• THE HILL ABDUCTION CASE PART 5

    From Jerry Woody@RICKSBBS to All on Sun Jul 12 05:54:16 2026
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    REPLY: By Terence Dickinson

    The question raised by Steven Soter and Carl Sagan concerning the
    pattern resemblance of the Hill map and the computer generated
    projection of the Fish pattern stars is certainly a key question worthy
    of discussion. Next month two authors will make specific comments on
    this point.

    Briefly, there is more to discounting the Fish interpretation than
    pattern resemblance. We would have discounted the Fish interpretation
    immediately on pattern resemblance alone. The fact that all the
    connecting lines join stars in a logical distance progression, and that
    all the stars are solar type stars, is significant. Ms. Fish tried to
    fit hundreds of other viewpoints and this one was the only one that
    even marginally fit and made sense in three dimensions and contained
    solar type stars. in this context, you could not "have just as well
    drawn the lines...to lead the other way".

    Naturally there was a desire to find a resemblance between a group of
    nearby stars and the Hill pattern! That's why Marjorie Fish built six
    models of the solar neighborhood containing the relative positions of
    up to 256 nearby stars. The fact that she came up with a pattern that
    fits as well as it does is a tribute to her perseverance and the
    accuracy of the models. Stars cannot be moved around "to optimize the
    desired resemblance". Indeed Marjorie Fish first tried models using
    nearby stars of other than strictly solar type as defined in the
    article. She found no resemblances.

    The three triangle dots selected from the background dots in the Hill
    map were selected because Mrs. Hill said they were more prominent than
    the other background stars. Such testimony was the basis of the
    original map so we either accept Mrs. Hill's observations and attempt
    to analyze them or reject the whole incident. We feel there is
    sufficient evidence compelling us not to reject the whole incident at
    this time.

    We too are demanding rigorous standards of evidence to establish the
    reality of extraterrestrial intelligence. If there is even the
    slightest possibility that the Hills' encounter can provide information
    about such life, we feel it is worth pursuing. The map is worthy of
    examination by as many critical minds as possible.

    Jerry
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23