Why burn a "good password" in a standards document? It's commonAgreed. A sample should be something like yourpassword
practice to bad passwords as example source material for hashes and
digests in standards https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1321
Good ${greeting_time}, Carol!
30 Apr 2024 17:01:08, you wrote to Rob Swindell:
Why burn a "good password" in a standards document? It's commonAgreed. A sample should be something like yourpassword
practice to bad passwords as example source material for hashes and
digests in standards https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1321
Being here for many years, you still don't know about 8-symbols limit still existing in other software and the common practice to use one password for a FTN stuff?
My suggestion: "password". Or, even better, "pAs5w0rD".
Both are (1) readable and (2) inacceptable for actual use.
--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii
... GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 50 |
| Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 75:29:58 |
| Calls: | 698 |
| Files: | 1,198 |
| D/L today: |
40 files (24,428K bytes) |
| Messages: | 168,128 |