• MJ12EURO.TXT - "MJ-12 - THE EUROPEAN CONNECTIONS" - Tom Mickus 11/2/89

    From Ricky Sutphin@RICKSBBS/TIME to All on Fri Dec 27 15:16:12 2024
    ======================================================================
    <<UFONET I>> * 416-237-1204 * PC-Pursuitable * File Requestable * HST
    * 24 Hour Operation * Sysop - Tom Mickus * Toronto * FREE ====================================================================== ====================================================================== MJ12EURO.TXT - "MJ-12 - THE EUROPEAN CONNECTIONS"

    - by Henry Azadehdel, Ph.D. 'Yerevan' 24 Prestwood Dr.
    Aspley Park, Nottingham
    NG8 3LY, ENGLAND
    Telephone: 0602-292187

    ======================================================================

    NOTE: Spelling errors below have not been corrected. The file you
    see is how I have received it.

    - Tom Mickus 11/2/89 ======================================================================


    MJ-12 - THE EUROPEAN CONNECTIONS
    ----------------------------------

    Initially the MJ12 papers were sent to Mr. Shandera in an envelope,
    post marked Albuquerquee, as undeveloped 35mm film. Later on Moore
    published them. Their publication caused a great deal of surprise
    mixed with doubts and anxiety in UFO circles worldwide. Some admitted
    them without any questions to be authentic, some did not. There was
    some preliminary work done with regards to their authenticity and the
    saga still continues today. What is important in this event is that
    Mr. Moore's ex-colleague or colleague, Stanton Friedman is commissioned
    to carry out further research on these documents. The funds are provided
    to him by the Fund For UFO Research and MUFON, so I am told. The role
    of the funding organizations in itself is raising some questions. One
    might ask why? For example, at the time when Moore was busy discrediting
    Paul Bennewitz for obvious reasons, Bruce Maccabee was following similar
    track, suggesting indirectly, thru his own so called independent inquiry,
    more or less what Moore was implying. This is quite obvious in Maccabee's
    correspondence with MacCampell. (Some copies of these correspondence are
    in my possession).

    Bill Cooper and few others had openly expressed their suspicion about
    Mr. Moore's conducts. Cooper's invitation from the last MUFON symposium
    was withdrawn and Moore allowed in. I would be surprised if anything but
    a smoke screen would come out from this so called investigation into the
    authenticity and origin of MJ12 papers from this current research. This
    is yet another close-shop approach by two American UFO groups who work
    very closely with each other and hardly ever allow any other even volunteer
    organization to participate in their operations. This I can say with
    absolute certainty and reason. At the time when the Gulf Breeze case
    surfaced and again these two organizations were involved to the degree of
    monopolization of the case, CUFOS's effort was responded with utmost
    venom. My own inquiry at that time as one of their own consultants
    (MUFON) to have some of these photographs analysed was severely rejected
    by Walt Andrus. And even today I am not aware of anybody else who
    managed to study those Gulf Breeze photographs but Bruce Maccabee from
    FUFOR, who was recently awarded I think 5000 US Dollars by MUFON. I
    might be carrying some poison in my pen but please do not forget what
    is mentioned here is actually happened and is not a hypothecy. It is
    like foxes mediating the wolf for devouring the lamb.

    But, even more important is the European connection of this entire
    bizarre affair. What I am about to say is what I am told in person by
    the person concerned, and the confirmation is also documented on video
    tape in another occasion in relation to this topic. Mr. Tim Good has
    said to me personally and in a recent UFO conference, held by the
    Yorkshire UFO Society in September this year (1989), where he was a guest
    speaker that, he received his MJ12 papers from a CIA source independently
    in US. He went on saying that he is pleased to say that he was the first
    person to publish them. When I questioned him personally in another
    occasion prior to this conference few months ago, he said that his source
    is still an active CIA member, middle aged. Was he referring to Mr. Moore
    then? Did he know THEN, that Mr. Moore is an active agent and yet despite
    all his claims to reveal the COVER UPS he was actually covering him up?
    If this is the case why, what interest does he have in all this? Or, he
    was talking to me about yet another CIA agent? At some stage prior to
    publishing his MJ12 papers in his book 'Above Top Secret', Mr. Good
    travelled to USA to see Moore and compare his documents of MJ12 with
    Moore's. Yet, what is more intriguing is that Good's published papers,
    whilst taking into consideration his claim to be the first to publish,
    and Moore's are the same. Moore apparently admitted to have tampered
    the MJ12 documents for reasons unknown. The next question is, what is
    Mr. Good's role in all this?

    When I put this question to Mr. Good, he replied that, Moore published
    his papers initially as I did, later on he decided to make some alterations.
    (Private conversation, the author and Mr. Good, Sep.23, 1989). This I
    can not accept because once a so called document/s published, the latter
    altered or shortened version could easily be spotted and compared with the
    initial publication. There are two important points which would underline
    my reasoning. One, we should not forget that Mr. Good's 'Above Top Secret'
    book had a world wide distribution, hence if there were any differences
    with Moore's version, both parties would have been subjected to inquiries
    about their anomalies. Two, only recently Moore admitted tampering the
    documents, and before that no one had noticed any differences. If Mr.
    Good was aware of this tampering, as a conscincious researcher, why he
    never mentioned anything about it to UFO community to safeguard the public's
    interest? Or, was it that he was influenced by Mr. Moore in his facts
    finding trip? Or, was it a joint decision by both parties to publish
    the documents as they were published in Mr. Good's book and by Mr. Moore,
    after, may be they both tampered the papers?

    In a written letter to me by CIA, dated 07 MAR 1989, in connection to
    my inquiry about MJ12, they say "CIA review of a 'Majestic 12', Majic 12'
    or MJ 12 - there are variations among the requesters, package has been
    requested by a number of persons worldwide. Only one part of that
    package as submitted to us was purported to be a CIA document; it was a
    poorly done photocopied fabrication. We cannot identify any CIA equities
    in any of the other material, and it is not our function to determine
    who does have equities therein" it goes on saying "Unfortunately, as you
    may know, there have been numerous hoaxes perpetrated over the years in
    the field of UFO investigation; photocopiers and carbon copies make this
    process relatively simple."

    Bearing CIA's reply in mind, if Mr. Good claims that his papers were sent
    to him by an active CIA agent, then I think, his so called agent has some
    answering to make, and it is a bad time to divert part of this inquiry
    towards Mr. Good. Surely, if he knows his source, as he has admitted to
    me, he should be able to get some questions answered with regards to the
    validity or invalidity of these documents and save the ufologists part of
    this sixteen thousand dollars. And if he does not trust his source, again
    he should be able to help the line of the inquiry by adding that point
    that, these documents might have been fakes and dis-information. Although,
    this would be rather difficult for him now, but still it is not too late.
    He should have had this assurity from his source before the publication,
    and somehow I think he received that from Mr. Moore. But, of course we
    now know who Moore was and is. Other important point is that if Mr. Good's
    source has provided him with disinformation, which in return Mr. Good has
    passed on to ufologists, by the same agent? This we do not know. Assuming
    that Mr. Good's source IS reliable, again Mr. Good would be the best person
    to go to in order to find out the 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' of the MJ12 documents,
    in seeking his assistance, that I am sure he should be glad to offer.
    How? In the same quiet way that his source provided him with this documents,
    this agent should be able to give him the supporting evidence. There are
    various options and methods open to the ufologists to further this
    investigations.

    Of course, all these options are dependent on the assumption that Mr. Good
    has told us the truth. But, if what he has said in some stage is proven
    to be not the truth, then the honest ufologists are faced yet with another
    'Unofficial' MAJESTIC 12 group in their own community which upon their
    will and well established stance in UFO circles, give us any time they wish
    bunch of gubbly googs and expect us to swallow. I am not putting any
    comments about Mr. Good's close ties and links with the elite, official/
    unofficial information-emitting circles here. Neither I am passing any
    judgement about the comments he has made couple of times to one of his
    close UFO colleagues that 'If I put infront of you solid, concrete evidence
    to prove to you that UFOs do constitute a serious threat to the national
    security of U.K., what would you do?' and his fellow colleague's answer
    that "I would publish it", and Mr. Good's final comment 'Therefore, I can
    not give you that evidence!' In other words this/these possible evidence
    is for 'The Eyes Only'. (Bearing in mind that the official stance of
    Ministry of Defence in U.K. is that UFOs DO NOT constitute any threat to
    the national security). How has Mr. Good come upon this evidence that
    so many in UK as yet have failed, is a mystery.

    I am beginning to believe that for sometimes now the UFO community has been
    taken for a ride by a bunch of self acclaimed giants of ufology. Some of
    these inturn are infilterated by official agencies, some others act as
    double agents. I firmly believe that Moore is not the last and we might
    see few more heads to roll. Although, I do hope I am wrong.


    Henry Azadehdel.

    ================================= EOF =======================================

    =============================================================================
    = IF YOU HAVE ANY UFO RELATED INFORMATION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO SEE =
    = OR HAVE DISTRIBUTED, YOU CAN NOW SEND IT VIA OUR NEW UFONET FAX LINE. = =============================================================================
    = ------>>> UFONET FAX HOTLINE - 24 Hrs - (414) 351-2075 <<<------ = =============================================================================



    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 IBBS Games