investigation,
    and cites "suppression of all facts, collaboration between
    investigators and/or witnesses, and a four-month campaign to
    discredit [me]." In a phone call, Boyd cited further instances
    of what he called "shoddy" techniques on the part
    of the primary investigators, Charles Flannigan, Donald Ware,
    and Andrus. In one conversation, Boyd asked Flannigan
    if one of the photos turned out to be a hoax, would it destroy
    the case in their minds? "ALL the photos would have to be proven
    hoaxes," Boyd quotes Flannigan as saying.

    Boyd still has the support of the Hynek Center, according to Don
    Schmitt, one of CUFOS' directors. And the Center is none too
    thrilled with an article in the latest MUFON Journal, in which
    Andrus made it sound as if CUFOS members were on bended knee,
    begging for forgiveness for having written several anti-Gulf
    Breeze articles. He charged that Schmitt, George
    Eberhard and others had "unwittingly accepted the distorted
    information supplied" by Boyd. He claimed that the two seemed
    "shocked by revelations of the truth," referring to information
    Andrus provided them at the MUFON Symposium at Lincoln.
    "Obviously," says Andrus, "they were embarrased for the
    premature article in the CUFOS Bulletin and the International
    UFO Reporter."

    "Nonsense," says Schmitt. "Obviously, there is a lot of
    information in this case, and some of it we have not been privy
    to. But we stand fully behind our basic premise, which is that
    of calling for an independent investigation and analysis of the
    evidence by a non-UFO entity, such as a government agency."

    Ware said that such an analysis might be in the works, but
    declined to give details.

    "We also still decry the premature publicity given the case by
    MUFON, and the premature declarations of authenticity" by such
    people as Andrus, Budd Hopkins and Donald Ware. "This case
    stands or falls on the evidence, and the evidence isn't all in
    yet."

    Generally, reaction to Boyd's alleged removal from the ranks of
    MUFON was surprise. "Does this mean we all have to agree with
    Walt in order to keep our positions?", one MUFON officer asked.
    "I thought this was a scientific organization."

    But Andrus was unruffled. "My action [regarding Boyd] was due to
    his spreading false and grossly irresponsible information about
    Ed in the name of MUFON. I would never ask anyone to resign
    simply because they didn't agree with me. But we have a certain
    standard of responsible investigation that needs to be adhered
    to."

    Boyd, in the meantime, is continuing to "research" the case from
    his home in Mobile, Alabama. He says he is offering copies of
    all his Gulf Breeze correspondence to anyone interested, for a
    small fee to cover copying and postage. And he continues to be
    outspoken about his conviction that "Mr. Ed" is a hoaxer. "I'm
    95% convinced that this is bogus," he muses. "But I'm willing to
    leave the other 5% open, just in case."

    <<>>

    COMMENTS:
    Initially, I praised Boyd for expressing the same reservations I
    had with the GB case. But as one independent researcher asked
    me, rather plaintively, "What exactly is it that Boyd is
    pointing to, regarding the evidence itself, that makes him say
    its a hoax?" I had to agree, Boyd's main contentions are with
    the quality of the investigation and the attitudes of the
    investigators. He points out very little with regard to the
    photographs, deferring instead to Dr. Willy Smith of UNICAT, who
    published one paper critical of the case. Part of that paper was
    based on weather information supplied by Ray Stanford, which was
    later discredited.

    Boyd also points to gaps in our knowledge of Mr. Ed's
    background, and rather freely bandies about the suggestion that
    Ed has done hard time at some point in the past. He offers no
    evidence except hearsay. I believe I was not supposed to print
    that; but then, Boyd didn't know me from Adam, and therefore he
    was not supposed to say that. It may very well be an example of
    the "irresponsibility" Andrus spoke of.

    As Boyd said, there's politics, ego, and wishful thinking at
    work here. However, without solid evidence, we have not the
    slightest reason to call this an outright hoax.

    As the independent researcher said, poor investigative
    techniques "are not Ed's fault." However, without a high
    standard of investigative thoroughness, we have not the
    slightest reason to call this "proof of extraterrestrial
    visitation."

    Our ParaNet rating remains: S5/P2.
    
    Seth,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS - telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23