• ALIEN IMPLANTS IN HUMANS

    From Denise Stevens@RICKSBBS to All on Fri Jul 17 06:05:55 2026
    Filename: Omni-8.Art
    Type : Article
    Author : Paul McCarthy
    Date : 06/01/91
    Desc. : Alien Implants in Humans

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following article was originally published in the science magazine
    OMNI. It is reproduced here exactly as it appeared in its original
    form, without so much as a misplaced comma, period, or question mark.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    From "OMNI"--June 1991

    CAN UFO RESEARCHERS PROVE THAT ALIENS ARE TAGGING AND TRACKING
    HUMANS WITH TINY DEVICES IMPLANTED IN THE BODY OR BRAIN?
    by Paul McCarthy


    One of the most insidious forms of alien technology ever reported by
    UFO buffs is the implant--a BB-like object said to be inserted in the
    brains or bodies of UFO abductees. According to some UFO advocates,
    E.T.'s use these tiny devices to tag and track human abductees just as
    earthbound wildlife specialists tag and track animals.

    But how can anyone know whether a reputed implant is real or not?
    How, some UFO investigators have begun to wonder, can they authenticate
    an implant should a sample emerge?

    One person addressing this issue is David Pritchard, a physicist at
    the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. According to Pritchard, no
    matter how strange the structure or material of an alleged implant, if
    it is not some "out of this world" material like "heavy metals or quark
    matter" it won't be possible to convince a lot of people.

    But, Pritchard adds, there are other ways to skin the cat. For
    example, researchers could peg an insert as such if it worked like a
    flashlight but was a hundred times brighter than any flashlight on
    Earth. If the implant sent complex but unrecognizable signals, he says,
    "that would be pretty convincing as well." Finally, Pritchard believes,
    evidence would mount if investigators found the exact same type of
    implant in numerous people making abduction claims.

    Yet another means of studying the so-called alien implant is a high-
    tech imaging technique called magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI. The
    technique was tapped by reputed abductee Whitley Strieber, who says he
    remembers the insertion of needles in his head. His MRI brain scans, he
    adds, now show strange white spots. "Are the unknown objects in my
    brain an outcome of such intrusions?" Strieber asked in his recent
    book, TRANSFORMATION. Pritchard says the dots prove nothing; they could
    be air bubbles. But a statistical argument could be made he adds, if
    researchers can show that professed UFO abductees have significantly
    more dots than a random control group.

    Longtime UFO skeptic Phil Klass, who doesn't believe that aliens have
    ever come to Earth, takes a different tack. First, he says, he would
    want to know "where the implant came from," and would feel more
    confident if it had been removed by a surgeon. Then, if it were
    something "that could not form naturally in the body," he would want to
    know if it could be made with terrestrial technology. If the answer to
    that is no, says Klass, "I think you have your proof."

    Even more skeptical is Robert Sheaffer, author of THE UFO VERDICT,
    who says the whole question of UFO abductions is dubious and that the
    idea of alien implants is "certainly rubbish." According to Sheaffer,
    the UFO is a slippery phenomenon that always manages to fade away
    before the evidence becomes too convincing, and alien implants are an
    example of this. "Some people might be saying they were kidnapped by
    aliens for the money," says Sheaffer. "Others might be doing it because
    they really believe that they were abducted. But there is not a shred
    of evidence to substantiate this claim. Alien implants are just too
    good to be true."

    According to UFO abduction expert Budd Hopkins, author of MISSING
    TIME, and INTRUDERS, a number of radiologists are privately doing MRI
    scans on people who claim they have been abducted by aliens--and that
    the aliens have inserted devices in their bodies or brains. But a
    neurosurgeon advised him that if, as claimed, implants exist somewhere
    above the upper nasal passages, then they are near the optic nerve. In
    that case, he says, "it would be very risky for a surgeon to try to get
    one out." What does Hopkins say about the prospect of actually
    validating these wierd alien implants? "It'd have devastating societal
    impact," he says, "I am not looking forward to something like this."

    One of the most insidious forms of alien technology ever reported by
    UFO buffs is the implant--a BB-like object said to be inserted in the
    brains or bodies of UFO abductees. According to some UFO advocates,
    E.T.'s use these tiny devices to tag and track human abductees just as
    earthbound wildlife specialists tag and track animals.

    But how can anyone know whether a reputed implant is real or not?
    How, some UFO investigators have begun to wonder, can they authenticate
    an implant should a sample emerge?

    One person addressing this issue is David Pritchard, a physicist at
    the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. According to Pritchard, no
    matter how strange the structure or material of an alleged implant, if
    it is not some "out of this world" material like "heavy metals or quark
    matter" it won't be possible to convince a lot of people.

    But, Pritchard adds, there are other ways to skin the cat. For
    example, researchers could peg an insert as such if it worked like a
    flashlight but was a hundred times brighter than any flashlight on
    Earth. If the implant sent complex but unrecognizable signals, he says,
    "that would be pretty convincing as well." Finally, Pritchard believes,
    evidence would mount if investigators found the exact same type of
    implant in numerous people making abduction claims.

    Yet another means of studying the so-called alien implant is a high-
    tech imaging technique called magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI. The
    technique was tapped by reputed abductee Whitley Strieber, who says he
    remembers the insertion of needles in his head. His MRI brain scans, he
    adds, now show strange white spots. "Are the unknown objects in my
    brain an outcome of such intrusions?" Strieber asked in his recent
    book, TRANSFORMATION. Pritchard says the dots prove nothing; they could
    be air bubbles. But a statistical argument could be made he adds, if
    researchers can show that professed UFO abductees have significantly
    more dots than a random control group.

    Longtime UFO skeptic Phil Klass, who doesn't believe that aliens have
    ever come to Earth, takes a different tack. First, he says, he would
    want to know "where the implant came from," and would feel more
    confident if it had been removed by a surgeon. Then, if it were
    something "that could not form naturally in the body," he would want to
    know if it could be made with terrestrial technology. If the answer to
    that is no, says Klass, "I think you have your proof."

    Even more skeptical is Robert Sheaffer, author of THE UFO VERDICT,
    who says the whole question of UFO abductions is dubious and that the
    idea of alien implants is "certainly rubbish." According to Sheaffer,
    the UFO is a slippery phenomenon that always manages to fade away
    before the evidence becomes too convincing, and alien implants are an
    example of this. "Some people might be saying they were kidnapped by
    aliens for the money," says Sheaffer. "Others might be doing it because
    they really believe that they were abducted. But there is not a shred
    of evidence to substantiate this claim. Alien implants are just too
    good to be true."

    According to UFO abduction expert Budd Hopkins, author of MISSING
    TIME, and INTRUDERS, a number of radiologists are privately doing MRI
    scans on people who claim they have been abducted by aliens--and that
    the aliens have inserted devices in their bodies or brains. But a
    neurosurgeon advised him that if, as claimed, implants exist somewhere
    above the upper nasal passages, then they are near the optic nerve. In
    that case, he says, "it would be very risky for a surgeon to try to get
    one out." What does Hopkins say about the prospect of actually
    validating these wierd alien implants? "It'd have devastating societal
    impact," he says, "I am not looking forward to something like this."

    Denise
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23