• Culture vs. Cult

    From Gary Gordon@RICKSBBS to All on Thu Apr 9 05:54:29 2026
    CALIPH HYMENAEUS BETA X

    Introduction: Culture vs. Cult

    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.


    OUR FOUNDING EDITOR, ALEISTER CROWLEY (also known as Baphomet X , The
    Master Therion etc., etc.) considered a balanced, wide-ranging
    education a prerequisite to complete initiation. Unlike most spiritual teachers, Crowley was worldly-wise as well as unworldly-wise,
    conversant with the work of the artists, writers, scientists and
    philosophers who defined his times. He accordingly used The Equinox,
    which he subtitled ``The Journal of Scientific Illuminism,'' to
    publish reviews and study guides, as well as individual works that
    have since become standard references. A poet in his own right, he
    maintained that initiation finds tangible expression in creative
    genius, and so issued the finest literature and poetry possible. This
    formed the editorial subtext of the original Equinox, and in that
    spirit we issue this new number. Successive generations of artists,
    writers, poets, filmmakers, dramatists, scientists and philosophers
    have contributed much to the birth of what we call Thelemic culture.
    Magick and the arts share the willingness to explore new modes of
    perception and expression, to experiment with consciousness itself,
    and communicate even if a new vocabulary is called for. This issue
    features both contemporary poetry and cinema (the poetry of light)
    that demonstrate this.

    The poets have always been with us, although we (for our part) have
    not always fully reciprocated--after being introduced to Allen
    Ginsberg in the 1950's, my predecessor Frater Saturnus X reportedly
    asked that ``beatniks'' not be brought around. I mean no disrespect to Saturnus, who after all knew and (in his way) encouraged half of the
    artistic contributors to this issue. But I am reminded of Robert
    Kelly's

    scribes & scholars of the College of the Holy Spirit, resting from
    their carnival appearances or conning the sermons they will whisper, o
    holy poison, in the ears of sleeping dominies. These are men who live
    for nothing but truth & love. Which is true of everyone in the world,
    but these men know it.

    We must never forget that it is we who run the risk of becoming
    ``sleeping dominies''--the poets know their business and a goodly part
    of ours. I should know--my poetry submission was respectfully
    declined.

    The work of living writers forms a counterpoise to the historical
    material in this issue, all of whose authors are deceased (with the
    possible exception of Frater Ad Veritatem). We have collected
    virtually all of the O.T.O.'s founding documents for this number--it
    was dubbed the ``ancestor worship'' issue during compilation. The
    purpose of this collection is twofold: first, to provide a ready








    compendium of the essential O.T.O. material as a guidebook during the renaissance the Order presently enjoys, and secondly, to make plain to
    the public exactly what the Order is, and is not. The O.T.O. is a
    manifold organization with a complex history and philosophy, rich in
    written, oral and ritual tradition. It is also the Aleister Crowley
    Estate, responsible for preserving his writings and setting consistent standards for Thelemic scholarship. These are essentially conservative functions, yet the O.T.O.'s design preserves flexibility and
    adaptability, without which ``Thelemic Order'' would be a
    contradiction in terms. While it has never been necessary to join the
    O.T.O. to be a Thelemite, it is central to the Order's ``experimental
    design'' that being a Thelemite never becomes a bar to membership. In
    this important sense, the O.T.O. is a crucible for the development of
    the social models necessary to a Thelemic culture, as opposed to
    Thelemic cult.

    My predecessor as head of the O.T.O., Caliph Hymenaeus Alpha 777 X ,
    rescued the O.T.O. from the brink of extinction. Only a decade ago the
    survival of the Order was in question, but as the leader of a handful
    of survivors from the Crowley era who had tended the flame for over
    forty years, Hymenaeus Alpha fanned it into life. Educated in
    political science and a management analyst by profession, he also
    successfully addressed the greatest long-term threat to the Order: the
    ``cult'' tendency in Thelema, manifesting as extreme conservativism on
    the one hand, and anarchic radicalism on the other.

    The ``conservative'' wing--Marcelo Motta and his Society Ordo Templi
    Orientis (SOTO)--evinced a fanatical elitism that laid claim to
    exclusive representation of Thelema in all its forms. After tolerating
    repeated attacks from this group in their apocryphal Equinox ``Volume
    Five,'' Hymenaeus Alpha filed suit in Federal Court and won a clear-
    cut victory--not for the O.T.O. alone, but also indirectly for many
    others who were abused in, or simply confused by, the offending works.

    The ``anarchic'' wing's development was spurred by the writings of Mr.
    Kenneth Grant, whose excellent book The Magical Revival indeed
    contributed to a genuine revival in the early 1970's. In subsequent
    works, Mr. Grant (who was expelled from the O.T.O. in the mid-1950's)
    claimed to be Outer Head of the O.T.O., and proceeded to organize an
    ``O.T.O.'' with complete disregard for the intent of Crowley and the
    original founders. Grant was, for example, extremely critical of the
    business aspects of the O.T.O., which are clearly a part of the
    original charter. Hymenaeus Alpha met this trend by simple example--he established a reputation as a tolerant monarch, and thereby gave the
    lie to anarchy. We count some of Mr. Grant's most enthusiastic readers
    among our members.

    First published in England beginning in 1909 EV, The Equinox served as
    the Official Organ of the A...A.... Crowley issued a new number on
    each equinox, and the ten numbers of Volume I are now a standard reference-library set. After Crowley's induction into the Ordo Templi
    Orientis in 1913 EV The Equinox became an Official Organ of the O.T.O.
    as well, beginning with Volume I(10). Although they shared the same
    journal for several numbers, the A...A... and the O.T.O. were and are
    distinct organizations. They are so often confused that Saturnus X
    asked Crowley for an official statement on the subject:

    The difference between the A...A... and the O.T.O. is very clear and
    simple. The A...A... is a sempiternal institution, and entirely







    secret. There is no communication between its members. Theoretically,
    a member knows only the superior who introduced him, and any person
    whom he himself has introduced. The Order is run on purely spiritual
    lines.
    The objective of membership is also entirely simple. The first
    objective is the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian
    Angel. The next objective, omitting considerations for the present of
    the 6 =5 and 7 =4 degrees, is the crossing of the Abyss, and the
    attainment of mastership of the Temple. This is described very fully
    especially in Liber 418. Much less is written about the 5 =6 degree,
    i.e. the Knowledge and Conversation, because it is too secret and
    individual. It is impossible to lay down conditions, or to describe
    the experiences in detail.
    The O.T.O. has nothing to do with this, except that The Book of
    the Law and the Word of the Aeon are essential principles of
    membership. In all other respects, it stands by itself as a body
    similar to Freemasonry, but involving acceptance of a social and
    economic system which is intended to put the world on its feet. There
    is also, of course, the secret of the IX which is to say, the weapon
    which they may use to further these purposes.
    To show you the difference, Theodor Reuss was Supreme Head of
    the O.T.O., but was not even a probationer of the A...A....

    Crowley spent the last of his inheritance in releasing Volume I, after
    which its publishing history becomes erratic--The Equinox had the
    first of many interruptions in 1913 EV. Crowley termed this first
    hiatus Volume II, ``a volume of silence,'' in accord with an A...A...
    rule of alternating 5-year periods of speech and silence.

    Volume III was issued by the O.T.O. under four administrations of the
    Order over 67 years. (The ``5-year'' rule was disregarded, presumably
    since it pertained to the A...A....) Volume III has a complicated
    bibliography whose twists and turns are a bell-wether of the Order's
    fortunes. The first number of Volume III to appear was the well-known
    ``blue'' Equinox, issued from Detroit in 1919 EV. Crowley outlined the
    proposed contents of the remainder of Volume III in this number, but
    Volume III(2) never appeared (although it reached galley-proofs and
    was included in the series as if issued). In subsequent numbers of
    Volume III The Equinox came to assume the character of a series of
    occasional monographs. Number 3 reached galley-proofs in 1927 EV, but
    was delayed until 1936 EV when it appeared in partial form as The
    Equinox of the Gods (actually part one of four parts of Book Four Part
    Four, to have included the Commentary to The Book of the Law). Number
    4 appeared in 1938 EV as Eight Lectures on Yoga. Number 5 was
    announced in 1938 EV as the Tao Teh King but actually appeared in 1944
    EV as The Book of Thoth. Number 6, Liber Aleph, was close to
    production at Crowley's death in 1947 EV but appeared posthumously in
    1962 EV. (Its ``publication fund''--contributions from the American
    O.T.O.--was found untouched under his deathbed.) This was followed by
    the Shih Yi (Yi King) (Number 7) in 1971 EV, the Tao Teh King (Number
    8) in 1975 EV and The Holy Books of Thelema (Number 9) in 1983 EV. The
    present issue therefore completes Volume III.

    The O.T.O.'s structure, history, aims and philosophy are well-
    represented in this last number of Volume III--the most comprehensive collection since Volume III(1). Caliph Hymenaeus Alpha was a
    pragmatist as well as a visionary, considering these papers plans for
    the future O.T.O. He observed the principles, and where practical,








    implemented them formally, as we are doing with the forthcoming
    promulgation of the Constitution. Although much of this material has
    been termed outdated or ignored outright--even by self-styled ``representatives'' of the Order--these papers stand as the foundation
    on which we must build if we would do honor to our predecessors'
    vision, and lay claim to their inherited wisdom.

    Love is the law, love under will.


    `UMENAIOS B X
    CALIPH HYMENAEUS BETA
    Rex Summus Sanctissimus, U.S.A.
    Acting Frater Superior, O.T.O.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23