• SPIRITUAL SWORDSMANSHIP - THE PROBLEM

    From Denise Stevens@RICKSBBS to All on Sun Feb 1 07:48:30 2026
    SPIRITUAL SWORDSMANSHIP
    or
    Defending Yourself against False Doctrines

    THE PROBLEM

    . It is obvious from Scripture that every Christian is expected to
    be able to fight back and defeat false teachings, no matter whether
    they are being proclaimed by an obvious cult, or by a brother who has
    fallen into error. Practically speaking, though, the average
    Christian often feels outmatched in verse-to-verse combat and looks
    for help from people he considers to be authorities.
    . There is a great deal of very good, helpful material available,
    but it usually has a problem or two that makes it difficult to use,
    especially if it is a situation that the believer has never been in
    before. This material will often give the reader tremendous insight,
    but ordinarily, requires him to research, memorize, study and practice
    it before he can use it effectively. It will also give him
    information about only ONE group or teaching, without giving him a
    general tool that can be used in all situations. The average
    Christian doesn't have the time or interest to pursue this avenue, or
    to become well informed about ALL the errant doctrines being put out.
    As a result, he becomes discouraged, and gives up on EVER successfully
    refuting false doctrine.
    . This writer is convinced that each and every Christian, no matter
    how long he has been a Christian or how knowledgeable he is about
    spiritual things has the means at hand to defeat any and all false
    teaching. All it requires is a knowledge of your weapon, how to use
    it, and what pitfalls to avoid.

    YOUR PRINCIPAL WEAPON

    . Nearly every person who is teaching false doctrine seeks to
    undermine the trustworthiness of the Bible. (A good sign the person
    IS teaching false doctrine!) After running into a wall of disbelief,
    you may be tempted to dispense with the Bible in favor of other
    material, in the hopes that you may convince him of the error of his
    way. DON'T, unless you are VERY familiar with the other material, and
    can use it WELL! Even then, your primary weapon should STILL be the
    Bible.
    . This may seem obvious, but it is e exactly at THIS point that
    many Christian "defenders of the Faith" get lost and confused. Much
    of the material available puts this Book, the Holy Bible, which is our
    real basis for power and authority, into an almost secondary position,
    and will rely upon other sources for most of their arguments.
    . If your friend - the one who is seeking to give you "another
    gospel" - distrusts the accuracy of the Bible, it makes NO difference
    in its being YOUR principal weapon. A sword remains a sword, even if
    the opponent doesn't think it is a reliable weapon. The Word of God
    remains the Word of God, "...living and active; sharper than any
    double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing the soul and
    spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the
    heart" (Hebrews 4:12), even if your friend disbelieves it.
    . This is true even if your friend is a self-avowed atheist, or
    part of a non-Christian religion - although some of what follows won't
    apply - STICK TO THE BIBLE!!! No other material has a divine
    guarantee of total effectiveness that the Bible has! The other
    materials can be used, if you desire, to further establish the fallacy
    of your friends claims, but your most reliable weapon in fighting
    error is the Holy Bible. Even if he INSISTS upon disregarding the
    Bible, and going elsewhere to find truth, DON'T DO IT! If he gets
    upset, ask him what he is afraid of finding in the Bible.

    EFFECTIVE DOCTRINAL DUELING

    . Like the sword it compares itself to, the Bible can be used to
    either attack or defend. To carry the parallel even further, it takes
    a fair amount of practice and experience to use a sword - or the Bible
    - effectively on the offense. As you grow and mature in your Walk
    with the Lord Jesus, your ability to use His Word will grow with you.
    But many of those who are approached by these "false apostles" (and
    sometimes led astray by them) haven't had the time to become familiar,
    much less skilled, in using the Bible.
    . When a soldier is being trained to fight, he is usually taught
    how to defend himself LONG before he is taught how to attack. There
    is every reason to expect this to be appropriate for our spiritual
    battles, as well. When talking with a person from any organization
    (or teaching) that is false, but wants to present itself or himself as "Christian," sooner or later, there will be an attempt to use a
    passage from the Bible to support or defend a doctrine that may be in
    conflict with the Truth of Scripture.
    . When ANYONE - even someone who is honestly seeking to teach the
    True Word of God - uses the Bible to teach or illustrate a concept
    unfamiliar to you (particularly when it is in conflict with what you
    have been taught before!), STOP THE CONVERSATION RIGHT THERE!!! Get
    out a Bible, turn to he passage just used, and read it - out loud, if
    possible, and include the entire paragraph in which it is found. A
    teacher of Truth probably won't mind, and a false teacher may or may
    not - their response at this point won't tell you much. If they
    object, just inform them that you want to find out if their use of the
    passage agrees with the author's intention, and continue examining the
    section! Under NO circumstances should your discussion continue until
    you have checked the passage to see if your friend and the author
    agree. Do this in EACH INSTANCE! The friend may be A-OK in some
    cases just to get you to believe that he knows what he is talking
    about, but then divert into the "real" false teachings after having
    obtained your confidence.

    BASIC INTERPRETIVE THRUST

    . The easiest way to determine the AUTHOR'S intent in a passage is
    to ask a series of simple questions - WHO?, WHEN?, WHERE?, HOW?,
    WHAT?, WHY?, and even SO WHAT? (These are sometimes referred to as
    the "journalism" questions). In order to answer the questions, you
    will need to examine MORE than just the passage quoted, but will find
    the answers in the context of the entire Book. After doing that, see
    if either your interpretation or his interpretation, should they be
    different, is closest to agreement with the Bible. God NEVER
    contradicts himself! A good help would be to follow the cross-
    references that are often in the margins of the Bible.
    . A false teaching will ALWAYS differ from the original purpose of
    the author; so you can spot - and refute - false teachings quite
    easily and effectively by using this simple method. It may sound like
    more work than you'd like to go through, and may even seem to be rude,
    at times, but it is a workable means to keep from being fooled by
    false teachings and deceiving spirits. It may be much easier to
    simply believe what someone tells you, particularly if they sound
    authoritative and have a positive, glowing personality, but Satan and
    his demonic forces prey upon those who blindly follow - see II
    Corinthians 11:3,4,13-15.
    . The Bible commands each of us to TEST ALL THINGS and to TEST
    EVERYONE to make CERTAIN that their teaching is truthful, and with
    your eternal destiny at stake, you cannot afford to be lazy - CAN YOU?
    . "BUT THAT'S JUST YOUR INTERPRETATION." Should the interpretation
    you receive differ from the teacher - as they will if your friend is a
    false teacher - then the teacher may attempt to disregard your
    interpretation and dismiss it because it is a variation, based upon
    your "pre-suppositions." This allows him to retain his interpretation
    as an acceptable interpretation, even more correct option, which
    ignores the fact that HIS interpretation is based upon HIS pre-
    suppositions!
    . Essentially he is correct in his assertion that this is merely a
    matter of interpretation, and you can (and perhaps SHOULD) agree with
    him about this point - But point out the interpretative method that
    you used (the "journalism" questions) is designed to help you
    understand what the Author really meant by what he said. Then ask him
    what HIS interpretative method (the method HE used to determine the
    meaning of the passage) is or was, and what he is trying to determine
    by using that method.
    . Sometimes, he will insist that it is the same one you use - then
    ask to see the steps that he took to reach his conclusions. But,
    usually, the significance of the real difference in means and purpose
    of interpreting Scriptures won't sink in until it has been repeated
    several times, which means you should, at this point, invite him to
    continue in his efforts to show the Biblical basis of his teaching.
    Each and every time - even when it gets a bit tough to do - he uses
    the Bible, go through the exact same procedure, asking the questions
    and explaining your purpose.
    . Sooner or later (if his teaching is false) he will begin to
    realize that HIS method is to see in the passage what he WANTS to see
    (often because someone else told HIM that it was there!), and his sole
    purpose is to support the teaching. He has taken his belief to the
    text to be supported, rather than going to the text to learn what IT
    HAS to teach. Once that realization is made, it is usually a simple
    matter to go on and teach the Gospel message that the Bible really
    teaches.
    . There are a few "traps" you need to watch out for:

    1. THE RETRANSLATION TRAP

    . A false teaching or system that claims to be "Christian" often
    uses the EXACT same words you would hear being used in a true,
    Biblically sound Christian gathering. There is a subtle danger here.
    In nearly every case, these special words and phrases mean something
    different to the false teacher or follower than they do to you. They
    have been re-interpreted, usually without your friend even being aware
    of it. They now mean something very different and foreign to the
    meaning that you attach to them.
    . There are a couple of things you need to remember and do anytime
    you are dealing with someone that you suspect is teaching heresy.
    . First is to avoid using those special meaning words of
    Christianity that are so familiar to you, such as "saved","Born- Again","Savior","Son of God","Gospel" and many others. Try to use
    phrases that DEFINE these terms, or other words that means the same
    thing that are not used in the cliche' manner that these are.
    . Secondly, be certain that you both understand what each of you
    mean when these terms ARE used when you are speaking about spiritual
    matters of any kind. Make certain that you define what YOU mean when
    YOU say "Christ dies for my sins" or anything else in a spiritual
    sense. Ask HIM what "Jesus is THE Christ" REALLY means to him - get
    him to clearly and totally define it - or any other term you both may
    be using. This may take a bit of doing, but keep at it until you are
    positive that you both understand each other. If there is any
    complaint, just tell your friend that with eternity "hanging" on the
    very meaning of these terms, you are required to be absolutely certain
    that you both understand what the other means by what he says.

    2. THE "SKIPPING ROCKS" TRAP

    . One thing that often happens in a discussion on religion is that
    one or all parties involved will jump from one subject to another,
    never staying on any one point long enough to be thorough in
    investigating the Truth it may contain. One or all will keep jumping
    from the original Scripture under discussion to others, scattered
    throughout the Bible, intending to support or clarify what is thought
    to be taught in the first passage considered. Both are to be avoided.
    . Be polite, but refuse to budge from the original text until it
    has been COMPLETELY examined, using the questions we have noted
    before. Only AFTER that is done should you allow the discussion to
    proceed to other passages for confirmation or refutation, but keep
    referring back to the original text that is "being justified".
    . All the data you need to refute a misuse of Scripture can be
    found right in the immediate context - you don't need to go elsewhere
    to do that, and the impact of refuting a false interpretation from the
    passage, itself, is much greater than it is going to some other text.
    All you need is the immediate context, nothing more, except to VERIFY
    an interpretation!

    3. THE BIBLE BASH TRAP

    . This is very similar to the "skipping rocks" trap above, except
    it is a trap that YOU are much more likely to fall into than your
    "errant" friend might be. As soon as you hear a teaching that is
    obviously contrary to the Truth of Scripture, you may be tempted to
    begin immediately to quote other Bible passages to disprove it. At
    this point, your friend starts quoting passages just as
    enthusiastically, proving HIS point of view (and seemingly disproving
    yours).
    . Neither of you is really listening to the other - you're just
    "spouting" Scriptures with no REAL reference to one another. Nothing
    is accomplished, except that, perhaps, some heat is generated, but
    little LIGHT. Stick to the original passage - it will get and keep
    your friend's attention, as you are giving evidence that you are
    seriously listening to him. If you want to confirm the true
    interpretation, THEN and ONLY THEN, go on to other passages. But as
    before, all the material you really need has been provided by God to
    be at your fingertips, in the full context of the verses quoted -
    there is little need to go elsewhere.

    A PRACTICE RUN

    . One of the most common errors is to teach that something besides
    Faith, alone, is needed for salvation in many of its facets. Usually
    this takes the form of a faith PLUS some personal effort. (A "work"
    to be added to what God has TOTALLY provided in Christ Jesus)
    . The favorite passage to support this "works" theory is James
    2:14-26 - "..faith without works is dead.." - and therefore, some sort
    of personal "work", which is usually "gladly spelled out in detail" by
    your friend, is needed to REALLY get into God's favor. Although you
    could probably quote a good dozen verses to discredit that concept,
    for the time being, lets stick with the letter of James - particularly
    to the immediate context of James 2:14-26 - and ask an "expanded" form
    of the "journalism" questions we have mentioned already.
    . Get out your Bible, some paper and pen, and then answer the
    questions, looking at ALL of James, but ONLY JAMES! Ready? - Then
    start "rightly dividing the Word of Truth"!

    * Who is the AUTHOR? What can you tell about him from this
    Epistle?
    * Who are the original readers? What can you tell about them from
    this Epistle?
    * HOW does he use and define his KEY WORDS in the passage? (Words
    like Faith, Works and Dead)
    * HOW do his examples illustrate and clarify his meaning?
    * WHAT is he talking about? What is his primary subject, concept,
    teaching or whatever?
    * WHAT is he saying about what he is talking about? What is the
    point of the passage? What does he want YOU to know about his
    subject, concept or teaching?
    * WHY is he saying this? Is there an error that he seeks to
    correct? Maybe a new knowledge to be revealed? WHAT is his purpose?
    * WHY is he saying it to these particular people? What are they
    thinking or doing or believing or hearing or preaching that may have
    prompted this letter to be written.
    * SO WHAT? What response should you have? What response did the
    Author expect from his readers?
    * Is there ANY SUPPORT from the rest of the Bible for your
    conclusions?

    SOME HINTS

    . Looking carefully for the following will help to answer the
    questions and keep you honest to he text and context:

    * Watch noun and pronoun shifts - sometimes the author will include
    himself with the group that he is writing to or about, other times he
    may remain silent or separate. The difference is often very
    important. In addition, our example above didn't include a couple of
    questions - the WHEN and WHERE - as they would not have added much to
    the interpretation. However; in some cases, they are most important,
    and for this reason are outlined below:

    * WHEN was it written? What events took place just before, just
    after, or at the same time as this epistle?
    * WHEN does the action described take place? Past, present or
    future? Eternal or temporal?
    * WHERE was the Author when these words were first written? Why
    was he there?
    * WHERE were the original readers? Why were they there?

    GET READY FOR BATTLE

    . These basic questions, based on simple "journalism" questions of
    WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, HOW, WHY AND SO WHAT, with little variation,
    are all that is needed to determine the original intent of any
    Biblical author through an examination of the text, in context. They
    will enable you to detect and refute false teaching EVERY TIME!
    . Your main responsibility, now, is to practice to make these
    questions automatic, so that you will always be ready to defend
    yourself when under attack by those who would lead you astray. Your
    own daily Bible study and reading would be a good place to start, or
    you could check out your pastor's text after you get home from church
    (Believe it, or not, he would probably appreciate it)! Enjoy your
    training, as you learn to be an expert "soldier" in Service of the
    King (Ephesians 6:10-18). KEEP PRACTICING!

    J. Steven Smith

    Computers for Christ

    Denise
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23