• JACK MATHIAS DEFENDING THE PHOENIX PROJECT FILE: UFO1546

    From Denise Stevens@RICKSBBS to ALL on Thu Nov 13 06:11:25 2025
    ===========================================================================
    BBS: Flite-Line
    Date: 08-10-92 (14:16) Number: 218
    From: JACK MATHIAS Refer#: NONE
    To: ALL Recvd: NO
    Subj: RESPONSE TO PARANET 1/5 Conf: (29) StrangeUne ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Distribution: To All

    To: Michael Corbin - ParaNet Information Service

    From: The Phoenix Project
    Via Jack Mathias

    Date: 08/10/92

    Re: Your recent message concerning the Phoenix Project

    Until your initial response to our release of the Dulce and K2
    Reports this organization would have treated you and ParaNet with
    the common courtesy and respect due any serious researcher.
    However, your spontaneous and instant negative reaction to our
    reports caused us to reconsider.

    Let us review the facts. You reacted by issuing a public warning
    to the members of ParaNet, which was also widely distributed via
    other BBS's nation-wide. That warning contained language which
    implied the information, and the source, were highly suspect.
    Thus, single-handedly, you created a strong impression throughout
    the UFO community, that our information was false. Many sincere
    people, trusting your qualifications, accepted your warning.

    Tell us Mr. Corbin, how did you arrive at that almost instantaneous
    conclusion? The conclusion that the information contained in the
    Dulce Report was highly suspect and possibly false? At the time,
    all you had in your possession was the first part of the Report
    that we released to various BBS's. You did not have any of the
    exhibits or supporting documents contained in the second part of
    the Report - information, that was only available in printed form.
    You had not seen or had any opportunity to review the support
    documents.

    Let's face it, Michael - you blew it. The sequence of events, and
    the timing of your response, are the facts. The rest is self-
    evident. You took it upon yourself to make a snap judgement
    without examining the evidence. Is this the way that you evaluate
    all new information? It is difficult for us to believe that the
    ParaNet Organization would approve or condone such behavior on your
    part. Your actions are not what one would expect from an
    individual occupying a leadership position in the UFO research
    community, or ParaNet. You abused your position of trust and
    responsibility.

    In your message, you mention that you wrote to the Phoenix Project,
    after the fact and your preliminary judgement, requesting further
    information. You made the same comment in other BBS messages. You
    state that we did not respond to your request. You also imply, by
    insinuation, that this is a mark against us and a further
    indication that we are suspect. Let us give this further
    clarification. After being informed that you had written us, we
    checked our mail daily, looking for your letter. To date we have
    not received your letter of inquiry. Apparently, of all the mail
    we receive, your letter is the only one that has gone astray. We
    can only conclude that is was either lost in the mail or you didn't
    mail it. Did it ever occur to you to mail us a second request,
    when you did not receive a response to your first inquiry? Most
    people would do so.

    But, this was not the end of your attitude problem regarding the
    Phoenix Project. You did the same thing, again, issuing warnings,
    etc., with our release of the K-2 and the Ultimate Secret Reports.
    And, again, you had not seen or examined the supporting documents
    at the time you issued those warnings to ParaNet and the public.
    Continued next message.
    ... "Mr. Worf, fire phasers at All" ... Zzzzzap!
    --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10


    ===========================================================================
    BBS: Flite-Line
    Date: 08-10-92 (14:16) Number: 219
    From: JACK MATHIAS Refer#: NONE
    To: ALL Recvd: NO
    Subj: RESPONSE TO PARANET 2/5 Conf: (29) StrangeUne --------------------------------------------------------------------------- istribution: To All
    To: Michaell Corbin -- ParaNet Information Service
    From: Phoenix Project

    The first time was inexcusable, but the second and third time?
    Are you trying to set a new record for prejudice? Again, long
    after the fact, you admit that someone provided you with the
    supporting documents concerning K-2 and the Ultimate Secret. You
    also state, that you didn't notice anything of significance in
    those documents - and, you continue to issue messages containing
    warnings. Would we be out of line in concluding that your mind was
    already made-up? Fortunately, for the UFO Movement, other
    investigators and researchers don't share your opinion.

    You state in your initial message that "much of the information in
    the Dulce Report about Dulce and the Archuleta Mesa contradicts
    information already provided to ParaNet by other capable
    investigators." What information? Who provided it? How did you
    determine its validity? We formally request access to that
    information. We'd like to examine it ourselves. Can we obtain
    copies of "that" information?

    Now, let us get to the main thrust of your message - your
    investigation to reveal the personnel of the Phoenix Project.

    Congratulations Mr. Corbin. You've just won the Golden Fleece
    Award for outstanding ineptness in your investigation of the
    Phoenix Project. Your efforts thus far indicate a degree of
    amateur sleuthing more in line with that of a Cub Reporter trying
    to get a job on the staff of The Daily Sentinel. True to form
    (notable in many self-centered and Godly UFO Organizations) and
    lacking any real expertise, let alone concrete evidence, your
    message reveals what purports to be the results of your
    investigation into the Phoenix Project. The result: a conclusion
    based on quote - "coincidences that are striking and suggestive."

    That's it? -- Come now, do you expect us, or anyone else with a
    sound mind, to be impressed?

    How could anyone fail to note that there is no mention of any hard
    evidence or anything resembling same. Could we all be wrong as to
    what constitutes legitimate evidence? Or do you make that
    determination, as well?


    Seated upon your starry throne you seem to have elected yourself to
    be the final arbiter of the truth concerning the information
    revealed by the Phoenix Project, assuming the role of Judge, Jury
    and Executioner in a Kangaroo Court Proceeding of your own
    fashioning and design. Somewhere out there, there must be others
    that are just as impressed by this demonstration of arm-chair
    expertise and power, as we are. The results of your "so-called"
    investigation would be laughable if anyone ignored the tragic
    implications of what it reveals.

    What, if anything, is the Phoenix Project guilty of? Is it the
    fact that we dared to question and investigate two of the sacred
    cows of UFO-dom namely the ones you mentioned, i.e., "underground
    alien bases, and the cluster of government projects referred to
    collectively as Operation Majestic Twelve?" Where did we ever get
    the silly idea that revealing the truth about these topics was the
    objective we are all seeking? Did we miss an important briefing?

    According to our sources within the intelligence community, the
    Dulce Scam, perpetrated by the disinformation specialists of MAJI,
    better known to you as Majestic Twelve with help from the CIA and
    NSA, is considered one of their most brilliant success stories.
    Only Project Redlight comes close to achieving the same degree of
    success.

    Tell us, Mr. Corbin, where did we go wrong? Armed with that
    information from trusted sources, was the Phoenix Project out of
    line in pricking the bubble of that illusion? You might also note
    that we referenced our investigation to commonly "accepted"
    reliable information from "so-called" serious UFO researchers.
    Continued next message.
    ... "Mr. Worf, fire phasers at All" ... Zzzzzap!
    --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10


    ===========================================================================
    BBS: Flite-Line
    Date: 08-10-92 (14:16) Number: 220
    From: JACK MATHIAS Refer#: NONE
    To: ALL Recvd: NO
    Subj: RESPONSE TO PARANET 3/5 Conf: (29) StrangeUne ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Distribution: To All
    To: Michael Corbin - ParaNet Information Service
    From: Phoenix Project

    We sent in experienced investigators, not amateurs, to check out
    the alleged Dulce Base. Those people knew what to look for, how to
    look for it, how to get answers, and are not easily mislead.
    If you do not agree with our findings, get off your posterior, go
    to Dulce, and check it out for yourself. In fact, we invite
    anybody to do the same thing. We're sure you'll find exactly what
    we did -- absolutely nothing to support the information supposedly
    provided by "reliable" (?) sources. We are not inclined to accept
    your arm-chair analysis of what is or isn't there or the validity
    of our findings. However, if you do get off your posterior and go
    to Dulce, and find anything of significance that we missed, we'll
    be more than happy to alter our stance and publicly admit we really
    missed something. The important item is to reveal the truth
    concerning the Dulce illusion.

    You imply that you're good at asking questions -- how are you at
    answering them? We have a few questions. Would you mind sharing
    with all of us, everyone on the BBS's and the public, what hard
    evidence you have that, without question, supports the presence and
    validity of the Dulce Base. In all fairness, can that evidence
    stand further scrutiny and investigation? Is it so credible that
    you are absolutely certain that it is genuine? Are you absolutely
    certain that any such evidence, if it exists, really pertains to
    the location referred to as Dulce? Is it possible, if such
    evidence exists, that it pertains to some location other than Dulce
    but Dulce was how it was labeled? Are you willing to offer that
    evidence to other investigators and make it available for public
    scrutiny. If your answer to any of the foregoing questions is
    "negative" or "no," we rest our case. Unless you have irrefutable
    evidence to present, made available for public scrutiny and
    evaluation, which invalidates the findings of the Phoenix Project
    regarding Dulce, K-2, or the Ultimate Secret, or our future
    reports, back off. Either put-up or shut-up. In other words, get
    off our back.

    The Phoenix Project is now making the results of its investigations
    and the evidence it has obtained, public. Anyone seriously
    interested in revealing the truth is encouraged to check it out.
    In fact we want them to check it out for themselves. It won't take
    an intelligent person long to discover that we report exactly what
    we find. We're not playing games with serious researchers or the
    public. Since we do not have unlimited funding, or the time to
    continuously monitor the on-going aspects of every area we have
    investigated, we do the best we can under the circumstances. We
    actively encourage other serious investigators to use the
    information we have provided as a basis for conducting their own
    inquiry and to carry-on our effort. Can you, Mr. Corbin, or
    ParaNet, or Mufon, make the same claim. Or, is it true that the
    results of critical investigations are held sacred by the elite
    leadership of these organizations, and are not shared with the
    member's of their organizations or the public?

    In your message, you insinuate that because of our past military
    and intelligence backgrounds, our area of expertise so-to-speak,
    that the motives of the Phoenix Project are suspect. You further
    insinuate that we are possibly government operatives attempting to
    send serious researchers off on a variety of wild goose chases. If
    that were true, which it isn't, or original, which it isn't, we're
    certainly going about it in a novel way. We are not government
    operatives, and we are not passing along disinformation provided by
    any government agency. To our way of thinking that concept smacks
    of "guilt by association." Bye-the-way, have you ever heard the
    expression "when did you stop beating your wife?"


    If anyone needed assurance that the truth regarding UFO's will
    remain a deep, dark, secret -- they can rest secure in the
    knowledge that you, are on the job. There are any number of
    government agencies who would welcome you with open arms. Expect
    some offers.
    Continued next message.
    ... "Mr. Worf, fire phasers at All" ... Zzzzzap!
    --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10


    ===========================================================================
    BBS: Flite-Line
    Date: 08-10-92 (14:16) Number: 221
    From: JACK MATHIAS Refer#: NONE
    To: ALL Recvd: NO
    Subj: RESPONSE TO PARANET 4/5 Conf: (29) StrangeUne --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution: To All
    To: Michael Corbin - ParaNet Information Service
    From: Phoenix Project

    We are sure that the honest and sincere members of ParaNet and
    other UFO investigative organizations (and there are many) must be
    seriously considering whether your qualifications, fitness and
    investigative ability warrant your continuance in a position of
    leadership within what used to be a respected research
    organization.

    The Phoenix Project offered what amounted to new information
    regarding the subjects covered in the reports released. The "meat
    and potatoes - the main course. You chose to ignore that, and went
    for the desert. Instead of making an honest attempt to validate or
    disprove our findings regarding the subjects mentioned -- missing
    the point completely, you chose to become obsessed with determining
    the identity of Phoenix Project personnel. For what reason? Do you
    intend to judge the validity of the information based on the
    credentials of those providing it? Some people would interpret
    that as putting the cart before the horse. Explain to us how or
    why the credentials of our investigators, or their identity, have
    any bearing on the validity of the information. Either the
    information is true or it isn't. It's as simple as that, or does
    that simple fact escape you.

    Your obsession with establishing the identity of Phoenix Project
    personnel could lead us to believe that "you" have an ulterior
    motive. How can we, or others, be assured of your motives. One does
    not need a brilliant mind to envision a scenario where the
    information the Phoenix Project has released is discredited because
    of an act of character assignation. This is a ploy utilized by not
    only the government but others who wish to suppress information.
    It has been used over and over again, with great success. Anyone
    familiar with the history of the UFO cover-up knows of and could
    cite you a dozen examples.

    Suppose we asked these questions -- would you be prepared to
    respond to them? Who are you? What are your credentials? Who are
    those holding positions of leadership in ParaNet? What are their qualifications and credentials? How do we know that you or ParaNet
    are not controlled by government operatives? What qualifications
    are required to hold a position of leadership within ParaNet? Who
    receives the results of investigations conducted by ParaNet? Are
    the results always made public? Are your records open for public
    inspection? Do you ever conceal investigative results from your
    members or the public? Every coin has two sides. If you can ask
    questions and demand answers, we claim the same privilege. If you
    think we will back-down because of your insinuations and
    innuendoes, think again.

    Regarding your message, and some of the items you've uncovered,
    that are "striking coincidences." We found the following
    interesting:

    We were unaware that anyone had ever attempted to create a
    corporation in Nevada calling itself the Phoenix Project. Due to
    the nature of our work, and to protect the identity of our
    personnel it would be a foolish endeavor. We never made an attempt
    to incorporate our organization in any State.

    We do not know, nor have we ever heard of, or met, an individual by
    the name of Thomas C. Naylor. This interests us. You will let us
    know what you discover about him - won't you?

    You suggest a possible link between our organization and America
    West. Sorry about that, but you're dead wrong. It has come to us
    from several sources that we're not on their list of favorite
    people. We will take this opportunity to categorically deny that
    we have any affiliation with America West, their publication the
    "Phoenix Liberator," or any other publication they provide.
    Continued next message.
    ... "Mr. Worf, fire phasers at All" ... Zzzzzap!
    --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10


    ===========================================================================
    BBS: Flite-Line
    Date: 08-10-92 (14:16) Number: 222
    From: JACK MATHIAS Refer#: NONE
    To: ALL Recvd: NO
    Subj: RESPONSE TO PARANET 5/5 Conf: (29) StrangeUne --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution: To All
    To: Michael Corbin - ParaNet Information Service
    From: Phonenix Project

    The fact that one of our investigator's forgot his camera on a
    quick trip to K-2 seems to intrigue you and many others. There's
    an old saying "Nobody's Perfect." Since we've never made the claim
    of being perfect, its absurd to expect us to abide by that
    standard. We did have a choice of including or deleting it from
    our report. After all, if we hadn't mentioned it, he would
    certainly look better. After discussion, we left it in because it
    was the truth. It's a peccadillo we'll have to live with,
    sometimes the truth hurts, or haven't you noticed.

    Do not expect us to respond to the other coincidences,
    suppositions, insinuations or innuendoes contained in your message.

    Since you brought up America West and The "Phoenix Liberator," why
    not turn your investigative abilities loose on their organization.
    Just suppose that Milton Cooper is, quietly, linked to their
    organization. That should intrigue you. Equally intriguing, is
    where their funding comes from - not the obvious subscription
    income - the covert funding. Or, how about the busy and numerous,
    off premise, writers that prepare the volumes of "Hatonn" material,
    and their use of high-speed modems to provide the copy for each
    weekly issue of the "Phoenix Liberator" and the dozens of books
    they produce. In our supposition, we're talking about a big-time
    operation. You might also check out their printing facilities,
    distribution centers, and world-wide circulation. Equally
    fascinating is their sudden rise, in a few short years, to the top
    of the New Age Movement. You might even think to ask yourself, why
    the New Age Movement? What possible connection is there with
    covert government UFO activities, or a New World Order, with the
    New Age Movement? The answer to that might be revealed, if you dig
    deep enough, and discover high-speed modem links between their
    headquarters and certain organizations located at Langley and Ft.
    Meade. Yes, if you really dig, you might uncover all kinds of
    interesting things about America West. However, since you don't
    take any information provided by the Phoenix Project seriously,
    this supposition will surely be labeled a fictional work. The
    product of over-worked imaginations and stressed-out investigators.

    Oh, well!

    As to your effort in trying to identify staff personnel of the
    Phoenix Project -- good luck. However, we do have to admit that
    you may get lucky and hit on a couple of them. However, since
    there are many, it is doubtful you will ever get beyond that point.


    It is not our intent nor will it become our objective to enter into
    an adversarial debate with either you or ParaNet, or any other
    individual or research organization. However, you started this
    debacle - we didn't. You implied our information was suspect and
    possibly false. Under the circumstances, we have every right to
    express our viewpoints on this issue.

    In our opinion, the public deserves the truth regarding the real
    story of UFO's, government involvement and the Alien threat. That
    should be our objective. It is up to "serious" researchers to
    really dig and reveal the facts and make them known. The Phoenix
    Project has dedicated its staff and resources, for over forty
    years, to that objective. Perhaps you'll agree that, that
    objective is more productive than entertaining the public via the
    BBS links with a side-show of petty squabbles and bickering between
    individuals and organizations.

    Signed,

    The Phoenix Project


    This response by the Phoenix Project to a recent message
    originating from Michael Corbin of ParaNet, will be posted on all
    available BBS's.
    ... "Mr. Worf, fire phasers at All" ... Zzzzzap!
    --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10


    BBS: Flite-Line
    Date: 08-12-92 (10:53) Number: 5082
    From: JACK MATHIAS Refer#: NONE
    To: ALL Recvd: NO
    Subj: Advent's Reply to paranet Conf: (46) UFO(Fido) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following is Advent's reply to ParaNet. I am only acting as relay.
    August 12, 1992

    To: Mr. Michael Corbin
    ParaNet Information Service

    From: Advent Publishing Company and
    Richard T. Miller

    A message from you, made public on many BBS's and pertaining mainly
    to the Phoenix Project, was brought to my attention. In that
    message you mention my name, the name of my company, and try to
    create an impression that I am involved in some type of activity
    and have relationships with others that is questionable.

    You state in your message: "based on striking and suggestive
    circumstances," that there is a possible connection between myself,
    Advent Publishing Company, and another publisher - known as America
    West and one of their publications "The Phoenix Liberator." You
    fail to clearly label your statements, or your presumptions, as
    "pure" speculation. I find your technique of using such
    speculation, and the end-result of that usage - guilt by
    implication - very offensive.

    The statement I refer to is - whether I am, or my company is,
    another incarnation of America West and their people. The answer is
    an emphatic - no.

    Let me set the record straight. I am a semi-retired electronic and
    radio and television broadcast engineer. I am also the sole owner
    of Advent Publishing Company. This Company is registered as a sole proprietorship, in Carson County, State of Nevada. I operate this
    business to occupy my spare time and to supplement my retirement
    income. Neither myself, or my Company has any connection with
    America West Publishing, their publication the "Phoenix Liberator,"
    or any of their numerous publications. I do not know them, and I
    have never had any dealings with them.

    It should be perfectly clear and very obvious from what I've
    stated, that I find the activities of America West and the content
    of the "Phoenix Liberator" thoroughly disgusting. And that, Mr.
    Corbin, is the overwhelming reason for my use of a strong
    disclaimer, disavowing any relationship or affiliation with the
    above named organization, its publications, and their known
    principals.

    You also raise the question as to whether I am the same Richard
    Miller who, many years ago, communicated with an individual known
    as Hatonn and started an organization known as the Solar Cross.

    My answer may startle you. Yes I am, and yes I did. However, I
    have not been active in such activities for many years. I am
    answering this question only because of your attempt to make an
    onerous association between myself and America West, and the
    "Phoenix Liberator." An association that doesn't exist.

    I can state, however, without reservation, that the "Phoenix
    Liberator" is fraudulently using the name Hatonn and claiming he is
    the source of their information. They have used the name of a
    respected Being as a "drawing card" to entice the innocent and lend
    a degree of credibility to the rubbish they publish.

    I am not the only one who might feel this way. In closing let me
    quote a paragraph in a message sent to Jack Mathias by Don Allen,
    regarding America West and the "Phoenix Liberator," on Fido_UFO:

    "Jack - Received your message and here is something to mull over.
    Just remember that people who claim to channel "Higher Entities"
    should be judged not only on their words, but also by their actions
    and ethics. I have read a considerable amount of "Hatonn's"
    material and it does not leave me feeling edified, uplifted or
    enlightened. It is very condemnatory. It is, I submit, not of the
    Light. These aren't the words of a "Christed being"...they are
    Cooperish rantings from quick buck con artists and most likely the
    "entity" that Dharma" is "channelling" (If "Hatonn" exists at all)
    is most definitely some lower/dark astral being. By their fruits
    ye shall know them."

    RTM
    --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10

    **********************************************
    * THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
    **********************************************

    Denise
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    irc ricksbbs.synchro.net:6667
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23