• STATEMENT REGARDING THE BOOK OF MORMON

    From Jim Singleton@RICKSBBS to All on Fri Mar 27 07:09:39 2026
    This article is an exact reproduction of a letter compiled by The
    Smithsonian Institution that was recieved by Computers for
    Christ, and has been graciously provided free of charge by them.
    For your own copy, write to:

    The Smithsonian Institute
    National Museum of Natural History
    Department of Anthropology
    Washington D.C.
    20560.

    Computers For Christ, Panama City, Fl.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    [Page 1]

    Information from the

    NATIONAL MUSEUM OF OF NATURAL HISTORY
    Smithsonian Institution Washington D.C.

    Your recent inquiry concerning the Book of Mormon has been
    received in the Smithsonian's Department of Anthropology.

    The book of Mormon is a religious document and not a scientific
    guide. The Smithsonian Institution does not use it in
    archeological research. Because the Smithsonian Institution
    recieves many inquiries regarding the book of Mormon, we have
    prepared a "Statement Regarding the Book of Mormon," a copy of
    which is enclosed for your information. This statement
    includes answers to questions most commonly asked about the Book
    of Mormon.

    PREPARED BY
    THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTROPOLOGY

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    [Page 2]

    STATEMENT REGARDING THE BOOK OF MORMON
    --------------------------------------

    1. The Smithsonian Institution has never used the Book of Mormon
    in any way as a scientific guide. The Smithsonian archeologists
    see no direct connection between archeology of the New World and
    the subject matter of the book.

    2. The physical type of American Indian is basically Mongoloid,
    being most closely related to that of the peoples of eastern,
    central, and northeastern Asia. Archeological evidence indicates
    that the ancestors of the present Indians came into the New World
    -- probably over a land bridge known to have existed in the
    Bering Staight region during the last Ice Age -- in a continuing
    series of small migrations beginning from about 25,000 to 30,000
    years ago.

    3. Present evidence indicates that the fist people to reach this
    continent from the East were the Norsemen who who briefly visited
    the northeastern part of North America around A.D. 1000 and then
    settled in Greenland. There is nothing to show that they reached
    Mexico or Central America.

    4. One of the main lines of evidence supporting the scientific
    finding that contacts with Old World civilizations, if indeed
    they occured at all, were of very little significance for the
    development of American Indian civilizations, is the fact that
    none of the principal Old World domesticated food plants or
    animals (except the dog) occured in the New World in pre-
    Columbian times. American Indians had no wheat, barley, oats,
    millet, rice, cattle, pigs, chickens, horses, donkeys, camels
    before 1492. (camels and horses were in the Americas, along with
    the bison, mammoth, mastodon, but all these animals became
    extinct around 10,000 B.C. at the time the early big game hunters
    spread across the Americas.)


    SIL - 76
    Summer 1982

    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    [Page 3]


    5. Iron, steel, glass, and silk were not used in the New World
    before 1492 (except for occasional use of unsmelted meteroic
    iron). Native copper was worked in various locations in pre-
    Columbian times, but true metallurgy was limited to southern
    Mexico and the Andean region, where its occurance in late
    prehistoric times involved gold, silver, copper, and their
    alloys, but not iron.

    6. There is a possibility that the spread of cultural traits
    across the Pacific to Mesoamerica and the northwestern coast of
    South America began several hundred years before the Christian
    era. However, any such inter-hemispheric contacts appear to have
    been the results of accidental voyages originating in eastern and
    southern Asia. It is by no means certain that even such contacts
    occured with the ancient Egyptians, Hebrews, or other peoples of
    Western Asia and the Near East.

    7. No reputable Egyptologist or other specialist on Old World
    archeology, and no expert on New World prehistory, has discovered
    or confirmed any relationship between archeological remains in
    Mexico and archeological remains in Egypt.

    8. Reports of findings of ancient Egyptian, Hebrew, and other
    Old World writtings in the New World in pre-Columbian contexts
    have frequently appeared in newspapers, magazines and sensational
    books. None of these claims has stood up to examination by
    reputable scholars. No inscriptions using Old World forms of
    writing have been shown to have occured in any part of the
    Americas before 1492 except for a few Norse rune stones which
    have been found in Greenland.

    9. There are copies of the Book of Mormon in the library of the
    National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.

    For more information see below:

    This file has been brought to you by the ministry of the;

    Southern Maryland Christian Information Service BBS, (SMCIS)
    (301) 862-3160 HST

    P.O. Box 463
    California, MD 20619

    Sysop: Buggs Bugnon


    Jim Singleton
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23