• FEDERAL CORRUPTION PART 2

    From Joel Garrett@RICKSBBS to All on Mon Jul 20 06:04:48 2026
    Author : Harry Martin
    Date : 03/15/91
    Desc : Federal Corruption Series Part II

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------


    HOW THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT USED THE BANKRUPTCY COURT
    By Harry V. Martin
    Second of a New Series
    (c) Copyright Napa Sentinel, 1991
    March 15, 1991
    Reprinted with permission of the Napa Sentinel


    The corruption of the bankruptcy system is endemic of a political
    patronage system with its roots going back to former U.S. Attorney
    Edwin Meese, according to many former employees of the Department of
    Justice. The INSLAW case--reported last week in the "Napa Sentinel"--is
    a microcosm of the entire system.

    As a result of the INSLAW cases, many heads in the Justice Department
    were lopped off. When Judge George Bason, a bankruptcy court judge,
    refused to liquidate INSLAW, ruling instead that the Department of
    Justice used deceit, trickery and fraud, he was only one of four who
    were not re-appointed to their jobs. A total of 132 were re-appointed.

    But to show the collusion of the Justice Department, when it removed
    Judge Bason from the bench after his ruling against them and for
    INSLAW, they had S. Martin Teel appointed to the bench to replace
    Bason. Who was Teel? He was a Department of Justice attorney who
    unsuccessfully argued the INSLAW case before Judge Bason.

    Tony Pasciuto admitted that he was ordered to pressure the bankruptcy
    judge to rule against INSLAW. After being subpoenaed by INSLAW's
    attorney, Pasciuto was offered a long-awaited transfer by the Justice
    Department from Washington, D.C. to Albany, New York. Pasciuto bought a
    home in Albany and then changed his testimony. After the testimony was
    completed, the Justice Department cancelled his transfer. Pasciuto had
    to commute from Albany to Washington.

    Former Attorney General Elliott Richardson made a list of the
    baffling questions of why the Justice Department wanted INSLAW declared
    insolvent and why it wouldn't pay a $6.8 million settlement to the
    small company. INSLAW received an offer to sell their company and they
    refused. The buyer informed the company that he had powerful political
    influence and "We have ways of making you sell." Within 90 days of that
    threat, the Justice Department commenced its attack on INSLAW.

    The company that made the attempt to buy INSLAW had financial
    connections to Meese and some of Meese's cronies. When the battle
    ended, INSLAW was broke, an attorney, a Justice Department
    whistleblower and a judge were out to work, but INSLAW was saved by a
    corporate giant--IBM--who rescued the company virtually from the
    auction block.

    The company that allegedly made the threat was Hadron. It has had
    brushes with the Security Exchange Commission, it has gone to the brink
    of being broke and one of its companies has been accused by the SEC of
    fraud and manipulation of stock prices, the company lost $4.3 million
    in one year. It soon sunk $12 million in the red.

    But once Meese became Attorney General, Hadron suddenly received
    lucrative Pentagon contracts, along with the Agency for International
    Development. The company was also awarded a $40 million contract from
    the Justice Department, despite protests against the bidding process.
    One member of Hadron's board was Dr. Earl Brian, who was in Reagan's
    California cabinet along with Meese. Meese was chief of staff in
    California. The Deputy Attorney General was D. Lowell Jensen, who had
    competed against INSLAW years earlier. The person in charge of making
    Justice Department payments for INSLAW's software--and who didn't--was
    an employee who had been fired from INSLAW. Jensen was also in trouble
    when the Senate was investigating the Iran-Contra scandal. Apparently
    the Senate committee discovered a memo written by Jensen to the
    National Security Council warning that the Miami federal prosecutors
    where on Ollie North's trail. The memo revealed that the Justice
    Department, who was supposed to prosecute the Iran-Contra affair,
    actually was tipping off the government in advance.

    One Justice Department official testified at the INSLAW hearing that
    INSLAW's software could be dangerous. Thomas Stanton testified "INSLAW
    could besmirch the U.S. Trustee program." The program is so
    sophisticated that it could trace all assets, track all trustees and
    judges. Another Justice Department employee stated that the U.S.
    Trustee program was flagrantly political. "It was a way of getting
    cronies into office. There would be 50 or 60 positions to be filled...
    it was Meese's baby." The official also stated, "It was always puzzling
    to me how he got away with what he got away with. He'd do things that
    were blatantly wrong and no one would question him--it's kind of
    scary."

    The Meese program would concentrate too much power in one government
    department. "It's supposed to act as a watchdog over lawyers and
    trustees, but the problem is it's more. It has a considerable amount of
    power to control the administration of cases. When a case moves from
    bankruptcy to liquidation, the U.S. Trustees office names the trustee,
    who converts the assets, oversees the auction, and retains appraisers
    who will put a price tag on the leavings. The U.S. Trustee's program
    also links Justice and the IRS. The thing that's a little frightening
    about it is that the U.S. Trustee department sees itself as a part of
    the tax-collecting function of government. The Justice Department
    represents the IRS, and the IRS is often the biggest creditor in
    liquidation," states a leading bankruptcy attorney.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23