Has there been an changes/conditions required that might make synchronet, default to the default menu?
I have a customized shell I call DEFAULT, and is set to be the default shell for users.
Recently, accounts set to DEFAULT are displaying the classic synchronet menu, but responding to keystrokes as defined in my DEFAULT shell.
Re: Command Shell defaulting to Classic menu
By: Amessyroom to All on Sat Jun 20 2026 11:43 am
Has there been an changes/conditions required that might make
synchronet,
default to the default menu?
Not that I'm aware of.
digital man (rob)
Re: Command Shell defaulting to Classic menuYes. For a year or more, I had a text based menu with the command shell I created. I started noticing the classic ansi pages being displayed. When I started looking for errors (which I didn't find any); I realized it was responding to the keystrokes as defined in my command shell.
By: Amessyroom to All on Sat Jun 20 2026 11:43 am
I have a customized shell I call DEFAULT, and is set to be the
default
shell for users.
Recently, accounts set to DEFAULT are displaying the classic
synchronet
menu, but responding to keystrokes as defined in my DEFAULT shell.
When you say "displaying the classic synchronet menu", do you mean you changed your own DEFAULT shell to display different ANSIs, but now
it's displaying the original classic ANSIs but responding to
keystrokes as defined in your customized DEFAULT command shell?
When you customized your DEFAULT, did you first make a copy intext/menu/errol_ directory and has worked. Maybe with all the command
sbbs/mods and modify that copy of it? Doesn't look like. It is in the
Also, have you tried calling your customized version something otherIt was originally called errol, and has been DEFAULT for at least a year without issues. But I can try renaming it and changing the directory name.
than DEFAULT and setting that up as a separate command shell via SCFG?
And no errors in logs, not sure why it is defaulting back to the other screen.
I've not made any edits to those files in months.
The definition in scfg seems to be in place, and the keystrokes it
responses to are from my command shell. I'll try and look at the display files and see if permissions or something got changed on them. I've not
made any edits to those files in months.
The definition in scfg seems to be in place, and the keystrokes it
responses to are from my command shell. I'll try and look at the display files and see if permissions or something got changed on them. I've not
made any edits to those files in months.
chro.net/main/sbbs/-/commit/d3123dd1ae2792d9268baa444b9469Yes.
Did you update Synchronet?
The change in behavior could be related to this commit: https://gitlab.syn chro.net/main/sbbs/-/commit/d3123dd1ae2792d9268baa444b9469
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 05:59:20 |
| Calls: | 933 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 1,323 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (11,028K bytes) |
| Messages: | 281,468 |