• THE PHOENIX PROJECT FROM A GENIE FORUM PART 14

    From Jerry Woody@RICKSBBS to All on Mon Jun 22 07:01:26 2026
    Filename: Phoeni14.Thd
    Type : Message Thread
    Author : Jack Mathias
    Date : 11/28/92
    Desc : Rebuttal to Ed Stewart

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Re: Phoenix project From Ed Stewart To Joseph Harris 11-26-92 07:17

    -=> Quoting Joseph Harris to Jack Mathias <=-

    JH> (and I STILL want to hear the reasoning behind letting this report
    JH> sit on a shelf for three years.)

    ES> Believe me you don't want to hear it! ...but promised to provide me
    ES> with material later after they contacted their alleged "inside
    ES> experts within the Phoenix Group".

    ES> Sure enough two days later Jack Mathias downloaded a file directly
    ES> to me and suggested I could do with it what I wish with only one
    ES> consideration. Remove all references to the Phoenix Project if I
    ES> chose to make it public because of the "difficulties" they were
    ES> experiencing with Paranet.

    Ed...

    The way I remember it is that the file I downloaded to you was
    information on 1989FC and had nothing to do with the question
    referenced by Joseph. However the way I recall our meeting the question
    in point was answered. The reason that it took a couple of years for
    the report to be transmitted was because the Phoenix Project *had*
    never intended on submitting it. The only reason it was released was
    because I, myself, pestered the team in my belief that this information
    should be released -- that we should allow those interested in UFOs,
    etc, to perhaps gain more knowledge and insight. Which, as it now
    appears, turned out being bad judgement on my part.

    ES> After I analyzed the file contents I privately secured the
    ES> assistance and technical expertise of individuals in the Space
    ES> Program that I have access to through GENIE and found out that
    ES> their "reason for three year delay story" has more holes and
    ES> misinformation than what we have already been exposed to and is
    ES> simply utter nonsense.

    Your initial response to the file I gave you was -- as stated -- from
    information taken from GENIE and concerned 1989FC. I believe it was the
    idea that 1989FC never existed and that the probe currently on station
    mapping Venus was never diverted to track its course. It had nothing to
    do with any of the published reports. If the asteroid doesn't or didn't
    exist then the newspapers printed falsehood at the time. Making the
    article in last weeks [I believe] Newsweek also a falsehood since it
    referred to this.

    ES> Once misinformation becomes public, someone somewhere will always
    ES> chose to believe it.

    Believe it or not I go along with that thought. It is also true that
    once individuals or groups decide that a piece is filled with lies and
    loop-holes that have not been explained to *their* satisfaction and
    state such, this information is also retained by those reading it thus
    doing nothing but deepening the mystery, etc., and casting suspicious
    eyes at the group submitting the information.

    ES> But rest assure, if they ever answer your query (which I seriously
    ES> doubt they will ever do) and publicize the material they gave me as
    ES> the reason, I am prepared and WILL respond publicly to the
    ES> misinformation that is in the file contents. BTW, I am still
    ES> waiting for their answer on the F-4s on my query to them from over
    ES> two months ago.

    I have now received the files that Joseph has been nice enough to put
    into this echo for me and I must say that I found them interesting.
    However it is still my contention -- and that of the team -- that
    nothing has been disproved. I will say -- and I have mentioned this to
    Steve and Joseph on several occasions -- I am a bit disappointed that
    the *Team* chose not to respond to the files and they were made public.

    I, myself, am considering responding, in sorts, to Joesph in regards to
    his messages and also to the file released by Michael Corbin in which
    he addressed Don Kircher's 10/23/92 report because I still feel that
    something should be said. I do not believe for one instant that the
    book is closed. After all, unless one experiences something it will
    always remain hard for others who haven't, to believe.

    Sincerely, Jack Mathias


    Jerry
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23