• CONFESSIONS OF A CROP CIRCLE SYY ! FILE: UFO2041

    From Cori Schnieder@RICKSBBS to All on Wed Apr 8 07:11:47 2026
    The following is a response from Dr Armen Victorian to the James
    Schnabel
    "Confessions of a Crop Circle Spy!" article in the MUFON UFO
    Journal No.295 November 1992: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    -
    DISINFORMERS, DECEIVERS AND THEIR LEGITIMATE SUPPORTERS

    By Dr Armen Victorian

    The November 1992 issue of the MUFON Journal published an
    extraordinary account written by Jim Schnabel titled, "Confessions
    of a Crop Circle Spy!" introduced by Dennis Stacy, the MUFON
    Editor. On December 5, 1992, I received a letter from Dennis Stacy
    together with a copy of the article concerned. Before this, my
    fellow colleague, Mr George Wingfield, had contacted me earlier on
    and briefed me about the article. I was utterly surprised that
    MUFON had decided to go ahead without checking the accuracy of
    Schnabel's material. I was later told that Walt Andrus had hiterto
    sanctioned the publication of the article. Andrus' interference in
    this instance was the result of a longstanding difference that
    exists between myself and his management of MUFON. He and the
    editor of the MUFON Journal are fully aware of my forthcoming
    paper, concerning MUFON, which portrays in detail a modern version
    of NICAP in its dying days. Equally condemning is his bluder in the
    Gulf Breeze fake case and the current Mr Hopkins abduction case
    that Mr Stacy coins the "case of the centry." MUFON's philosophy
    and attitude is reflective of how easily it acts as a mouthpiece,
    readily and in accordance with what is precisely the official line
    and has been for decades; deceit, dis-information and the high
    level publicity and support given to these accounts. Several State
    Directors of MUFON, that I have talked to, are also highly critical
    of the autocratic manner in which a few run the organisation. In
    one instance, in the course of our recent correspondence with Mr
    Stacy, the MUFON Editor, when he had faxed a ridiculous letter to
    Mr Wingfield he wrote back with the excuse that he was drunk when
    he wrote the letter, therefore apologising for its contents.
    Equally condemning is the attitude and supportive platform MUFON
    provides for self confessed tricksters like Jim Schnabel and Robert
    Irving, who boast about what they have done and still do. Which, in
    a sense, is very much reminiscent of what OSI did through Bill
    Moore, for a decade, to the field.

    But who are Jim Schnabel and Robert Irving and what did
    actually happen? It is known by everyone in crop circle research
    that Irving-Schnabel's joint covert activities have caused enormous
    damage to both the farmers, who are desperately seeking for legal
    means to prosecute the two, and the crop circle researchers
    themselves, whose research has suffered irreparable damage.

    Schnabel, a graduate of Duke University in Electronic
    Engineering, later applied for a place in the Lincoln College,
    Oxford, to study Politics. This was rejected. During the period
    when his application was under Oxford's consideration, he made
    several contacts with leading crop circle researcehrs, with the
    excuse that he is trying to collect information for his Ph.D.
    thesis in Sociology. In reality he was neither a student nor was
    his applied subject in Lincoln College that of Sociology. Senior
    researchers believed that he was a genuine student and they trusted
    him and shared with him the results of some of their findings.
    Then Schnabel published the most damning article in the Independent
    Magazine in December 1991 about crop circles and their researchers,
    and his true quest emerged. It became immediately clear that
    Schnabel, by deploying outright deceitful tacts, had fooled
    everyone about his genuine intentions. In fact, in a letter dated
    December 4, 1991, to a leading crop circle researcher, he very
    diplomaticlaly confessed what he was all about:

    "I am writing to you to apologize. A week or so ago I decided,
    unwisely, to write an article about Doug and Dave and the reaction
    to them by the crop circle groups. Everything I report in the
    article is true, and personally I believe that crop circle research
    could use a general house cleaning, but house cleaning is not my
    proper role, and I am afraid that the article unnecessarily hurt
    some people. In any case, by the time I regretted writing the
    piece it was too late. I understand that the story will appear in
    the Independent Magazine on December 7.

    "Naturally, you and others will be concerned that my mingling
    of sociological and journalistic roles is inappropriate. I agree,
    and can only reiterate my apology. Something that I report I might
    not have learned if I had not seemed like a harmless sociological
    researcher. In particular, some questions I have asked `for my
    thesis' may now seem to have been intended all along for a magazine
    article. Although I emphasize that this is not the case,
    nevertheless I admit that I was wrong to write the article in the
    first place, and I assure you that information you have given me
    will be treated with all due respect. In any case I have finished
    my sociological field work, and although I still have a personal
    interest in the circles phenomenon, I am more or less retiring from
    the case."

    Quite the contrary, this was the beginning of an intensified campaign
    of disinformation by Schnabel and his colleague Robert Irving. In
    the following months they published more similar articles.
    Together with Robert Irving, they donned camouflage clothing and,
    with the help of the night, they created utter havoc in the farmers
    fields and, thereby, further confusion amongst the crop circle
    researchers about the number of hoaxed formations in existence.
    Ken Brown, who is currently writing a book about the Doug and Dave
    affair, told me that several meetings had taken place between
    Schnabel/Irving and Doug and Dave, the former keen to further his
    knowledge on how to advance hoaxing techniques. In fact, Jim
    Schnabel was proud of winning the second prize in a circle faking
    competition in the summer of 1992. Gill Freeman, the producer of
    the Equinox TV program, did tell me that Schnabel and Irving had
    admitted to faking several crop formations by illegally entering
    into farm land and thereby causing damage crops.

    Robert Irving, Schnabel's colleague, claims to be a
    photographer. He spends his entire time on the farm lands during
    the crop circle season each year. He lived in Los Angeles for
    eight years prior to returning to England. He was allegedly a
    member of the Second Church of Satan in the USA, or Friends of
    Hecarte in England, and his views on black magic are widely known
    in England through a number of anonymous Statanic letters he has
    written to a number of crop circle researchers. When he was
    questioned about who pays for him to spend his full time in the
    field, he answered, as he did to me, "Man does not live on bread
    alone, a Foundation pays me handsomely for my work," but would not
    divulge the name of the foundation. He is also known for his
    provocative manner of taking photographs of everyone without
    seeking their consent as a matter of courtesy. He carries a very
    large knife with him at all times. In a letter from a couple of
    American crop cirlce researchers, they related the impression made
    upon them by Schnabel and Irving, during their visit to England:

    "Many thanks for meeting up with Suzie and I during summer.
    Wasn't it bloody marvellous? I felt that I had to write and tell
    you about a nasty close encounter which happened over the 3rd to
    4th August, just outside of Marlborough. Suzie and I had left the
    Merlin Hotel, at 1.30am, to go and drive around for a bit. We
    ended up on a small dirt track, we parked the car and with camera
    in tow, walked along a footpath. After about 30 min., we saw
    lights in a field ahead of us. Thinking we had discovered some
    little green men at play, we hurriedly moved forward. Imagine our
    surprise, when we came face to face with four men, all dressed in
    black. Two of them, were rather burly characters wearing peaked
    caps. One was tall and thin and had long, dirty looking straggly
    hair.

    "They were each carrying certain bits and pieces - the one with
    the hair had a video camera in his hand and a fancy looking camera
    hanging from his shoulder. We asked them what they were doing.
    One of them said, that they were taking a short cut through the
    field. But I didn't like the look of them at all. Suzie and I
    walked back to the car and availed ourselves of the black coffee
    that the hotel had provided. The men were ahead of us. Two of
    them got into a small van, the others into a dark coupe type of
    car. They then drove off.

    "We did not think much about it until the following morning,
    when a guy at the hotel told us about a new crop circle at a place
    called Froxfield (?) When we went there, later that day, imagine
    our further surprise when it turned out to be the field we had
    visited the night before. I have no doubt that those guys were the
    makers of that circle. What is your feeling about this?

    "That isn't the end of the story. We ended up at the Wagon and
    Horses for a drink. Just as we were finishing, a guy came in, with
    a big built American chap - who was brandishing a video camera. I
    was sure that it was two of the men that we had seen the night
    before. Out of curiosity, I started up a conversation about the
    corn circles. I wished I hadn't.

    "The guy with the hair (dressed black) name was Bob (maybe Rob)
    Irvine (Bob Irving - author). He was a psychopath. Suzie wanted
    us to leave, because he was becoming very annoyed with my
    questions. I am of the opinion that this guy had something very
    wrong with him, in a psychological way. A nutter.

    "I don't know whether this means anything to you but I would
    stay well away from this idiot, he seems dangerous to me. Have you
    heard of him? As to the crop circle, I hope no-one said it was
    genuine!!!"

    We were aware for a long time that some elements, with certain
    connections, were determined to put an end to the crop circle
    research. In fact, this is all too clear in Schnabel's telephone
    conversation with me, where he states that the aim is to terminate
    the research and media interest in this phenomena. Although, he
    admits that the phenomena is genuine.

    It was in the course of my telephone conversation with Jim
    Schnabel in August 30 and 31, 1992, when a clearer picture emerged.
    His use of certain worlds left no doubt in my mind about the length
    and the depth of the problem we were faced with. Some of the
    vocabulary he used is used only by Intelligence officers or their
    recruits. In the course of over two decades that I have been
    engaged as a researcher within Intelligence, only those who have
    had an intelligence or related career used terms such as "Burnt
    out" in the context of their conversations: "It's extremely
    strenuous work and, you know, sometimes people become BURNED OUT
    after only a few years but usually they've made enough money that
    they are able to retire, you know, after a few years anyway... it's
    very generous." How would a young student know about all these
    professional details of the espionage world, whilst none of his
    previous few articles were about the world of spooks? Perhaps one
    should not forget that Edward Hunter, a formidable CIA agent, also
    claimed to be a Journalist, as Jim Schnabel now claims. We are
    also aware that Jim Schnabel belongs to a Catholic far-right group.

    The result of the voice-stress analysis carried out by an
    official government body in the U.S. has proved beyond any shadow
    of doubt that he spoke the truth in his telephone conversations
    with me. Two further independent analyses have provided the same
    results. What is more hilarious is that Jim Schnabel is now
    investigating Budd Hopkins' latest abduction case, which was coined
    "the case of the century" by Dennis Stacy. I have no doubts about
    his future writing on the case as he has expanded his scope and is
    about to write a book on abductions. Or, is there something else
    that the researchers are missing. I wonder will they ever wake up
    and smell the coffee, or will they prefer to leave the decision
    making in the hands of punch-drunk editors and sleazy directors,
    whilst the Schnabels and Irvings slaughter what is left of the field.

    THE END


    **********************************************
    * THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo * **********************************************

    Cori,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23